logging in or signing up The New Age of Learning mdrshell Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: Embed: Flash iPad Copy Does not support media & animations WordPress Embed Customize Embed URL: Copy Thumbnail: Copy The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 1049 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (4) Dislike it (2) Added: August 06, 2010 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 5 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: 23010319470921 (23 month(s) ago) could you mind sending me this ppt? it's very useful. my email is zwecnu@126.com. thanks a lot. Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: aarushij (26 month(s) ago) nyc Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: T.Sujatha (27 month(s) ago) can I have a copy of this presentation Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: phuc15 (28 month(s) ago) great thank you so very much Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: karen_sweetman (30 month(s) ago) good job Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close loading.... See all Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide 1: The New Age of Learning Presentation created by M. Randell for Education 6620 Slide 2: “How” we Learn “What” we Learn Introduction Changing Focus of Learning : Inventive, participatory, collaborative learning Transfer & Acquisition of Knowledge Changing Focus of Learning New Trends : New Trends Immersive learning Open Learning Social Learning {1} Slide 5: Immersive Learning Slide 6: Immersive Learning Entrenched in Digital Technology {2} Slide 7: Immersive Learning Gives the subjective impression that one is participating in a comprehensive realistic experience (Dede, 2009) {3} Slide 8: Immersive Learning Simulations Computer Modelling Virtual Environments {4} {5} {6} Slide 9: Immersive Learning Second Life ™ Avatar (Virtual Representations of Oneself) {7} {8} Slide 10: Immersive Learning Learners Generate Content Have More Control Gain Empowerment Produce Own Materials Share Learning Experiences Practice Skills without risk or danger Slide 11: Immersive Learning Instructors Flexibility Engagement Opportunities Sound & Visual Clues Rich Textures Realistic Perspectives Slide 12: Immersive Learning Challenges Large Learning Curves Vague Connection to specified Learning Outcomes Difficulty Finding Appropriate Assessment Techniques Slide 13: Immersive Learning Requirements Opportunities for Reflection Teachers’ role shifting to that of mentor & guide Slide 14: Immersive Learning Supports Behaviour Change & Learner Engagement Potential to improve the quality and depth of future learning experiences (Freitas & Neumann, 2009). Slide 15: Open Learning Slide 16: Open Learning Open Content Open Courseware Open Educational Resources {9} {10} {11} Slide 17: Open Learning Open Course Ware Digital Collections Lecture Notes Exams & Reading Material Other Resources Slide 18: Open Learning Open Content Repositories Educational Resources Slide 19: Open Learning Slide 20: Open Learning Free Development & Sharing of educational content Equal access to education Global Sharing Removal of Social & Cultural Barriers {12} Slide 21: Open Learning Challenges Copyright an Issues Pertaining to Intellectual Property Cost & Time Constraints Sustainability of Open Resources Quality Assurance Slide 22: Open Learning Has the Potential to change the way the world develops, disseminates, & uses knowledge. Slide 23: Social Learning Slide 24: Social Learning The development of knowledge, skills and attitudes while connected to others (peers, mentors, experts) through electronic and digital media, both real-time and asynchronous (Jarche, 2009). Slide 25: Social Learning Social Learning Slide 26: Social Learning Slide 27: Social Learning Social Learning will not focus on social Media, but will certainly make use of it. {13} Slide 28: Social Learning Challenges The need for well-crafted learning platforms to integrate social media tools within the context of social learning. The need for structure & control measures. Requires constant work and effort Slide 29: Summary Proliferation of Technology Revival of the communal and collaborative spirit Creation of powerful and enduring learning Slide 30: Image URL’s http://eduratireview.com/2009/07/10-principles-for-future-of-learning-html/ http://www.geuzen.org/kit.png http://www.cs.utah.edu/research/areas/ve/images/VR_Photo_pointing.jpg http://media.techeblog.com/images/flightsimulator_.jpg http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2128943668_081209-pressrelease2.jpg http://www.siggraph.org/publications/newsletter/volume-40-number-2/intern_01.jpg http://kimholmberg.fi/blog/files/2008/10/lecture_in_sl.jpg http://blog.bioethics.net/second%20life.jpg http://www.onlineedublog.com/wp-content/themes/default/images//mit_open_course_ware_for_online_teachers.jpg http://services.arcgisonline.com/arcgisexplorer500/help/addcontent.png http://www.oui-iohe.org/frances/images/stories/OER/oer.jpg http://www.tru.ca/__shared/assets/international_students_key_look14291.jpg http://www.sem-deutschland.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/social-media.png Slide 31: References Baraniuk, R. G., (2007). Challenges and opportunities for the open education movement: A connexions case study. In Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M.S.V. (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Retrieved on August 4, 2010 from http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262033712chap3.pdf Brett, P. & Nagra, J. (2005). An investigation into students’ use of a computer-based social learning space: Lessons for facilitating collaborative approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 36(2), 281-292. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00457.x Brown, J.S., & Adler, R.P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review. 43(1). Retrieved August 2, 2010, from http://foruminnova.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/minds_on_fire.pdf Capponi, M.F., Nussbaum, M., Marshall, G., & Lagos, M.E. (2010). Pattern discovery for the design of face-to-face computer supported collaborative learning activities. Educational Technology and Society. 13(2), 40-52. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database. Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M., and Wiley, D. (2008). Open educational resources: Enabling universal education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 9(1). Retrieved on August 1, 2010 from http://www.distanceandaccesstoeducation.info/contents/IRRODL-Caswell.pdf Davidson, C.N., & Goldberg, D.T. (2009). The future of learning institutions in a digital age. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning. Retrieved on August 3, 2010, from http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/Future_of_Learning.pdf Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science. 323(5910), 66-69. DOI: 10.1126/science.1167311 de Freitas, S., & Neumann, T. (2009). The use of ‘exploratory learning’ for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments. Computers and Education. 52, 343-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.010 de Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Maqgoulas, G., & Poulovassilis, A. (2010). Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41(1), 69-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01024.x Slide 32: Geser, G. (2007). Open Educational Practices and Resources. OLCOS Roadmap 2012. Salzburg Research & Edumedia Group. Retrieved on August 2, 2010, from http://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf Hew, K.F., & Cheung, W.S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings. A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41(1), 33-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.x Inglis, A. (2005). Quality improvement, quality assurance, and benchmarking: Comparing two frameworks for managing quality processes in open and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 6(1). Retrieved on August 3, 2010, from http://www.irrodl.org.qe2a-proxy.mun.ca/index.php/irrodl/article/view/221/867 Jarche, H. (2009). Social learning introduction. White Paper. Retrieved on August 3, 2010 from http://www.entreprisecollaborative.com/index.php/en/articles/129-livre-blanc-introduction-au-social-learning Johnson, L.F. & Levine, A.H. (2008). Virtual worlds: Inherently immersive, highly social learning spaces. Theory Into Practice. 47, 161-170. DOI: 10.1080/00405840801992397 Lane, A. (2009). The impact of openness on bridging educational digital divides. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 10(5). Retrieved on August 4, 2010 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ869420.pdf Ojo, D.O., & Olakulehin, F.K., (2006). Attitudes and perceptions of students to open and distance learning in Nigeria. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 7(1). Retrieved on August 2, 2010 from: http://www.irrodl.org.qe2a-proxy.mun.ca/index.php/irrodl/article/view/313/496 Taylor, J. (2007). Open courseware futures: Creating a parallel universe E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology. 10(1). Retrieved on August 3, 2010 from http://74.125.155.132/scholar?q=cache:VB8viryaarQJ:scholar.google.com/+open+courseware&hl=en&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=2005&as_yhi=2010 Yang, Y.F., Yeh, H.C., & Wong, W.K. (2010). The influence of social interaction on meaning construction in a virtual community. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41(2), 287-306. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00934.x References You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
The New Age of Learning mdrshell Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: Embed: Flash iPad Copy Does not support media & animations WordPress Embed Customize Embed URL: Copy Thumbnail: Copy The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 1049 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (4) Dislike it (2) Added: August 06, 2010 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 5 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: 23010319470921 (23 month(s) ago) could you mind sending me this ppt? it's very useful. my email is zwecnu@126.com. thanks a lot. Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: aarushij (26 month(s) ago) nyc Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: T.Sujatha (27 month(s) ago) can I have a copy of this presentation Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: phuc15 (28 month(s) ago) great thank you so very much Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: karen_sweetman (30 month(s) ago) good job Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close loading.... See all Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide 1: The New Age of Learning Presentation created by M. Randell for Education 6620 Slide 2: “How” we Learn “What” we Learn Introduction Changing Focus of Learning : Inventive, participatory, collaborative learning Transfer & Acquisition of Knowledge Changing Focus of Learning New Trends : New Trends Immersive learning Open Learning Social Learning {1} Slide 5: Immersive Learning Slide 6: Immersive Learning Entrenched in Digital Technology {2} Slide 7: Immersive Learning Gives the subjective impression that one is participating in a comprehensive realistic experience (Dede, 2009) {3} Slide 8: Immersive Learning Simulations Computer Modelling Virtual Environments {4} {5} {6} Slide 9: Immersive Learning Second Life ™ Avatar (Virtual Representations of Oneself) {7} {8} Slide 10: Immersive Learning Learners Generate Content Have More Control Gain Empowerment Produce Own Materials Share Learning Experiences Practice Skills without risk or danger Slide 11: Immersive Learning Instructors Flexibility Engagement Opportunities Sound & Visual Clues Rich Textures Realistic Perspectives Slide 12: Immersive Learning Challenges Large Learning Curves Vague Connection to specified Learning Outcomes Difficulty Finding Appropriate Assessment Techniques Slide 13: Immersive Learning Requirements Opportunities for Reflection Teachers’ role shifting to that of mentor & guide Slide 14: Immersive Learning Supports Behaviour Change & Learner Engagement Potential to improve the quality and depth of future learning experiences (Freitas & Neumann, 2009). Slide 15: Open Learning Slide 16: Open Learning Open Content Open Courseware Open Educational Resources {9} {10} {11} Slide 17: Open Learning Open Course Ware Digital Collections Lecture Notes Exams & Reading Material Other Resources Slide 18: Open Learning Open Content Repositories Educational Resources Slide 19: Open Learning Slide 20: Open Learning Free Development & Sharing of educational content Equal access to education Global Sharing Removal of Social & Cultural Barriers {12} Slide 21: Open Learning Challenges Copyright an Issues Pertaining to Intellectual Property Cost & Time Constraints Sustainability of Open Resources Quality Assurance Slide 22: Open Learning Has the Potential to change the way the world develops, disseminates, & uses knowledge. Slide 23: Social Learning Slide 24: Social Learning The development of knowledge, skills and attitudes while connected to others (peers, mentors, experts) through electronic and digital media, both real-time and asynchronous (Jarche, 2009). Slide 25: Social Learning Social Learning Slide 26: Social Learning Slide 27: Social Learning Social Learning will not focus on social Media, but will certainly make use of it. {13} Slide 28: Social Learning Challenges The need for well-crafted learning platforms to integrate social media tools within the context of social learning. The need for structure & control measures. Requires constant work and effort Slide 29: Summary Proliferation of Technology Revival of the communal and collaborative spirit Creation of powerful and enduring learning Slide 30: Image URL’s http://eduratireview.com/2009/07/10-principles-for-future-of-learning-html/ http://www.geuzen.org/kit.png http://www.cs.utah.edu/research/areas/ve/images/VR_Photo_pointing.jpg http://media.techeblog.com/images/flightsimulator_.jpg http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2128943668_081209-pressrelease2.jpg http://www.siggraph.org/publications/newsletter/volume-40-number-2/intern_01.jpg http://kimholmberg.fi/blog/files/2008/10/lecture_in_sl.jpg http://blog.bioethics.net/second%20life.jpg http://www.onlineedublog.com/wp-content/themes/default/images//mit_open_course_ware_for_online_teachers.jpg http://services.arcgisonline.com/arcgisexplorer500/help/addcontent.png http://www.oui-iohe.org/frances/images/stories/OER/oer.jpg http://www.tru.ca/__shared/assets/international_students_key_look14291.jpg http://www.sem-deutschland.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/social-media.png Slide 31: References Baraniuk, R. G., (2007). Challenges and opportunities for the open education movement: A connexions case study. In Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M.S.V. (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Retrieved on August 4, 2010 from http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262033712chap3.pdf Brett, P. & Nagra, J. (2005). An investigation into students’ use of a computer-based social learning space: Lessons for facilitating collaborative approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 36(2), 281-292. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00457.x Brown, J.S., & Adler, R.P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review. 43(1). Retrieved August 2, 2010, from http://foruminnova.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/minds_on_fire.pdf Capponi, M.F., Nussbaum, M., Marshall, G., & Lagos, M.E. (2010). Pattern discovery for the design of face-to-face computer supported collaborative learning activities. Educational Technology and Society. 13(2), 40-52. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database. Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M., and Wiley, D. (2008). Open educational resources: Enabling universal education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 9(1). Retrieved on August 1, 2010 from http://www.distanceandaccesstoeducation.info/contents/IRRODL-Caswell.pdf Davidson, C.N., & Goldberg, D.T. (2009). The future of learning institutions in a digital age. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning. Retrieved on August 3, 2010, from http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/Future_of_Learning.pdf Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science. 323(5910), 66-69. DOI: 10.1126/science.1167311 de Freitas, S., & Neumann, T. (2009). The use of ‘exploratory learning’ for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments. Computers and Education. 52, 343-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.010 de Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Maqgoulas, G., & Poulovassilis, A. (2010). Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41(1), 69-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01024.x Slide 32: Geser, G. (2007). Open Educational Practices and Resources. OLCOS Roadmap 2012. Salzburg Research & Edumedia Group. Retrieved on August 2, 2010, from http://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf Hew, K.F., & Cheung, W.S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings. A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41(1), 33-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.x Inglis, A. (2005). Quality improvement, quality assurance, and benchmarking: Comparing two frameworks for managing quality processes in open and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 6(1). Retrieved on August 3, 2010, from http://www.irrodl.org.qe2a-proxy.mun.ca/index.php/irrodl/article/view/221/867 Jarche, H. (2009). Social learning introduction. White Paper. Retrieved on August 3, 2010 from http://www.entreprisecollaborative.com/index.php/en/articles/129-livre-blanc-introduction-au-social-learning Johnson, L.F. & Levine, A.H. (2008). Virtual worlds: Inherently immersive, highly social learning spaces. Theory Into Practice. 47, 161-170. DOI: 10.1080/00405840801992397 Lane, A. (2009). The impact of openness on bridging educational digital divides. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 10(5). Retrieved on August 4, 2010 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ869420.pdf Ojo, D.O., & Olakulehin, F.K., (2006). Attitudes and perceptions of students to open and distance learning in Nigeria. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 7(1). Retrieved on August 2, 2010 from: http://www.irrodl.org.qe2a-proxy.mun.ca/index.php/irrodl/article/view/313/496 Taylor, J. (2007). Open courseware futures: Creating a parallel universe E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology. 10(1). Retrieved on August 3, 2010 from http://74.125.155.132/scholar?q=cache:VB8viryaarQJ:scholar.google.com/+open+courseware&hl=en&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=2005&as_yhi=2010 Yang, Y.F., Yeh, H.C., & Wong, W.K. (2010). The influence of social interaction on meaning construction in a virtual community. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41(2), 287-306. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00934.x References