crim 100 lesson 11 lecture

Views:
 
Category: Education
     
 

Presentation Description

No description available.

Comments

Presentation Transcript

Lesson 11 Lecture : 

Lesson 11 Lecture Chapter 11: Determination of Guilt: Plea Bargaining and Trials

Lesson Subtopics : 

Lesson Subtopics The Courtroom: How It Functions Plea Bargaining Trial: The Exceptional Case Appeals

The Courtroom: How It Functions : 

The Courtroom: How It Functions Local Legal Culture The courtroom workgroup Adversarial or Cooperative?

Plea Bargaining : 

Plea Bargaining “Going Rate” and Pleas without bargaining Charge Bargaining, Sentence Bargaining, and Fact Bargaining Consequences to Defendant of Pleading Guilty Judicial Obligations

Plea Bargaining : 

Plea Bargaining Legal Issues – Plea Bargaining Boykin v. Alabama – plea must be voluntary North Carolina v. Alford – defendant may plead guilty while maintaining innocence Santobello v. New York – prosecutors must live up to plea bargaining promises Ricketts v. Adamson – defendants must live up to plea bargaining promises Bordenkircher v. Hayes – prosecutors may threaten harsher prosecution if defendant refuses to plead

Plea Bargaining : 

Plea Bargaining Does plea bargaining really save money over trials? Hidden/delayed costs Less community involvement/less public “Dumber” on crime?

Trial: the Exceptional Case : 

Trial: the Exceptional Case Few defendants go to trial and few defendants who go to trial win complete acquittals Actual questions of facts? Jury penalty?

Trial: the Exceptional Case : 

Trial: the Exceptional Case Burden of proof Public Trial process Goal – Rational consideration of evidence; no surprises

Appeals : 

Appeals Usually concerned with answering questions of law, not fact Appeals must proceed up court hierarchy without skipping steps State courts have final say on defining meaning of state law Federal law is supreme when state and federal laws conflict U.S. Supreme Court’s case selection power is, for all practical purposes, completely discretionary