logging in or signing up Evaluation Tool for CSI ralugersyadiloh Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Let's Connect Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Copy embed code: Embed: Flash iPad Dynamic Copy Does not support media & animations Automatically changes to Flash or non-Flash embed WordPress Embed Customize Embed URL: Copy Thumbnail: Copy The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 204 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: January 23, 2012 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description Performance evaluation for crime scene investigation. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript by MELCON S. LAPINA, MSCrim Dean of Criminology John Paul II College of Davao Davao City: by MELCON S. LAPINA, MSCrim Dean of Criminology John Paul II College of Davao Davao City Evaluation Tool for Students’ Performance in CSIPowerPoint Presentation: Objectives: To come up with a unified performance evaluation tool for crime scene investigation which is academically and industrially validated, verified and reviewed; To be able to objectively rate the performance of students, thereby giving justice to their time, money and effort in the preparation of the mock crime scene; To hold an inter-school tournament on crime scene investigation, initially region-wide and ultimately nationwide;PowerPoint Presentation: Objectives: cont… To propose for the institutionalization of mock crime scene investigation using performance evaluation tool in the form of CMO; and To suggest to the PNP the adoption of the evaluation tool for proper and objective assessment of the learning of the PNP trainees in the crime scene investigation.PowerPoint Presentation: Salient Features of the Evaluation Tool Utilization of the usual qualitative assessment of performance and its equivalent quantitative weight; Conversion of quantitative weight into transmuted rating; and Arbitrary selection of CSI practices to constitute as one unit or step in the CSI.PowerPoint Presentation: How It Works Ideally, there shall be 3 evaluators – 1 from the academe, 1 from the SOCO and another from the local PNP investigator. Before the actual evaluation, there shall be briefing and clarification as to the criteria to be evaluated; The evaluators shall rate the performance per item in the criteria by writing a check mark [√] on the appropriate box.PowerPoint Presentation: The performance shall be evaluated on the following rating:PowerPoint Presentation: How It Works The number of check [√] marks under a certain quantitative weight shall be tallied . 4 for weight 5 6 for weight 4 5 for weight 3 2 for weight 2 0 for weight 1PowerPoint Presentation: How It Works Get the weight sum: 63PowerPoint Presentation: How It Works Get the Average of Weight Sum (AWS).PowerPoint Presentation: How It Works Get the equivalent transmuted rating:PowerPoint Presentation: How It Works Get the qualitative assessment based on the result of AWS.PowerPoint Presentation: How It Works Get the total of ER from the 10 areas by multiplying each ER per relative weight assigned to each area.PowerPoint Presentation: How It Works Example of computation of getting Total ER:PowerPoint Presentation: How It Works Get the total of WS from the 10 areas by multiplying each WS per relative weight assigned to each area. Final Qualitative Assessment = GoodPowerPoint Presentation: Some Important Remarks: The selection of criteria per area is arbitrarily done from the references. Thus, this is subject to further polishing. The assignment of relative weight per area is also arbitrary. Thus, this is subject to further study. The formula adopted for arriving ER is 50-based. To raise the standard, it can be adjusted to 60-based or better yet, 0-based.PowerPoint Presentation: Thank you for listening You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.