Slide 1:Bicycling in Iowa Promoting Iowa bicycling as safe and enjoyable recreation and transportation
Slide 2:What is going right?
Slide 3:Iowa Is Great For Bicycling First-in-the-nation rail-trail conversions
1400 miles of trails in 50 projects
American Discovery Trail
Mississippi River Trail
90,000 miles of rural county roads
Rural ADT of 160 cars per day
Iowa leads the nation in road diets
Most Category 5 racers
Streets are inadequate: :Streets are inadequate: No room for bikes or pedestrians What is Wrong?
Streets are inadequate: :Streets are inadequate:
Streets are inadequate: :Streets are inadequate:
Streets are inadequate: :Streets are inadequate: Too dangerous to cross on foot
Streets are inadequate: :No room for people Streets are inadequate:
Mixed Messages :Mixed Messages
Benefits: for reducing traffic :Benefits: for reducing traffic Of all trips taken in metro areas:
50% are three miles or less
28% are one mile or less
65% of trips under one mile
are now taken by automobile 2001 NHTS
Fewer kids are biking and walking. :Fewer kids are biking and walking. 2001: 16% walked
1969: 42% walked
(CDC, 2005)
Parents driving :Parents driving Parents driving their children to school account for 20%-25% of morning rush hour traffic. (NHTSA 2003; Dept. of Environment)
Slide 15:Today’s children may be the first generation to have a shorter life expectancy than their parents have.
Physical activity :Physical activity Most kids aren’t getting the physical activity they need.
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1985 :(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman) (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1985
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1986 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1986 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman) (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1987 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1987 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman) (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1988 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1988 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman) (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1989 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1989 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman) (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1990 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1990 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman) (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1991 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1991 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1992 :(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman) Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1992 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1993 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1993 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1994 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1994 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1995 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1995 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1996 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1996 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1997 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1997 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1998 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1998 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1999 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 1999 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 2000 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 2000 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 2001 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 2001 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 2002 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 2002 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends Among U.S. adults: 2003 :Obesity trends Among U.S. adults: 2003 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 2004 :Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 2004 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 2005 :<10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%-29% 30%-34% Obesity trends among U.S. adults: 2005 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC, 2004) (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” woman)
1996 Summer Olympic Games banned single occupant cars in downtown Atlanta :1996 Summer Olympic Games banned single occupant cars in downtown Atlanta
Results of the ban :Morning traffic – 23%
Peak ozone – 28%
Asthma-related events for kids – 42%
(Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA], 2001) Results of the ban
Americans want to walk and bike more :Americans want to walk and bike more 52% want to bike more than they do now.
Americans want to walk and bike more :Americans want to walk and bike more 55% would rather drive less and walk more
Slide 42:Safer Cyclists
More Bikes
Better Communities
Share The Road Plates :Share The Road Plates
Slide 44:Cycling Safety Instructors
How to Fix a Flat :How to Fix a Flat Iowa Bicycle Coalition www.iowabicyclecoalition.org
Principles of Traffic Law :Principles of Traffic Law Drive on the Right-hand Side of the Roadway
Slide 48:Right to occupy the
space you are in.
Left turners are near the centerline :Left turners are near the centerline To change your position scan & signal
Principles of Traffic Law :Principles of Traffic Law Never be a
wrong-way rider
When we get more bikes... :When we get more bikes...
Businesses embrace bicycling :Businesses embrace bicycling
Creativity :Creativity
Cyclists want function :Cyclists want function
Don't forget schools :Don't forget schools
Slide 59:Bicycling As Transportation
Slide 60:Des Moines
Iowa City
Cedar Falls/Waterloo
Quad Cities
Fort Dodge
Cedar Rapids
Breakfast Station :Breakfast Station
Try it once and you are hooked :Try it once and you are hooked
Try it once and you are hooked :Try it once and you are hooked
Media Event :Media Event
Safe Routes to School :Safe Routes to School
Safe Routes to School programs :Make walking and bicycling safe ways to get to school
Encourage more children to walk and bike to school Safe Routes to School programs
The Good: :The Good: Communities are taking action on behalf of their kids
Encouragement :Increases popularity of walking and biking
Is an easy way to start SRTS programs
Emphasizes fun of walking and biking Encouragement
Encouragement :Encouragement
Education :Teaches safety skills
Creates safety awareness
Fosters life-long safety habits
Includes parents, neighbors and other drivers Education
Enforcement :Enforcement Increases awareness of pedestrians and bicyclists
Improves driver behavior
Helps children follow traffic rules
Decreases parent perceptions of danger
Engineering :Engineering Creates safer settings for walking and biking
Can influence the way people behave
What is a Complete Street? :What is a Complete Street? A Complete Street is safe, comfortable and convenient for travel via automobile, foot, bicycle, and transit.
A Complete Street: :Offers a full range of travel choices A Complete Street:
A Complete Street: :Offers a full range of travel choices
Connects to a network that offers choices A Complete Street:
A Complete Street: :Offers a full range of travel choices
Connects to a network that offers choices
Is fully accessible to all: kids, seniors and people with disabilities A Complete Street:
A Complete Street: :Offers a full range of travel choices
Connects to a network that offers choices
Is fully accessible to all: kids, seniors and people with disabilities
Supports & contributes to life in pleasant, convenient neighborhoods A Complete Street:
Most states don’t build Complete Streets :Most states don’t build Complete Streets 2000 FHWA Guidance:
“Bicycling and walking facilities will be incorporated into all transportation projects unless exceptional circumstances exist.”
Few states follow this guidance.
Completing the Streets: State Action :Completing the Streets: State Action Oregon state law:
“…footpaths and bicycle trails… shall be provided wherever a highway, road or street is being constructed, reconstructed, or relocated.”
A minimum of 1% of state highway funds go to bicycling and walking.
Iowa Policies :Iowa Policies Cascade
Iowa City (includes transit)
Johnson County Council of Governments
Complete Streets Act of 2008 introduced
Completing the Streets: Local Action :95 % of arterial streets in Corvallis (OR) have bike lanes Completing the Streets: Local Action
Completing the Streets: Local Action :Completing the Streets: Local Action Boulder, Colorado is building all arterials as multi-modal corridors for auto, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit use.
Slide 85:Bike lanes encourage bike commuting Portland Oregon 1990:
Slide 86:Bike lanes encourage bike commuting:Portland Oregon 2000:
Isn’t it expensive? :Isn’t it expensive? “The cost is incremental or minimal in terms of the overall construction costs for a new facility.”
Whit Clement, Virginia Secretary of Transportation
Slide 88:Bike Facility Design Conference
Slide 89:Local Successes
The many types of Complete Streets :The many types of Complete Streets
The many types of Complete Streets :The many types of Complete Streets
The many types of Complete Streets :The many types of Complete Streets bike lanes aren’t always needed
The many types of Complete Streets :The many types of Complete Streets
The many types of Complete Streets :The many types of Complete Streets
Slide 97:Is this supported in design manuals?
Slide 98:Is this supported in design manuals?
Slide 99:Bringing in the other needed ingredients: Start with a stark, plain street
Slide 100:Bringing in the other needed ingredients: Narrow travel lanes, add a bike lane
Slide 101:Bringing in the other needed ingredients: Add a median, trees and some texture
Slide 102:Bringing in the other needed ingredients: Bring the buildings in closer
Slide 103:Bringing in the other needed ingredients: Make sure the buildings face the street
Slide 104:Bringing in the other needed ingredients: Bring in more buildings (infill)
Slide 105:Bringing in the other needed ingredients: The street now has a life!
Policy Elements :Policy Elements Specifies all users:
Pedestrians, Bicyclists, Transit
and Motorists of all ages/abilities
Policy Elements :Policy Elements Creates a comprehensive,
Integrated, connected network.
Policy Elements :Policy Elements Recognizes the need
for flexibility – all streets
are different.
Policy Elements :Policy Elements Is adoptable by all agencies
to cover all roads.
Policy Elements :Policy Elements Applies to new and
retrofit projects for entire ROW.
Policy Elements :Policy Elements Makes any exceptions specific
with a clear procedure that
requires high-level approval.
Policy Elements :Policy Elements Directs the use of the
latest and best
design standards.
Policy Elements :Policy Elements Directs solutions fit in
the context of the community.
Policy Elements :Policy Elements Establishes performance
standards with measurable
outcomes.
What we would like to see :What we would like to see
Join the movement :Join the movement