Ford Pinto Case

Uploaded from authorPOINTLite
Views:
 
Category: Education
     
 

Presentation Description

No description available.

Comments

By: dark_angle_o (5 month(s) ago)

I need it

By: rendhy86 (11 month(s) ago)

yes i like that..

By: yanthan123 (16 month(s) ago)

Like this case....if u have no obligations, i'll be honoured to use it in my class lecture.....email ren.hmt@gmail.com....thank you

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1: 

Ford Pinto Shauna Sullivan

The Beginning : 

Events in the 1970s related to the Ford Pinto automobile illustrate some of the ethical issues related to technology and safety. The Beginning

Safety Issues : 

Safer Gas Tank Tank Location Precedences over safety were price and style Safety Issues

Engineer Constraints : 

Design Cost Limitations Marketing Strategies Engineer Constraints

Major Design Problems : 

Major Design Problems Short rear end to imitate Ford Mustang Tank placed behind rear axle instead of over the axle The Pinto could weigh no more than 2000 pounds or cost more than $2000

Problems from fuel tank : 

Problems from fuel tank Rear end collision over 21 mph resulted in fire Some so bad it resulted in fatalities or horrible burns

Ford's Cost/Benefit Analysis Benefits and Costs Relating to Fuel  Leakage : 

Ford's Cost/Benefit Analysis Benefits and Costs Relating to Fuel  Leakage Benefits:Savings:  180 burn deaths, 180 serious burn injuries, 2100 burned vehicles Unit Cost:  $200,000 per death, $67,000 per injury, $700 per vehicleTotal Benefit:  180 x ($200,000) + 180 x ($67,000) + 2100 x ($700) = $49.5 Million Costs:Sales: 11 million cars, 1.5 million light trucks Unit Cost: $11 per car, $11 per truckTotal Cost: 11,000,000 x ($11) + 1,500,000 x ($ I 1) = $137 Million

Slide 8: 

Questions?? Management placed marketing considerations above safety, was that ethical and are members of management morally responsible for the preventable Pinto fire deaths? Finally, was the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ineffective or unethical because the Ford Pintos always complied with all the government standards?