Evaluation Tool for CSI

Views:
 
Category: Education
     
 

Presentation Description

Performance evaluation for crime scene investigation.

Comments

Presentation Transcript

by MELCON S. LAPINA, MSCrim Dean of Criminology John Paul II College of Davao Davao City:

by MELCON S. LAPINA, MSCrim Dean of Criminology John Paul II College of Davao Davao City Evaluation Tool for Students’ Performance in CSI

PowerPoint Presentation:

Objectives: To come up with a unified performance evaluation tool for crime scene investigation which is academically and industrially validated, verified and reviewed; To be able to objectively rate the performance of students, thereby giving justice to their time, money and effort in the preparation of the mock crime scene; To hold an inter-school tournament on crime scene investigation, initially region-wide and ultimately nationwide;

PowerPoint Presentation:

Objectives: cont… To propose for the institutionalization of mock crime scene investigation using performance evaluation tool in the form of CMO; and To suggest to the PNP the adoption of the evaluation tool for proper and objective assessment of the learning of the PNP trainees in the crime scene investigation.

PowerPoint Presentation:

Salient Features of the Evaluation Tool Utilization of the usual qualitative assessment of performance and its equivalent quantitative weight; Conversion of quantitative weight into transmuted rating; and Arbitrary selection of CSI practices to constitute as one unit or step in the CSI.

PowerPoint Presentation:

How It Works Ideally, there shall be 3 evaluators – 1 from the academe, 1 from the SOCO and another from the local PNP investigator. Before the actual evaluation, there shall be briefing and clarification as to the criteria to be evaluated; The evaluators shall rate the performance per item in the criteria by writing a check mark [√] on the appropriate box.

PowerPoint Presentation:

The performance shall be evaluated on the following rating:

PowerPoint Presentation:

How It Works The number of check [√] marks under a certain quantitative weight shall be tallied . 4 for weight 5 6 for weight 4 5 for weight 3 2 for weight 2 0 for weight 1

PowerPoint Presentation:

How It Works Get the weight sum: 63

PowerPoint Presentation:

How It Works Get the Average of Weight Sum (AWS).

PowerPoint Presentation:

How It Works Get the equivalent transmuted rating:

PowerPoint Presentation:

How It Works Get the qualitative assessment based on the result of AWS.

PowerPoint Presentation:

How It Works Get the total of ER from the 10 areas by multiplying each ER per relative weight assigned to each area.

PowerPoint Presentation:

How It Works Example of computation of getting Total ER:

PowerPoint Presentation:

How It Works Get the total of WS from the 10 areas by multiplying each WS per relative weight assigned to each area. Final Qualitative Assessment = Good

PowerPoint Presentation:

Some Important Remarks: The selection of criteria per area is arbitrarily done from the references. Thus, this is subject to further polishing. The assignment of relative weight per area is also arbitrary. Thus, this is subject to further study. The formula adopted for arriving ER is 50-based. To raise the standard, it can be adjusted to 60-based or better yet, 0-based.

PowerPoint Presentation:

Thank you for listening