Presentation Transcript
FOOD SECURITY PLANT PATHOGENS: FOOD SECURITY PLANT PATHOGENS MICROBIOLOGY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
STEM RUST: STEM RUST DATE: 16 JAN 2007
A NEW FORM OF STEM RUSTJUMPED FROM EASTERN AFRICA TO WHEAT IN YEMEN IN THE ARABIAN PENINSULA
NEW STEM RUST: NEW STEM RUST STRAIN KNOWN AS UG99
UGANDA, KENYA, AND ETHIOPIA.
RECENTLY CONFIRMED IN SUDAN
NOW IN YEMEN
THE GEOGRAPHY: THE GEOGRAPHY
WHAT IS STEM RUST: WHAT IS STEM RUST FUNGAL PATHOGEN OF PLANTS
Puccinia graminis
Phylum: Basidiomycota Order: Uredinales
WORLD DISTRIBUTION WIDESPREAD
RUSTS OF WHEATGrant Hollaway and John Brownhttp://www.dpi.vic.gov.au: RUSTS OF WHEAT Grant Hollaway and John Brown http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au STEM RUST
(Puccinia graminis)
LEAF RUST
(Puccinia triticina/recondita)
STRIPE RUST
(Puccinia striiformis)
WHAT IS STEM RUST: WHAT IS STEM RUST HETEROECIOUS
ON GRASS UREDINIAL & TELIAL STATES
BROWN/BLACK STRIPES ON STEMS & LEAF-SHEATHS
ON
Berberis (barberry) and Mahonia (oregon-grape).
AECIA & SPERMOGONIA
UREDINAL STAGE ON WHEAT: UREDINAL STAGE ON WHEAT
AECIAL STAGE ON Berberis vulgaris: AECIAL STAGE ON Berberis vulgaris Aecial stage on Barberry (Berberis vulgaris). Drem, East Lothian, 1985.
P. graminis: P. graminis A NUMBER OF FORMAE SPECIALES (VARIANTS) ARE RECOGNISED ON DIFFERENT WILD AND CULTIVATED GRASS HOSTS
F.SP. TRITICI
ON WHEAT
(LESS OFTEN BARLEY AND RYE),
F.SP. SECALIS
(= F.SP. HORDEI?)
BARLEY, RYE AND SOME WILD SPECIES
F.SP. AVENAE
CULTIVATED OATS AND WILD RELATIVES.
P. graminis: P. graminis
THE MAJOR PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN WITH WHEAT
F.SP. TRITICI
P. graminis: P. graminis SYMPTOMS OF IN WHEAT
PUSTULES PRIMARILY ON THE STEMS AND LEAF SHEATHS (FIG. 1)
EACH PUSTULE IS THE RESULT OF AN INFECTION BY A SINGLE RUST SPORE
THE INITIAL INFECTIONS PRODUCE NO OBVIOUS SYMPTOMS
FUNGAL MYCELIUM GROWS WITHIN PLANT TISSUE FOR 7-10 DAYS
P. graminis: P. graminis AFTER 7 -10 DAYS
PUSTULE APPEARS
REPRESENTS BEGINNING OF PRODUCTION OF SPORES THAT RUPTURE PLANT EPIDERMIS
THOUSANDS OF SPORES EMERGE AS POWDERY, RUST COLORED PILES OF UREDINIOSPORES
P. graminis: P. graminis EACH UREDINIOSPORE CAN PRODUCE A NEW INFECTION THAT WILL CAUSE SIMILAR DAMAGE
ON THE SAME PLANT
OR
ANOTHER WHEAT PLANT
. MULTIPLE CYCLES OF INFECTION, SPORULATION, AND RE-INFECTION CAN PRODUCE VERY DESTRUCTIVE EPIDEMICS IN WHEAT FIELDS WITHIN JUST A FEW WEEKS.
STEM RUST INFECTED WHEAT: STEM RUST INFECTED WHEAT
P. graminis COMPLETE LIFE CYCLE: P. graminis COMPLETE LIFE CYCLE LATE IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT
INFECTIONS ON WHEAT PLANTS CONVERT FROM PRODUCING UREDINIOSPORES
TO TELIOSPORES
A NEW KIND OF SPORE
P. graminis COMPLETE LIFE CYCLE: P. graminis COMPLETE LIFE CYCLE TELIOSPORES
A NEW KIND OF SPORE
REMAIN ATTACHED TO THE INFECTED PLANTS COMMONLY LEFT IN THE FIELD ON STRAW
SPECIALIZED SURVIVAL STRUCTURES
P. graminis COMPLETE LIFE CYCLE : P. graminis COMPLETE LIFE CYCLE TELIOSPORES
DORMANT IN THE FIELD UNTIL THE FOLLOWING SPRING
GERMINATE AND IMMEDIATELY PRODUCE ANOTHER TYPE OF SPORE KNOWN AS
BASIDIOSPORES.
P. graminis COMPLETE LIFE CYCLE : P. graminis COMPLETE LIFE CYCLE BASIDIOSPORES
BASIDIOSPORES CANNOT INFECT WHEAT PLANTS
INFECT YOUNG LEAVES OF COMMON BARBERRY (BERBERIS VULGARIS) OR OTHER RELATED PLANTS
ON BARBERRY PRODUCE SPECIALIZED INFECTION STRUCTURES CALLED PYCNIA
ESSENTIAL ROLE IN THE SEXUAL STAGE OF THE FUNGUS
P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION: P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION BACK TO THE TELIOSPORES
. TELIOSPORES OF P. GRAMINIS HAVE TWO NUCLEI PER CELL.
EACH NUCLEUS CONTAINS A SINGLE SET OF CHROMOSOMES.
NUCLEI ARE PAIRED
ONE NUCLEUS IS OF A + MATING TYPE
THE OTHER IS OF A - MATING TYPE.
DURING “DORMANT” PERIOD + AND - MATING TYPE NUCLEI FUSE
A SINGLE DIPLOID NUCLEUS
(TWO SETS OF CHROMOSOMES).
P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION: P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION CHROMOSOMES PAIR
DIPLOID NUCLEUS BEGINS TO DIVIDE IN MEIOSIS
RESULTS IN FOUR HAPLOID NUCLEI
RECOMBINATION OF GENES FROM THE PAIRED CHROMOSOMES
DURING THE DORMANT PERIOD (WINTER) MEIOSIS IS SUSPENDED AT AN INTERMEDIATE STAGE
P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION: P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION SPRING
WARM WET WEATHER
MEIOSIS RESUMES AND THE TELIOSPORES GERMINATE.
EACH OF THE FOUR HAPLOID NUCLEI MIGRATE TO ONE OF THE FOUR DEVELOPING BASIDIOSPORES
DIVIDE TO PRODUCE TWO HAPLOID NUCLEI PER MATURE BASIDIOSPORE.
P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION: P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION
MATURE BASIDIOSPORES ARE FORCIBLY EJECTED
CARRIED AWAY BE AIR CURRENTS
IF THEY REACH A SUSCEPTIBLE BARBERRY LEAF
BASIDIOSPORES GERMINATE AND PENETRATE THE LEAF.
P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION - BARBERRY: P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION - BARBERRY BASIDIOSPORES GERMINATE ON BARBERRY
GROW & DEVELOP INTO PYCNIA
FORM ON THE UPPER SURFACE OF THE LEAVES
TWO KEY ELEMENTS FOR THE SEXUAL PROCESS.
PYCNIOSPORES.
TO FERTILIZE THE RECEPTIVE HYPHAE OF ANOTHER PYCNIUM OF COMPATIBLE MATING TYPE.
RECEPTIVE HYPHAE
FUNCTION AS THE FEMALE GAMETES
P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION - BARBERRY: P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION - BARBERRY PYCNIOSPORES ARE PRODUCED IN A SUGARY NECTAR
INSECTS ATTRACTED TO THE NECTAR
VISIT SEVERAL PYCNIA IN SUCCESSION, FERTILIZING THEM
SELF FERTILIZATION IS PREVENTED IN P. GRAMINIS
+ MATING TYPE PYCNIOSPORES CAN FUSE WITH - MATING TYPE RECEPTIVE HYPHAE, AND VICE VERSA.
P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION - BARBERRY: P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION - BARBERRY FERTILISED PYCNIUM
CELLS QUICKLY CHANGE
FROM HAPLOID UNINUCLEATE STATE
TO DIKARYOTIC CONDITION WITH PAIRED + AND - NUCLEI IN EACH CELL.
DEVELOPS INTO AN AECIUM
P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION - BARBERRY: P. graminis SEXUAL REPRODUCTION - BARBERRY AECIUM
FORM WITHIN 5-7 DAYS AFTER FERTILIZATION
ON THE LOWER SIDE OF LEAF BELOW THE PYCNIUM
PRODUCES CHAINS OF AECIOSPORES SURROUNDED BY A CUP-LIKE ENCLOSURE OF FUNGAL CELLS.
AECIOSPORE LIKE UREDINIOSPORES
CONTAINS TWO NUCLEI
INFECT WHEAT NOT BARBERRY
AECIA ON BARBERRY LEAF: AECIA ON BARBERRY LEAF
BARBERRY BUSH NEAR A WHEAT FIELD: BARBERRY BUSH NEAR A WHEAT FIELD
IMPORTANCE OF THE BARBERRY BUSH: IMPORTANCE OF THE BARBERRY BUSH
HELPS TO BRIDGE THE WINTER
WITHOUT BARBERRY TELIOSPORE IS A DEAD END
WHAT ELSE?
BARBERRY ERADICATION: BARBERRY ERADICATION
IN IMPORTANT WHEAT PRODUCING STATES
BEGAN IN NORTH AMERICA IN 1917/18
FOCUSED ON THE NORTHERN U.S.
P. GRAMINIS TELIOSPORES
EITHER DO NOT GERMINATE
OR BARBERRY BUSHES FAIL TO BECOME INFECTED IN REGIONS WHERE WINTERS ARE MILD
BARBERRY ERADICATION : BARBERRY ERADICATION Berberis vulgaris
NOT INDIGENOUS IN NA
INTRODUCED FROM EUROPE
ESCAPED INTO WILD
ALSO RELATED INDIGENEOUS SPECIES
PROGRESSIVELY MORE WHEAT GROWING STATES JOINED UP TO 1955
BARBERRY QUARANTINE AREA: BARBERRY QUARANTINE AREA
WHEAT SUSCEPTIBILITY TOP. graminis: WHEAT SUSCEPTIBILITY TO P. graminis DEPENDS ON GENETICS OF WHEAT CULTIVAR
A NUMBER OF GENETIC DETERMINANTS OF RESISTANCE TO P. graminis ARE KNOW
WHEAT BREEDING CENTRES CULTIVATE VARIETIES RESISTANT TO INFECTION
WHEAT SUSCEPTIBILITY TOP. graminis: WHEAT SUSCEPTIBILITY TO P. graminis DEPENDS ON GENETICS OF WHEAT CULTIVAR
WHEAT CULTIVARS RESISTANCE IF “RACE” SPECIFIC
TPMK AND QFCS
MOST COMMON RACES IN THE GREAT PLAINS
CONTROLLED SEVERAL DIFFERENT RESISTANCE GENES IN CURRENT WHEAT VARIETIES
OTHER GENES FOR RESISTANCE ARE KNOWN AND ARE AVAILABLE FOR USE AGAINST OTHER P. graminis RACES
WHEAT GENES: WHEAT GENES
COMMON BARBERRY BUSH: COMMON BARBERRY BUSH
IMPORTANCE OF THE BARBERRY BUSH: IMPORTANCE OF THE BARBERRY BUSH WHAT ELSE?
SEXUAL REPRODUCTION GENERATES GENETIC DIVERSITY
NEW PROPERTIES
NEW PATHOGENIC “RACES” OF FUNGUS
THAT IMPORTANT WHEAT VARIETIES MAY NOT BE RESISTANT TO
OAT CROWN RUST: OAT CROWN RUST Rhamnus cathartica
SEXUAL STAGE ON COMMON BUCKTHORN
ALSO INTRODUCED FROM EUROPE
HAS BECOME NATURALIZED AND EXTREMELY COMMON IN THE NORTH CENTRAL U.S.
BUCKTHORN HAS NOT BEEN ERADICATED
RACES OF WHEAT STEM & OAT CROWN RUST: RACES OF WHEAT STEM & OAT CROWN RUST
OAT CROWN RUST: OAT CROWN RUST Rhamnus cathartica
OAT VARIETIES RARELY REMAIN RESISTANT TO CROWN RUST FOR MORE THAN 5 YEARS
BACK TO UG99: BACK TO UG99 P. graminis RACE ABLE TO INFECT MOST COMMON WHEAT VARIETIES
IMPORTANCE OF WHEAT: IMPORTANCE OF WHEAT Triticum spp.
SECOND ONLY TO MAIZE IN TONNAGE OF CEREAL CROP PRODUCTION
RICE THIRD
GLOBALLY WHEAT IS PROBABLY MOST IMPORTANT FOOD GRAIN
IMPORTANCE OF WHEAT: IMPORTANCE OF WHEAT
DISSEMINATION OF NEW RACE OF STEM RUST
HAS POTENTIAL TO DRAMATICALLY REDUCE GLOBAL WHEAT YIELDS
WHEAT RESERVES CURRENTLY AT A 30 YEAR LOW
IMPLICATIONS FOF GLOBAL GOOD SUPPLY
DEALING WITH UG99: DEALING WITH UG99 PROMISING EXPERIMENTAL WHEAT
MATERIALS WITH RESISTANCE TO UG99 IDENTIFIED
FROM THE 1ST BREEDING TRIALS TO
GROWING NEW, RUST-RESISTANT VARIETIES IN FARMERS' FIELDS ON MILLIONS OF HECTARES TAKES TIME AND A MASSIVE EFFORT
NEED TO SLOW DISSEMINATION
MILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS: MILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS
MDG 1.
ERADICATE EXTREME POVERTY AND HUNGER
REDUCE BY HALF THE PROPORTION OF PEOPLE LIVING ON LESS THAN A DOLLAR A DAY AND THOSE WHO SUFFER FROM HUNGER
LACK OF FOOD: LACK OF FOOD UN DEFINITION OF STARVATION
A PERSON IS STARVING IF HE OR SHE DOES NOT GET SUFFICIENT FOOD TO PERFORM LIGHT PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
(1500 CALORIES/DAY STARVATION LEVEL)
WHAT IS POVERTY : WHAT IS POVERTY IDEAS OF POVERTY
ADAM SMITH
“NECESSARIES OF LIFE”
Adam Smith. : Adam Smith . “necessaries”
not only the commodities which are indispensably necessary for the support of life, but what ever the customs of the country renders it indecent for creditable people even the lowest order to be without.
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations 1776
WHAT IS POVERTY : WHAT IS POVERTY RELATIVE POVERTY
ABSOLUTE POVERTY
LESS THAN A DOLLAR A DAY
ABSOLUTE POVERTY : ABSOLUTE POVERTY LACK OF ADEQUATE
FOOD
WATER
SHELTER
SANITATION
LACK OF FOOD-TWO RELATED ASPECTS: LACK OF FOOD-TWO RELATED ASPECTS
LONG TERM/CHRONIC FOOD SHORTAGE
FAMINE
STARVATION/HUNGER/UNDERNUTRITION: STARVATION/HUNGER /UNDERNUTRITION HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE STARVING?
IS IT GETTING BETTER OR WORSE?
WHERE ARE THEY STARVING?
WHY ARE THEY STARVING?
HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE UNDERNOURISHED?: HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE UNDERNOURISHED? UNDERNOURISHED
FOOD INTAKE THAT IS INSUFFICIENT TO MEET DIETARY REQUIREMENTS CONTINUOUSLY (FIVIMS)
852* MILLION UNDERNOURISHED 2000-2002
815 IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
28 MILLION IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES
9 MILLION IN INDUSTRIALISED COUNTRIES
* MORE THAN TWICE THE POPULATION OF THE EU
STARVATION: IS IT GETTING BETTER OR WORSE? : STARVATION: IS IT GETTING BETTER OR WORSE?
1971 920 MILLION PEOPLE STARVING
1997 792 MILLION PEOPLE STARVING
2010 PREDICTION 680 MILLIION
(Sceptical Environmentalist)
STARVATION: IS IT GETTING BETTER FAST ENOUGH?: STARVATION: IS IT GETTING BETTER FAST ENOUGH?
THE HARM THAT IT DOES: THE HARM THAT IT DOES OBVIOUS
IMMEDIATE SUFFERING
OTHER
IMPAIRS LEARNING
IMPAIRS ABILITY TO WORK & EARN
WHERE ARE THE PEOPLE: WHERE ARE THE PEOPLE POPULATION DENSITY DISTRIBUTION
WHERE ARE THEY STARVING?: WHERE ARE THEY STARVING?
WHERE ARE THEY STARVING?: WHERE ARE THEY STARVING?
ARE THEY STARVING IN CITIES OR COUNTRYSIDE? : ARE THEY STARVING IN CITIES OR COUNTRYSIDE?
75% OF HUNGRY PEOPLE LIVE IN RURAL AREAS IN POOR COUNTRIES
WHY ARE THEY STARVING? : WHY ARE THEY STARVING? IS IT JUST INEVITABLE
MORE PEOPLE = LESS FOOD TO GO ROUND
REVEREND THOMAS MALTHUS 1798
POPULATION GROWTH IS BY A FIXED PERCENTAGE
(EXPONENTIAL)
FOOD PRODUCTION GROWTH IS SLOWER
STARVATION IS INEVITABLE
WHATS HAPPENING TO POPULATION : WHATS HAPPENING TO POPULATION UN DEFINITION
1750 ABOUT 1 BILLION
1950 ABOUT 2.5 BILLION
BY 1999 6 BILLION
BY 2050 > 9 BILLION
BY 2200 CIRCA 11 BILLION
POPULATION GROWTH?: POPULATION GROWTH? BIRTH RATES ARE ALREADY FALLING IN MOST PARTS OF THE WORLD
3.1/WOMAN IS NOW AVERAGE FOR LOW INCOME COUNTRIES
2.1/WOMAN REPRESENTS STABILITY
“ITS NOT THAT PEOPLE HAVE SUDDENLY STARTED BREEDING LIKE RABBITS; ITS JUST THAT THEY STOPPED DYING LIKE FLIES”
(Sceptical Environmentalist)
“RIGHTS” & POPULATION: “RIGHTS” & POPULATION
IS COERCION A LEGITIMATE TOOL FOR CONTROL OF POPULATION GROWTH?
“RIGHTS” & POPULATION: “RIGHTS” & POPULATION
IS COERCION AN EFFECTIVE TOOL FOR CONTROL OF POPULATION GROWTH?
FOOD PRODUCTION: FOOD PRODUCTION 1999
GLOBAL FOOD PRODUCTION PER CAPITA WAS 23% HIGHER THAN IN 1961
1999
PER CAPITA FOOD PRODUCTION IN LOW INCOME COUNTRIES WAS 52% HIGHER THAN IN 1961
WHY MORE FOOD PRODUCTION?: WHY MORE FOOD PRODUCTION? GREEN REVOLUTION
HIGH YIELD CROPS
IRRIGATION
FERTILISERS AND PESTICIDES
FARM MANAGEMENT
WHY MORE FOOD PRODUCTION?: WHY MORE FOOD PRODUCTION? LOW INCOME COUNTRIES
SINCE 1960
YIELD PER HECTARE
RICE UP 122%
WHEAT UP 229%
CORN (MAIZE) UP 159%
ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION?: ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION?
ADJUSTING TYPES OF FOOD PRODUCED
PRODUCTION OF FOOD OF ANIMAL ORIGIN MUCH LESS EFFICIENT THAT FOOD OF PLANT ORIGIN
ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION?: ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION? YIELD PER HECTARE IN LOW INCOME COUNTRIES IS STILL WELL BELOW
THAT IN MANY HIGH INCOME COUNTRIES
MANY HIGH INCOME COUNTRIES ARE ACTIVELY DISCOURAGING FARMERS FROM PRODUCING FOOD BECAUSE THERE IS NO DEMAND
ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION?: ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION?
REASON TO BELIVE THAT GROWTH IN GLOBAL FOOD PRODUCTION IS CONSTRAINED MORE BY LACK OF DEMAND THAN BY LACK OF CAPACITY
FOOD PRODUCTION: FOOD PRODUCTION 1999
GLOBAL FOOD PRODUCTION PER CAPITA WAS 23% HIGHER THAN IN 1961
1999
PER CAPITA FOOD PRODUCTION IN LOW INCOME COUNTRIES WAS 52% HIGHER THAN IN 1961
WHY MORE FOOD PRODUCTION?: WHY MORE FOOD PRODUCTION? GREEN REVOLUTION
HIGH YIELD CROPS
IRRIGATION
FERTILISERS AND PESTICIDES
FARM MANAGEMENT
WHY MORE FOOD PRODUCTION?: WHY MORE FOOD PRODUCTION? LOW INCOME COUNTRIES
SINCE 1960
YIELD PER HECTARE
RICE UP 122%
WHEAT UP 229%
CORN (MAIZE) UP 159%
ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION?: ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION?
ADJUSTING TYPES OF FOOD PRODUCED
PRODUCTION OF FOOD OF ANIMAL ORIGIN MUCH LESS EFFICIENT THAT FOOD OF PLANT ORIGIN
ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION?: ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION? YIELD PER HECTARE IN LOW INCOME COUNTRIES IS STILL WELL BELOW
THAT IN MANY HIGH INCOME COUNTRIES
MANY HIGH INCOME COUNTRIES ARE ACTIVELY DISCOURAGING FARMERS FROM PRODUCING FOOD BECAUSE THERE IS NO DEMAND
ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION?: ARE WE AT THE LIMIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION?
REASON TO BELIVE THAT GROWTH IN GLOBAL FOOD PRODUCTION IS CONSTRAINED MORE BY LACK OF DEMAND THAN BY LACK OF CAPACITY
WHERE IS THE DEMAND: WHERE IS THE DEMAND
WITH 750 MILLION HUNGRY WHY IS THERE NO DEMAND?
POST HARVEST FOOD LOSS IN STORAGE: POST HARVEST FOOD LOSS IN STORAGE POOR STORAGE AND HANDLING
RODENTS/INSECTS/FUNGI
VARIES WITH FOOD AND REGION
2 TO 10%
FAMINE: FAMINE “A SUDDEN ERUPTION OF ACUTE FOOD DEPRIVATION AFFECTING A CONSIDERABLE SECTION OF THE POPULATION”
WHAT CAUSES FAMINE?
DROUGHT?
CROP DISEASE?
LACK OF FOOD SUPPLIES?
BENGAL FAMINE1943: BENGAL FAMINE1943
FISHERMEN
NEEDED TO SELL FISH
TO BUY HIGH CALORIE STAPLE (RICE)
FISH PRICE FELL & RICE PRICE INCREASED
STARVATION
BENGAL FAMINE 1943: BENGAL FAMINE 1943 BARBERS
PEOPLE SKIPPED HAIR CUTS
&
RATE OF EXCHANGE BETWEEN HAIR CUTTING AND STAPLE FOOD FELL BY 80%
STARVATION
BENGAL 1943: BENGAL 1943 LEAST AFFECTED
MANY URBAN WAR WORKERS
HAD INCREASED INCOMES
WERE CONSUMING MORE FOOD AND DRIVING UP THE PRICE OF RICE
BENGAL 1943: BENGAL 1943 LITTLE DECLINE IN FOOD PRODUCTION OR TOTAL FOOD SUPPLY
BUT INCREASE IN PRICE
BECAUSE
INCREASED URBAN DEMAND
SPECULATIVE WITHHOLDING OF FOOD FROM THE MARKET
WHAT CAUSES FAMINE?: WHAT CAUSES FAMINE?
SUDDEN LOSS BY A LARGE SECTION OF THE POPULATION OF THE ABILITY TO SUSTAIN ACCESS TO AN ADEQUATE
SUPPLY OF FOOD?
THE SECTION AFFECTED IS RARELY MORE THAN 10%
THERE MAY BE NO OR ONLY A MODEST REDUCTION IN FOOD AVAILABLE ON THE MARKET
FOOD COMMONLY MOVES OUT OF THE FAMINE AREA TO LESS AFFECTED AREAS
RELATIVE POVERTY: RELATIVE POVERTY WHO DO YOU COMPARE WHAT YOU SHOULD HAVE WITH?
YOUR NEIGHBOURS
OTHERS IN YOUR COUNTRY
GLOBAL MEDIA MARKET
GLOBAL ADVERTISING
POVERTY: POVERTY KEY DETERMINANT OF
WHO SUFFERES ILL HEALTH
WHO DIES FROM ILL HEALTH
CAUSES OF POVERTY?: CAUSES OF POVERTY?
ABSOLUTE DEFICIENCY OF GOODS
UNEQUAL DISTRIBUTION OF GOODS
IS OUR AFFLUENCE DEPENDENT ON OTHERS IMPOVERISHMENT?
REDUCING POVERTY?: REDUCING POVERTY? REALLOCATION/REDISTRIBTUION OF GOODS
SHOULD IT BE DONE?
CAN IT BE DONE?
HOW SHOULD IT BE DONE?
HOW MUCH REDISTRIBUTION IS RIGHT?
DOES REDISTRIBUTION UNDERMINE PRODUCTION OF GOODS?
JUSTICE: JUSTICE FAIRNESS
WHAT CAN BE EXPECTED TO BE CHOSEN IN A HYPOTHETICAL “ORIGINAL POSITION”
WHAT BALANCE BETWEEN GENERARTION AGGREGATION & DISTRIBUTION WOULD YOU CHOOSE IF YOU DID NOT KNOW WHO YOU WOULD BE
IS THERE AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF OF INEQUALITY: IS THERE AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF OF INEQUALITY EQUALITY
EVERYONE HAS THE SAME CAPABILITY
EQUITY
EVERYONE HAS A FAIR/MINIMUM SET OF CAPABILITIES
EQUITY: EQUITY THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
IS THIS THE MINIMUM SET OF CAPABILITIES THAT ALL SHOULD HAVE
GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION OF ABSOLUTE POVERTY: GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION OF ABSOLUTE POVERTY sub-SAHARAN AFRICA
SOUTH ASIA (INDIA)
LOW INCOME
LOW LIFE EXPECTANCY AT BIRTH
ADULT FEMALE LITERACY
GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION OF ABSOLUTE POVERTY: GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION OF ABSOLUTE POVERTY AVERAGE LIFE EXPECTANCY IS NOT ALL
1991
INDIA MEDIAN AGE AT DEATH 37 YEARS
Sub-SAHARAN AFRICA MEDIAN AGE AT DEATH 5 YEARS
GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION OF ABSOLUTE POVERTY: GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION OF ABSOLUTE POVERTY UNDERNOURISHMENT
AFRICAN CHILDREN 20 TO 40%
INDIA 40 TO 60%
INDIA (NOT AFRICA) SELF SUFFICIENT IN FOOD
IE PRODUCES ENOUGH FOOD TO SUPPLY MARKET DEMAND
BUT MARKET DEMAND IS NOT ENOUGH
INCOMES (FUELS MARKET DEMAND) IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
CONTRASTING INDIA AND AFRICA OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS: CONTRASTING INDIA AND AFRICA OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS AFRICA
PERSISTENT WARFARE
POLITICAL INSTABILITY
INDIA
INFREQUENT WARFARE
POLITICAL STABILITY
MAKING POVERTY HISTORY: MAKING POVERTY HISTORY MAKING DEGRADING WRETCHEDNESS HISTORY WOULD BE A START
NOT GOING TO BE EASY
HOW MUCH DO WE CARE?
HOW MUCH CAN WE DO?
ENDS HERE: ENDS HERE