bfp..ppt (4)

PowerPoint Presentation: 

Brain Fingerprinting PRESENTED BY BHARGAVI.C & LALITHA.B

PowerPoint Presentation: 

CONTENTS: HISTORY TECHNIQUE BACKGROUND AND TERMINOLOGY CURRENT USES AND RESEARCH USES IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS OF BRAIN FINGERPRINTING CONCLUSION REFERENCES

PowerPoint Presentation: 

Dr Lawrence Farwell is the inventor of Brain Fingerprinting which uses a technology that he developed, MERMER. HISTORY

PowerPoint Presentation: 

TECHNIQUE An Electrical signal known as P300 is emitted from individuals brain is mainly used in this technique It is based on EEG signals The person wears a special Head band with Electronic sensors that measure the EEG from various locations of scalp Here in this technique the system does not require the subject to issue verbal responses to questions or stimuli Stimuli are of three types: Irrelevant Target Probe

PowerPoint Presentation: 

Brain Fingerprinting is fundamentally different from Polygraph IRELEVANT : Stimuli that are irrelevant to the investigated situation and to the test subject. TARGET : Stimuli that are relevant to the investigated situation and are known to the subject. PROBE : Stimuli that are relevant to the investigated situation and the subject denies knowing Brain Finger printing uses cognitive brain responses and it does not depends up on emotions of the subject.

PowerPoint Presentation: 

Background and Terminology Computer based test. Evidence of guilty knowledge regarding crimes Detection of Alzheimer’s and other cognitively degenerative diseases . Technology based on EEG device that is purported to be able to detect the existence of prior knowledge in the brain. MERMER-Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic Response.

PowerPoint Presentation: 

Current uses and researches Tests were made by Dr. Farewell and FBI agent, Drew Richardson CIA also had funded and used this technology which later resulted 100% accuracy Why it is not being implemented in India? After-all numerous scams have been brought in to light in recent years. But the question is….

PowerPoint Presentation: 

Use in criminal research and investigation THE FIRST TEST: On Terry harrington who later proved to be non-guilty. Grinder a serial killer was proved guilty

PowerPoint Presentation: 

The credit goes to the BRAINWAVES 1) Red: information the suspect is expected to know BRAINWAVE OF TERRY The suspect is exposed to three types of informations (3 different colours ) 2) Green: information not known to suspect 3) Blue: information of the crime that only perpetrator would know

PowerPoint Presentation: 

Not guilty : blue-green correlation Guilty : red-blue correlation

PowerPoint Presentation: 

LIMITATIONS OF BFP: If a suspect acknowledges being at the scene of the crime, but claims to be a witness and not a perpetrator, then the fact that he knows details about the crime would not be incriminating . If there is no known information on which a suspect could be tested, a brain fingerprinting test cannot be structured . Brain fingerprinting does not detect lies. It simply detects information

PowerPoint Presentation: 

CONCLUSION Revolutionary new scientific technology for solving crimes , identifying perpetrators. The Technology fulfills an urgent need for government, law enforcement agencies… mainly the falsely accused innocent suspects

PowerPoint Presentation: 

ANY QUERIES