Presentation Transcript
Indoor Environmental Rating by Comparing Green Building Certification Systems : Indoor Environmental Rating by Comparing Green Building Certification Systems SB07 SEOUL
Hanyang University
Yu Ri, Kim
Sung Ho, Tae
Sung Woo, Shin
Contents: Contents Aim of this study
Green building certification systems
Indoor environmental quality
Case study
Evaluation result
Conclusion
Aim of this study: Aim of this study Green Building Certification Systems Figure out problems
Provide fundamental data in development
of Green Building Certification Systems
by evaluating and comparing 5 systems
Green building certification systems: Green building certification systems GBCC (Korea)
: 4 issues and 9 sub issues
SBTool (Canada, iiSBE)
: Evaluation program, 114 sub issues
CASBEE (Japan)
: 5 levels by the result of Q and L
LEED (USA)
: Entire life cycle of building
BREEAM (England)
Indoor environmental quality: Indoor environmental quality Issues and the portion in Green building certification system
Indoor environmental quality: Indoor environmental quality Air Quality : Highest portion in GBCC, SBTool, and LEED
Regional Feature and Environmental differences Analysis on Indoor environmental quality
Case study: Case study Outline of object building
Case study: Case study Environmental technologies under issues
Evaluation result: Evaluation result GBCC
Evaluation result: Evaluation result Evaluation of indoor environmental quality
Evaluation result: Evaluation result Analysis and comparison GBCC got the highest score : 89%
LEED and BREEAM got lowest score
Scope of the study
Issues of acoustics
Conclusion: Conclusion 1) Quality of environment and Environmental loading
2) The percentage of indoor environmental quality
is highest.
Quantitative and objective evaluation is needed
in issues of indoor environmental quality.
3) Applying quantitative benchmarks and
evaluation program are important.
Slide13: Thank you