logging in or signing up goodman demirel Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 44 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: November 14, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Neutrino Astronomy: Neutrino Astronomy Why Neutrinos Questions in ultra high energy astrophysics Source of UHE cosmic rays GRBs AGN Other Physics Questions – DM, Top Down models, etc Understanding the W-B bound Why the kilometer scale or bigger Overview of experimental approach Cherenkov Detectors- IceCube – Nestor, Antares, Baikal Radio - Rice, Anita, Salsa Why Neutrinos: Why NeutrinosWhy not protons?: Why not protons? Protons are bent in the magnetic fields of our galaxy and local cluster Energy of >1019eV needed to point back to even galactic sources Above a few 1019eV GZK cutoff limits their range tooEffect of IR Absorption on Distant Sources: Effect of IR Absorption on Distant Sources e+ e- ~eV g ~TeV g No direct measurement of IR extragalactic background light exists due to zodiacal foreground. TeV absorption constrains IR which depends on cosmology of galaxy and star formation models. IR Model of Stecker & deJager (1998)Photon Attenuation on IR: Photon Attenuation on IRQuestions in ultra high energy astrophysics: Questions in ultra high energy astrophysics Source of UHE cosmic rays GRBs AGN Dark Matter Other Physics QuestionsOrigin of Cosmic Rays: Origin of Cosmic Rays Extragalactic flux sets scale for many acceleration models Atmospheric neutrinos See Monday PM & Thursday AMAlternative Models: Alternative Models Bottom up GRB fireballs Jets in active galaxies Accretion shocks in galaxy clusters Galaxy mergers Young supernova remnants Pulsars, Magnetars Mini-quasars … Observed showers either protons (or nuclei) Top-down Radiation from topological defects Decays of massive relic particles in Galactic halo Resonant neutrino interactions on relic n’s (Z-bursts) Mostly pions (ns,gs,not protons) Disfavored! Highest energy cosmic rays are not gamma rays Overproduce TeV-neutrinos SNRs: SNRs HESS: RXJ1713: HESS: RXJ1713 First resolved TeV g-ray image of a Shell type SNR (Resolution ~10 arcmin) Acceleration source of Cosmic Rays, but is it evidence of Protons?HESS: RXJ1713 – Molecular Clouds : HESS: RXJ1713 – Molecular Clouds RXJ1713 Spectrum: RXJ1713 Spectrum In favor of p0: no cut-off in the HE tail of HESS spectrum signal from the direction of molecular clouds See HESS Talk Tuesday AfternoonHave g-rays from p0 decay been discovered?: Have g-rays from p0 decay been discovered? En Nn (En) = Eg Ng (Eg) 1 < < 8 transparent source p0 = p+ = p- accelerator beam dump (hidden source) n flux predicted observed g-ray flux ~40 per km2 RX J1713-3946 per year (galactic center) Milagro (TeV) Diffuse Source: Milagro (TeV) Diffuse Source See Milagro Talk Tues AfternoonActive Galactic Nuclei: Produces cosmic ray beam Radiation field: Active Galactic NucleiActive Galactic Nuclei (AGN): Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)VLA image of Cygnus A: VLA image of Cygnus A See Monday Morning AGN Session GZK: GZK g p n p n n n E = 6 x10 19 eV E ~4 x 10 19 eV p + gCMB → p+ + n = (ncmb s p + g )-1 l= 10 Mpc Cutoff above 50 EeVGZK: GZK Cosmogenic neutrinos are guaranteed if primaries are nucleons. May be much larger fluxes, for some models, such as topological defects GZK: GZK See Monday PM + Thurs AM Sess.GRBs: GRBsGRBs: GRBs Shocks: external collisions with interstellar material or internal collisions when slower material is overtaken by faster in the fireball. See Wed AM+ Thu PM GRB sessionsSlide25: e- p+ R < 108 cm R 1014 cm, T 3 x 103 seconds R 1018 cm, T 3 x 1016 seconds E 1051 – 1054 ergs Shock variability is reflected in the complexity of the GRB time profile. 6 Hours 3 Days Radio Optical -ray X-ray (2-10 keV) Fireball Phenomenology & The Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) Neutrino Connection Progenitor (Massive star) Meszaros, PGeneric GRB Explosion Models: Generic GRB Explosion ModelsSlide27: Lorentz Invariance Violation Bounds on energy dependence of the speed of light can be used to place constraints on the effective energy scale for quantum gravitational effects. Dt ~ x(E/EQG)a L/c E2-c2p2~E2x(E/EQG)a - This may be modified in some quantum gravity models. This has the important observational consequence that this will give rise to energy dependent delays between arrival times of photons. E2 = m2c4 +p2c2 - in the Lorentz invariant case, The expected time delay is : This may be measurable for very high energy photons/neutrinos coming from large distances. See Wed. AfternoonGalactic Microquasars: Galactic Microquasars See Talk Monday MorningWhat About Dark Matter?: What About Dark Matter? ~85% of the matter in the Universe is Dark Matter At most a few % of the matter is baryons Most people believe that the lightest SUSY particle is a stable neutralino and is probably the dark matter These are weakly interacting and heavy Evidence of clustering See Friday Afternoon Session on Dark MatterWimp Capture: Wimp CaptureWimp Detection: Wimp DetectionNeutrino Astronomy Explores Extra Dimensions: Neutrino Astronomy Explores Extra Dimensions 100 x SM GZK range TeV-scale gravity increases PeV n-cross section See Wednesday Afternoon SessionCosmic Neutrino Factory: radiation enveloping black hole black hole p + g -> n + p+ ~ cosmic ray + neutrino -> p + p0 ~ cosmic ray + gamma Cosmic Neutrino FactoryW-B Bound: W-B BoundEvading the Bound: Evading the Bound “Neutrino only” sources that are optically thick to proton photo-meson interactions and from which protons cannot escape. No observational evidence (from baryons or high energy photons) Cores of AGNs (rather than in the jets) by photo-meson interactions or via p−p collisions in a collapsing galactic nucleus or in a cacooned black hole. The most optimistic predictions of the AGN core model have already been ruled out by AMANDAMannheim, Protheore and Rachen Model: Mannheim, Protheore and Rachen ModelNeutrinos from Cosmic Rays: Neutrinos from Cosmic Rays ~50 events/km2/yrSize Perspective for KM3: Size Perspective for KM3 50 m 1500 m 2500 m 300 m AMANDAIIDetection Technique: Detection Technique neutrino muon or tau Cerenkov light cone detector interaction The muon radiates blue light in its wake Optical sensors capture (and map) the light See Talks in this SessionDetection of e , , : Detection of e , , O(km) long muon tracks direction determination by cherenkov light timing 17 m Muon Events : Eµ= 10 TeV Eµ= 6 PeV Measure energy by counting the number of fired PMT. (This is a very simple but robust method) Muon Events Determining Energy: Determining Energy 10 TeV m 6 PeV m 375 TeV CascadeDouble Bang: Double Bang E << 1PeV: Single cascade (2 cascades coincide) E ≈ 1PeV: Double bang E >> 1 PeV: partially contained (reconstruct incoming tau track and cascade from decay) Regeneration makes Earth quasi transparent for high energie ; (Halzen, Salzberg 1998, …) Also enhanced muon flux due to Secondary µ, and nµ (Beacom et al.., astro/ph 0111482) Learned, Pakvasa, 1995Tau Cascades: Tau Cascades E << 1PeV: Single cascade (2 cascades coincide) E ≈ 1PeV: Double bang E >> 1 PeV: partially contained (reconstruct incoming tau track and cascade from decay)Neutrino ID (solid)Energy and angle (shaded): Neutrino ID (solid) Energy and angle (shaded) Neutrino flavorTau Transparency/Regeneration: Tau Transparency/Regeneration ne and nµ are absorbed in the Earth via charged current interactions (muons range out) Above ~100 TeV the Earth is opaque to ne & νµ. But, the Earth never becomes completely opaque to nt Due to the short t lifetime, t’s produced in nt charged-current interactions decay back into nt Also, secondary ne & νµ. fluxes are produced in the tau decays. Flavor Ratios: Flavor Ratios The ratio of flavors at the source is expected to be 0:2:1= nt : nm : ne Since the distance to the source is >> than the oscillation length – any admixture at the source should wind up: 1:1:1= nt : nm : ne when arriving at earth What if that isn’t true? Exotic neutrino properties if not 1:1:1: Exotic neutrino properties if not 1:1:1 Neutrino decay (Beacom, Bell, Hooper, Pakvasa& Weiler) CPT violation (Barenboim& Quigg) Oscillation to steriles with very tiny delta δm2 (Crocker et al; Berezinskyet al.) Pseudo-Dirac mixing (Beacom, Bell, Hooper, Learned, Pakvasa& Weiler) 3+1 or 2+2 models with sterile neutrinos (Dutta, Reno and Sarcevic) Magnetic moment transitions (Enqvist, Keränen, Maalampi) Varying mass neutrinos (Fardon, Nelson & Weiner; Hung & Pas) Supernova Monitor: Amanda-II Amanda-B10 IceCube Supernova Monitor B10: 60% of Galaxy A-II: 95% of Galaxy IceCube: up to LMCLarge Scale Neutrino Detectors: Large Scale Neutrino Detectors NESTOR Pylos, Greece ANTARES La-Seyne-sur-Mer, France BAIKAL Russia IceCube, South Pole, Antarctica NEMO Catania, Italy See Talks in this SessionRadio Cherenkov Detectors: Radio Cherenkov Detectors Rice Anita SalsaAcoustic Detectors: Acoustic Detectors SAUND (Study of Acoustic Underwater Neutrino Detection)Conclusions: Conclusions Now Soon Future Amanda Cherenkov arrays ??? SK Radio Detectors Neutrino Astronomy is just beginning to open a new window on the Universe! You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
goodman demirel Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 44 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: November 14, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Neutrino Astronomy: Neutrino Astronomy Why Neutrinos Questions in ultra high energy astrophysics Source of UHE cosmic rays GRBs AGN Other Physics Questions – DM, Top Down models, etc Understanding the W-B bound Why the kilometer scale or bigger Overview of experimental approach Cherenkov Detectors- IceCube – Nestor, Antares, Baikal Radio - Rice, Anita, Salsa Why Neutrinos: Why NeutrinosWhy not protons?: Why not protons? Protons are bent in the magnetic fields of our galaxy and local cluster Energy of >1019eV needed to point back to even galactic sources Above a few 1019eV GZK cutoff limits their range tooEffect of IR Absorption on Distant Sources: Effect of IR Absorption on Distant Sources e+ e- ~eV g ~TeV g No direct measurement of IR extragalactic background light exists due to zodiacal foreground. TeV absorption constrains IR which depends on cosmology of galaxy and star formation models. IR Model of Stecker & deJager (1998)Photon Attenuation on IR: Photon Attenuation on IRQuestions in ultra high energy astrophysics: Questions in ultra high energy astrophysics Source of UHE cosmic rays GRBs AGN Dark Matter Other Physics QuestionsOrigin of Cosmic Rays: Origin of Cosmic Rays Extragalactic flux sets scale for many acceleration models Atmospheric neutrinos See Monday PM & Thursday AMAlternative Models: Alternative Models Bottom up GRB fireballs Jets in active galaxies Accretion shocks in galaxy clusters Galaxy mergers Young supernova remnants Pulsars, Magnetars Mini-quasars … Observed showers either protons (or nuclei) Top-down Radiation from topological defects Decays of massive relic particles in Galactic halo Resonant neutrino interactions on relic n’s (Z-bursts) Mostly pions (ns,gs,not protons) Disfavored! Highest energy cosmic rays are not gamma rays Overproduce TeV-neutrinos SNRs: SNRs HESS: RXJ1713: HESS: RXJ1713 First resolved TeV g-ray image of a Shell type SNR (Resolution ~10 arcmin) Acceleration source of Cosmic Rays, but is it evidence of Protons?HESS: RXJ1713 – Molecular Clouds : HESS: RXJ1713 – Molecular Clouds RXJ1713 Spectrum: RXJ1713 Spectrum In favor of p0: no cut-off in the HE tail of HESS spectrum signal from the direction of molecular clouds See HESS Talk Tuesday AfternoonHave g-rays from p0 decay been discovered?: Have g-rays from p0 decay been discovered? En Nn (En) = Eg Ng (Eg) 1 < < 8 transparent source p0 = p+ = p- accelerator beam dump (hidden source) n flux predicted observed g-ray flux ~40 per km2 RX J1713-3946 per year (galactic center) Milagro (TeV) Diffuse Source: Milagro (TeV) Diffuse Source See Milagro Talk Tues AfternoonActive Galactic Nuclei: Produces cosmic ray beam Radiation field: Active Galactic NucleiActive Galactic Nuclei (AGN): Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)VLA image of Cygnus A: VLA image of Cygnus A See Monday Morning AGN Session GZK: GZK g p n p n n n E = 6 x10 19 eV E ~4 x 10 19 eV p + gCMB → p+ + n = (ncmb s p + g )-1 l= 10 Mpc Cutoff above 50 EeVGZK: GZK Cosmogenic neutrinos are guaranteed if primaries are nucleons. May be much larger fluxes, for some models, such as topological defects GZK: GZK See Monday PM + Thurs AM Sess.GRBs: GRBsGRBs: GRBs Shocks: external collisions with interstellar material or internal collisions when slower material is overtaken by faster in the fireball. See Wed AM+ Thu PM GRB sessionsSlide25: e- p+ R < 108 cm R 1014 cm, T 3 x 103 seconds R 1018 cm, T 3 x 1016 seconds E 1051 – 1054 ergs Shock variability is reflected in the complexity of the GRB time profile. 6 Hours 3 Days Radio Optical -ray X-ray (2-10 keV) Fireball Phenomenology & The Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) Neutrino Connection Progenitor (Massive star) Meszaros, PGeneric GRB Explosion Models: Generic GRB Explosion ModelsSlide27: Lorentz Invariance Violation Bounds on energy dependence of the speed of light can be used to place constraints on the effective energy scale for quantum gravitational effects. Dt ~ x(E/EQG)a L/c E2-c2p2~E2x(E/EQG)a - This may be modified in some quantum gravity models. This has the important observational consequence that this will give rise to energy dependent delays between arrival times of photons. E2 = m2c4 +p2c2 - in the Lorentz invariant case, The expected time delay is : This may be measurable for very high energy photons/neutrinos coming from large distances. See Wed. AfternoonGalactic Microquasars: Galactic Microquasars See Talk Monday MorningWhat About Dark Matter?: What About Dark Matter? ~85% of the matter in the Universe is Dark Matter At most a few % of the matter is baryons Most people believe that the lightest SUSY particle is a stable neutralino and is probably the dark matter These are weakly interacting and heavy Evidence of clustering See Friday Afternoon Session on Dark MatterWimp Capture: Wimp CaptureWimp Detection: Wimp DetectionNeutrino Astronomy Explores Extra Dimensions: Neutrino Astronomy Explores Extra Dimensions 100 x SM GZK range TeV-scale gravity increases PeV n-cross section See Wednesday Afternoon SessionCosmic Neutrino Factory: radiation enveloping black hole black hole p + g -> n + p+ ~ cosmic ray + neutrino -> p + p0 ~ cosmic ray + gamma Cosmic Neutrino FactoryW-B Bound: W-B BoundEvading the Bound: Evading the Bound “Neutrino only” sources that are optically thick to proton photo-meson interactions and from which protons cannot escape. No observational evidence (from baryons or high energy photons) Cores of AGNs (rather than in the jets) by photo-meson interactions or via p−p collisions in a collapsing galactic nucleus or in a cacooned black hole. The most optimistic predictions of the AGN core model have already been ruled out by AMANDAMannheim, Protheore and Rachen Model: Mannheim, Protheore and Rachen ModelNeutrinos from Cosmic Rays: Neutrinos from Cosmic Rays ~50 events/km2/yrSize Perspective for KM3: Size Perspective for KM3 50 m 1500 m 2500 m 300 m AMANDAIIDetection Technique: Detection Technique neutrino muon or tau Cerenkov light cone detector interaction The muon radiates blue light in its wake Optical sensors capture (and map) the light See Talks in this SessionDetection of e , , : Detection of e , , O(km) long muon tracks direction determination by cherenkov light timing 17 m Muon Events : Eµ= 10 TeV Eµ= 6 PeV Measure energy by counting the number of fired PMT. (This is a very simple but robust method) Muon Events Determining Energy: Determining Energy 10 TeV m 6 PeV m 375 TeV CascadeDouble Bang: Double Bang E << 1PeV: Single cascade (2 cascades coincide) E ≈ 1PeV: Double bang E >> 1 PeV: partially contained (reconstruct incoming tau track and cascade from decay) Regeneration makes Earth quasi transparent for high energie ; (Halzen, Salzberg 1998, …) Also enhanced muon flux due to Secondary µ, and nµ (Beacom et al.., astro/ph 0111482) Learned, Pakvasa, 1995Tau Cascades: Tau Cascades E << 1PeV: Single cascade (2 cascades coincide) E ≈ 1PeV: Double bang E >> 1 PeV: partially contained (reconstruct incoming tau track and cascade from decay)Neutrino ID (solid)Energy and angle (shaded): Neutrino ID (solid) Energy and angle (shaded) Neutrino flavorTau Transparency/Regeneration: Tau Transparency/Regeneration ne and nµ are absorbed in the Earth via charged current interactions (muons range out) Above ~100 TeV the Earth is opaque to ne & νµ. But, the Earth never becomes completely opaque to nt Due to the short t lifetime, t’s produced in nt charged-current interactions decay back into nt Also, secondary ne & νµ. fluxes are produced in the tau decays. Flavor Ratios: Flavor Ratios The ratio of flavors at the source is expected to be 0:2:1= nt : nm : ne Since the distance to the source is >> than the oscillation length – any admixture at the source should wind up: 1:1:1= nt : nm : ne when arriving at earth What if that isn’t true? Exotic neutrino properties if not 1:1:1: Exotic neutrino properties if not 1:1:1 Neutrino decay (Beacom, Bell, Hooper, Pakvasa& Weiler) CPT violation (Barenboim& Quigg) Oscillation to steriles with very tiny delta δm2 (Crocker et al; Berezinskyet al.) Pseudo-Dirac mixing (Beacom, Bell, Hooper, Learned, Pakvasa& Weiler) 3+1 or 2+2 models with sterile neutrinos (Dutta, Reno and Sarcevic) Magnetic moment transitions (Enqvist, Keränen, Maalampi) Varying mass neutrinos (Fardon, Nelson & Weiner; Hung & Pas) Supernova Monitor: Amanda-II Amanda-B10 IceCube Supernova Monitor B10: 60% of Galaxy A-II: 95% of Galaxy IceCube: up to LMCLarge Scale Neutrino Detectors: Large Scale Neutrino Detectors NESTOR Pylos, Greece ANTARES La-Seyne-sur-Mer, France BAIKAL Russia IceCube, South Pole, Antarctica NEMO Catania, Italy See Talks in this SessionRadio Cherenkov Detectors: Radio Cherenkov Detectors Rice Anita SalsaAcoustic Detectors: Acoustic Detectors SAUND (Study of Acoustic Underwater Neutrino Detection)Conclusions: Conclusions Now Soon Future Amanda Cherenkov arrays ??? SK Radio Detectors Neutrino Astronomy is just beginning to open a new window on the Universe!