Presentation Transcript
: Dr. Antone Brooks
Washington State University Tri-cities
Richland, Washington Linear-No-Threshold Hypothesis-
Scientific Evidence?
My Background :My Background Early interest in radiation (Watching atomic weapons in southern Utah)
MS in radiation ecology (Chasing fallout)
PhD in radiation biology in genetics (Trying to discover what radiation is actually doing inside people)
Investment of my life in research on health effects of low doses of radiation
DOE Low-Dose Radiation Research Program :DOE Low-Dose Radiation Research Program A 10 year program at $21 million/year
International in scope
To fund the best scientist (currently 46 projects/year)
To understand biological mechanisms
To develop radiation standards based on risk
http://lowdose.org
Why now? :Why now? Standards have been set from high dose effects, but low dose effects have not been measurable until now
New technological developments and biological discoveries have made it possible to study low dose effects
Problems Associated with Estimating Health Risks :Problems Associated with Estimating Health Risks Background radiation (dose)
Background cancer (response)
: 70 mrem/yr
Medical procedures 53 mrems
Consumer products 10 mrems
One coast to coast airplane flight 2 mrems
Watching color TV 1 mrem
Sleeping with another person 1 mrem
Weapons test fallout less that 1 mrem
Nuclear industry less than 1 mrem Normal annual exposure from man-made radiation
Exposure at Different Elevations :Exposure at Different Elevations 1 mrem/year = 200 feet of altitude
4 mrem/year = 800 feet
500 mrem/year = some isolated populations
Background Cancer :Background Cancer Over 30 % of us will develop cancer
About 25 % will die of cancer
Cancer is variable as a function of
Genetic Background
Environmental Exposures
Diet
Lifestyle
Key Research Areas :Key Research Areas Technological Advances
Biological Advances
Major Paradigm Shifts :Major Paradigm Shifts Hit Theory vs. Bystander Effects
Mutation vs. gene induction
Genomic instability vs. multiple steps in carcinogenesis
How Does Radiation Interact with Cells? :How Does Radiation Interact with Cells? Past
Hit theory
Direct ionization
Free radical formation Present
Bystander effects
Cell-cell communication
Cell-matrix communication
Slide 13:Schematic of the Gray Laboratory Microfocus X-ray source
Microbeam :Microbeam Alpha Hits for Cell Transformation Each cell hit by one particle Average of one particle/cell Miller et al.1999
Bystander Effects :Bystander Effects Normal 10 cGy 3 cGy
Biological Changes Detected in Non-hit Cells :Biological Changes Detected in Non-hit Cells Gene induction
Mutations
Chromosome aberrations
Apoptosis and cell killing
Cell transformation
Adaptive Response Radiation-induced Chromatid Aberrations :Adaptive Response Radiation-induced Chromatid Aberrations Shadley and Wolff 1987 Aberrations Dose cGy
7K Microarray Results for “Stress Chip” Clone Selection :7K Microarray Results for “Stress Chip” Clone Selection Fornace
Slide 19:Normal Initiation Promotion Progression Mutation Theory Tissue Theory Tissues suppress cancer. Gene Mutation and Expression in Cancer Gene Mutation- a rare event Gene Expression- a common event Gene Activation Down Regulation Single cell origin of cancer Normal Progression
LNTH Assumption with Dose :LNTH Assumption with Dose Energy to system High dose x small number of subjects Low dose x large number of subjects
Absorbed Dose-Imparted Energy :Absorbed Dose-Imparted Energy Background Energy Level Biological Response Barrier Imparted Energy (J) in System Number Responding
Low-Dose Research Program Goals :Low-Dose Research Program Goals Understand mechanisms of biological response to low-dose radiation on a cellular and molecular level
Evaluate appropriate and adequate risk from low doses and dose-rates of radiation
Adequate Protection :Adequate Protection Control Contamination
Minimize Exposure
Reduce Dose
How low is low enough? “Zero”?
Adequate Protection :Adequate Protection
Adequate Protection :Adequate Protection
Adequate Protection :Adequate Protection
Adequate Protection :Adequate Protection
Adequate Protection :Adequate Protection Adequate and Appropriate?
Questions and Problems Associated with Dose-Response Relationships :Questions and Problems Associated with Dose-Response Relationships Ratios:
Energy/Mass=Dose
Damage/Mass=Response
What is the appropriate mass?
Is there a “free lunch”?
Is the biological response unique at low radiation doses?
Is extrapolation possible?
Do New Paradigms Impact Standards? :Do New Paradigms Impact Standards? NON-LINEAR Multiple Independent Events
vs.
Genomic Instability LINEAR Gene Expression
vs.
Mutation Tissue
vs.
Cell
Summary :Summary Radiation risks from low levels of radiation exposure cannot be predicted with epidemiological studies.
Combining advances in technology with those in cell and molecular biology make it possible to detect biological changes after low levels of radiation exposure.
These low level changes have required changes in basic radiation paradigms.
Understanding the role of these biological changes in cancer risk may or may not impact radiation protection standards, but will help ensure that the standards are both adequate and appropriate.