Presentation Transcript
TRANSPORTATION OF ULSD MAP SYSTEM TESTING: Transport and Station
Observations and Recommendations
January 26, 2005
TOMA – Diesel Fuel Marketers Seminar
Nashville, TN TRANSPORTATION OF ULSD MAP SYSTEM TESTING
ULSD Timeline: ULSD Timeline 80% pool
Diesel Marketing - Low Sulfur or ULSD?: Diesel Marketing - Low Sulfur or ULSD? Who are your customers?
What are your logistical capabilities – tanks, lines, dispensers?
What are your supply options?
What is your risk tolerance?
Pricing?
HOW DO YOU ENSURE PRODUCT QUALITY?
Light Product Distribution System Pre-Test Observations: Light Product Distribution System Pre-Test Observations Barges, Pipelines, Terminals, Transports have little or no experience in handling ultra low sulfur diesel product
Protecting the sulfur quality of ULSD while transporting it presents a challenge as difficult as when handling Jet Fuel
Industry has a new distribution challenge that has not been completely quantified. Additional transportation system testing and sharing of test data will be required.
Industry will spend millions of dollars to make facility and procedural changes to our transportation systems to minimize the risk of sulfur contamination
Objective of MAP ULSD Testing: Objective of MAP ULSD Testing
Evaluate the capability of barge, pipeline, terminal, transport and retail facilities to deliver ≤ 15 ppm ULSD to the retail customer.
MAP ULSD Testing Background: MAP ULSD Testing Background Barge transportation, loading and unloading operations
Originating tank and manifold piping
Pipelines from 6” through 20” – up to 500 miles in length
Destination manifolds and tank piping
Terminal Aboveground Storage Tanks
Transport loading and unloading operations
Retail Station Underground Storage Tanks
Third party pipeline companies ability to move ULSD
Test Scenario ExampleGulf Coast to Louisville ~ 24,000 bbls ULSD ~250 samples : Test Scenario Example Gulf Coast to Louisville ~ 24,000 bbls ULSD ~250 samples (Gulf Coast) (Lexington, KY) (Louisville, KY)
Terminal Operations: Terminal Operations Observations & Recommendations
Observations - Terminal Operations : Observations - Terminal Operations Distillate aboveground storage tanks, after receipt of ULSD, showed indications of product (sulfur) stratification
A single tank sample will not represent the overall sulfur level of the product in the tank
Tank turns (heel mixing) for above ground storage tanks may not be effective for converting tanks to ULSD
Header displacement tests indicate that dead leg piping will displace
Recommendations - Terminal Operations : Recommendations - Terminal Operations To obtain the sulfur level of ULSD in a tank, several samples at different liquid heights will be required
Tanks must be emptied and have two turnovers, emptying the tank each time, before the tank can protect ULSD
Contamination from dead legs remains a possibility.
Each terminal must be thoroughly analyzed for dead leg contamination
Transport Operations: Transport Operations
Objectives of Transport Testing: Objectives of Transport Testing Determine the sulfur contamination impact of transport heels
Establish if the transport type, flat vs. slope bottom, contributes differently to contamination
Transport Testing Background: Transport Testing Background Two scenarios included transport testing
Louisville 4/16/04
Macon 5/31/04
Previous contents of the transports were jet fuel at 1425 ppm sulfur
Transports were compartmented
One loaded “as is”
One drained down at rack prior to loading
One flushed at rack prior to loading
300 gallons loaded in each compartment
Observations – Flat Bottom Transports : Observations – Flat Bottom Transports
Observations – Slope Bottom Transports: Observations – Slope Bottom Transports
Transport Operations Observations: Transport Operations Observations Transports need to be completely drained when switching from higher sulfur products to ULSD
A flat bottom transport can present significant contamination issues when loading ULSD
Sloped bottom transports had little if any contribution to contamination
Draining compartments at the loading rack reduced flat bottom contamination
Flushing compartments with ULSD prior to loading effectively removed any residual sulfur contamination in both transport types
Transport Operations Recommendations: Transport Operations Recommendations Transport operators will need to adopt procedures to protect ULSD quality
Transport operators should consider complete drain down capability prior to loading ULSD
More testing needs to be done
Retail & Station Operations: Retail & Station Operations
Objectives of Station Testing: Objectives of Station Testing Determine how stations can successfully convert to ULSD from low sulfur diesel
Ascertain the impact of manifolded underground storage tanks
Establish if/when product stratification occurs
Station Testing Background: Station Testing Background Louisville 4/16/04
Truck Stop A
Truck Stop B
Gas Station
Minimized Inventories Macon 5/31/04
Truck Stop C
Truck Stop D
Normal Inventories
Samples were pulled from each station before and after drops
Top, middle, and bottom samples from each tank
A nozzle sample (random dispenser)
Macon Station Tank Mixing: Macon Station Tank Mixing
Louisville Station Tank Mixing: Louisville Station Tank Mixing
Station Drop Volume Correlation: Station Drop Volume Correlation % Drop Volume = Volume of Load Delivered
Total Inventory After Delivery
Station Mixing Calculations: Station Mixing Calculations Average sulfur content in UST before the drop
Inventory in tank before the drop
Volume of ULSD load
Sulfur content of ULSD
Linear mixing assumptions
Station Observations: Station Observations Mixing does occur across manifolded tanks
Stratification in USTs can occur if the drop volume is less than 60% of the final UST inventory
Multiple drops into different tanks promote better mixing
Stations should be able to successfully provide ≤ 15 ppm with planning multiple drops into each tank
Station Recommendations: Station Recommendations Minimize inventory levels in tanks prior to receiving ULSD loads to minimize stratification
Drop into each tank on site to promote mixing and quicker conversion
Estimate number of loads necessary to convert a station using historical sulfur content, tank inventories, and site sales
CONCLUSION: CONCLUSION