Presentation Transcript
What is the Territory of the Brand? :What is the Territory of the Brand? Six inches wide
Grey and wet
Mysterious
Contents :Contents Presentation Objective
Understanding Branding
From Products to Brands
Brand Attributes
Brand Management
Brand Architecture
Exercise
Brand Building
Brand Audit
Connection Triangle
Big Idea
Evaluating Advertising
Presentation Objective :Presentation Objective To understand the facets / issues involved in branding
To develop a framework for building a brand
Presentation incorporates learnings from :Presentation incorporates learnings from India’s Branding School, founded by Reliance: MICA
Personal Work Experience
Al Ries & Laura Ries: The 22 Immutable Laws of Branding Al Ries, David Ogilvy & Ambani
Contents :Contents
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Module 1 Understanding Branding Understanding
Branding Brand Building
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Module 1 Understanding Branding
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Module 1 Understanding Branding Exercise Architecture Management Attributes Products to brands
Module 1 - Stage 1 From Products to Brands :Module 1 - Stage 1 From Products to Brands
Module 1 - Stage 1 From Products to Brands :Module 1 - Stage 1 From Products to Brands Brand v/s. Product A brand is more distinctive than a product
It is first of all a name, a means of identification
Secondly it s a set of added values offering both functional and psychological benefits Above all ‘a brand is a promise’
Module 1 - Stage 1 From Products to Brands :Module 1 - Stage 1 From Products to Brands A Brand is a Promise “ …A seller’s promise to deliver consistently
a specific set of features, benefits and services
to buyers.
Module 1 - Stage 1 From Products to Brands :Module 1 - Stage 1 From Products to Brands …….a short-hand that communicates powerfully & reduces uncertainty
Fevicol Case :Fevicol Case
Fevicol Case :Fevicol Case
Fevicol Case :Fevicol Case
Brand as an Asset :Brand as an Asset “If Coca Cola lost everything except for ‘the formula’ and its brand name , it could walk into any bank in the world and get $100 billion loan to start from the scratch”
Fortune Magazine
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Attributes Module 1 Understanding Branding Exercise Architecture Management Attributes Products to brands
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Module 1 Understanding Branding Exercise Architecture Management Attributes Products to brands Name Logo Colours Essence
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes Immutable Law of Name In the long run the brand is nothing more than a name
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes Name Logo Colours Essence Brand Name
Short
? Kodak, Fuji
CNN an AOL Time Warner Company
Distinctive
Toyota’s Lexus is distinctive.Toyota’s Luxury commonplace
Orange was a striking name in a world of tel and coms
Not mean anything rude or silly in another language
Big Macs( McDonald’s) is a slang for big breasts in Canada
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes Name Logo Colours Essence Brand Name
Avoid generic / line extended names
Xerox as opposed to Haloids Paper Master
Xerox (Copier) is powerful. Xerox Computer is not
Changing your name will not overcome a bad strategy
“Monday” (Price Waterhouse Coopers )
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes A brand’s logotype should be designed to fit the eyes.
Both eyes Immutable Law of Shape
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes Name Logo Colours Essence Brand Logo
Simple logo, designed to fit both eyes
Mercedes three star
Logos with a horizontal bias
Logo with a horizontal bias is esp. useful for retail brands
Logo font has to be clear and legible
A housewife does not buy Ariel because it is written in a specific font
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes A brand should use a colour opposite of its rival Immutable Law of Colour
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes The Cola Wars: Energy Vs. Peace
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes Name Logo Colours Essence Brand Colours
Colours have meanings
Purple means royalty
Red is energetic
Blue is peaceful
Opposite colours can differentiate
Coke is red, Pepsi is blue
Kodak is yellow, Fuji is green
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes Name Logo Colours Essence Brand Colours..
Colours can help you stand out
FedEx’s orange and purple packet stands out in corporate blue
Logo and colours help, but the power of the brand
Essentially in the meaning of the brand name in consumer’s mind, its essence
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes Most important thing for a brand is its
single mindedness. Immutable Law of Singularity
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes Single-mindedness means consistency.
Fresh and interesting manifestations of a single idea.
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes Name Logo Colours Essence Brand Essence
A brand must “leverage a compelling truth”
Linux stands for freedom as opposed to Microsoft’s monopoly
A brand should mean a single powerful thing: the essence
Essence of Volvo is Safety
Essence of Tata is trust
Essence of Fevicol is bonding
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes Name Logo Colours Essence Brand Essence
A brand should also be clear of what is not its essence
In India, STAR NEWS is not a channel of the masses unlike STAR PLUS
A brand should drive single mindedly its essence
Volvo has been selling safety for 35 years
Raymond has been selling the complete man for over 2 decades
Essence of Dettol is protection against germs
A brand loses its essence if it starts meaning a lot of things
What is Miller :A regular,light,draft,cheap, expensive beer
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes A brand should try to own a word in consumer’s mind Immutable Law of Word
Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes :Module 1 - Stage 2 Attributes
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Attributes Module 1 Understanding Branding Exercise Architecture Management Products to brands Management
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Attributes Module 1 Understanding Branding Exercise Architecture Products to brands Co-Brand Stealth Brand Fighting Brand Multi-Brand
Module 1 - Stage 3 Management :Module 1 - Stage 3 Management Co-Brand Stealth Brand Fighting Brand Multi-Brand Co-Brand
Brands need to address a similar need segment
Kellogg's Pop-tarts with Smuckers Jam
Brands with complementary strengths: Seen often on the Net
NY Times gives Amazon credibility
Amazon makes NY Times look modern.
Module 1 - Stage 3 Management :Module 1 - Stage 3 Management Co-Brand Stealth Brand Fighting Brand Multi-Brand Stealth Brand
Brand building that attracts customer attention but not of rivals
Home-to-home, word of mouth / PR, internet community building
Krispy Kreme relies only on PR
Good option when unsure of a new medium/market
Little promotion for Maytag website as opposed to a buy.com. Maytag sold 1000s of Neptune washers on web
Module 1 - Stage 3 Management :Module 1 - Stage 3 Management Co-Brand Stealth Brand Fighting Brand Multi-Brand Fighting Brand
Pricing led branding option. Works as a competitive response.
Smirnov (Heublein) Case
Smirnov attacked by W’schmidt @ $1 less
Heublein raised the price of Smirnov
Heublein introduced Reiska(fighting brand) at the same price point as W’schmidt
Heublein added Popov lower than both
Module 1 - Stage 3 Management :Module 1 - Stage 3 Management Co-Brand Stealth Brand Fighting Brand Multi-Brand Fighting Brand
Built as new, independent brand
Prevents dilution of the leading brand
HLL introduced Wheel to fight Nirma
Module 1 - Stage 3 Management :Module 1 - Stage 3 Management There is a time and place to launch a second brand Immutable Law of Siblings
Slide 42:Possibly even a third or a fourth brand..
Module 1 - Stage 3 Management :Module 1 - Stage 3 Management Co-Brand Stealth Brand Fighting Brand Multi-Brand Multi Brand
Key to a multi-brand approach is to give each sibling a unique identity
Time, Fortune,Life, Money, People
Tempting to mash the brands and top it with corporate frosting
Tata Salt,Tata Tea
Second brand risks diluting equity
Is Kingfisher Mild drinker more likely to be from Kingfisher or from Fosters?
Module 1 - Stage 3 Management :Module 1 - Stage 3 Management Co-Brand Stealth Brand Fighting Brand Multi-Brand Multi Brand..
Common product area focus
Shampoos: Clinic Plus, Ayush, Sunsilk
Single attribute segmentation
Price:Maruti 800, Zen, Esteem
Sibling creates a new category
Herbal Anti-Dandruff category by Ayush
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Attributes Module 1 Understanding Branding Exercise Architecture Management Products to brands Architecture
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Attributes Module 1 Understanding Branding Exercise Management Products to brands House of Brands Endorsed Brand Sub Brand Branded House
Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture :Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture Immutable Law of Contraction A brand becomes stronger when you narrow its focus
Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture :Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture The Economist is red and daring.
Provocative, brutally honest and non-conformist
Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture :Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture Products to brands House of Brands Endorsed Brand Sub Brand Branded House House of Brands
Often dictated by corporate strategy. Core competence of the firm is marketing / branding
P&G is the prime example. Its “big” with the channel
Multiple independent brands allows company to fill each niche
Helps brand focus
Gives an opportunity for the company to focus on each brand and contract its scope.
Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture :Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture Products to brands House of Brands Endorsed Brand Sub Brand Branded House Endorsed Brand
Endorsement used as a device to transfer brand assets from one brand(corporate) to another
Titan from TATA, transferring trust
Danger of diluting the equity of endorsing brand
Best as a transitional strategy
Gain, from makers of Ariel
Module 1 - Stage 4Architecture :Module 1 - Stage 4Architecture Immutable Law of Expansion Brand’s power inversely proportional to scope.
Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture :Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture The Volkswagen bus ad, talked only about ‘plenty of room’
Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture :Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture Products to brands House of Brands Endorsed Brand Sub Brand Branded House Sub Brand
Inside out branding.Company pushes core brand in different directions
Sub-branding can destroy what branding builds
Donna Karan menswear, DKNY, DKNY menswear, DKNY kids
Module 1 - Stage 4Architecture :Module 1 - Stage 4Architecture Immutable Law of Company Brands are brands, companies are companies.
There is a difference.
Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture :Module 1 - Stage 4 Architecture Products to brands House of Brands Endorsed Brand Sub Brand Branded House Branded house
Consumers buy brands, not companies
Danger of branded house, being many things to one group of people
Virgin? Does “Virgin trains” work?
May motivate trade, so might be useful for PR purposes with trade/other stakeholders
P& G way
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Attributes Module 1 Understanding Branding Exercise Architecture Management Products to brands Exercise
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Module 1 Understanding Branding Two brand positioning within the same brand family?How do we reconcile the two positions?
The options available to us
Single brand
Stand Alone New Brand
Transfer of Brand Assets from an existing brand
What are the pros and cons of each option ? Exercise
Module 1 Understanding Branding :Attributes Module 1 Understanding Branding Architecture Management Products to brands Options Single Brand Family Stand Alone Brand Transfer of Brand Assets
Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise :Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise Options Single Brand Family Stand Alone Brand Transfer of Brand Assets Single Brand Family
‘Stand-alone’ New Brand
Transfer of Brand Assets ‘x from y’
Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise :Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise Options Single Brand Family Stand Alone Brand Transfer of Brand Assets Option : Single Brand family
Constant values / different products
Dettol antiseptic / soap / hand wash
Crest toothpaste / Mouth wash (But not chewing gum)
Differentiate on product usage
IBM Value Point - Entry level purchase
Gillette Good News Line - Disposables
Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise :Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise Options Single Brand Family Stand Alone Brand Transfer of Brand Assets Option : Single Brand family
Use as umbrella branding
TATA Trust
SONY Electronic technology
But Taj from TATA for Performance segments
Difficult for a single brand to straddle Performance and Price segments
Surf entry in popular segment with Surf Easywash. Withdrew after 2 yrs
Gap changed Gap Warehouse to Old Navy Clothing due to perceived brand erosion
Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise :Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise Options Single Brand Family Stand Alone Brand Transfer of Brand Assets Option : Single Brand family
Learnings
+ Cheaper than creating a new brand
- Difficult to stretch brands across Price and Performance
- Risk of eroding present position
- Lose opportunity of creating a new segment
Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise :Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise Options Single Brand Family Stand Alone Brand Transfer of Brand Assets Option : ‘Stand-alone’ New Brand
Levers enters popular segment successfully with Wheel as opposed to Surf Easywash
Levers use of brand-wise differentiation of brand values and attributes to target consumer segments- Surf / Rin / Wheel / OK detergents
Toyota launches Lexus to enter the Premium Auto segment credibly
Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise :Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise Options Single Brand Family Stand Alone Brand Transfer of Brand Assets Option : ‘Stand-alone’ New Brand
Learnings
+ Clear brand identity, values and assets
+ Create new opportunity of a range possibility in Popular segment
+ Leave present brand secure
- Expensive to build brand assets
- Difficult to build trial as a stand-alone Brand
Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise :Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise Options Single Brand Family Stand Alone Brand Transfer of Brand Assets Option: Transfer of Brand Assets ‘x from y’
Titan (from Tata’s)
Worked well for Titan
Sonata (from Titan)
Eroding equity of Titan
Gain (from the makers of Ariel)
Apparently a ‘Transitional Strategy’
Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise :Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise Options Single Brand Family Stand Alone Brand Transfer of Brand Assets Option: Transfer of Brand Assets ‘x from y’
Learnings
+ Cheaper than developing a new brand
+ Can be used as a ‘Transitional Strategy’
- Still a risk of eroding present image
- Possible mix of values and assets
Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise :Module 1 - Stage5 Exercise Options Single Brand Family Stand Alone Brand Transfer of Brand Assets Branding Options: Conclusion
‘Single Brand family possible if:
Different products / similar values
Differentiate on end use
‘Stand-alone ‘New Brand’ best option to straddle values - however it is expensive to create a new Brand
‘Transfer of Brand assets ‘x from y’’ possible, especially as a transitional strategy - still a risk of eroding present values and mixing values and assets
Slide 68:www.mastersungroup.com
http://strategy-execution.blogspot.com
chandra@mastersunindia.com