logging in or signing up Learning Theories dr.nadeem Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Let's Connect Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Copy embed code: Embed: Flash iPad Dynamic Copy Does not support media & animations Automatically changes to Flash or non-Flash embed WordPress Embed Customize Embed URL: Copy Thumbnail: Copy The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 20664 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (25) Dislike it (0) Added: November 14, 2009 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 19 Presentation Description Its about theories of Learning and its implication in education Comments Posting comment... By: slkslkslk (9 month(s) ago) Please, could you send me your presentation. Thank you. email@example.com Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: gobinathan (13 month(s) ago) sir plz allow me to download this ppt. coz this very useful for my assignment Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: carissahjl (19 month(s) ago) sir, ur ppt is so useful, plz allow me to dnld it, thx! Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: nviveknaik (20 month(s) ago) I'm teaching in Teacher Training college. I find your ppt is useful. plz allow me to dnld it..sir. Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: larikrozina (23 month(s) ago) sir i wants to download this presentation may i Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close loading.... See all Premium member Presentation Transcript Theories of learning: Theories of learning Forwarded By: Dr Muhammad Nadeem Anwar Assistant Professor University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan Broad Goals: Broad Goals 1. Operationally define terms relevant to theories of learning. 2. Examine learning theories that are currently important. Definitions: Learning is:: Definitions: Learning is: 1. “a persisting change in human performance or performance potential . . . (brought) about as a result of the learner’s interaction with the environment” (Driscoll, 1994, pp. 8-9). 2. “the relatively permanent change in a person’s knowledge or behavior due to experience” (Mayer, 1982, p. 1040). 3. “an enduring change in behavior, or in the capacity to behave in a given fashion, which results from practice or other forms of experience” (Shuell, 1986, p. 412). Learning Theory: Learning Theory Q: How do people learn? A: Nobody really knows. But there are 6 main theories: Behaviorism Cognitivism Social Learning Theory Social Constructivism Multiple Intelligences Brain-Based Learning Behaviorism: Behaviorism Learning is defined by the outward expression Confined to observable and measurable behavior Classical Conditioning – Pavlov Operant Conditioning - Skinner Behaviorism: Behaviorism Classical Conditioning - Pavlov S R A stimulus is presented in order to get a response: Behaviorism: Behaviorism Classical Conditioning - Pavlov S US U: Unconditioned Stimulus) UR CS US CR Behaviorism: Behaviorism Operant Conditioning - Skinner The response is made first, then reinforcement follows. Behaviorism in the Classroom: Behaviorism in the Classroom Rewards and punishments Responsibility for student learning rests squarely with the teacher Lecture-based, highly structured Critiques of Behaviorism: Critiques of Behaviorism Does not account for processes taking place in the mind that cannot be observed Advocates for passive student learning in a teacher-centric environment One size fits all Knowledge itself is given and absolute Programmed instruction & teacher-proofing Learning Theory: Learning Theory Behaviorism Cognitive Learning Theory Social Learning Theory Cognitivism: Cognitivism Grew in response to Behaviorism Knowledge is stored cognitively as symbols Learning is the process of connecting symbols in a meaningful & memorable way Studies focused on the mental processes that facilitate symbol connection Cognitive Learning Theory: Cognitive Learning Theory Discovery Learning - Jerome Bruner Meaningful Verbal Learning - David Ausubel Cognitive Learning Theory: Cognitive Learning Theory Discovery Learning 1. Bruner said anybody can learn anything at any age, provided it is stated in terms they can understand. Cognitive Learning Theory: Cognitive Learning Theory Discovery Learning 2. Powerful Concepts (not isolated facts) a. Transfer to many different situations b. Only possible through Discovery Learning c. Confront the learner with problems and help them find solutions. Do not present sequenced materials. Cognitive Learning Theory: Cognitive Learning Theory Meaningful Verbal Learning Advance Organizers: New material is presented in a systematic way, and is connected to existing cognitive structures in a meaningful way . Cognitive Learning Theory: Meaningful Verbal Learning Cognitive Learning Theory When learners have difficulty with new material, go back to the concrete anchors (Advance Organizers). Provide a Discovery approach, and they’ll learn. Cognitivism in the Classroom: Cognitivism in the Classroom Inquiry-oriented projects Opportunities for the testing of hypotheses Curiosity encouraged Staged scaffolding Critiques of Cognitivism: Critiques of Cognitivism Like Behaviorism, knowledge itself is given and absolute Input – Process – Output model is mechanistic and deterministic Does not account enough for individuality Little emphasis on affective characteristics Learning Theory: Learning Theory Behaviorism Social Learning Theory Cognitive Learning Theory Social Learning Theory (SLT): Social Learning Theory (SLT) Grew out of Cognitivism A. Bandura (1973) Learning takes place through observation and sensorial experiences Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery SLT is the basis of the movement against violence in media & video games Social Learning Theory: Social Learning Theory Learning From Models - Albert Bandura 1. Attend to pertinent clues 2. Code for memory (store a visual image) 3. Retain in memory 4. Accurately reproduce the observed activity 5. Possess sufficient motivation to apply new learning Social Learning Theory: Social Learning Theory Research indicates that the following factors influence the strength of learning from models: 1. How much power the model seems to have 2. How capable the model seems to be 3. How nurturing (caring) the model seems to be 4. How similar the learner perceives self and model 5. How many models the learner observes Social Learning Theory: Social Learning Theory Four interrelated processes establish and strengthen identification with the model: 1. Children want to be like the model 2. Children believe they are like the model 3. Children experience emotions like those the model is feeling. 4. Children act like the model. Social Learning Theory: Social Learning Theory Through identification, children come to believe they have the same characteristics as the model. When they identify with a nurturant and competent model, children feel pleased and proud. When they identify with an inadequate model, children feel unhappy and insecure. SLT in the Classroom: SLT in the Classroom Collaborative learning and group work Modeling responses and expectations Opportunities to observe experts in action Critiques of Social Learning Theory : Critiques of Social Learning Theory Does not take into account individuality, context, and experience as mediating factors Suggests students learn best as passive receivers of sensory stimuli, as opposed to being active learners Emotions and motivation not considered important or connected to learning Social Constructivism: Social Constructivism Grew out of and in response to Cognitivism, framed around metacognition Knowledge is actively constructed Learning is… A search for meaning by the learner Contextualized An inherently social activity Dialogic and recursive The responsibility of the learner Lev Vygotsky Social Learning Zone of Proximal Development Social Constructivism in the Classroom: Social Constructivism in the Classroom Journaling Experiential activities Personal focus Collaborative & cooperative learning Critiques of Social Constructivism : Critiques of Social Constructivism Suggests that knowledge is neither given nor absolute Often seen as less rigorous than traditional approaches to instruction Does not fit well with traditional age grouping and rigid terms/semesters Multiple Intelligences (MI): Multiple Intelligences (MI) Grew out of Constructivism, framed around metacognition H. Gardner (1983 to present) All people are born with eight intelligences: Enables students to leverage their strengths and purposefully target and develop their weaknesses 1. Verbal-Linguistic 5. Musical 2. Visual-Spatial 6. Naturalist 3. Logical-Mathematical 7. Interpersonal 4. Kinesthetic 8. Intrapersonal MI in the Classroom: MI in the Classroom Delivery of instruction via multiple mediums Student-centered classroom Authentic Assessment Self-directed learning Critiques of MI: Critiques of MI Lack of quantifiable evidence that MI exist Lack of evidence that use of MI as a curricular and methodological approach has any discernable impact on learning Suggestive of a departure from core curricula and standards Brain-Based Learning (BBL): Brain-Based Learning (BBL) Grew out of Neuroscience & Constructivism D. Souza, N. Caine & G. Caine, E. Jensen (1980’s to present) 12 governing principles 1. Brain is a parallel processor 7. Focused attention & peripheral perception 2. Whole body learning 8. Conscious & unconscious processes 3. A search for meaning 9. Several types of memory 4. Patterning 10. Embedded learning sticks 5. Emotions are critical 11. Challenge & threat 6. Processing of parts and wholes 12. Every brain is unique BBL in the Classroom: BBL in the Classroom Opportunities for group learning Regular environmental changes A multi-sensory environment Opportunities for self-expression and making personal connections to content Community-based learning Critiques of BBL: Critiques of BBL Research conducted by neuroscientists, not teachers & educational researchers Lack of understanding of the brain itself makes “brain-based” learning questionable Individual principles have been scientifically questioned Other Learning Theories of Note: Other Learning Theories of Note Andragogy (M. Knowles) Flow (M. Czikszentmihalyi) Situated Learning (J. Lave) Subsumption Theory (D. Ausubel) Conditions of Learning (R. Gagne) Humanist: Humanist All students are intrinsically motivated to self actualize or learn Learning is dependent upon meeting a hierarchy of needs (physiological, psychological and intellectual) Learning should be reinforced. PowerPoint Presentation: facultyweb.anderson.edu/~jhaukerman/ Learning %20Theory.ppt Matthew D. Laliberte www.nercomp.org/data/media/A%20Brief%20History%20of%20 Learning %20Theory.ppt Michael A. Lorber, Ph.D. www. learning technologies.ac.uk/.../PROJECT/resources/ Learning %20Theory/Resources/ learning %20 theories .ppt www.dcs.bbk.ac.uk/selene/reports/SeLeNe1.2.ppt Sources: You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.