logging in or signing up Paper critique Part 2 Results Discussion Conclusio physioactive Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 1530 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (5) Dislike it (0) Added: March 09, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description Lecturer: Chee- Wee Tan Module P1112 - Intro to Research Institution: Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh Comments Posting comment... By: rutgers64 (41 month(s) ago) I am about to write my first critique on quantitative research and this power point presentation was the best resource I could find. Now I feel prepared to criticize, criticize, criticize! Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: siddharth (43 month(s) ago) i am working in critical care . i want to download this file Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript How to criticise quantitative research? Lecture II – Results, Discussion and Conclusion: How to criticise quantitative research? Lecture II – Results, Discussion and Conclusion Chee-Wee Tan Queen Margaret University, EdinburghSection: Results: Section: Results Were all planned outcomes reported? Anything missing? Is something dubious going on here? Anything added not previous set out? Section: Results - Presentation: Section: Results - Presentation Were the figures and tables clear? Any misleading figures or tables? Figure A Figure BSection: Results - Analysis: Section: Results - Analysis Were appropriate statistics used? Were interpretations of analysis reasonable? Any additional tests conducted that were not planned? (c.f. discussion) Common error: If you throw a lot of tests at it, something is bound to stick!Section: Discussion: Section: Discussion Was a concise summary of the main results offered? Were interpretations of their results reasonable? Guernica – Picasso, Pablo (1881-1973)Section: Discussion: Section: Discussion Common errors: Non-significant results ignored Non-significant results interpreted as proof of no effect Correlation does not imply causation Ad hominem Appeal to tradition/authority Confirmation bias Etc…Section: Discussion - Application: Section: Discussion - Application Basic studies - onus on reader to apply it. Sometimes, they do offer potential applications. Clinical – some indication how findings may influence practiceSection: Conclusion & Abstract: Section: Conclusion & Abstract Conclusion consistent with the rest of paper?How to be good at this?: How to be good at this? Never take any statements at face value. Criticise, criticise, criticise! You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Paper critique Part 2 Results Discussion Conclusio physioactive Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 1530 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (5) Dislike it (0) Added: March 09, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description Lecturer: Chee- Wee Tan Module P1112 - Intro to Research Institution: Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh Comments Posting comment... By: rutgers64 (41 month(s) ago) I am about to write my first critique on quantitative research and this power point presentation was the best resource I could find. Now I feel prepared to criticize, criticize, criticize! Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: siddharth (43 month(s) ago) i am working in critical care . i want to download this file Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript How to criticise quantitative research? Lecture II – Results, Discussion and Conclusion: How to criticise quantitative research? Lecture II – Results, Discussion and Conclusion Chee-Wee Tan Queen Margaret University, EdinburghSection: Results: Section: Results Were all planned outcomes reported? Anything missing? Is something dubious going on here? Anything added not previous set out? Section: Results - Presentation: Section: Results - Presentation Were the figures and tables clear? Any misleading figures or tables? Figure A Figure BSection: Results - Analysis: Section: Results - Analysis Were appropriate statistics used? Were interpretations of analysis reasonable? Any additional tests conducted that were not planned? (c.f. discussion) Common error: If you throw a lot of tests at it, something is bound to stick!Section: Discussion: Section: Discussion Was a concise summary of the main results offered? Were interpretations of their results reasonable? Guernica – Picasso, Pablo (1881-1973)Section: Discussion: Section: Discussion Common errors: Non-significant results ignored Non-significant results interpreted as proof of no effect Correlation does not imply causation Ad hominem Appeal to tradition/authority Confirmation bias Etc…Section: Discussion - Application: Section: Discussion - Application Basic studies - onus on reader to apply it. Sometimes, they do offer potential applications. Clinical – some indication how findings may influence practiceSection: Conclusion & Abstract: Section: Conclusion & Abstract Conclusion consistent with the rest of paper?How to be good at this?: How to be good at this? Never take any statements at face value. Criticise, criticise, criticise!