IMP

Views:
 
Category: Education
     
 

Presentation Description

No description available.

Comments

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1: 

INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA PROJECTS INCREASE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE PREPARATION FOR THE WORKFORCE MOTIVATE STUDENTS I M P

INCREASE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE : 

INCREASE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE Technology improves performance when: Directly support the objectives of the curriculum Provides for student collaboration Effective evaluation is used Integrated into instructional day Creative opportunities are present The use of technology is supported Center for Applied Research in Technology (2005). Retrieved January 28, 2010 from http://caret.iste.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=answers&QuestionID=1 In West Virginia, increases in student test scores on the SAT-9 were attributable to the alignment of the targeted curriculum objectives with technology (Mann, 1998). FACT

MOTIVATE STUDENTS : 

MOTIVATE STUDENTS Technology improves motivation and interest when: Computer programs maximize students’ success Students produce and share their work In support of a knowledge base Students interact with challenging game-like programs Computer based instruction allows for instance feedback in a semi-private environment enabling students to build self-esteem (Underwood & Brown, 1997). FACT Center for Applied Research in Technology (2005). Retrieved January 28, 2010 from http://caret.iste.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=answers&QuestionID=1

PREPARATION FOR THE WORKFORCE : 

PREPARATION FOR THE WORKFORCE Technology prepares students for the workforce when: Computer programs are the same as the ones used in the “real world” Students are shown the benefits of communication Students are shown the benefits of technology Technology can assist students learn workforce skills and help students prepare for the work place while utilizing problem solving skills (Cradler, 1994). FACT Center for Applied Research in Technology (2005). Retrieved January 28, 2010 from http://caret.iste.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=answers&QuestionID=1

Slide 5: 

Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2009). Retrieved January 28, 2010, from http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/ATC/Collaboratory/Idea/mm-why.html

CONCERNS : 

CONCERNS Logistical Considerations Training and Workshops Implementation Teachers! Technical Considerations Technology availability Funding

References : 

References Center for Applied Research in Technology (2005). Retrieved January 28, 2010 from http://caret.iste.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=answers&QuestionID=1 Cradler, J. (1994). Summary of research and evaluation findings relating to technology in education. San Mateo, CA: Educational Support Systems. Retrieved March 20, 2003 from http://www.wested.org/techpolicy/refind.html Mann, D., Shakeshaft, C., Becker, J., & Kottkamp, R. (1998). West Virginia story: Achievement gains from a statewide comprehensive instructional technology program. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Educational Technology. Underwood, J., & Brown, J. (Eds.). (1997). Integrated learning systems: Potential into practice. Oxford, UK: Heinemann/NCET. Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2009). Retrieved January 28, 2010, from http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/ATC/Collaboratory/Idea/mm-why.html