logging in or signing up GRoland PPTMac smith Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 10, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Bulk Particle Production A Global View: Bulk Particle Production A Global View Gunther Roland Bulk Properties: Bulk Properties Single Au+Au Collision O(104) 4-Vectors Provide background (5 - 15% accuracy) against which we can search for structureGlobal Observables: Global ObservablesControl Parameters: Control Parameters Also: Different systems (different nuclei, pp, pA, e+e-) System-Size EnergyBulk Properties: Bulk PropertiesSlide6: Please, see poster by Sasha Milow ! I. Particle Density near Mid-Rapidity How does Density at 90o change with Energy and Centrality?Particle Density near Mid-Rapidity: Particle Density near Mid-Rapidity Beware of the Jacobian! dN/dh = <b> dN/dyParticle Density near Mid-Rapidity: Particle Density near Mid-Rapidity Logarithmic Rise with Collision EnergyParticle Density near Mid-Rapidity: Particle Density near Mid-Rapidity Models prior to RHICCentrality Dependence at |h| < 1: Centrality Dependence at |h| < 1II. 4-p Multiplicity <Nch>: II. 4-p Multiplicity <Nch> How does Integral over 4-p, <Nch>, change with Energy and Centrality?Slide12: Nch vs Npart in d+Au PHOBOS preliminary PHOBOS preliminary see talk by Rachid Nouicer d+Au Multiplicity proportional to p+p Multiplicity * Npart <Nch>pp*NpartNch vs Npart in Au+Au : Nch vs Npart in Au+Au 200 GeV 130 GeV 19.6 GeV Pseudorapidity dN/dh/<1/2 Npart> 200 GeV 19.6 GeV central peripheral central peripheral <Nch>e+e-*Npart Au+Au Multiplicity proportional to NpartIII. Shape of dN/dh Distributions: III. Shape of dN/dh Distributions How does Shape of dN/dh (dN/dy) change with Energy? Reaching the Central Plateau?Boost-invariance?: Boost-invariance? p+ dN/dy spectra Single Gaussian fits from 2 to 200 GeVLandau Hydrodynamics: Landau Hydrodynamics Carruthers, Duong-Van on pp data in 1973: <Nch> vs sqrt(s) revisited: <Nch> vs sqrt(s) revisited Carruthers, Duong-Van on pp and e+e- data in 1983:Slide18: IV. Spectrum of Produced Hadrons Yield Mass Quantum Numbers Temperature Chemical Potential Hagedorn, Becattini, Braun-Munzinger, Cleymans, Letessier, Mekijan,Rafelski, Redlich,Stachel, TounsiSpectrum of Produced Hadrons: Spectrum of Produced Hadrons“Thermal Fit” Parameters vs sqrt(s): “Thermal Fit” Parameters vs sqrt(s)Slide21: V. Transverse DynamicsSlide22: Structure in Inverse Slope vs sqrt(s) Summary: Summary Data can indeed by reduced efficiently We’re doing Thermodynamics! Total Multiplicity Proportional to Npart Rises like s1/4 from mid-SPS Energy Range p dN/dy Distributions Single Gaussian with width s2 ~ 0.5 ln(s/4mp) Statistical Fits describe Hadron Abundances Systematic Evolution, Limiting Temperature Correspondence with other ‘Hadronic’ Systems p+p, p+A, e+e- Max Entropy Evolution from Dense Initial State How is the Initial State Prepared? Baryon Number Transport? Coincidence?: Coincidence? Nmin - Nmax 1.8 2.5 3.7 5.0 dN/dh||h|<1 /<0.5 Npart>(200 GeV) Ratio RRHIC/SPS This is a cartoon! (so far) Model H pp e+e- A+A Predictions Particle Ratios in d+Au: p/p vs Centrality: Particle Ratios in d+Au: p/p vs Centrality Constant p/p ratio vs centrality Disagreement with expectations/models nucl-ex/0309013 - submitted to PRC Au+Au Phys. Rev. C 67, 021901R (2003) Npart scaling?: Npart scaling? Rapidity Distributions at 200 GeV: Rapidity Distributions at 200 GeV yT h Surprising agreement in shape between AA/e+e- /pp Correspondence between perturbative and non-perturbative approaches? e+e- measures dN/dyT (rapidity relative to “thrust” axis) AA/pp ~ 1.4-1.5 200 GeV Central Au+Au q q PHOBOS QM’02, SteinbergTransverse Energy near h=0: Transverse Energy near h=0 dET/dh exhibits smooth rise vs sqrt(s) Surprisingly, <ET> per particle at h=0 constant even though p+p spectra get much harder with sqrt(s) PHENIX QM ‘02 nucl-ex/0209025 PHENIX QM ‘02 nucl-ex/0209025Transverse Energy near h=0: Transverse Energy near h=0 D<ET> < 10% D<pT> ~ 20% PHENIX QM ‘02 nucl-ex/0209025 STAR QM ‘02 nucl-ex/02111021Net Proton dN/dy: Net Proton dN/dyTransverse Energy vs Npart: Transverse Energy vs Npart STAR prel. 130 GeV 200 GeV dET/dh and <pT> independent of Npart above Npart ~50 PHENIX QM ‘02 nucl-ex/0209025 STAR QM ‘02 nucl-ex/0211021, poster M. CalderonBoost-invariance?: Boost-invariance? You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
GRoland PPTMac smith Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 10, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Bulk Particle Production A Global View: Bulk Particle Production A Global View Gunther Roland Bulk Properties: Bulk Properties Single Au+Au Collision O(104) 4-Vectors Provide background (5 - 15% accuracy) against which we can search for structureGlobal Observables: Global ObservablesControl Parameters: Control Parameters Also: Different systems (different nuclei, pp, pA, e+e-) System-Size EnergyBulk Properties: Bulk PropertiesSlide6: Please, see poster by Sasha Milow ! I. Particle Density near Mid-Rapidity How does Density at 90o change with Energy and Centrality?Particle Density near Mid-Rapidity: Particle Density near Mid-Rapidity Beware of the Jacobian! dN/dh = <b> dN/dyParticle Density near Mid-Rapidity: Particle Density near Mid-Rapidity Logarithmic Rise with Collision EnergyParticle Density near Mid-Rapidity: Particle Density near Mid-Rapidity Models prior to RHICCentrality Dependence at |h| < 1: Centrality Dependence at |h| < 1II. 4-p Multiplicity <Nch>: II. 4-p Multiplicity <Nch> How does Integral over 4-p, <Nch>, change with Energy and Centrality?Slide12: Nch vs Npart in d+Au PHOBOS preliminary PHOBOS preliminary see talk by Rachid Nouicer d+Au Multiplicity proportional to p+p Multiplicity * Npart <Nch>pp*NpartNch vs Npart in Au+Au : Nch vs Npart in Au+Au 200 GeV 130 GeV 19.6 GeV Pseudorapidity dN/dh/<1/2 Npart> 200 GeV 19.6 GeV central peripheral central peripheral <Nch>e+e-*Npart Au+Au Multiplicity proportional to NpartIII. Shape of dN/dh Distributions: III. Shape of dN/dh Distributions How does Shape of dN/dh (dN/dy) change with Energy? Reaching the Central Plateau?Boost-invariance?: Boost-invariance? p+ dN/dy spectra Single Gaussian fits from 2 to 200 GeVLandau Hydrodynamics: Landau Hydrodynamics Carruthers, Duong-Van on pp data in 1973: <Nch> vs sqrt(s) revisited: <Nch> vs sqrt(s) revisited Carruthers, Duong-Van on pp and e+e- data in 1983:Slide18: IV. Spectrum of Produced Hadrons Yield Mass Quantum Numbers Temperature Chemical Potential Hagedorn, Becattini, Braun-Munzinger, Cleymans, Letessier, Mekijan,Rafelski, Redlich,Stachel, TounsiSpectrum of Produced Hadrons: Spectrum of Produced Hadrons“Thermal Fit” Parameters vs sqrt(s): “Thermal Fit” Parameters vs sqrt(s)Slide21: V. Transverse DynamicsSlide22: Structure in Inverse Slope vs sqrt(s) Summary: Summary Data can indeed by reduced efficiently We’re doing Thermodynamics! Total Multiplicity Proportional to Npart Rises like s1/4 from mid-SPS Energy Range p dN/dy Distributions Single Gaussian with width s2 ~ 0.5 ln(s/4mp) Statistical Fits describe Hadron Abundances Systematic Evolution, Limiting Temperature Correspondence with other ‘Hadronic’ Systems p+p, p+A, e+e- Max Entropy Evolution from Dense Initial State How is the Initial State Prepared? Baryon Number Transport? Coincidence?: Coincidence? Nmin - Nmax 1.8 2.5 3.7 5.0 dN/dh||h|<1 /<0.5 Npart>(200 GeV) Ratio RRHIC/SPS This is a cartoon! (so far) Model H pp e+e- A+A Predictions Particle Ratios in d+Au: p/p vs Centrality: Particle Ratios in d+Au: p/p vs Centrality Constant p/p ratio vs centrality Disagreement with expectations/models nucl-ex/0309013 - submitted to PRC Au+Au Phys. Rev. C 67, 021901R (2003) Npart scaling?: Npart scaling? Rapidity Distributions at 200 GeV: Rapidity Distributions at 200 GeV yT h Surprising agreement in shape between AA/e+e- /pp Correspondence between perturbative and non-perturbative approaches? e+e- measures dN/dyT (rapidity relative to “thrust” axis) AA/pp ~ 1.4-1.5 200 GeV Central Au+Au q q PHOBOS QM’02, SteinbergTransverse Energy near h=0: Transverse Energy near h=0 dET/dh exhibits smooth rise vs sqrt(s) Surprisingly, <ET> per particle at h=0 constant even though p+p spectra get much harder with sqrt(s) PHENIX QM ‘02 nucl-ex/0209025 PHENIX QM ‘02 nucl-ex/0209025Transverse Energy near h=0: Transverse Energy near h=0 D<ET> < 10% D<pT> ~ 20% PHENIX QM ‘02 nucl-ex/0209025 STAR QM ‘02 nucl-ex/02111021Net Proton dN/dy: Net Proton dN/dyTransverse Energy vs Npart: Transverse Energy vs Npart STAR prel. 130 GeV 200 GeV dET/dh and <pT> independent of Npart above Npart ~50 PHENIX QM ‘02 nucl-ex/0209025 STAR QM ‘02 nucl-ex/0211021, poster M. CalderonBoost-invariance?: Boost-invariance?