logging in or signing up Goat milk karimagalal Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: Embed: Flash iPad Dynamic Copy Does not support media & animations Automatically changes to Flash or non-Flash embed WordPress Embed Customize Embed URL: Copy Thumbnail: Copy The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 243 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 20, 2012 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Evaluation of chemical and microbiological quality of raw goat milk in Qena Province : Evaluation of chemical and microbiological quality of raw goat milk in Qena Province Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 57 No. 129 April 2011 Dr. Karima Galal Abdel Hameed Lecturer of Milk Hygiene Fac. Vet. Med. South Valley Uni.PowerPoint Presentation: Introduction There is growing demand for unpasteurized goat’s milk by consumers ( Harrington et al., 2002 ). This is due to the increasing number of children suffering from intolerance to cow’s milk. Investigation on microbiological quality such as Total Plate Count (TPC), coliforms and the presence of pathogenic bacteria of goat’s milk in Qena province, was very rare. So, there is a clear need to find out more about the present situation regarding the quality of goat’s milk. Goat’s milk has a nutritional value similar to that of cow’s milk Goats are more disease resistance than cows ( Muehlherr et al., 2003).PowerPoint Presentation: Aim of the work The objective of this study was to allow qualitative checking of hygienic conditions of examined raw goat’s milk in Qena province chemically and microbiologically to check the suitability of such milk for public consumption, as well as, for processing of high quality dairy products.PowerPoint Presentation: Materials &methods Samples collection 50 raw goat milk samples Chemical Sanitary MicrobiologicalPowerPoint Presentation: Chemical examination 1- Detection of heat treatment by Storch’s test ( Lampert , 1975 ). 2- Determination of total solids percentage ( A.O.A.C., 1990 ). 3- Determination of water percentage: Water content was calculated by subtracting the total solids percentage from the original weight of the sample before drying. 4- Determination of fat percentage ( A.P.H.A., 1985 ). 5- Determination of solids non fat percentage : The solids non fat percentage of the examined samples was calculated by subtracting the fat percentage from the total solids percentage. 6- Determination of protein percentage : Using formal titration method as described by Schulz, et al . (1953) and modified by Mumm (1970) . 7- Determination of lactose percentage ( Harvey and Hill, 1967 ).PowerPoint Presentation: Sanitary examination Determination of titratable acidity percentage (A.O.A.C., 1990). Microbiological examination 1- Aerobic plate count ( A.P.H.A.,1985 ). 2- Determination of total Coliform and Fecal Coliform counts ( Mercuri and Cox, 1979 ). 3- Enterococci count ( Deibel and Hartman, 1976 ). 4- S. aureus count ( A.O.A.C., 2000 ). 5- Yeast and Mold counts ( Harrigan and McCance , 1976 ).PowerPoint Presentation: Results & conclusion Composition No. of examined samples Min. Max. Mean SE T.S % 50 9.49 13.3 10.90 ± 0.93 Water % 50 86.7 90.51 89.04 ± 0.94 Fat % 50 2.66 4.84 3.46 ± 0.52 S.N.F % 50 6.57 8.6 7.46 ± 0.32 Protein % 50 2.71 4.9 3.45 ± 0.53 Lactose % 50 2.73 4.59 3.99 ± 0.32 Table 1: Statistical analytical results of chemical composition of the examined goat’s milk samples. Addition of water Partial skimmingPowerPoint Presentation: Effect of season Amount of roughages &concentrates in the ration (feeding) Age of animals Methods used for determination of these constituents Stage of lactation The variations in chemical constituents could be attributed to Breed & genotype of animalPowerPoint Presentation: No. of examined samples Min. Max. Mean SE 50 0.09 0.26 0.15 ± 0.01 Table 2: Statistical analytical results of acidity % of the examined goat’s milk samples. Microbial flora Reflect bad hygienic measuresPowerPoint Presentation: Fig. 1: Incidence of different microorganisms in the examined goat’s milk samples.PowerPoint Presentation: The microbiological quality was only marginally acceptable with respect to the total bacteria count. Nevertheless, the presence of pathogenic and indicator organisms, such as, coliforms , fecal coliforms , enterococci , S. aureus and yeasts & molds indicate the growth of these organisms may lead to a hazard against public health. Therefore, practice and regulations, such as on-site pasteurization and implementation of HACCP following established standards, should be introduced to facilitate the production of goat milk of high quality and safety. You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.