logging in or signing up Democracy on Trial thedisdem Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 27 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: February 05, 2011 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide 1: The Story of Democracy: The Struggle of the Many to Escape the Domination by the FewSlide 2: Demos + KratiaSlide 3: The Golden AgeSlide 4: The Principle of Equality Embedded in the Political Institutions Isonomia Isegoria Isocratia Isogonia Isopoliteia Political Rights Speech Political Power Birthright Legal RightsSlide 5: The Fall of AthensSlide 6: Life Was Nasty, Brutish, and Short Divine Rule Rule by Military ForceSlide 7: The RenaissanceSlide 8: Gutenberg’s GalaxySlide 9: Popular RevolutionSlide 10: Democracy RebornSlide 11: The Order of Equality v. the Order of PrivilegeSlide 12: The Eternal Tug of War Over the Rules of the GameSlide 13: The Great War of IdeologiesSlide 14: The Triumph of DemocracySlide 15: Les Trente Gloriouses (1945-1975)Slide 16: Democracy Takes HoldSlide 17: Warning!Slide 18: “The 20 th Century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance. The growth of democracy; the growth of corporate power; and the growth of corporate propaganda as means of protecting corporate power against democracy.” Alex CareySlide 19: The Empire Strikes BackSlide 20: To Re-Establish the Predominance of PrivilegeSlide 21: Create the Uneven Playing FieldSlide 22: Promote the Idea that We Are One EconomySlide 23: Seek Technological LeverageSlide 24: Limit the Impact of Sovereign Nation StatesSlide 25: Make Use of the CourtsSlide 26: Take Advantage of Corporate Personhood Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific RailroadSlide 27: Push As Far As You Can Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSlide 28: Voila the Preferred Social Order Corporate PlutocracySlide 29: Institutional Disorder is all about DemocracySlide 30: “What the term means is that the people hold power and exercise rule. This was what the term meant in Athens, where the claim bore some relation to the truth. That is what it means today, when it appears to be a thumping falsehood: a bare-faced lie.” John DunnSlide 31: “When every vote counts and counts equally, politics is much more a reflection of the priorities of the population.” Henry MilnerSlide 32: Social JusticeSlide 33: Environmental ProtectionSlide 34: To Fight Back Make Each and Every Vote CountSlide 35: The PlaintiffsSlide 36: The NetworkSlide 37: The Motion Filed With the Court Seeks a declaratory judgment to have the articles in the Quebec Electoral Law that bring forward the first-past-the-post voting system declared null and void because this system infringes upon the plaintiffs' right to vote as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms .Slide 38: Section 3 Arguments The content of the Charter right to vote is to be determined in a broad and purposive way, having regard to historical and social context. ...The Court, most importantly, must be guided by the ideal of a "free and democratic society" upon which the Charter is founded. ( Sask. Reference)Slide 39: Section 3 Arguments The purpose of the right to vote enshrined in s. 3 of the Charter is not equality of voting power per se , but the right to “effective representation”. Ours is a representative democracy. Each citizen is entitled to be represented in government. Representation comprehends the idea of having a voice in the deliberations of government as well as the idea of the right to bring one’s grievances and concerns to the attention of one’s government representative. ( Sask. Reference )Slide 40: Section 3 Arguments The purpose of s. 3 of the Charter is, then, to grant every citizen of this country the right to play a meaningful role in the selection of elected representatives . ( Figueroa )Slide 41: Point of Contention First-Past-The-Post violates the right to vote. Effective representation is systemically denied to those electors who vote for political parties whose support is dispersed geographically. Case in point: the Green Party of Canada. The right to play a meaningful role in the selection of elected representatives is compromised because institutional incentives favour large parties at the expense of smaller ones.Slide 42: Section 15 Argument 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination.Slide 43: Point of Contention First-Past-The-Post violates the right to equal treatment by the law. Given voting patterns within non-Francophone ridings in Quebec, the voting system puts into place significant institutional incentives for non-Francophones not to vote.Slide 44: In a Nutshell First-Past-The-Post cannot meet the equality requirements of the right to vote because it lacks a mechanism to aggregate votes or voting preferences. To discard votes or to encourage people not to vote for their authentic choice or not to vote at all is contrary to the values of a free and democratic society.Slide 45: Quebec Attorney General’s Response The plaintiffs’ right to vote has not been violated. They are represented by their Deputies. They participate in elections by voting and by being candidates. Anglophones elect members of their community to the National Assembly. The plaintiffs are asking the Court to impose a voting system upon the legislature.Slide 46: March 2004 Declaratory Judgment Motion is filed Sept. 2006 Trial for Admissibility Nov. 2006 Favourable Decision Jan. 2007 Crown’s Appeal Denied Dec. 2008 Motion goes to trial Feb. 2009 Unfavorable Decision Feb 2011 Appeal is heard Chronology of EventsSlide 47: Elements That Play in Our Favour History of Voting Reform in Quebec Electoral Promise to Change the Voting System Draft Legislation Tabled Public Consultations Held Unable to Draw Up a New Electoral Map Powers of the Director of Elections Suspended Referendum in the UK on the Voting System Unpopular Government Plagued by ScandalsSlide 48: Once Every Century the Planets Are Perfectly AlignedSlide 49: For more information or to make a donation please visit our website: http://www.ardd.qc.ca You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Democracy on Trial thedisdem Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 27 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: February 05, 2011 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide 1: The Story of Democracy: The Struggle of the Many to Escape the Domination by the FewSlide 2: Demos + KratiaSlide 3: The Golden AgeSlide 4: The Principle of Equality Embedded in the Political Institutions Isonomia Isegoria Isocratia Isogonia Isopoliteia Political Rights Speech Political Power Birthright Legal RightsSlide 5: The Fall of AthensSlide 6: Life Was Nasty, Brutish, and Short Divine Rule Rule by Military ForceSlide 7: The RenaissanceSlide 8: Gutenberg’s GalaxySlide 9: Popular RevolutionSlide 10: Democracy RebornSlide 11: The Order of Equality v. the Order of PrivilegeSlide 12: The Eternal Tug of War Over the Rules of the GameSlide 13: The Great War of IdeologiesSlide 14: The Triumph of DemocracySlide 15: Les Trente Gloriouses (1945-1975)Slide 16: Democracy Takes HoldSlide 17: Warning!Slide 18: “The 20 th Century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance. The growth of democracy; the growth of corporate power; and the growth of corporate propaganda as means of protecting corporate power against democracy.” Alex CareySlide 19: The Empire Strikes BackSlide 20: To Re-Establish the Predominance of PrivilegeSlide 21: Create the Uneven Playing FieldSlide 22: Promote the Idea that We Are One EconomySlide 23: Seek Technological LeverageSlide 24: Limit the Impact of Sovereign Nation StatesSlide 25: Make Use of the CourtsSlide 26: Take Advantage of Corporate Personhood Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific RailroadSlide 27: Push As Far As You Can Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSlide 28: Voila the Preferred Social Order Corporate PlutocracySlide 29: Institutional Disorder is all about DemocracySlide 30: “What the term means is that the people hold power and exercise rule. This was what the term meant in Athens, where the claim bore some relation to the truth. That is what it means today, when it appears to be a thumping falsehood: a bare-faced lie.” John DunnSlide 31: “When every vote counts and counts equally, politics is much more a reflection of the priorities of the population.” Henry MilnerSlide 32: Social JusticeSlide 33: Environmental ProtectionSlide 34: To Fight Back Make Each and Every Vote CountSlide 35: The PlaintiffsSlide 36: The NetworkSlide 37: The Motion Filed With the Court Seeks a declaratory judgment to have the articles in the Quebec Electoral Law that bring forward the first-past-the-post voting system declared null and void because this system infringes upon the plaintiffs' right to vote as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms .Slide 38: Section 3 Arguments The content of the Charter right to vote is to be determined in a broad and purposive way, having regard to historical and social context. ...The Court, most importantly, must be guided by the ideal of a "free and democratic society" upon which the Charter is founded. ( Sask. Reference)Slide 39: Section 3 Arguments The purpose of the right to vote enshrined in s. 3 of the Charter is not equality of voting power per se , but the right to “effective representation”. Ours is a representative democracy. Each citizen is entitled to be represented in government. Representation comprehends the idea of having a voice in the deliberations of government as well as the idea of the right to bring one’s grievances and concerns to the attention of one’s government representative. ( Sask. Reference )Slide 40: Section 3 Arguments The purpose of s. 3 of the Charter is, then, to grant every citizen of this country the right to play a meaningful role in the selection of elected representatives . ( Figueroa )Slide 41: Point of Contention First-Past-The-Post violates the right to vote. Effective representation is systemically denied to those electors who vote for political parties whose support is dispersed geographically. Case in point: the Green Party of Canada. The right to play a meaningful role in the selection of elected representatives is compromised because institutional incentives favour large parties at the expense of smaller ones.Slide 42: Section 15 Argument 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination.Slide 43: Point of Contention First-Past-The-Post violates the right to equal treatment by the law. Given voting patterns within non-Francophone ridings in Quebec, the voting system puts into place significant institutional incentives for non-Francophones not to vote.Slide 44: In a Nutshell First-Past-The-Post cannot meet the equality requirements of the right to vote because it lacks a mechanism to aggregate votes or voting preferences. To discard votes or to encourage people not to vote for their authentic choice or not to vote at all is contrary to the values of a free and democratic society.Slide 45: Quebec Attorney General’s Response The plaintiffs’ right to vote has not been violated. They are represented by their Deputies. They participate in elections by voting and by being candidates. Anglophones elect members of their community to the National Assembly. The plaintiffs are asking the Court to impose a voting system upon the legislature.Slide 46: March 2004 Declaratory Judgment Motion is filed Sept. 2006 Trial for Admissibility Nov. 2006 Favourable Decision Jan. 2007 Crown’s Appeal Denied Dec. 2008 Motion goes to trial Feb. 2009 Unfavorable Decision Feb 2011 Appeal is heard Chronology of EventsSlide 47: Elements That Play in Our Favour History of Voting Reform in Quebec Electoral Promise to Change the Voting System Draft Legislation Tabled Public Consultations Held Unable to Draw Up a New Electoral Map Powers of the Director of Elections Suspended Referendum in the UK on the Voting System Unpopular Government Plagued by ScandalsSlide 48: Once Every Century the Planets Are Perfectly AlignedSlide 49: For more information or to make a donation please visit our website: http://www.ardd.qc.ca