Slide1:
October 3, 2002
Michael J. Bowers
Legal Aspects of WMD Events: Legal Aspects of WMD Events Background
Jurisdiction
Martial Law
Mutual Aid Agreements
Quarantine
Evacuation
Official Liability
Slide7: “The purpose of terrorism is to terrorize.” Mao Tse Tung Weapons of Mass Destruction
WMD Threat: WMD Threat Terrorist Goals
disrupt society
produce mass panic and terror
get publicity
Terrorism Exists Because . . .: It is cheap
It is mobile
It is low tech
It is deniable
It is more effective than the political process
It is less drastic than total warfare
and IT WORKS!
Terrorism Exists Because . . .
WMD Threat: WMD Threat Easy to obtain
Cost-effective
cost per casualty
Nuclear $2 million
Chemical $2 thousand
Biological $2
WMD ThreatUnique Features: WMD Threat Unique Features Fear
Lack of Training
Lack of Equipment
Potential for Mass Casualties
Psychological Casualties
Crime Scene/Evidence Collection
Slide13: U.S. Militant Islamic Groups
Terrorism - Definitions: Terrorism - Definitions “The unlawful use of force or violence committed by a group or individual against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” Federal Bureau of Investigation
Terrorism - Definitions: Terrorism - Definitions “Transnational” terrorism is terrorism that transcends national boundaries. Transnational terrorism occurs when the target group and the victims (both individually and/or institutionally), the perpetrators, the terrorist action, the mechanics of resolution, and other ramifications transcend national boundaries.
Terrorism - Definitions: Terrorism - Definitions “State terrorism” is terrorism conducted by a government against its own citizens within its own borders.
Terrorism - Definitions: Terrorism - Definitions “International terrorism” is often referred to as state-sponsored terrorism. International terrorism is transnational terrorism that is conducted by individuals or groups that are controlled by a sovereign state.
Terrorism - Definitions: Terrorism - Definitions “Domestic terrorism” is terrorism that is directed against the citizens, government, or other institutions, of one nation by terrorists or terrorist groups that inhabit that same nation.
WMD Threat: WMD Threat Chemical
Biological
Nuclear
Conventional Weapons (explosives)
Slide20: SMALL POX - 40,000,000 ANTHRAX - 10,000,000 TULAREMIA
PNEUMONIC PLAGUE
1,000,000 CHEMICAL
ORGANOPHOSPHATE
10,000 Illustrative Population at Risk
TERRORIST THREATS: TERRORIST THREATS Conventional
weapons
Unconventional
weapons
CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS: CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS Bombs
Guns
Chemical Agents: Chemical Agents Nerve
sarin, tabun, soman
Pulmonary (choking)
phosgene, chlorine
Vesicants (blister)
lewisite, phosgene oxime
Blood agents
hydrogen cyanide, cyanogen chloride
Biological Agents: Biological Agents Bacteria
anthrax, E. coli, salmonella, plague, Q-fever, tularemia
Viruses
smallpox, influenza, hantavirus
Toxins
botulinum, ricin, staph, enterotoxin B
Biological - Key Points: Biological - Key Points Hospital as “First Responder”
Surveillance - Recognize Event
Isolation/Quarantine - Decision
Relationship with Public Health
Mortuary Services
Slide26: …The guy next door?
Nuclear/Radiological Threats: Nuclear/Radiological Threats Radiation sources in hospitals
Transportation accidents
Nuclear power plant accident
Radiological device
Conventional WeaponsExplosives: Conventional Weapons Explosives World Trade Center - 1993
Oklahoma City Bombing - 1995
Embassy Bombings (Africa) - 1998
World Trade Center - Sep 11, 2001
Pentagon - Sep 11, 2001
Slide29: *Dead - < 2,819
First Responders:
343 (FDNY/NJFD)
62 (NYPD/PAPD )
4 (EMS) * As of 08/29/02
TRENDS IN TERRORISM: TRENDS IN TERRORISM Groups involved with unconventional
weapons tend to be:
Single-issue groups
Abortion
Animal rights
Religious Extremists
Nationalist / separatist groups
Apocalyptic groups
TRENDS IN TERRORISM: TRENDS IN TERRORISM Targets today are:
General population
(indiscriminate attacks)
Symbolic buildings or organizations
NEW TRENDS IN TERRORISM: NEW TRENDS IN TERRORISM
TRENDS IN TERRORISM: TRENDS IN TERRORISM Overall, terrorist groups will
become:
less state-sponsored
more transnational
less accountable
more interested in mass casualties
The United States government estimates individual states’ unconventional weapons capabilities as follows:: The United States government estimates individual states’ unconventional weapons capabilities as follows:
Slide35:
Libya
Iran, Iraq, Libya, N. Korea
China, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Libya, Myanmar, N. Korea, Pakistan, Syria, Taiwan, Yemen, former Yugoslavia
China, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, N. Korea, Russia, S. Korea, Syria, Taiwan, Vietnam
Israel
Libya?
India, Russia, US China, France, Russia, UK, US, India, Pakistan Chemical Weapons Biological Weapons Nuclear Weapons Declared Current Possessors Suspected Possessors Suspected of Attempting Acquisition
Slide36: Former
Soviet military
Russian mob
Drug cartels
Private
companies
PLO
IRA Hezbollah
Chechen rebels
Algerian Islamic
rebels
Kurdish guerillas
Timothy McVeigh
Rwandan militias
Sendero Luminoso Ramzi
Yousef
Bosnian
Serbs Suicidal
cults Aum
Bin
Laden Lunatic fringe
Right-wing
militias Interested in
Using CBRN Capable of Obtaining CBRN Interested in Mass Casualty International Group Capabilities
- (Events) suggest that the technical barriers to mass casualty terrorism are eroding.”Jonathan TuckerMonterey Institute: - (Events) suggest that the technical barriers to mass casualty terrorism are eroding.” Jonathan Tucker Monterey Institute
Slide38: 1. Abu Nidal Organization (ANO)
2. Abu Sayyaf Group
3. Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade
4. Armed Islamic Group
5. 'Asbat al-Ansar
6. Aum Shinrikyo
7. Basque Fatherland and Liberty (ETA)
8. Gama'a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group)
9. Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement)
10. Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HUM)
11. Hizballah (Party of God)
12. Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU)
13. Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM) (Army of Mohammed)
14 . Al-Jihad (Egyptian Islamic Jihad)
15. Kahane Chai (Kach)
16. Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK)
17. Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LT) (Army of the Righteous)
18. Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
19. Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK)
20. National Liberation Army (ELN)
21. Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ)
22. Palestine Liberation Front (PLF)
23. Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
(PFLP)
24. PFLP-General Command (PFLP-GC)
25. Al-Qaida
26. Real IRA
27. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia
(FARC)
28. Revolutionary Nuclei (formerly ELA)
29. Revolutionary Organization 17 November
30. Revolutionary People's Liberation
Army/Front (DHKP/C)
31. Salafist Group for Call and Combat (GSPC)
32. Shining Path (Sendero Luminoso, SL)
33. United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia
(AUC)
34. Jemaah Islamiyah
World Terrorist Organizations
Slide39: U.S. Militant Islamic Groups
The Federal Response Plan/The Federal Terrorism Conplan: The Federal Response Plan/ The Federal Terrorism Conplan An Overview
FEMA MISSION: Reduce the loss of life and property in disasters
Protect our Nation’s critical infrastructure from all hazards
Lead and support a comprehensive emergency management program of mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery FEMA MISSION
STAFFORD ACT: Applies to natural disasters and other emergencies
Supplements resources of State and local governments and disaster relief organizations
Requires a Presidential declaration of a major disaster or emergency
Basis for federal funding for disasters and emergencies STAFFORD ACT
WHEN IS THE FRP IMPLEMENTED?: In response to an actual event requiring Federal assistance under a Presidential declaration of a major disaster or emergency
In anticipation of a significant event likely to result in a need for Federal assistance WHEN IS THE FRP IMPLEMENTED?
Slide46: A National team would augment Regional resources during response phase of a catastrophic disaster. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER RESPONSE
United States Government’s Role in Support of Catastrophic Events: United States Government’s Role in Support of Catastrophic Events
The US Government is there when needed!: The US Government is there when needed! United States Government responders will be in a “in support of” role when providing consequence management support to local and state governments. This element is key when providing Federal assistance to civil authority.
Federal assets remain under Federal control
Domestic Emergency Continuum: Most Likely Least Likely Greatest Least Probability HAZMAT -- MAJOR FLOODING LOCAL & STATE FEDERAL HURRICANE -- IND CBNRE Protests -- Severe Storms -- Civil Disturbance -- Impact Domestic Emergency Continuum
WHAT HELP IS AVAILABLE?: Initial response resources, including food, water, and emergency generators
Emergency services to clear debris, open critical transportation routes, restore public utilities, and provide mass sheltering and feeding
Specialized teams for rapid damage assessment, emergency communications, medical assistance and support, urban search and rescue, emergency power restoration and incident management WHAT HELP IS AVAILABLE?
EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTIONS (ESF’s): The FRP employs a functional approach that groups under 12 ESFs the types of direct Federal assistance that a State is most likely to need
Each ESF is headed by a primary agency designated on the basis of its authorities, resources, and capability in that functional area
Federal response assistance is provided using some or all ESFs as necessary
Federal ESF representatives coordinate with their counterpart State agencies EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTIONS (ESF’s)
Slide52: THE 12 ESFs Transportation
Department of Transportation
Communications
National Communications System
Public Works and Engineering
Department of Defense/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Firefighting
Department of Agriculture/Forest Service
Information and Planning
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Mass Care
American Red Cross Resource Support
General Services Administration
Health and Medical Services
Department of Health and Human Services
Urban Search and Rescue
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Hazardous Materials
Environmental Protection Agency
Food
Department of Agriculture/Food and Nutrition Service
Energy
Department of Energy
Slide53: Following a declaration, the President may direct any Federal agency to use its authorities and resources in support of State and local assistance efforts
This authority has also been delegated to the FEMA Director; the Associate Director, Response and Recovery; the FEMA Regional Directors; and the Federal Coordinating Officer
They may activate some or all of the structures of the FRP to meet the needs of the situation FRP ACTIVATION
Slide54: FEMA Regions 2 1 USPACOM USSOUTHCOM (US Northern Command) Area Office - Hawaii Area Office - P.R.
Slide56: FEMA President Tiered Disaster/Emergency Response DCO
NUNN LUGAR DOMENICI OVERVIEW: NLD Defense Against Weapons of Mass
Destruction Act of 1996 directed DOD as
lead to:
Train first responders
Establish a chemical/biological hot line
Loan equipment
Use National Guard as State/local asset for response. NUNN LUGAR DOMENICI OVERVIEW
POLICIES & AUTHORITIES: POLICIES & AUTHORITIES Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) #39, U.S. Policy on Counterterrorism, June 21, 1995
PDD #62, Protection Against Unconventional Threats to Homeland and Americans Overseas, May 22, 1998
PDD #63, Protecting American’s Critical Infrastructure, May 22, 1998
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, PL-93-288
PDDs # 39 & 62: PDDs # 39 & 62 Set National policy against terrorism
Require that Federal agencies cooperate to detect, prevent, defeat, and manage consequences of WMD incidents
Support the Federal Response Plan (FRP) Terrorism Incident Annex
Support Federal Terrorism Plan
CRISIS MANAGEMENT(Lead Federal Agency - FBI): CRISIS MANAGEMENT (Lead Federal Agency - FBI) Measures to identify, acquire, and plan
the resources needed to:
Anticipate
Prevent
Resolve
a threat or act of terrorism.
CONSEQUENCE MANAGEMENTLead Federal Agency - FEMA): CONSEQUENCE MANAGEMENT Lead Federal Agency - FEMA) Measures to:
Protect public health and safety
Restore essential government services
Provide emergency relief to governments, businesses, and individuals affected by the consequences of terrorism.
Responsibilities: Responsibilities Crisis Mgm’t - FBI
Consequence
Mgm’t -
FEMA
WMD VS. DISASTER RESPONSE: WMD VS. DISASTER RESPONSE Similarities:
Mass casualties
Damage to buildings
Evacuation
Mass sheltering
Effect the economy
Public reaction
WMD VS. DISASTER RESPONSE: Differences:
Deliberate act
Crime scene
May not be recognizable as terrorist act
Mass contamination
Public reaction - fear WMD VS. DISASTER RESPONSE
Slide65: FBI LEAD
On Scene Cdr. (OSC)
Federal,
State,
Local /
Private
Sectors Federal,
State,
Local /
Private
Sectors CRISIS CONSEQUENCE Law Enforcement
Starts Here
FEMA LEAD
(Focus on Effects)
Consequence
Starts Here Management SHARPENING THE RESPONSE TO WMD Management Coordinating the Interface The Federal Terrorism Plan
THE FEDERAL TEAM (BIG 6): THE FEDERAL TEAM (BIG 6) Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Department of Defense
Department of Energy
Department of Health and Human Services
Environmental Protection Agency
Other supporting agencies
The Federal Response - To A Terrorist Incident (Federal Terrorism Plan): The Federal Response - To A Terrorist Incident (Federal Terrorism Plan) The President Attorney General
FBI Director SIOC OSC Command Post/JOC ROC ERT State EOC Local EOC UC* FEMA Director Scene *Unified Command Coordination Relationships
The Federal Response - To A Terrorist Incident (Federal Terrorism Plan): The Federal Response - To A Terrorist Incident (Federal Terrorism Plan) OSC Command Post/JOC/JIC FCO SCO State & Local Agencies Federal Agencies (FEMA) FBI
WHERE ARE WE NOW?: WHERE ARE WE NOW? NLD transfer from DOD to DOJ (ODP)
DOD and DOJ equipment grant programs
FEMA grants for planning and training
Office of Homeland Security
Office of National Programs (ONP) - FEMA
Homeland Security Agency (Pending)
Hospital administration (JCAHO 1.4, 2.4)
Jurisdictions: Jurisdictions Considerations and Implications
Jurisdiction, Federal: Jurisdiction, Federal Presidential Decision Directive 39 (PDD-39):
Threat or use of WMD considered an act of terrorism
FBI as lead federal agency to coordinate all aspects of the Federal response to WMD incident
Other federal agencies with significant responsibilities:
Department of Defense (DoD)
Department of Energy (DoE)
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Public Health Service (USPHS)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) prohibits use of military in civilian law enforcement
Jurisdiction, States: Jurisdiction, States Primarily responsible for exercise of both law enforcement and public health powers
Activation of National Guard into state service or federal service can be assumed
Use of National Guard in state service does not violate PCA
Particularly in biological or chemical attack, state agencies will likely identify WMD event and be burdened early
Jurisdiction, Local: Jurisdiction, Local Results of WMD event will overwhelm local resources
Number of casualties
Nature of casualties (victims of bio/chem agent requires decontamination and extraordinary care)
Local authorities will have best access to early useful information
Jurisdiction, General: Jurisdiction, General WMD events have federal, state and local jurisdictional implications
USC Title 10
Insurrection
Mobilization
USC Title 42
Quarantine
Interstate Commerce
“Home Rule”
Jurisdiction, General: Jurisdiction, General Consideration involves:
Area immediately impacted by WMD event
Areas remote to site of WMD event
Example: May (should) Governor of Florida activate National Guard in event of mass anthrax attack in state of Minnesota?
Can this be federally mandated?
Can this be federally prohibited?
Existing federal statutes that govern bio-terrorism incidents?
Considerations
Martial Law: Martial Law
The Posse Comitatus Act (PCA)(18 USC 1385): The Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) (18 USC 1385) Prohibits U.S. military personnel from performing law enforcement functions such as:
search and seizure
surveillance and pursuit
being informants, undercover agents or investigators
Martial Law: Martial Law PCA effectively precludes federal martial law
State Martial Law, examples:
Missouri
Georgia
Usage is extremely rare. Since civil war only time statute has been invoked in court cases in either state involved claims by members of National Guard to workers’ compensation benefits while on state active duty.
Martial Law, Cont.: Martial Law, Cont. “The Governor may, when in his opinion the circumstances so warrant, call out the organized militia or any portion thereof to execute the laws, suppress actual, and prevent threatened, insurrection and repel invasion. The governor, if in his judgment the maintenance of law and order will thereby be promoted, may by proclamation declare martial law throughout the state or any part thereof.” Missouri R.S. Mo. §41.480(1)
Martial Law, Cont.: Martial Law, Cont. “The Governor shall have the power, in case of invasion, disaster, insurrection, riot, breach of the peace, combination to oppose the enforcement of the law by force or violence, or imminent danger thereof, to order all or any part of the organized militia into the active service of the state…” Georgia O.C.G.A. § 38-2-6(a).
“Whenever any judge of a superior, city, or state court, sheriff or mayor of a municipality shall apprehend the outbreak of insurrection, riot, breach of the peace, combination to oppose the enforcement of the law by force or violence within the jurisdiction of which said officer is the conservator of the peace, it shall be [their duty], when it appears that the unlawful combination or disaster has progressed beyond the control of the civil authorities to notify the Governor; and the Governor may then, in his discretion” order the organized militia into the service of the State. Georgia O.C.G.A. § 38-2-6(b).
Mutual Aid Agreements: Mutual Aid Agreements
Mutual Aid Agreements: Mutual Aid Agreements Local Mutual Aid Agreements
Emergency Management Assistance Compacts (EMAC)
Interstate Civil Defense and Disaster Compacts
Mutual Aid Agreements: Mutual Aid Agreements Local Mutual Aid Agreements:
City/Country All-hazards
Law Enforcement
Medical
Mutual Aid Agreements: Mutual Aid Agreements Emergency Management Assistance Compacts (EMAC)
“The Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC) has
has been adopted by 41 states and 2 territories with additional states
planning to join. EMAC is an interstate mutual aid agreement ratified
by Congress, passed by state Legislatures and signed into law by the
Governors, and is well coordinated with the Federal Response Plan.
…Interstate and intrastate mutual aid assistance must be recognized
and supported by the federal government as an expedient,
cost-effective approach to disaster response and recovery…”
White Paper on Domestic Preparedness -
National Emergency Managers Association- October 1, 2001
Mutual Aid Agreements: Mutual Aid Agreements Interstate Civil Defense and Disaster Compacts
NY/NJ Civil Assistance Compact - 1954
Western Governor’s Compact
Quarantine: Quarantine
Quarantine: Quarantine “Compulsory physical separation, including restriction of movement, of populations or groups of healthy people who have been exposed to contagious disease, or efforts to segregate these persons within specified geographic areas”
Quarantine, cont.: Quarantine, cont. Distinct from “isolation” – separation and confinement of individuals known or suspected (via signs, symptoms or laboratory criteria) to be infected with a contagious disease to prevent them from transmitting disease to others
Quarantine, cont.: Quarantine, cont. Response to biological attack
Outside the experience of police authorities
Federal quarantine authority cannot be used in a situation that is confined to a single state
Some states and localities do not have statutory quarantine authority
Level of force acceptable to enforce quarantine
Quarantine, cont.: Quarantine, cont. Response to Biological Attack
Most commonly discussed “first option”, followed by “vaccination rings”
When is quarantine most commonly used today?
Do federal, state or local plans exist for quarantine?
Quarantine, cont.: Quarantine, cont. Outside the experience of police authorities
When was the last act of quarantine in the United States?
What common events today most closely resemble “quarantine law enforcement operations”?
What differences would exist or be implied?
Quarantine, cont.: Quarantine, cont. Federal quarantine authority cannot be used in a situation that is confined to a single state
USC Title 42 - Interstate Commerce
“...the Surgeon General under 42 USC 266 only has the authority to exercise quarantine powers if there is a declaration of war, the National Advisory Health Council (NAHC) recommends it, and there is an executive order specifying the communicable disease. “
Quarantine, cont.: Quarantine, cont. USC Title 42 - Interstate Commerce - cont.
Section 106(a), 42 USC 9606a ...control population movement.
"In addition to any other action taken by a State or local government, when the President determines that there may be an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or welfare or the environment because of an actual or threatened release of a hazardous substance..., he may require the Attorney General of the U.S. to secure such relief as may be necessary to abate such danger or threat, and the district court of the U.S. in the district in which the threat occurs shall have jurisdiction to grant such relief as the public interest and the equities of the case may require. The President may also, after notice to the affected State, take other action under this section, including, but not limited to, issuing such orders as may be necessary to protect public health and welfare and the environment."
Quarantine, cont.: Some states and localities do not have statutory quarantine authority
“Model State Emergency Health Powers Act - Oct, 2001”
Center for Disease Control (Georgetown & Johns Hopkins Universities)
NGA
National Conference of State Legislatures
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
National Association of City and County Health Officers
National Association of Attorneys General
Quarantine, cont.
Quarantine, cont.: Level of force acceptable to enforce quarantine
“Rules of Engagement”
Ingress/egress
Use of “deadly force”
Newer non-lethal “weapons” being developed and might be considered (example: non-lethal acoustic weapons for area denial, establishing cordons, crowd direction) Quarantine, cont.
Evacuation: Evacuation
Evacuation: Evacuation Evacuation in a chemical attack is theoretical equivalent to quarantine in a biological attack
Similar issues to quarantine
Lack of police experience
Use of force
Safety of responders
Liability for personal property
Evacuation, cont.: Evacuation, cont. Issues: Lack of police experience
More recent similar events
Hurricane evacuations
Tornado aftermath
Mandatory/Non-mandatory
Evacuation, cont.: Evacuation, cont. Use of force “Rules of Engagement”
Forcible Removal
Use of “deadly force”
Confiscation of property
etc.
Evacuation, cont.: Evacuation, cont. Safety of responders
Exposure to contagious/infectious disease
Self-defense (force protection)
Workman’s compensation
Tort liability
Under Mutual aid agreements
Evacuation, cont.: Evacuation, cont. Liability for personal property Security of premises
Liability for losses/damage
LIABILITY: LIABILITY
Official Liability, State Law: Official Liability, State Law Old System – Sovereign Immunity
“Exposure of municipalities and public officials to lawsuits has evolved over time from almost complete protection under the doctrine of sovereign immunity to ….”
Official Liability, State Law: Official Liability, State Law Current System – Liability for Wrongful Acts and Omissions
“With specific immunities, exceptions, and limits – municipalities and public officials are subject to liability for their wrongful acts and omissions in the same way that people and private corporations are liable.”
Official Liability, State Law: Official Liability, State Law Wrongful Acts and Omissions
“Municipalities are generally responsible for the wrongful acts and omissions of their agents, employees, and elected and appointed officials when those people are acting within the scope of their authority.”
Official Liability, State Law: Official Liability, State Law Public officials can be sued personally for their activities on behalf of the municipality. Generally, public officials are indemnified for their official activities by state law. The municipality is required to defend and pay any claims brought against the public official, unless the public official commits an act that is outside the scope of official responsibilities or where the activities are committed intentionally, with knowledge of wrongdoing.
Official Liability, Missouri: Official Liability, Missouri Official Immunity - Public employees not personally liable for negligent acts related to discretionary duties performed within scope of authority
Official Liability, Missouri: Official Liability, Missouri Public employees are liable for negligently performing ministerial acts. Ministerial acts are acts that individual performs without exercising opinion or judgment (see Green vs Clayton [TAB A] and Sherer Law Review - TAB B)
Official Liability, Missouri: Official Liability, Missouri Public employees personally responsible for actions which are not within the scope of their official responsibilities and where employee’s activities are committed intentionally, with knowledge of wrongdoing
Official Liability, Missouri: Official Liability, Missouri Specific statutory exemption for state employees acting in their official capacity in connection with hazardous waste cleanup activities (see R.S. Mo. § 260-500) and activities connected to emergency response commission and committees (see R.S. Mo. § 260-600).