logging in or signing up Renal replacement therapy in the ICU fergua Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 88 Category: Science & Tech.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: September 18, 2011 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Renal Replacement Therapies in Critical Care: Renal Replacement Therapies in Critical Care Dr. Andrew Ferguson Consultant in Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine Craigavon Area HospitalWhere are we - too many questions?: Where are we - too many questions? What therapy should we use? When should we start it? What are we trying to achieve? How much therapy is enough? When do we stop/switch? Can we improve outcomes? Does the literature help us?Overview: Overview Impact of Acute Kidney Injury in the ICU Dose-outcome relationships & IRRT vs CRRT Mechanisms of solute clearance Therapies in brief IRRT, CRRT & Hybrid therapies e.g. SLEDD Solute clearance with IRRT v CRRT v SLEDD Extracorporeal blood purification in sepsis Putting it together – making a rational choiceAKI classification systems 1: RIFLE: AKI classification systems 1: RIFLEAKI classification systems 2: AKIN: AKI classification systems 2: AKIN Stage Creatinine criteria Urine output criteria 1 1.5 - 2 x baseline (or rise > 26.4 mmol/L) < 0.5 ml/kg/hour for > 6 hours 2 >2 - 3 x baseline < 0.5 ml/kg/hour for > 12 hours 3 > 3 x baseline (or > 354 mmol/L with acute rise > 44 mmol/L) < 0.3 ml/kg/hour for 24 hours or anuria for 12 hours Patients receiving RRT are Stage 3 regardless of creatinine or urine outputAcute Kidney Injury in the ICU: Acute Kidney Injury in the ICU AKIis common: 3-35%* of admissions AKI is associated with increased mortality “Minor” rises in Cr associated with worse outcome AKI developing after ICU admission (late) is associated with worse outcome than AKI at admission ( APACHE underestimates ROD ) AKI requiring RRT occurs in about 4-5% of ICU admissions and is associated with worst mortality risk ** * Brivet, FG et al . Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 192-198 ** Metnitz, PG et al . Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 2051-2058Mortality by AKI Severity (1): Mortality by AKI Severity (1) Clermont, G et al . Kidney International 2002; 62: 986-996Mortality by AKI Severity (2): Mortality by AKI Severity (2) Bagshaw, S et al. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48: 402-409RRT for Acute Renal Failure: RRT for Acute Renal Failure There is some evidence for a relationship between higher therapy dose and better outcome, at least up to a point This is true for IHD* and for CVVH** There is no definitive evidence for superiority of one therapy over another, and wide practice variation exists*** Accepted indications for RTT vary No definitive evidence on timing of RRT *Schiffl, H et al . NEJM 2002; 346: 305-310 ** Ronco, C et al . Lancet 2000; 355: 26-30 *** Uchino, S. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12: 538-543Therapy Dose in IRRT: Therapy Dose in IRRT p = 0.01 p = 0.001 Schiffl, H et al . NEJM 2002; 346: 305-310Therapy Dose in CVVH: Therapy Dose in CVVH 25 ml/kg/hr 35 ml/kg/hr 45 ml/kg/hr Ronco, C et al . Lancet 2000; 355: 26-30Outcome with IRRT vs CRRT (1): Outcome with IRRT vs CRRT (1) Trial quality low : many non-randomized Therapy dosing variable Illness severity variable or details missing Small numbers Uncontrolled technique, membrane Definitive trial would require 660 patients in each arm! Unvalidated instrument for sensitivity analysis Kellum, J et al. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 29-37 “there is insufficient evidence to establish whether CRRT is associated with improved survival in critically ill patients with ARF when compared with IRRT”Outcome with IRRT vs CRRT (2): Outcome with IRRT vs CRRT (2) Tonelli, M et al. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 875-885 No mortality difference between therapies No renal recovery difference between therapies Unselected patient populations Majority of studies were unpublishedOutcome with IRRT vs CRRT (3): Outcome with IRRT vs CRRT (3) Vinsonneau, S et al . Lancet 2006; 368: 379-385Proposed Indications for RRT: Proposed Indications for RRT Oliguria < 200ml/12 hours Anuria < 50 ml/12 hours Hyperkalaemia > 6.5 mmol/L Severe acidaemia pH < 7.0 Uraemia > 30 mmol/L Uraemic complications Dysnatraemias > 155 or < 120 mmol/L Hyper/(hypo)thermia Drug overdose with dialysable drug Lameire, N et al . Lancet 2005; 365: 417-430Implications of the available data: Implications of the available dataThe Ideal Renal Replacement Therapy: The Ideal Renal Replacement Therapy Allows control of intra/extravascular volume Corrects acid-base disturbances Corrects uraemia & effectively clears “toxins” Promotes renal recovery Improves survival Is free of complications Clears drugs effectively (?)Solute Clearance - Diffusion: Solute Clearance - Diffusion Small (< 500d) molecules cleared efficiently Concentration gradient critical Gradient achieved by countercurrent flow Principal clearance mode of dialysis techniquesSolute Clearance – Ultrafiltration & Convection (Haemofiltration): Solute Clearance – Ultrafiltration & Convection (Haemofiltration) Water movement “drags” solute across membrane At high UF rates (> 1L/hour) enough solute is dragged to produce significant clearance Convective clearance dehydrates the blood passing through the filter If filtration fraction > 30% there is high risk of filter clotting* Also clears larger molecular weight substances (e.g. B12, TNF, inulin) * In post-dilution haemofiltrationMajor Renal Replacement Techniques: Major Renal Replacement Techniques Intermittent Continuous Hybrid IHD Intermittent haemodialysis IUF Isolated Ultrafiltration SLEDD Sustained (or slow) low efficiency daily dialysis SLEDD-F Sustained (or slow) low efficiency daily dialysis with filtration CVVH Continuous veno -venous haemofiltration CVVHD Continuous veno -venous haemodialysis CVVHDF Continuous veno -venous haemodiafiltration SCUF Slow continuous ultrafiltrationIntermittent Therapies - PRO: Intermittent Therapies - PROSlide 22: Intermittent Therapies - CONIntradialytic Hypotension: Risk Factors: Intradialytic Hypotension: Risk Factors LVH with diastolic dysfunction or LV systolic dysfunction / CHF Valvular heart disease Pericardial disease Poor nutritional status / hypoalbuminaemia Uraemic neuropathy or autonomic dysfunction Severe anaemia High volume ultrafiltration requirements Predialysis SBP of <100 mm Hg Age 65 years + Pressor requirementManaging Intra-dialytic Hypotension: Managing Intra-dialytic Hypotension Dialysate temperature modelling Low temperature dialysate Dialysate sodium profiling Hypertonic Na at start decreasing to 135 by end Prevents plasma volume decrease Midodrine if not on pressors UF profiling Colloid/crystalloid boluses Sertraline (longer term HD) 2005 National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI GUIDELINESContinuous Therapies - PRO: Continuous Therapies - PROSlide 26: Continuous Therapies - CONSCUF: SCUF High flux membranes Up to 24 hrs per day Objective VOLUME control Not suitable for solute clearance Blood flow 50-200 ml/min UF rate 2-8 ml/minCA/VVH: CA/VVH Extended duration up to weeks High flux membranes Mainly convective clearance UF > volume control amount Excess UF replaced Replacement pre- or post-filter Blood flow 50-200 ml/min UF rate 10-60 ml/minCA/VVHD: CA/VVHD Mid/high flux membranes Extended period up to weeks Diffusive solute clearance Countercurrent dialysate UF for volume control Blood flow 50-200 ml/min UF rate 1-8 ml/min Dialysate flow 15-60 ml/minCVVHDF: CVVHDF High flux membranes Extended period up to weeks Diffusive & convective solute clearance Countercurrent dialysate UF exceeds volume control Replacement fluid as required Blood flow 50-200 ml/min UF rate 10-60 ml/min Dialysate flow 15-30 ml/min Replacement 10-30 ml/minSLED(D) & SLED(D)-F : Hybrid therapy: SLED(D) & SLED(D)-F : Hybrid therapy Conventional dialysis equipment Online dialysis fluid preparation Excellent small molecule detoxification Cardiovascular stability as good as CRRT Reduced anticoagulation requirement 11 hrs SLED comparable to 23 hrs CVVH Decreased costs compared to CRRT Phosphate supplementation required Fliser, T & Kielstein JT. Nature Clin Practice Neph 2006; 2: 32-39 Berbece, AN & Richardson, RMA. Kidney International 2006; 70: 963-968Kinetic Modelling of Solute Clearance: Kinetic Modelling of Solute Clearance CVVH (predilution) Daily IHD SLED Urea TAC (mg/ml) 40.3 64.6 43.4 Urea EKR (ml/min) 33.8 21.1 31.3 Inulin TAC (mg/L) 25.4 55.5 99.4 Inulin EKR (ml/min) 11.8 5.4 3.0 b 2 microglobulin TAC (mg/L) 9.4 24.2 40.3 b 2 microglobulin EKR (ml/min) 18.2 7.0 4.2 TAC = time-averaged concentration (from area under concentration-time curve) EKR = equivalent renal clearance Inulin represents middle molecule and b 2 microglobulin large molecule. CVVH has marked effects on middle and large molecule clearance not seen with IHD/SLED SLED and CVVH have equivalent small molecule clearance Daily IHD has acceptable small molecule clearance Liao, Z et al . Artificial Organs 2003; 27: 802-807Uraemia Control: Uraemia Control Liao, Z et al . Artificial Organs 2003; 27: 802-807Large molecule clearance: Large molecule clearance Liao, Z et al . Artificial Organs 2003; 27: 802-807Comparison of IHD and CVVH: Comparison of IHD and CVVH John, S & Eckardt K-U. Seminars in Dialysis 2006; 19: 455-464Beyond renal replacement… RRT as blood purification therapy: Beyond renal replacement… RRT as blood purification therapyExtracorporeal Blood Purification Therapy (EBT): Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapy (EBT) Intermittent Continuous TPE Therapeutic plasma exchange HVHF High volume haemofiltration UHVHF Ultra-high volume haemofiltration PHVHF Pulsed high volume haemofiltration CPFA Coupled plasma filtration and adsorptionPeak Concentration Hypothesis: Peak Concentration Hypothesis Removes cytokines from blood compartment during pro-inflammatory phase of sepsis Assumes blood cytokine level needs to fall Assumes reduced “free” cytokine levels leads to decreased tissue effects and organ failure Favours therapy such as HVHF, UHVHF, CPFA But tissue/interstitial cytokine levels unknown Ronco, C & Bellomo, R. Artificial Organs 2003; 27: 792-801Threshold Immunomodulation Hypothesis: Threshold Immunomodulation Hypothesis More dynamic view of cytokine system Mediators and pro-mediators removed from blood to alter tissue cytokine levels but blood level does not need to fall ? pro-inflammatory processes halted when cytokines fall to “threshold” level We don’t know when such a point is reached Honore, PM & Matson, JR. Critical Care Medicine 2004; 32: 896-897Mediator Delivery Hypothesis: Mediator Delivery Hypothesis HVHF with high incoming fluid volumes (3-6 L/hour) increases lymph flow 20-40 times “Drag” of mediators and cytokines with lymph Pulls cytokines from tissues to blood for removal and tissue levels fall High fluid exchange is key Di Carlo, JV & Alexander, SR. Int J Artif Organs 2005; 28: 777-786High Volume Hemofiltration: High Volume Hemofiltration May reduce unbound fraction of cytokines Removes endothelin - I (causes early pulm hypertension in sepsis) endogenous cannabinoids (vasoplegic in sepsis) myodepressant factor PAI-I so may eventually reduce DIC Reduces post-sepsis immunoparalysis (CARS) Reduces inflammatory cell apoptosis Human trials probably using too low a dose (40 ml/kg/hour vs 100+ ml/kg/hour in animals)CRRT, Haemodynamics & Outcome: CRRT, Haemodynamics & Outcome 114 unstable (pressors or MAP < 60) patients 55 stable (no pressors or MAP > 60) patients Responders = 20% fall in NA requirement or 20% rise in MAP (without change in NA) Overall responder mortality 30%, non-responder mortality 74.7% (p < 0.001) In unstable patients responder mortality 30% vs non-responder mortality 87% (p < 0.001) Haemodynamic improvement after 24 hours CRRT is a strong predictor of outcome Herrera-Gutierrez, ME et al. ASAIO Journal 2006; 52: 670-676Common Antibiotics and CRRT: Common Antibiotics and CRRT These effects will be even more dramatic with HVHF Honore, PM et al . Int J Artif Organs 2006; 29: 649-659Towards Targeted Therapy: Towards Targeted Therapy Non-septic ARF Septic ARF Cathecholamine resistant septic shock Daily IHD Daily SLEDD CVVHD/F ? dose CVVH > 35ml/kg/hour ? 50-70 ml/kg/hour CVVH @ 35ml/kg/hour Daily IHD? Daily SLEDD? HVHF 60-120 ml/kg/hour for 96 hours PHVHF 60-120 ml/kg/hour for 6-8 hours then CVVH > 35 ml/kg/hour EBT Honore, PM et al . Int J Artif Organs 206; 29: 649-659 Cerebral oedema“You should listen to your heart, and not the voices in your head”: “You should listen to your heart, and not the voices in your head” Marge SimpsonQuestions?: Questions? You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Renal replacement therapy in the ICU fergua Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 88 Category: Science & Tech.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: September 18, 2011 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Renal Replacement Therapies in Critical Care: Renal Replacement Therapies in Critical Care Dr. Andrew Ferguson Consultant in Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine Craigavon Area HospitalWhere are we - too many questions?: Where are we - too many questions? What therapy should we use? When should we start it? What are we trying to achieve? How much therapy is enough? When do we stop/switch? Can we improve outcomes? Does the literature help us?Overview: Overview Impact of Acute Kidney Injury in the ICU Dose-outcome relationships & IRRT vs CRRT Mechanisms of solute clearance Therapies in brief IRRT, CRRT & Hybrid therapies e.g. SLEDD Solute clearance with IRRT v CRRT v SLEDD Extracorporeal blood purification in sepsis Putting it together – making a rational choiceAKI classification systems 1: RIFLE: AKI classification systems 1: RIFLEAKI classification systems 2: AKIN: AKI classification systems 2: AKIN Stage Creatinine criteria Urine output criteria 1 1.5 - 2 x baseline (or rise > 26.4 mmol/L) < 0.5 ml/kg/hour for > 6 hours 2 >2 - 3 x baseline < 0.5 ml/kg/hour for > 12 hours 3 > 3 x baseline (or > 354 mmol/L with acute rise > 44 mmol/L) < 0.3 ml/kg/hour for 24 hours or anuria for 12 hours Patients receiving RRT are Stage 3 regardless of creatinine or urine outputAcute Kidney Injury in the ICU: Acute Kidney Injury in the ICU AKIis common: 3-35%* of admissions AKI is associated with increased mortality “Minor” rises in Cr associated with worse outcome AKI developing after ICU admission (late) is associated with worse outcome than AKI at admission ( APACHE underestimates ROD ) AKI requiring RRT occurs in about 4-5% of ICU admissions and is associated with worst mortality risk ** * Brivet, FG et al . Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 192-198 ** Metnitz, PG et al . Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 2051-2058Mortality by AKI Severity (1): Mortality by AKI Severity (1) Clermont, G et al . Kidney International 2002; 62: 986-996Mortality by AKI Severity (2): Mortality by AKI Severity (2) Bagshaw, S et al. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48: 402-409RRT for Acute Renal Failure: RRT for Acute Renal Failure There is some evidence for a relationship between higher therapy dose and better outcome, at least up to a point This is true for IHD* and for CVVH** There is no definitive evidence for superiority of one therapy over another, and wide practice variation exists*** Accepted indications for RTT vary No definitive evidence on timing of RRT *Schiffl, H et al . NEJM 2002; 346: 305-310 ** Ronco, C et al . Lancet 2000; 355: 26-30 *** Uchino, S. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12: 538-543Therapy Dose in IRRT: Therapy Dose in IRRT p = 0.01 p = 0.001 Schiffl, H et al . NEJM 2002; 346: 305-310Therapy Dose in CVVH: Therapy Dose in CVVH 25 ml/kg/hr 35 ml/kg/hr 45 ml/kg/hr Ronco, C et al . Lancet 2000; 355: 26-30Outcome with IRRT vs CRRT (1): Outcome with IRRT vs CRRT (1) Trial quality low : many non-randomized Therapy dosing variable Illness severity variable or details missing Small numbers Uncontrolled technique, membrane Definitive trial would require 660 patients in each arm! Unvalidated instrument for sensitivity analysis Kellum, J et al. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 29-37 “there is insufficient evidence to establish whether CRRT is associated with improved survival in critically ill patients with ARF when compared with IRRT”Outcome with IRRT vs CRRT (2): Outcome with IRRT vs CRRT (2) Tonelli, M et al. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 875-885 No mortality difference between therapies No renal recovery difference between therapies Unselected patient populations Majority of studies were unpublishedOutcome with IRRT vs CRRT (3): Outcome with IRRT vs CRRT (3) Vinsonneau, S et al . Lancet 2006; 368: 379-385Proposed Indications for RRT: Proposed Indications for RRT Oliguria < 200ml/12 hours Anuria < 50 ml/12 hours Hyperkalaemia > 6.5 mmol/L Severe acidaemia pH < 7.0 Uraemia > 30 mmol/L Uraemic complications Dysnatraemias > 155 or < 120 mmol/L Hyper/(hypo)thermia Drug overdose with dialysable drug Lameire, N et al . Lancet 2005; 365: 417-430Implications of the available data: Implications of the available dataThe Ideal Renal Replacement Therapy: The Ideal Renal Replacement Therapy Allows control of intra/extravascular volume Corrects acid-base disturbances Corrects uraemia & effectively clears “toxins” Promotes renal recovery Improves survival Is free of complications Clears drugs effectively (?)Solute Clearance - Diffusion: Solute Clearance - Diffusion Small (< 500d) molecules cleared efficiently Concentration gradient critical Gradient achieved by countercurrent flow Principal clearance mode of dialysis techniquesSolute Clearance – Ultrafiltration & Convection (Haemofiltration): Solute Clearance – Ultrafiltration & Convection (Haemofiltration) Water movement “drags” solute across membrane At high UF rates (> 1L/hour) enough solute is dragged to produce significant clearance Convective clearance dehydrates the blood passing through the filter If filtration fraction > 30% there is high risk of filter clotting* Also clears larger molecular weight substances (e.g. B12, TNF, inulin) * In post-dilution haemofiltrationMajor Renal Replacement Techniques: Major Renal Replacement Techniques Intermittent Continuous Hybrid IHD Intermittent haemodialysis IUF Isolated Ultrafiltration SLEDD Sustained (or slow) low efficiency daily dialysis SLEDD-F Sustained (or slow) low efficiency daily dialysis with filtration CVVH Continuous veno -venous haemofiltration CVVHD Continuous veno -venous haemodialysis CVVHDF Continuous veno -venous haemodiafiltration SCUF Slow continuous ultrafiltrationIntermittent Therapies - PRO: Intermittent Therapies - PROSlide 22: Intermittent Therapies - CONIntradialytic Hypotension: Risk Factors: Intradialytic Hypotension: Risk Factors LVH with diastolic dysfunction or LV systolic dysfunction / CHF Valvular heart disease Pericardial disease Poor nutritional status / hypoalbuminaemia Uraemic neuropathy or autonomic dysfunction Severe anaemia High volume ultrafiltration requirements Predialysis SBP of <100 mm Hg Age 65 years + Pressor requirementManaging Intra-dialytic Hypotension: Managing Intra-dialytic Hypotension Dialysate temperature modelling Low temperature dialysate Dialysate sodium profiling Hypertonic Na at start decreasing to 135 by end Prevents plasma volume decrease Midodrine if not on pressors UF profiling Colloid/crystalloid boluses Sertraline (longer term HD) 2005 National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI GUIDELINESContinuous Therapies - PRO: Continuous Therapies - PROSlide 26: Continuous Therapies - CONSCUF: SCUF High flux membranes Up to 24 hrs per day Objective VOLUME control Not suitable for solute clearance Blood flow 50-200 ml/min UF rate 2-8 ml/minCA/VVH: CA/VVH Extended duration up to weeks High flux membranes Mainly convective clearance UF > volume control amount Excess UF replaced Replacement pre- or post-filter Blood flow 50-200 ml/min UF rate 10-60 ml/minCA/VVHD: CA/VVHD Mid/high flux membranes Extended period up to weeks Diffusive solute clearance Countercurrent dialysate UF for volume control Blood flow 50-200 ml/min UF rate 1-8 ml/min Dialysate flow 15-60 ml/minCVVHDF: CVVHDF High flux membranes Extended period up to weeks Diffusive & convective solute clearance Countercurrent dialysate UF exceeds volume control Replacement fluid as required Blood flow 50-200 ml/min UF rate 10-60 ml/min Dialysate flow 15-30 ml/min Replacement 10-30 ml/minSLED(D) & SLED(D)-F : Hybrid therapy: SLED(D) & SLED(D)-F : Hybrid therapy Conventional dialysis equipment Online dialysis fluid preparation Excellent small molecule detoxification Cardiovascular stability as good as CRRT Reduced anticoagulation requirement 11 hrs SLED comparable to 23 hrs CVVH Decreased costs compared to CRRT Phosphate supplementation required Fliser, T & Kielstein JT. Nature Clin Practice Neph 2006; 2: 32-39 Berbece, AN & Richardson, RMA. Kidney International 2006; 70: 963-968Kinetic Modelling of Solute Clearance: Kinetic Modelling of Solute Clearance CVVH (predilution) Daily IHD SLED Urea TAC (mg/ml) 40.3 64.6 43.4 Urea EKR (ml/min) 33.8 21.1 31.3 Inulin TAC (mg/L) 25.4 55.5 99.4 Inulin EKR (ml/min) 11.8 5.4 3.0 b 2 microglobulin TAC (mg/L) 9.4 24.2 40.3 b 2 microglobulin EKR (ml/min) 18.2 7.0 4.2 TAC = time-averaged concentration (from area under concentration-time curve) EKR = equivalent renal clearance Inulin represents middle molecule and b 2 microglobulin large molecule. CVVH has marked effects on middle and large molecule clearance not seen with IHD/SLED SLED and CVVH have equivalent small molecule clearance Daily IHD has acceptable small molecule clearance Liao, Z et al . Artificial Organs 2003; 27: 802-807Uraemia Control: Uraemia Control Liao, Z et al . Artificial Organs 2003; 27: 802-807Large molecule clearance: Large molecule clearance Liao, Z et al . Artificial Organs 2003; 27: 802-807Comparison of IHD and CVVH: Comparison of IHD and CVVH John, S & Eckardt K-U. Seminars in Dialysis 2006; 19: 455-464Beyond renal replacement… RRT as blood purification therapy: Beyond renal replacement… RRT as blood purification therapyExtracorporeal Blood Purification Therapy (EBT): Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapy (EBT) Intermittent Continuous TPE Therapeutic plasma exchange HVHF High volume haemofiltration UHVHF Ultra-high volume haemofiltration PHVHF Pulsed high volume haemofiltration CPFA Coupled plasma filtration and adsorptionPeak Concentration Hypothesis: Peak Concentration Hypothesis Removes cytokines from blood compartment during pro-inflammatory phase of sepsis Assumes blood cytokine level needs to fall Assumes reduced “free” cytokine levels leads to decreased tissue effects and organ failure Favours therapy such as HVHF, UHVHF, CPFA But tissue/interstitial cytokine levels unknown Ronco, C & Bellomo, R. Artificial Organs 2003; 27: 792-801Threshold Immunomodulation Hypothesis: Threshold Immunomodulation Hypothesis More dynamic view of cytokine system Mediators and pro-mediators removed from blood to alter tissue cytokine levels but blood level does not need to fall ? pro-inflammatory processes halted when cytokines fall to “threshold” level We don’t know when such a point is reached Honore, PM & Matson, JR. Critical Care Medicine 2004; 32: 896-897Mediator Delivery Hypothesis: Mediator Delivery Hypothesis HVHF with high incoming fluid volumes (3-6 L/hour) increases lymph flow 20-40 times “Drag” of mediators and cytokines with lymph Pulls cytokines from tissues to blood for removal and tissue levels fall High fluid exchange is key Di Carlo, JV & Alexander, SR. Int J Artif Organs 2005; 28: 777-786High Volume Hemofiltration: High Volume Hemofiltration May reduce unbound fraction of cytokines Removes endothelin - I (causes early pulm hypertension in sepsis) endogenous cannabinoids (vasoplegic in sepsis) myodepressant factor PAI-I so may eventually reduce DIC Reduces post-sepsis immunoparalysis (CARS) Reduces inflammatory cell apoptosis Human trials probably using too low a dose (40 ml/kg/hour vs 100+ ml/kg/hour in animals)CRRT, Haemodynamics & Outcome: CRRT, Haemodynamics & Outcome 114 unstable (pressors or MAP < 60) patients 55 stable (no pressors or MAP > 60) patients Responders = 20% fall in NA requirement or 20% rise in MAP (without change in NA) Overall responder mortality 30%, non-responder mortality 74.7% (p < 0.001) In unstable patients responder mortality 30% vs non-responder mortality 87% (p < 0.001) Haemodynamic improvement after 24 hours CRRT is a strong predictor of outcome Herrera-Gutierrez, ME et al. ASAIO Journal 2006; 52: 670-676Common Antibiotics and CRRT: Common Antibiotics and CRRT These effects will be even more dramatic with HVHF Honore, PM et al . Int J Artif Organs 2006; 29: 649-659Towards Targeted Therapy: Towards Targeted Therapy Non-septic ARF Septic ARF Cathecholamine resistant septic shock Daily IHD Daily SLEDD CVVHD/F ? dose CVVH > 35ml/kg/hour ? 50-70 ml/kg/hour CVVH @ 35ml/kg/hour Daily IHD? Daily SLEDD? HVHF 60-120 ml/kg/hour for 96 hours PHVHF 60-120 ml/kg/hour for 6-8 hours then CVVH > 35 ml/kg/hour EBT Honore, PM et al . Int J Artif Organs 206; 29: 649-659 Cerebral oedema“You should listen to your heart, and not the voices in your head”: “You should listen to your heart, and not the voices in your head” Marge SimpsonQuestions?: Questions?