logging in or signing up THERMAL POWER PLANT SAFETY shivajichoudhury Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 22850 Category: Science & Tech.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (18) Dislike it (1) Added: June 03, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 10 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: asgm (9 month(s) ago) please to be download Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: anil201 (15 month(s) ago) pleae to be download Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: anuj.6789 (15 month(s) ago) i want to download it Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: Eng.Saeed (17 month(s) ago) let us download it Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: UDAYKUMAR91 (17 month(s) ago) IT IS VERY WASY Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close loading.... See all Premium member Presentation Transcript THERMAL POWER PLANT SAFETY : THERMAL POWER PLANT SAFETY SHIVAJI CHOUDHURY TERRIBLE INCIDENTS : TERRIBLE INCIDENTS FIXBOROUGH, BHOPAL,SEVESO,PIPER ALPHA AND MEXICO CITY. THESE PLACES AND THEIR ASSOCIATED TERRIBLE INCIDENTS ARE ALL FAMILIAR TO EVERY ONE. THEY WERE ALSO THE DRIVERS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF OSHA 1910.119 IN US AND SIMILAR SAFETY LAWS IN OTHER COUNTRY. LAW & STANDARD : LAW & STANDARD THE ESTABILISHMENT OF THE AIChE CENTER FOR CHEMICAL PROCESS SAFETY AND DEVELOPMENT OF ANSI/ISA/IEC STANDARDS WERE ALSO DIRECT RESULTS OF TREGEDIES. THE SAFETY STANDARD ARE COME OUT IN 1996 . SO,WHY 12 YEARS LATER, DO WE STILL EXPERIENCE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS. CAUSE OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT : CAUSE OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT UK HEALTH AND SAFETY AND EXECUTIVE (HSE) ANALYSED THE CAUSE OF A NUMBER OF FAILURES/ACCIDENT: SPECIFICATION-44% CHANGES AFTER COMMISSIONING-2O% OPERATION & MAINTANCE-15% DESIGN & IMPLEMENTATION-15% INSTALATION & COMMISSIONING-6% SPECIFICATION : SPECIFICATION THE HSE STUDY SUGGESTS THE MOST FAILURES ARE RELATED TO INADEQUATE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION. THIS MAY BE DUE TO LACK OF PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE OR TRAINING OR SIMPLY DUE TO ERRORS MADE DURING THE ASSESSMENT OF THE FOLLOWING : PROCESS HAZARDS REQUIRED DEVICE FUNCTIONALLY FAILURE MODES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVICES USED TO IMPLEMENT THE PROTECTION LAYERS. PROTECTION LAYERS : PROTECTION LAYERS PROCESS. CONTROL AND MONITORING. PREVENTION. MITIGATION. PLANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE. SAFETY- PROCESS : SAFETY- PROCESS UK HEALTH AND SAFETY AND EXECUTIVE (HSE) ANALYSED THE MAIN CAUSE OF FAILURES IS SPECIFICATION. ALL SPECIFICATION SHALL BE AS PER GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES. ALL SYSTEM DESIGN SHALL AS PER NATIONAL/INERNATIONAL CODE /STANDARD-AS PER ASME,ASTM,DIN,BS ,IEC ,NFPA ,ISA,OSHA,EPA etc ALL PIPING COMFORM TO ASME B 31.1. ALL INSTALATION AND COMMISSIONING AS PER DESIGN. CONTROL & MONITORING : CONTROL & MONITORING BASIC CONTROL SYSTEM. MONITORING SYSTEM. ALARM SYSTEM. GOOD OPERATOR SUPERVISION. PREVENTION : PREVENTION MECHNICAL SAFETY VALVE/SYSTEM PROCESS ALARM WITH OPERATOR ACTION SAFETY INSTRUMENTED CONTROL SYSTEM. MITIGATION : MITIGATION MECHANICAL SAFETY VALVE/FAIL DEVICES /MITIGATION DEVICES BURNER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AS NFPA 85 TURBINE PROTECTION INTERLOCK & PROTECTION DESIGN AS PER ISA 84,IEC 61508,IEC 61511 OPERATOR SUPERVISION & ACTION PLANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE : PLANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE EVACUTION PLAN OR PROCEDURE FOR ACCIDENT LIKE FIRE OR GAS LEAKAGES. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE : COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSEFOR ACCIDENT LIKE THREE ISLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ,USA( IN 1979) OR CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR PLANT ,USSR: EMERGENCY BROADCASTING. EVACUTE THE AREA. TRAINING OF PERSONNELS : TRAINING OF PERSONNELS IMPROPER OPERATIONAL OR MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY CAN COMPLETELY DISABLE AN SAFETY SYSTEM. TO OVERCOME THESE ERRORS ,OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES SHOULD BE CLEAR AND CONSISTENT WITH OPERATOR OR MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN EXPECTATION TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL FOR ERROR. GOOD DESIGN PRACTICES & TRAINING CAN REDUCE OPERATOR OR MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN ERRORS THAT COULD POTENTIALLY LEAD TO FAILURE. BOILER : BOILER MECHANICAL MITIGATION(SAFETY VALVE -500 MW) : MECHANICAL MITIGATION(SAFETY VALVE -500 MW) DRUM- 6 No SUPERHEATER SAFETY VALVE 2 No ELECTROMATIC 5 No REHEATER CRH 4 No HRH 4 No INCIDENT REPORTS : INCIDENT REPORTS MOST INCIDENT REPORT INCLUDE A SENTENCE THAT STATES THAT THE INCIDENT WAS PREVENTABLE.IF COMPANIES PROPERLY USE THE AVAILABLE STANDARDS. THE MOST EXPENSIVE SAFETY EQUIPMENT,YOU CAN BUY IS ONE YOU INSTALL AFTER THE CATASTROPHIC INCIDENT. : THE MOST EXPENSIVE SAFETY EQUIPMENT,YOU CAN BUY IS ONE YOU INSTALL AFTER THE CATASTROPHIC INCIDENT. THANKS : THANKS You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
THERMAL POWER PLANT SAFETY shivajichoudhury Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 22850 Category: Science & Tech.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (18) Dislike it (1) Added: June 03, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 10 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: asgm (9 month(s) ago) please to be download Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: anil201 (15 month(s) ago) pleae to be download Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: anuj.6789 (15 month(s) ago) i want to download it Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: Eng.Saeed (17 month(s) ago) let us download it Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: UDAYKUMAR91 (17 month(s) ago) IT IS VERY WASY Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close loading.... See all Premium member Presentation Transcript THERMAL POWER PLANT SAFETY : THERMAL POWER PLANT SAFETY SHIVAJI CHOUDHURY TERRIBLE INCIDENTS : TERRIBLE INCIDENTS FIXBOROUGH, BHOPAL,SEVESO,PIPER ALPHA AND MEXICO CITY. THESE PLACES AND THEIR ASSOCIATED TERRIBLE INCIDENTS ARE ALL FAMILIAR TO EVERY ONE. THEY WERE ALSO THE DRIVERS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF OSHA 1910.119 IN US AND SIMILAR SAFETY LAWS IN OTHER COUNTRY. LAW & STANDARD : LAW & STANDARD THE ESTABILISHMENT OF THE AIChE CENTER FOR CHEMICAL PROCESS SAFETY AND DEVELOPMENT OF ANSI/ISA/IEC STANDARDS WERE ALSO DIRECT RESULTS OF TREGEDIES. THE SAFETY STANDARD ARE COME OUT IN 1996 . SO,WHY 12 YEARS LATER, DO WE STILL EXPERIENCE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS. CAUSE OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT : CAUSE OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT UK HEALTH AND SAFETY AND EXECUTIVE (HSE) ANALYSED THE CAUSE OF A NUMBER OF FAILURES/ACCIDENT: SPECIFICATION-44% CHANGES AFTER COMMISSIONING-2O% OPERATION & MAINTANCE-15% DESIGN & IMPLEMENTATION-15% INSTALATION & COMMISSIONING-6% SPECIFICATION : SPECIFICATION THE HSE STUDY SUGGESTS THE MOST FAILURES ARE RELATED TO INADEQUATE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION. THIS MAY BE DUE TO LACK OF PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE OR TRAINING OR SIMPLY DUE TO ERRORS MADE DURING THE ASSESSMENT OF THE FOLLOWING : PROCESS HAZARDS REQUIRED DEVICE FUNCTIONALLY FAILURE MODES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVICES USED TO IMPLEMENT THE PROTECTION LAYERS. PROTECTION LAYERS : PROTECTION LAYERS PROCESS. CONTROL AND MONITORING. PREVENTION. MITIGATION. PLANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE. SAFETY- PROCESS : SAFETY- PROCESS UK HEALTH AND SAFETY AND EXECUTIVE (HSE) ANALYSED THE MAIN CAUSE OF FAILURES IS SPECIFICATION. ALL SPECIFICATION SHALL BE AS PER GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES. ALL SYSTEM DESIGN SHALL AS PER NATIONAL/INERNATIONAL CODE /STANDARD-AS PER ASME,ASTM,DIN,BS ,IEC ,NFPA ,ISA,OSHA,EPA etc ALL PIPING COMFORM TO ASME B 31.1. ALL INSTALATION AND COMMISSIONING AS PER DESIGN. CONTROL & MONITORING : CONTROL & MONITORING BASIC CONTROL SYSTEM. MONITORING SYSTEM. ALARM SYSTEM. GOOD OPERATOR SUPERVISION. PREVENTION : PREVENTION MECHNICAL SAFETY VALVE/SYSTEM PROCESS ALARM WITH OPERATOR ACTION SAFETY INSTRUMENTED CONTROL SYSTEM. MITIGATION : MITIGATION MECHANICAL SAFETY VALVE/FAIL DEVICES /MITIGATION DEVICES BURNER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AS NFPA 85 TURBINE PROTECTION INTERLOCK & PROTECTION DESIGN AS PER ISA 84,IEC 61508,IEC 61511 OPERATOR SUPERVISION & ACTION PLANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE : PLANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE EVACUTION PLAN OR PROCEDURE FOR ACCIDENT LIKE FIRE OR GAS LEAKAGES. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE : COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSEFOR ACCIDENT LIKE THREE ISLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ,USA( IN 1979) OR CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR PLANT ,USSR: EMERGENCY BROADCASTING. EVACUTE THE AREA. TRAINING OF PERSONNELS : TRAINING OF PERSONNELS IMPROPER OPERATIONAL OR MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY CAN COMPLETELY DISABLE AN SAFETY SYSTEM. TO OVERCOME THESE ERRORS ,OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES SHOULD BE CLEAR AND CONSISTENT WITH OPERATOR OR MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN EXPECTATION TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL FOR ERROR. GOOD DESIGN PRACTICES & TRAINING CAN REDUCE OPERATOR OR MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN ERRORS THAT COULD POTENTIALLY LEAD TO FAILURE. BOILER : BOILER MECHANICAL MITIGATION(SAFETY VALVE -500 MW) : MECHANICAL MITIGATION(SAFETY VALVE -500 MW) DRUM- 6 No SUPERHEATER SAFETY VALVE 2 No ELECTROMATIC 5 No REHEATER CRH 4 No HRH 4 No INCIDENT REPORTS : INCIDENT REPORTS MOST INCIDENT REPORT INCLUDE A SENTENCE THAT STATES THAT THE INCIDENT WAS PREVENTABLE.IF COMPANIES PROPERLY USE THE AVAILABLE STANDARDS. THE MOST EXPENSIVE SAFETY EQUIPMENT,YOU CAN BUY IS ONE YOU INSTALL AFTER THE CATASTROPHIC INCIDENT. : THE MOST EXPENSIVE SAFETY EQUIPMENT,YOU CAN BUY IS ONE YOU INSTALL AFTER THE CATASTROPHIC INCIDENT. THANKS : THANKS