azotobacter as biofertilizer

Category: Education

Presentation Description

biofertilizers are very useful


Presentation Transcript

Slide 1:

Azotobacter as Biofertilizer Sangeeta Paul

Slide 2:

Azotobacter belongs to the family Azotobacteraceae . This family includes various gram negative, aerobic, heterotrophic, catalase positive, free-living diazotrophic bacteria. The first species of the genus Azotobacter , named Azotobacter chroococcum , was isolated from the soil in Holland in 1901 by Beijerinck. Along with Rhizobium, Azotobacter is the most extensively studied genus among the saprophytes. Winogradsky (1932) discovered that Azotobacter released ammonia into the soil. This started work on harnessing of Azotobacter for the benefit of plant and to improve soil fertility.

Slide 3:

At present six species of Azotobacter are known – A. chroococcum A. vinelandii A. nigricans A. paspali A. armenicus A. salinestris Azotobacter are much more abundant in the rhizosphere of plants than in the surrounding soil and that this abundance depends on the crop species. A. chroococcum is the most commonly found species in soils.

Slide 4:

Identifying characteristics of the genus Azotobacter Large ovoid cells 1.5-2.0 m m or more in diameter. Pleomorphic, ranging from rods to coccoid cells. All the species of this genus form cysts. Motile by peritrichous flagella or non-motile. Aerobic Production of water-soluble and water insoluble pigments. Nitrogen fixers, generally fix nonsymbiotically at least 10 mg of atmospheric nitrogen/g of carbohydrate consumed. Catalase positive.

Slide 5:

Bio-fertilizers Bio-fertilizers are not fertilizers, which directly give nutrition to crop plants. These are cultures of microorganisms like bacteria, fungi, packed in a carrier material. Thus, the critical input in Biofertilizers is the microorganisms. They help the plants indirectly through better Nitrogen (N) fixation or improving the nutrient availability in the soil.

Slide 6:

Potential of Azotobacter in Agriculture Gerlach and Vogel (1902) initiated work on artificial inoculation of seeds with A. chroococcum and reported an increase of dry matter in buck wheat by 42 per cent. Kostychev et al. (1926) recommended the use of Azotobacte r to improve the growth of agricultural plants and soil properties. A. chroococcum and A. vinelandii have long been used as soil and seed inoculants. Azotobacter is a broad spectrum biofertilizer and can be used as inoculant for most of agricultural crops. With emphasis on development of sustainability in agriculture, Azotobacter is an important bioinoculant especially in organic farming.

Slide 7:

Yield of a number of crops have been improved by inoculation with Azotobacter like cereals, millets, vegetables, fruits, and fiber and oil producing commercial crops. The yield increases usually range around 10-35%. Higher benefits are accrued at lower fertilizer levels. Azotobacter when applied as seed inoculant can add 15-20 kg/ha nitrogen to the soil. Although benefits obtained due to Azotobacter inoculation may not be as visible as that of chemical fertilizers, application of Azotobacter bioinoculant should not be viewed from only the angle of nutrient supply to the crops. Since they also add life to the soil rendered sterile by the excessive use of chemicals and also stimulate activity of other beneficial soil microorganisms.

Slide 8:

Benefits to the crop Increase in percentage of seed germination Increased root and shoot length Improved nitrogen nutrition Reduction in disease incidence Increase in grain yield Improved post harvest seed quality in terms of germination

Slide 9:

S. No. Crop Percent increase in grain yield 1. Cotton 15-23 2. Wheat 6-17 3. Maize 15-20 4. Sorghum 8-35 5. Potato 6-14 6. Pea 36-60 7. Cabbage 33.5 8. Rice 17.7 9. Onion 10-17 10. Chickpea 19-42 11. Finger millet 37-39 12. Pearl millet 10-12 Improvement in crop production due to Azotobacter inoculation

Slide 10:

S. No. Crop Percent increase in grain yield 1 2 3 4 Mango Kinnaw Mandarin Lemon 30-32 21.1 21.1 25-35 Improvement in fruit production due to Azotobacter inoculation

Slide 11:

Mode of action of Azotobacter The beneficial influence of Azotobacter on plant growth is attributed to a number of factors. These being – Direct mechanism of plant growth improvement Biological nitrogen fixation under free-living conditions Productions of phytohormones like indole 3-acetic acid, gibberrillin-like substances and cytokinins Solubilization of insoluble phosphates Indirect mechanism of plant growth improvement by biocontrol Antagonism against phytopathogens by Production of siderophores Production of antifungal compounds Induction of defense enzymes

Slide 12:

Strain Nitrogen fixation efficiency (mg N/g sucrose consumed) Excretion of IAA (mg/ml of culture filtrate) Production of GLS (grades of fluorescence) A-41 7.9 3.0 +++ B-1 5.3 1.8 ++ B-2 6.6 1.1 ++ C-1 9.5 1.7 +++ C-2 7.9 2.7 +++ M-2 10.0 2.8 +++ M-4 ND a 0.8 + M-6 1.8 ND + P-1 6.2 1.5 ++ P-2 6.2 2.5 ++ P-4 6.5 3.0 +++ W-2 1.5 1.6 + W-3 9.2 1.6 + W-5 7.5 2.5 ++ Plant growth-promoting activities of different strains of Azotobacter chroococcum (Apte and Shende, 1981) + yellowish green fluorescence, ++ greenish yellow fluorescence, +++ greenish fluorescence a Not detectable

Slide 13:

Effect of Azotobacter inoculation on seed germination Crop % germination over control Cotton 1.7-33.3 Rice 1.6-16.8 Maize 3-27 Wheat 4.6-24

Slide 14:

Biocontrol Azotobacter is also known to suppress phytopathogens or reduce their deleterious effects thereby improving plant growth. Incidence of fungal, bacterial and viral diseases in the crops is reduced by Azotobacter inoculation (Sidorov, 1954; Samitsevich, 1962; Singh, 1977; Meshram, 1984). Various mechanisms like production of siderophores, antifungal compounds and defense enzymes have been proposed for antagonistic action of A. chroococcum on phytopathogens (Schroth and Hancock, 1982; Verma et al. , 2001). Flag smut incidence in wheat was significantly reduced due to azotobacterization (Beniwal et al. , 1996). There was reduction of loose smut of wheat ( Ustilago tritici ), yellow leaf spot of wheat ( Helminthosporium tritici-vulgaris ), powdery mildew ( Erysiphe sp.) and bacterial blight of bean ( Xanthomonas phaseoli ) by application of Azotobacter ( Beltyukova, 1953). Sidorov (1954) observed a reduction in the attack of Phytophthora infestans and Streptomyces scabies on potato crop due to Azotobacter application. Chakrabarti and Yadav (1991) reported that Azotobacter treatment resulted in lowering of the disease incidence of downy mildew in opium poppy crop.

Slide 15:

Azotobacter also has a good potential as a biocontrol agent for management of nematodes and insects. Azotobacter inoculation led to nearly 50% reduction in wheat infected with Heterodera avenae (Wollenweber). A. chroococcum inhibited the hatching of egg masses of Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) and did not allow the larvae to penetrate into the roots of brinjal to form crown galls (Chahal and Chahal, 1988). A. chroococcum was observed to inhibit hatching of egg masses of Spodoptera litura (Fab.) , Spilarctia obliqua (Walker) and Corcyra cephalonica ( Stainton) (Paul et al., 2002) . There was also drastic reduction in number of eggs laid/female, per cent pupation and the emergence of adults from pupae.

Slide 16:

Inhibitory effects of Azotobacter chroococcum strains on growth of various fungi (Pandey and Kumar, 1990) Fungal strain Zone of inhibition (mm) produced by strains of A. chroococcum A41 C2 W5 M4 Sclerotiorum rolfsii 22 16 14 6 S. sclerotiorum 20 17 8 11 Fusarium moniliforme 18 14 17 5 F. solani 18 12 15 6 F. oxysporum 18 11 15 10 Cephalosporium maydis 2 2 2 2 Alternaria brassicola 17 17 15 6 Colletotrichum falcatum 23 16 14 5 Exserohilum turcicum 19 2 11 2 Chaetomium globosum 11 6 8 10 Penicillium chrysogenum 17 13 11 6 Trichoderma viride 31 15 12 12 Drechslera tetramera 17 12 16 9 Cladosporium herbanum 32 23 18 17

Slide 17:

Maintenance of Azotobacter cultures For routine maintenance Azotobacter should be sub-cultured at monthly or bimonthly with sucrose as carbon source. The culture can also be preserved by use of heavy mineral oil (paraffin). Usually Azotobacter survives for many months. Routine sub-culturing at 6-monthly interval is adequate. The cultures are grown on slants in tubes. Sterile mineral oil is added to these tubes after growth has occurred to completely cover the slope. These can be maintained on the lower most rack of refrigerator. Mineral oil is sterilized in an oven for 3 days for 90 min each day at 160 o C. Azotobacter can also be maintained as glycerol based cultures in a deep freezer. Broth cultures are prepared. Glycerol solution (60%) is sterilized by autoclaving and is added to the broth culture to get a final glycerol concentration of 15% v/v.

Slide 18:

Commercial Manufacture of Azotobacter The manufacturing process in short involves Selection of suitable strain of the organism for which market demand is identified. Mass multiplication. Mixing of the culture with carrier material and packing. The steps involved are Culture selection and maintenance. Purchase of desired strains from the identified authentic sources like Agricultural Universities, IARI, some ICAR institutions, Regional biofertilizer labs of MOA, etc. There are international sources of supply also like NifTAL, IRRI etc. These sources maintain pure mother cultures. They have to be further sub-cultured and maintained purely for mass production by adopting standard techniques under the supervision of trained microbiologist.

Slide 19:

Culture augmentation Culture has to be mass multiplied in two levels at primary level using shakers in flasks Secondary stage multiplication in fermenters The important factor in this is the preparation of growing medium in which the culture is mass multiplied. There are standard media on which information is available from published sources like Norris and Date, Fred et al. , ISI approved etc. After the media is formulated and sterilized in fermenter, it is inoculated using the shorter cultures multiplied in the flasks at definite ratios usually 5%. The bacteria growing medium is called broth and it is continuously aerated by passing sterile air from compressors. After about 3-4 days fermentation period, the broth will be ready for packing in a carrier material. At various stages the quality is tested by drawing samples.

Slide 20:

Carrier sterilization While the broth is getting ready in the fermenter, the carrier material, which is usually the carbon source for the cultures to survive, is sterilized in autoclaves and kept ready for mixing with the broth. The carrier is either sterilized in bulk or it is packed and then the packets are sterilized. Peat imported from countries like U.S., Australia is reported to be the best source of carrier material. However, as it is costly lignite, charcoal : soil mix are used extensively in India. The pH of the carrier material is adjusted to 7 for better results. Moisture is generally maintained at 10%.

Slide 21:

Mixing and packing There are 2-3 alternatives depending upon the sophistication and automation of the unit. Under non sterile system , the broth is harvested from the fermenter into sterilized carrier - the mixing is done manually under aseptic condition and packed in polythene bags of desired quantity. In a slightly upgraded method , the broth and sterilized carrier are mixed mechanically in a blender and the material is packed using semiautomatic packing and sealing machine. In a slightly modified method some units are packing by delivering desired quantities of carrier and broth simultaneously from separate pipe conveyance system into the polythene bags. Under a completely sterile system the carrier is taken in autoclavable polypropylene bags and pre sealed - into which the broth from fermenter is directly injected with the help of dispenser. The injection hole is immediately sealed. The packets are kept in incubation room for about a week before transferring to store room. Sterile system of packing using auto syringe and dispenser is recommended to be the best method and all new units should follow and adopt this system.

Slide 22:

Quality Control Though there is BIS standard for Azotobacter ( IS – 9138-2002 ), there is no systematic quality certification system and monitoring mechanism. It is entirely an internal arrangement and voluntary system as of now. As the products being living microorganisms, the quality check up, certification batch-wise even if it is internal is highly essential. Each unit should have lab infrastructure and plans/arrangements for the same. Each unit, therefore should have the following facilities : Adequate microbiological lab and qualified microbiologist. Sampling and testing at various stages of production, including the quality of raw materials. Specify on the packets all the contents and cell counts. The source of mother culture and the strain name should also be mentioned. The unit should fix their quality certificate and batch number, pack the products in proper packing material. Store the products in cooler places till they are sold to farmers. Ensure to have aseptic conditions, cleanliness and contamination free production lines and housing. Preferably use automatic and closed systems.

Slide 23:

As per BIS specifications , certain tests are required to be conducted, like no. of cells, colony character, reaction etc. Cell number at the time of manufacture should not be less than 10 7 per gram of carrier material for Azotobacter . Similarly, the number of cell count and permissible contamination at expiry dates are also specified. As certification arrangements are not in place at present , legislation for quality monitoring and accredited labs for testing may be needed in future to ensure proper quality and to promote this product.

Slide 24:

Indian standard specification for Azotobacter S.N. Parameters Azotobacter Inoculant IS – 9138-2002 1. Base Carrier based 2. Viable cells 10 7 cells/g of carrier within 15 days manufacture. 3. Cell no at the time of expiry 10 6 cells/g within 15 days before expiry date 4. Shelf life or expiry period 6 months from the date of manufacture 5. Permissible contamination No contamination at 10 5 dilution 6. PH 6.0-7.5 7. Moisture % 35-40% 8. Strain A. chroococcum mentioned 9. Carrier Should pass through 100 micron IS sieve 10. Efficiency test Minimum amount of N-fixation not less than 10 mg/g of sucrose utilized.

Slide 25:

Methods of Application Application of bio-fertilizer require technical methods, thus it should be shown to farmers. There are three methods of application Seed treatment: Normally, 500 g of bio-fertilizers is required for seeds to be applied in a hectare of field. Bio-fertilizer is mixed with water and adhesive material so that seed coat is not broken, is dried for half an hour before sowing. Seedling treatment: Bio-fertilizers are being used for seedling treatment. This is mainly done in transplanted crops. A slurry of Azotobacter biofertilizer is prepared. Seedlings are dipped in this slurry for about 15 minutes, allowed to dry and then transplanted. Soil application : About 2 kg of bio-fertilizers are mixed with 40-50 kg of decomposed FYM and are broad cast at the time of sowing/prior to sowing.

Slide 26:

Main constraints with bio-fertilizers Marketing constraints Short shelf life Lack of proper storage facilities Consumer illiteracy Low awareness amongst consumers Inadequate guidelines to consumers Inadequate production/promotion effort Environmental constraints Seasonal conditions (high temperature) Soil pH Usage of high dose of chemical fertilizers/pesticides/soil amendments.

Slide 27:

At field level the efficiency is limited by several factors drought and high summer temperature water logging unfavourable soil pH antagonism from other organisms nutrient deficiency incompatibility of biofertilizer with fungicide or insecticide coated on the seed There is an acute awareness gap among the farmers on the subject.

Slide 28:

Critical factors responsible for effectiveness of Azotobacter Suitability of the strains to the target crop: There are specific strains of Azotobacter for different crops viz., cotton, mustard, wheat etc. Biofertilizers of specific cultures should be used for specific crop. While there are also broad spectrum Azotobacter strains which can be used as biofertilizers for most of the crops. Identification of strains as suited to the agro-eco system, particularly the soil pH and moisture conditions. Through research, specific strains as suited to a particular soil and environmental conditions are usually identified and pure mother cultures are maintained in research labs for supply to the commercial manufacturers. The aseptic conditions of manufacturing, the cell count of living organism present in the carrier material, purity and level of contamination. The conditions of carrier material in which the culture is packed and the quality of the packing material, which determine the shelf life. The conditions, in which the packed materials are stored, distributed and kept with the farmers before it is applied. Soil conditions particularly pH, organic matter content, moisture level and agronomic practices.

Slide 29:

How to overcome limitations and constraints Broaden the genetic base of mother cultures and go for efficient and effective strains suitable to various agro-environments, or specific for crop and location specific strains. Competitive strains capable of surviving and maintaining high populations in soil. Improved carrier material with uniform and consistent good quality comparable to imported peat material. Avoid contamination in broth mixing and packing stages by using completely closed system of production. Improve packing material to improve shelf life. Improve storing conditions, particularly during the distribution period. Avoid exposure to high temperatures and sunlight which destroy the microbial culture. They should be preferably kept in cold storage conditions. Employ properly trained microbiologist. Maintain proper quality controls and certification procedures.

Slide 30:

Thank you

authorStream Live Help