logging in or signing up VAP PPT totzrn Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: Embed: Flash iPad Dynamic Copy Does not support media & animations Automatically changes to Flash or non-Flash embed WordPress Embed Customize Embed URL: Copy Thumbnail: Copy The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 213 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: February 26, 2013 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Jamie Carson, Ashley Raley, and Patty Whaley Maryville University Ventilator-Associated PneumoniaIntroduction to Ventilator-Acquired Pneumonia (VAP): VAP is defined as “pneumonia occurring more than 48 hours after the patient has been intubated and received mechanical support” (Koenig & Truwit, 637) The Institute for Healthcare Improvement defines VAP, there is no minimum timeframe of the pneumonia occurrence VAP is noted to be the number one acquired nosocomial infection in the ICU setting Introduction to Ventilator-Acquired Pneumonia (VAP) Definition of the Problem: VAP: Statistics the likeliness to get VAP 10-30% risk of death 25-50% even higher mortality rate associated with resistance pathogens as of 2008, Medicaid and Medicare along with most other insurance companies do not cover nosocomial infections cost to a facility ranges $6,000-$ 50,000 Definition of the Problem: VAP Significance: Great significance to patient care Increased hospital stays Muscle wasting, non-optimal nutrition status for healing, potential for kidney dysfunction related to antibiotic therapy Highly likeliness of developing a resistant pathogen Significance Prevalence and Ideal Benchmark: Research and major interest sparked in the late 1990s Major Quality Initiative Goal is ZERO prevalence Not a realistic goal, therefore should not be used as a benchmark CDC recommends a benchmark of 1.6 per 1,000 ventilator days One of the biggest problems related to using VAP as a benchmark is related to diagnosis and the disease process itself Prevalence and Ideal Benchmark Issues with benchmarking: Lack of consistency in diagnosis Variable Case mix Patient’s age Severity of illness Comorbidities Trauma or surgical status Hospital environment or equipment Immunologic status and condition of oral health Issues with benchmarking Disease process that mimic VAP: There are multiple disease processes that mimic VAP Pulmonary Edema Sepsis Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Pulmonary Embolism Atelectasis Disease process that mimic VAPGoals & Objectives: Goals: Goals should be clear and measurable Short term goals and long term goals for patients Goals communicated with team members Objectives: Head of bed elevated 30-45 degrees Sedation vacations Peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis Goals & ObjectivesBuy-in Strategy – VAP Bundle: Infection Control and Prevention Equipment & Environment Infection Control Patient Positioning Sedation Interruption/Vacation Routine Assessment of Readiness to Wean Routine Oral Care Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD) Prophylaxis Buy-in Strategy – VAP BundleData Collection: Data Needed: Specific data that identifies areas within the VAP that lack compliance Steps in data collection process: Identify Population – Ventilator Patients Identify target infection – VAP Specify Time Frame to collect data – 3 mo., 6mo., 1 year Specify number of ventilated days – days patients are exposed to the ventilator Identify specific setting - ICU Data Collection: Data NeededData Collection: Data Needed: Collect data to establish baseline Identify rates of compliance Compare rates to state, regions, or national rates Data collected: Determining compliance rates for interventions Observed performance versus observed opportunities Numerator: # of observed performances (67) Denominator: # of observed opportunities (100) Result: 67% compliance Data Collection: Data NeededAnalysis: VAP can be drastically reduced Mercy Hospital in Minnesota-ventilator bundle eliminated VAP Ochsner Medical Center in New Orleans- reported a zero VAP rate for 2011 East Jefferson General Hospital in Louisiana-reported a decrease from 2.3 to 1.9 VAPS per 1,000 ventilator days Barnes-Jewish Hospital-St. Louis Missouri has been able to decrease VAP rates from 12.6 to 5.7 per 1000 ventilator days. AnalysisImprovement: Proposed Solutions: Develop Proposed Solution that is both: Effective in prevention of VAP Cost effective Proposed Solutions: Staff Education Quality Improvement Projects New Protocols or Standardization of Care Joining outside network: 100,000 Lives Campaign Improvement: Proposed SolutionsSelecting a Solution: Best solution: Quality Improvement Plan Initiation of VAP Bundle Ties together each solution previously described VAP Bundle: Standard of care for most institutions Must haves: P roper guidance from leadership Necessary Data Developed plan to bring about change Supporting Change Model: Lewin’s Change Model Selecting a Solution Implementation Plan: Compliance with all healthcare staff Mandatory education classes Evaluations for areas to improve Chart audits for nursing compliance Implementation PlanCommunication Plan: Good communication is vital Leadership should communicate the following: 1. Inform staff of plan for change and developed method 2. Educate staff and address staff questions/concerns 3. Emphasize importance of why change is being made 4. Support rationale with evidence-based findings End Result: Staff works cohesively to achieve greater patient outcomes New-norm New Standardization of Care Increased compliance Prevention of VAP Communication PlanSustaining Change: Importance of VAP prevention understood by healthcare staff Outcomes prove cost savings Communication and educating are the best way to sustain change Sustaining Change Discussion: Detriment of VAP to staff and patients VAP may never be completely eliminated but greatly reduced with simple measures such as: Timed oral care, stress ulcer prophylaxis, elevating HOB, draining condensation for ventilator tubing, early intervention Implementing change Lewin’s change model DiscussionReferences: Aardema, H., Dijkema, L. M., Lazonder, M. G., Ligtenberg, J. J., Tulleken, J. E., & Zijlstra, J. G. (2010). Value and price of ventilator-associated pneumonia surveillance as a quality indicator. Critical Care , 14 (1), 403. Bird, D., Zambuto, A., O’Donnell, C., Silva, J., Korn, C., Burke, R., & Agarwal, S. (2010). Adherence to ventilator-associated pneumonia bundle and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the surgical intensive care unit. American Medical Association , 145 (5), 465-470. Cason, C., Tyner, T., Saunders, S., & Broome, L. (2007). Nurses’ implementation of guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. AJCC , 16 , 28-37. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013, January). Ventilator-associated pneumonia (vap) event. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/6pscvapcurrent.pdf East Jefferson General Hospital (2009). Nurses driving change: 2009 nursing annual report. Retrieved from http://www.ejgh.org/publications/nursingannualreport2009/files/nursingannualreport2009.pdf Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2010). Overview of the 100,000 Lives campaign. Retrieved from http://www.ihi.org/offerings/Initiatives/PastStrategicInitiatives/ 5MillionLivesCampaign/Documents/Overview%20of%20the%20100K% 20Campaign.pdf ReferencesReferences con’t: Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2011, April 26). Ventilator-associated pneumonia (vap) rate per 1,000 ventilator days. Retrieved from http://www.ihi.org/knowledge/Pages/Measures/VentilatorAssociatedPneumoniaRateper1000VentilatorDays.aspx Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2012). Getting started kit: Prevent ventilator-acquired pneumonia. Retrieved from https://www.premierinc.com/safety/topics/bundling/downloads/03-vap-how-to-guide.pdf Karhu, J., Ala-Kokko, T. I., Ylipalosaari, P., Ohtonen, P., Laurila, J. J., & Syrjala, H. (2011). Hospital and long-term outcomes of icu-treated severe community- and hospital-acquired, and ventilator-associated pneumonia patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scandinavica , 55 , 1254-1260. Kay, I. U., Ahmed, Q. A., Sax, H., & Pittet, D. (2008). Ventilator-associated pneumonia as a quality indicator for patient safety. Clinical Infectious Diseases , 46 (4), 557-563. Klompas, M., Kulldorff, M., & Platt, R. (2008). Risk of misleading ventilator-associated pneumonia rates with the use of standard clinical and microbiological criteria. Clinical Infectious Diseases , 46 (9), 1443-1446. Koenig, S. M., & Truwit, J. D. (2006, October). Ventilator-associated pneumonia: Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Clinical Microbiology Review , 19 (4), 637-657. Lillis, K. (2011, December 7). Driving down vap rates: One hospital’s success story. Retrieved from http://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/articles/2011/12/driving-down-vap-rates-one-hospitals-success-story.aspx Lisboa, T., & Rello, J. (2009). Ventilator-associated pneumonia prevalence: To benchmark or not to benchmark. Critical Care Medicine , 37 (9), 2657-2659. Ochsner Health System (2011). 2011 nursing annual report: Achieving excellence. Retrieved from http://www.ochsner.org/content/misc_files/OHS541-2011%20Nursing%20Annual%20Report_Final-2-5-13.pdf O’Keefe-McCarthy, S. (2006). Evidence-based nursing strategies to prevent ventilator-acquired pneumonia. Dynamics , 17 (1), 8-11. Safdar, N., Dezfulian, C., Collard, H. R., & Saint, S. (2005). Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review. Critical Care Medicine , 33 , 2184-2193. Scott, R. D. (2009, March). The direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in U.S. hospitals and the benefits of prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hai/pdfs/hai/scott_costpaper.pdf Sherwood, G., & Barnsteiner, J. (2012). Quality and safety in nursing: A competency approach to improving outcomes . West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Van Hooser, D. T. (n.d.). Ventilator-associated pneumonia: Best practice strategies for caregivers. Retrieved from http://en.haiwatch.com/data/upload/tools/VAP_CEU_Booklet_Z0406.pdf References con’t You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.