logging in or signing up Akridge demirel Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 31 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 28, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript CPDA Adjuvants and Inerts CommitteeAnnual ConferenceMay 12, 2005Memphis, TN: CPDA Adjuvants and Inerts Committee Annual Conference May 12, 2005 Memphis, TN Redefining Value for a Changing Commercial Producer Dr. Jay Akridge Center for Food and Agricultural Business Purdue University 765-494-4327 akridge@purdue.eduToday….: Today…. Look at OPPORTUNITIES a changing customer base offers What do commercial producers want and need from their input suppliers? How is their definition of value evolving? What are the implications for input supplier strategy? A Closer Look… : A Closer Look… The 2003 Commercial Producer ProjectStudy Design: 14,301 Questionnaires mailed January 2003 2,424 Questionnaires returned (17%) Names from Farm Journal database Producers in states accounting for 75% of production (by enterprise) Corn/Soybeans, Wheat/Barley/Canola, and Cotton Dairy, Swine, Beef Fruits/Nuts/Vegetables/Vines Study DesignAverage Size of CommodityCrop Operations: Average Size of Commodity Crop OperationsCommercial Corn/Soybean Producers: Commercial Corn/Soybean Producers 6% 11% 13% 8% 5% 12% 13% Total: 356 Other States: 11% 9% 5% 4% 4%Commercial Wheat/Barley/Canola Producers: Commercial Wheat/Barley/Canola Producers 7% 18% 7% 7% 32% 23% Total: 41 Other States: 2% 2% 0% 2% 0%Commercial Cotton Producers: Commercial Cotton Producers 63% 3% 14% 6% 6% 6% Total: 129 Other States: 2%Fruit, Nut, Vine, and Vegetable Producers: Fruit, Nut, Vine, and Vegetable ProducersFruit, Nut, Vine and Vegetable Growers: Fruit, Nut, Vine and Vegetable Growers 15% 5% 37% 5% 8% Total: 170 Other States: 8% 8% 5% 4% 1% 1% 2% 1%Slide11: Growth PlansExpected Growth in Next 5 Years for Crop Producers** : Expected Growth in Next 5 Years for Crop Producers** ** Does not include those exiting farmingGrowth Predictions Across Time: Growth Predictions Across Time NOTE: These do not include anyone who indicated they would not be farming in 5 years AND takes out all outliers with >300% growth predictedHigh Growth Producers: Top 20% Growth: High Growth Producers: Top 20% Growth Most 44 and under Most concerned about expansion and management challenges Most confident and optimistic Higher reliance on local sources for information Seeking more direct relationship with both Capital and Expendable suppliers More reliance on sales/tech reps for information than before Slide15: General AttitudesI am very confident in my own abilityby Age: I am very confident in my own ability by AgeI am very optimistic about the future of farming by Age: I am very optimistic about the future of farming by AgeManagement Techniques Used by Size (Part I): Management Techniques Used by Size (Part I)Management Techniques Used by Size (Part II): Management Techniques Used by Size (Part II)Use of the Internet for Farm-Related Business by Size: Use of the Internet for Farm-Related Business by SizeSummary General Attitudes: Summary General Attitudes Producers tend to be confident and feel that they are successful High growth and Under 35 producers are more confident, feel that they are more successful, and see themselves as opinion leaders Compared to 1993 and 1998, participants were more confident, but less optimistic about the overall future of farming The larger the operator, the more intense the use of management tools Slide22: Decision-making ProcessDecision Process: Decision Process Input purchasing decisions are influenced by a variety of sources, these sources include: Inside the farm influence Outside the farm influence External media and communicationHow Purchase Decisions Are Made for Expendable Items for Commercial Crop Operations: How Purchase Decisions Are Made for Expendable Items for Commercial Crop OperationsDecision Makers and Influencers: Decision Makers and Influencers Commercial producers tend to make expendable decisions after extensive discussion or on their own High growth are the most independent Smaller operations more independent Crop expendable input decision-making process complex: homework required!Slide26: Off-Farm InfluencersInfluence Outside the Farm on Purchases of Expendable Items by Primary Operation: Influence Outside the Farm on Purchases of Expendable Items by Primary OperationUse of Independent, Paid Consultants by Commercial Crop Producers in 5 years: Use of Independent, Paid Consultants by Commercial Crop Producers in 5 yearsInfluence Outside the Farm on Purchases of Expendable Items (by use of consultants): Influence Outside the Farm on Purchases of Expendable Items (by use of consultants)Outside Expendable Influencers: Outside Expendable Influencers Local dealers most important off-farm influencer Large producers place relatively more influence on independent consultants for expendables Under 35 producers place more influence on the lender for expendables 65+ producers place less influence on other farmers Producers who use consultants place less importance on the local dealerSlide31: The Value-Bundle and Market SegmentsBuying Process: Buying Process When you choose a supplier for expendable items like pesticides or feed, how is your decision influenced by the following factors? Assign a percentage value to each factor based on its importance in the decision. The percentages should add to 100.Factors Influencing Purchases of Expendable Items for Commercial Producers for Commercial Crop Producers: Factors Influencing Purchases of Expendable Items for Commercial Producers for Commercial Crop ProducersSize of Crop Operations by Segment*: Size of Crop Operations by Segment* Mid-size Large *Does not include FNVVValue Bundle and Market Segments: Value Bundle and Market Segments Commercial producers are diverse in their buying preferences As size increases, price segment becomes larger, service segment smaller Price focused buyers have the highest projected growth rates for corn/soybeans, different for cottonSlide36: A Focus on Private Label/Generic ProductsPrivate Label/Generic Purchasing Plans: Private Label/Generic Purchasing Plans Took sample and separated those who agreed with the following question: Relative to branded products, my farm will increase its use of generic (unbranded or private label) expendable items over the next five years 40% commercial crop producers agreed Relative to branded products, my farm will increase its use of generic expendable items over the next five years: Relative to branded products, my farm will increase its use of generic expendable items over the next five yearsWhen buying expendable items, I usually purchase the lowest price products: When buying expendable items, I usually purchase the lowest price productsI am spending more time evaluating new technology for use in my farming operation than I did five years ago: I am spending more time evaluating new technology for use in my farming operation than I did five years agoRelative to 5 years ago, I have a much more business-like relationship with suppliers: Relative to 5 years ago, I have a much more business-like relationship with suppliersPrivate Label/Generic Attitudes: Private Label/Generic Attitudes 40% anticipate more private label/generic purchases Price a bigger issue for this group Believe they are spending more time evaluating technology Have a more business-like relationship with suppliersSlide43: Sales IssuesTop 3 Characteristics of the Best Ag Salesperson for Commercial Crop Producers by Year : Top 3 Characteristics of the Best Ag Salesperson for Commercial Crop Producers by Year Sales Issues: Sales Issues Significant changes in characteristics participants were looking for from their sales reps from 1998 to 2003: Big increases in demand for honesty and technical knowledge Slide46: Closing CommentsSome Closing Comments…: Some Closing Comments… Don’t forget about mid-size growers! Commercial producers do not comprise a single segment Growth in private label/generics is more than ‘price shopping’ Dealers and sales force have a major role in creating value Trust is an overriding relationship issue You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Akridge demirel Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 31 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 28, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript CPDA Adjuvants and Inerts CommitteeAnnual ConferenceMay 12, 2005Memphis, TN: CPDA Adjuvants and Inerts Committee Annual Conference May 12, 2005 Memphis, TN Redefining Value for a Changing Commercial Producer Dr. Jay Akridge Center for Food and Agricultural Business Purdue University 765-494-4327 akridge@purdue.eduToday….: Today…. Look at OPPORTUNITIES a changing customer base offers What do commercial producers want and need from their input suppliers? How is their definition of value evolving? What are the implications for input supplier strategy? A Closer Look… : A Closer Look… The 2003 Commercial Producer ProjectStudy Design: 14,301 Questionnaires mailed January 2003 2,424 Questionnaires returned (17%) Names from Farm Journal database Producers in states accounting for 75% of production (by enterprise) Corn/Soybeans, Wheat/Barley/Canola, and Cotton Dairy, Swine, Beef Fruits/Nuts/Vegetables/Vines Study DesignAverage Size of CommodityCrop Operations: Average Size of Commodity Crop OperationsCommercial Corn/Soybean Producers: Commercial Corn/Soybean Producers 6% 11% 13% 8% 5% 12% 13% Total: 356 Other States: 11% 9% 5% 4% 4%Commercial Wheat/Barley/Canola Producers: Commercial Wheat/Barley/Canola Producers 7% 18% 7% 7% 32% 23% Total: 41 Other States: 2% 2% 0% 2% 0%Commercial Cotton Producers: Commercial Cotton Producers 63% 3% 14% 6% 6% 6% Total: 129 Other States: 2%Fruit, Nut, Vine, and Vegetable Producers: Fruit, Nut, Vine, and Vegetable ProducersFruit, Nut, Vine and Vegetable Growers: Fruit, Nut, Vine and Vegetable Growers 15% 5% 37% 5% 8% Total: 170 Other States: 8% 8% 5% 4% 1% 1% 2% 1%Slide11: Growth PlansExpected Growth in Next 5 Years for Crop Producers** : Expected Growth in Next 5 Years for Crop Producers** ** Does not include those exiting farmingGrowth Predictions Across Time: Growth Predictions Across Time NOTE: These do not include anyone who indicated they would not be farming in 5 years AND takes out all outliers with >300% growth predictedHigh Growth Producers: Top 20% Growth: High Growth Producers: Top 20% Growth Most 44 and under Most concerned about expansion and management challenges Most confident and optimistic Higher reliance on local sources for information Seeking more direct relationship with both Capital and Expendable suppliers More reliance on sales/tech reps for information than before Slide15: General AttitudesI am very confident in my own abilityby Age: I am very confident in my own ability by AgeI am very optimistic about the future of farming by Age: I am very optimistic about the future of farming by AgeManagement Techniques Used by Size (Part I): Management Techniques Used by Size (Part I)Management Techniques Used by Size (Part II): Management Techniques Used by Size (Part II)Use of the Internet for Farm-Related Business by Size: Use of the Internet for Farm-Related Business by SizeSummary General Attitudes: Summary General Attitudes Producers tend to be confident and feel that they are successful High growth and Under 35 producers are more confident, feel that they are more successful, and see themselves as opinion leaders Compared to 1993 and 1998, participants were more confident, but less optimistic about the overall future of farming The larger the operator, the more intense the use of management tools Slide22: Decision-making ProcessDecision Process: Decision Process Input purchasing decisions are influenced by a variety of sources, these sources include: Inside the farm influence Outside the farm influence External media and communicationHow Purchase Decisions Are Made for Expendable Items for Commercial Crop Operations: How Purchase Decisions Are Made for Expendable Items for Commercial Crop OperationsDecision Makers and Influencers: Decision Makers and Influencers Commercial producers tend to make expendable decisions after extensive discussion or on their own High growth are the most independent Smaller operations more independent Crop expendable input decision-making process complex: homework required!Slide26: Off-Farm InfluencersInfluence Outside the Farm on Purchases of Expendable Items by Primary Operation: Influence Outside the Farm on Purchases of Expendable Items by Primary OperationUse of Independent, Paid Consultants by Commercial Crop Producers in 5 years: Use of Independent, Paid Consultants by Commercial Crop Producers in 5 yearsInfluence Outside the Farm on Purchases of Expendable Items (by use of consultants): Influence Outside the Farm on Purchases of Expendable Items (by use of consultants)Outside Expendable Influencers: Outside Expendable Influencers Local dealers most important off-farm influencer Large producers place relatively more influence on independent consultants for expendables Under 35 producers place more influence on the lender for expendables 65+ producers place less influence on other farmers Producers who use consultants place less importance on the local dealerSlide31: The Value-Bundle and Market SegmentsBuying Process: Buying Process When you choose a supplier for expendable items like pesticides or feed, how is your decision influenced by the following factors? Assign a percentage value to each factor based on its importance in the decision. The percentages should add to 100.Factors Influencing Purchases of Expendable Items for Commercial Producers for Commercial Crop Producers: Factors Influencing Purchases of Expendable Items for Commercial Producers for Commercial Crop ProducersSize of Crop Operations by Segment*: Size of Crop Operations by Segment* Mid-size Large *Does not include FNVVValue Bundle and Market Segments: Value Bundle and Market Segments Commercial producers are diverse in their buying preferences As size increases, price segment becomes larger, service segment smaller Price focused buyers have the highest projected growth rates for corn/soybeans, different for cottonSlide36: A Focus on Private Label/Generic ProductsPrivate Label/Generic Purchasing Plans: Private Label/Generic Purchasing Plans Took sample and separated those who agreed with the following question: Relative to branded products, my farm will increase its use of generic (unbranded or private label) expendable items over the next five years 40% commercial crop producers agreed Relative to branded products, my farm will increase its use of generic expendable items over the next five years: Relative to branded products, my farm will increase its use of generic expendable items over the next five yearsWhen buying expendable items, I usually purchase the lowest price products: When buying expendable items, I usually purchase the lowest price productsI am spending more time evaluating new technology for use in my farming operation than I did five years ago: I am spending more time evaluating new technology for use in my farming operation than I did five years agoRelative to 5 years ago, I have a much more business-like relationship with suppliers: Relative to 5 years ago, I have a much more business-like relationship with suppliersPrivate Label/Generic Attitudes: Private Label/Generic Attitudes 40% anticipate more private label/generic purchases Price a bigger issue for this group Believe they are spending more time evaluating technology Have a more business-like relationship with suppliersSlide43: Sales IssuesTop 3 Characteristics of the Best Ag Salesperson for Commercial Crop Producers by Year : Top 3 Characteristics of the Best Ag Salesperson for Commercial Crop Producers by Year Sales Issues: Sales Issues Significant changes in characteristics participants were looking for from their sales reps from 1998 to 2003: Big increases in demand for honesty and technical knowledge Slide46: Closing CommentsSome Closing Comments…: Some Closing Comments… Don’t forget about mid-size growers! Commercial producers do not comprise a single segment Growth in private label/generics is more than ‘price shopping’ Dealers and sales force have a major role in creating value Trust is an overriding relationship issue