logging in or signing up Digital Inequality Assignment kimedtech501 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: Embed: Flash iPad Dynamic Copy Does not support media & animations Automatically changes to Flash or non-Flash embed WordPress Embed Customize Embed URL: Copy Thumbnail: Copy The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 418 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (2) Added: July 11, 2012 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description This presentation focuses on the issue of digital inequality and various options for solving this problem. Iit was created by Graduate students in the EdTech program at Boise State University (2012). Comments Posting comment... By: Ficky1993 (9 month(s) ago) Great presentation, congratulations for this. I've added your item to my favorites, I hope you don't mind. Cheers. Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript Digital Inequality Presentation: Digital Inequality Presentation By : Kim Hefty, Rashell Clarke, Tyler Zunker, and Angie KruzichDigital Divide vs Digital Inequality: Digital Divide vs Digital Inequality Digital Divide refers to the gap that exists between those who have access to technology and those who do not . Digital Inequality refers to inequalities that exists among various groups in society that affect their technology access and use. These factors are: Equipment Autonomy of Use Skills Social Support Use PatternImportance of Addressing Digital Inequality: Importance of Addressing Digital Inequality Digital inequality influences social inequality . "Washington is an information enigma. Some of the nation's leading digital-technology companies are headquartered in and around Seattle, yet vast areas of the state are starved of local news. ...In short, Washington is a digital state with a rural information ghetto." (Washington state, Seattle Times)Scenario: : Scenario: We, the Digital Inequality Task Force, have been hired by the Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Randy Do r n . He has been given a special allocation of $50M to address digital inequalities in the state of Washington, and he wants us, the Task Force, to consider several options.Ideas for Addressing Digital Inequality: Ideas for Addressing Digital Inequality Install computers in public libraries Expand staffing and resources in public schools Provide computers to individuals in disadvantaged communities Provide high-speed Internet and mobile access to all residents Provide low-cost Internet access to all residents Provide information literacy courses to residents Develop free online educational content to the publicAlternative Ideas: Alternative Ideas Provide support and/or create “Internet cafes" Create mobile computer centers#1 Recommendation: #1 Recommendation E xpand staffing and other resources so that public schools can be open to the public after normal school hours, on weekends, and during the summer months. Reasoning: According to Bernard, three factors that are vital to leveling the digital "playing field," involve addressing: Availability of the devices themselves Accessibility of the technology at hand Literacy#2 Recommendation: Install computers in all public libraries in the state and expand the hours when the computers are available. Reasoning : Although this option provides the technology and expands hours so the technology is available to the public , it does not include funding for support staff to provide literacy education to those who need it. #2 Recommendation#3 Recommendation: #3 Recommendation Provide high-speed Internet and mobile access for all state residents . Reasoning: This option provides the technology and accessibility but lacks funding for literacy education.#4 Recommendation: Create mobile computer centers . Reasoning: This option provides the technology but lacks funding for literacy education and technology accessibility . #4 Recommendation#5 Recommendation: Provide information literacy courses to enhance computer skills and enable knowledgeable use of digital technologies. Reasoning : This option only addresses one vital factor for closing the educational gap: digital literacy. #5 Recommendation#6 Recommendation: #6 Recommendation Subsidize Internet Service Providers to provide low-cost Internet to all state residents. Reasoning: This option is ranked 6th because it only addresses one factor for closing the digital gap: technology accessibility.#7 Recommendation: #7 Recommendation Provide individuals in disadvantaged communities with computers . Reasoning: This option is ranked 7th because it only provides the technology . It does address technology accessibility or literacy education.#8 Recommendation: #8 Recommendation Develop free online educational content, giving first priority to content most relevant to lower socio-economic groups before content that is relevant to the rest of the public . Reasoning: This option only addresses literacy education. However, education requires technology availability and accessibility , which the funding does not allow for.#9 Recommendation: #9 Recommendation Provide support and/or create “Internet cafes” in urban and rural areas … open 24/7 at no cost to those who qualify, and minimal cost to general public who can afford. Resoning : This option is ranked last because it only addresses technology accessibility.Conclusion: Conclusion As Cooper stated, “...digital technologies change society very quickly. The ability to participate and prosper in the new economy will be severely restricted if a household is cut off from technology for more than a decade” (Cooper, 2004, pg 13).References: References Bernard, S. (n.d.). Crossing the Digital Divide: Bridges and Barriers to Digital Inclusion. Edutopia . Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/digital-divide-technology-access-inclusion Cooper, M. (2004). Expanding the digital divide and falling behind in broadband . Consumer Federation of America and Consumers Union, October. Retrieved from http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/digitaldivide.pdf Hargittai, E. (2003). The digital divide and what to do about it. New Economy Handbook , 821-839. Retrieved from http://www.eszter.com/research/pubs/hargittai-digitaldivide.pdf Kang , S. & Pamukcu, A. (2009). Digital inequality: Information poverty in the information age. The Greenlining Report , Retrieved from http ://greenlining.org/resources/pdfs/digitalinequality.pdf Washington state’s rural information ghettos. (n.d.). The Seattle Times . Retrieved July 5, 2012, from http ://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2018445689_guest18pintak.html You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Digital Inequality Assignment kimedtech501 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: Embed: Flash iPad Dynamic Copy Does not support media & animations Automatically changes to Flash or non-Flash embed WordPress Embed Customize Embed URL: Copy Thumbnail: Copy The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 418 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (2) Added: July 11, 2012 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description This presentation focuses on the issue of digital inequality and various options for solving this problem. Iit was created by Graduate students in the EdTech program at Boise State University (2012). Comments Posting comment... By: Ficky1993 (9 month(s) ago) Great presentation, congratulations for this. I've added your item to my favorites, I hope you don't mind. Cheers. Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript Digital Inequality Presentation: Digital Inequality Presentation By : Kim Hefty, Rashell Clarke, Tyler Zunker, and Angie KruzichDigital Divide vs Digital Inequality: Digital Divide vs Digital Inequality Digital Divide refers to the gap that exists between those who have access to technology and those who do not . Digital Inequality refers to inequalities that exists among various groups in society that affect their technology access and use. These factors are: Equipment Autonomy of Use Skills Social Support Use PatternImportance of Addressing Digital Inequality: Importance of Addressing Digital Inequality Digital inequality influences social inequality . "Washington is an information enigma. Some of the nation's leading digital-technology companies are headquartered in and around Seattle, yet vast areas of the state are starved of local news. ...In short, Washington is a digital state with a rural information ghetto." (Washington state, Seattle Times)Scenario: : Scenario: We, the Digital Inequality Task Force, have been hired by the Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Randy Do r n . He has been given a special allocation of $50M to address digital inequalities in the state of Washington, and he wants us, the Task Force, to consider several options.Ideas for Addressing Digital Inequality: Ideas for Addressing Digital Inequality Install computers in public libraries Expand staffing and resources in public schools Provide computers to individuals in disadvantaged communities Provide high-speed Internet and mobile access to all residents Provide low-cost Internet access to all residents Provide information literacy courses to residents Develop free online educational content to the publicAlternative Ideas: Alternative Ideas Provide support and/or create “Internet cafes" Create mobile computer centers#1 Recommendation: #1 Recommendation E xpand staffing and other resources so that public schools can be open to the public after normal school hours, on weekends, and during the summer months. Reasoning: According to Bernard, three factors that are vital to leveling the digital "playing field," involve addressing: Availability of the devices themselves Accessibility of the technology at hand Literacy#2 Recommendation: Install computers in all public libraries in the state and expand the hours when the computers are available. Reasoning : Although this option provides the technology and expands hours so the technology is available to the public , it does not include funding for support staff to provide literacy education to those who need it. #2 Recommendation#3 Recommendation: #3 Recommendation Provide high-speed Internet and mobile access for all state residents . Reasoning: This option provides the technology and accessibility but lacks funding for literacy education.#4 Recommendation: Create mobile computer centers . Reasoning: This option provides the technology but lacks funding for literacy education and technology accessibility . #4 Recommendation#5 Recommendation: Provide information literacy courses to enhance computer skills and enable knowledgeable use of digital technologies. Reasoning : This option only addresses one vital factor for closing the educational gap: digital literacy. #5 Recommendation#6 Recommendation: #6 Recommendation Subsidize Internet Service Providers to provide low-cost Internet to all state residents. Reasoning: This option is ranked 6th because it only addresses one factor for closing the digital gap: technology accessibility.#7 Recommendation: #7 Recommendation Provide individuals in disadvantaged communities with computers . Reasoning: This option is ranked 7th because it only provides the technology . It does address technology accessibility or literacy education.#8 Recommendation: #8 Recommendation Develop free online educational content, giving first priority to content most relevant to lower socio-economic groups before content that is relevant to the rest of the public . Reasoning: This option only addresses literacy education. However, education requires technology availability and accessibility , which the funding does not allow for.#9 Recommendation: #9 Recommendation Provide support and/or create “Internet cafes” in urban and rural areas … open 24/7 at no cost to those who qualify, and minimal cost to general public who can afford. Resoning : This option is ranked last because it only addresses technology accessibility.Conclusion: Conclusion As Cooper stated, “...digital technologies change society very quickly. The ability to participate and prosper in the new economy will be severely restricted if a household is cut off from technology for more than a decade” (Cooper, 2004, pg 13).References: References Bernard, S. (n.d.). Crossing the Digital Divide: Bridges and Barriers to Digital Inclusion. Edutopia . Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/digital-divide-technology-access-inclusion Cooper, M. (2004). Expanding the digital divide and falling behind in broadband . Consumer Federation of America and Consumers Union, October. Retrieved from http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/digitaldivide.pdf Hargittai, E. (2003). The digital divide and what to do about it. New Economy Handbook , 821-839. Retrieved from http://www.eszter.com/research/pubs/hargittai-digitaldivide.pdf Kang , S. & Pamukcu, A. (2009). Digital inequality: Information poverty in the information age. The Greenlining Report , Retrieved from http ://greenlining.org/resources/pdfs/digitalinequality.pdf Washington state’s rural information ghettos. (n.d.). The Seattle Times . Retrieved July 5, 2012, from http ://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2018445689_guest18pintak.html