Slide 1: microRNA PROFILING USING A HIGH PERFORMANCE,
FLEXIBLE μPARAFLO® BIOCHIP PLATFORM Christoph Eicken PhD
Head of Technical Services, Microarrays
Chris Hebel
Director of Business Development
Slide 2: Agenda μParaflo® MicrofluidicsTechnology Customer
Applications Q & A Practical
Considerations
Slide 3: LC Sciences headquarters in Houston, Texas - USA
offices in USA & China, representatives inEurope, Japan, Korea, & India
customers in >40 countries
first miRNA array service provider (since 2005)
Slide 4: Microfluidic Array Platform μParaflo® Microfluidics Chip 10 µl total volume
4000 features
Slide 5: The Core:
3 Levels of Flexibility Chemistry
Digital Photolithography
Microfluidics
Slide 6: Chemistry
Does not require electrochemical surface
Nor specialty monomers
Standard DMT chemistry allows use ofwide array of (non-regular) building blocks The Core:
3 Levels of Flexibility
Slide 7: Standard t-Boc protecting group in an amino acid
Deprotected using an acid or a photogenerated acid (PGA) Others: Photo-labile protecting group in an amino acid
Deprotected using light irradiation 3 Levels of Flexibility No specialty monomers required
Slide 8: 3 Levels of Flexibility Digital Photolithography
custom sequences
on demand synthesis
Slide 9: 3 Levels of Flexibility Microfluidics
multiple washing steps
T-variation
using the same chip, keeping all other parameters constant
Slide 10: Si Substrate Cover Glass Distribution Channel Fluid Channel Reaction Chamber Light Beam Photogenerated Reagent μParaflo® Microfluidics Chip
Slide 11: DNA
DNA array
OligoMix®
Modified Nucleotides
miRNA array
ncRNA array Peptides
Kinase array
Protein binding array
Custom arrays Probe Diversity
Slide 12: microRNA Related Publications Source: PubMed
Slide 13: miRBase Version # of sequences
(all species) miRBase Synchronicity
Slide 14: Probe Content: miRBase and Beyond miRBase 13.0
Slide 15: Microfluidics vs. Spotted Arrays - Raw Data
Slide 16: Microfluidics vs. Spotted Arrays - Raw Data
Slide 17: Spot Uniformity
Enhanced Mass Transfer: improving sensitivity
High Reproducibility
Closed System:no dye “bleaching”
Incremental Stringency Wash: higher specificity
Stable for years Microfluidics vs. Spotted Arrays
Slide 18: Specificity: Optimized RNA Hybridization Probes Sample: 20 mer RNA control spiked into total RNA sample Signal Intensity
Slide 19: Brain qRT-PCR Validation Dual sample array using mouse brain and mouse thymus RNA samples from Ambion.
Results are compared with QPCR data for the same two RNA samples, also purchased from Ambion, published by Applied Biosystems (ABI)*.
The comparison data includes all 12 microRNA transcripts published by ABI.
* Data is obtained from http://www.appliedbiosystems.com
Slide 20: To Sum It Up: Microfluidic Microarray Platform:Reliable and accurate results as validated with qPCR and Northern Blot
Optimized RNA Hybridization Probes:Designed with optimized Tms to ensure uniform hybridization affinity under high stringency hybridization conditions enhancing both, sensitivity and specificity of the probes
Most Current Content:Not 90% or 95% coverage but always 100% of experimentally verified miRNA sequences on all our arrays
Complete Content Flexibility:The choice is yours!
No Limitation on Use of Data:Full access and control over the results generated from your experiment
Slide 21: Customer Publications: 75+ Cancer Research
Cardiovascular Research
Neuroscience
Small RNA Discovery
Reproductive Biology
Plant Science
Virology (HIV, Epstein-Barr)
Stem Cell Research
Endocrinology
Slide 22: Pseudo color images Biomarker Discovery / Profiling:
Differential Expression - One Dual Sample Chip control (Cy3) vs treated (Cy5) Cy3/Cy5 ratio
Slide 23: Sample Data Repeats
Slide 24: Raw Data in Publications
Slide 25: Control / Treated Biological repeats t-Test Multi-array normalization and clustering analysis Array assay Differentiated miRNAs of Biological & Statistical Significance - Multiple Chips
Slide 26: Disease - Marker identification(Olga, Olson, Cameron) Cameron JE, Yin Q, Fewell C, Lacey M, McBride J, Wang X, Lin Z, Schaefer BC, Flemington EK. (2008)The Epstein-Barr Virus latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) induces cellular microRNA-146a, a modulator of lymphocyte signaling pathways. J Virol [Epub ahead of print]. Disease Marker Discovery
Slide 27: Cameron JE, Yin Q, Fewell C, Lacey M, McBride J, Wang X, Lin Z, Schaefer BC, Flemington EK. (2008)The Epstein-Barr Virus latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) induces cellular microRNA-146a, a modulator of lymphocyte signaling pathways. J Virol [Epub ahead of print]. Experiment included 5 biological repeats/group
Probes for human (hsa) & virus (kshv) miRNA were used on the same chip
Slide 28: From Biomarkers to Therapeutics Tavazoie SF, Alarcón C, Oskarsson T, Padua D, Wang Q, Bos PD, Gerald WL, Massagué J. (2008) Endogenous human microRNAs that suppress breast cancer metastasis. Nature 451(7175), 147-52.
Slide 29: Discovery Applications: Potential miRNA or other small regulatory RNA genes array result
Slide 30: Discovery Applications: mRNA 3’ 3’ UTR Protein miRNA Target Screening
Slide 31: Vagin VV, Sigova A, Li C, Seitz H, Gvozdev V, Zamore PD. (2006) A distinct small RNA pathway silences selfish genetic elements in the germline. Science 313(5785), 320-324. Cummins JM, He Y, Leary RJ, Pagliarini R, Diaz L.A Jr, Sjoblom T, Barad O, Bentwich Z, Szafranska AE, Labourier E, et al. (2006) The colorectal microRNAome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 3687-3692. Discovery Applications:
Slide 32: Workflow
Slide 33: microRNA Microarray Service - Reports
Slide 34: Which Probe Content Should I Chose? Most current miRBase content
If correlation to older data needed:chose same probe content
single vs multi species chips:less can be more...
custom probes:(predicted sequences, controls etc.)
proprietary probes (additional paperwork, who will benefit from those data?)
Slide 35: For differential studies, such as normal versus disease, untreated versus treated, and time course experiments, it is very important to have biological repeats in the experiment. Statistic identification of biologically significant calls can only be made based on comparing miRNA expression difference between different sample groups with the expression variations among samples within corresponding groups.
Statistic significance is determined by a statistic test, such as T-test. The mathematical formulation of the T-test is T function
where, A and B are the average value of group A and B, respectively; SA and SB are the standard deviations of group A and B, respectively; and nA and nB are the number of samples in group A and B, respectively. The higher the T function, the higher the probability of groups A and B being statistically different. Obviously, a statistic test can be performed only when each group contains more than one sample. Importance of biological repeats _ _
Slide 36: Number of biological repeats needed The higher the biological variations are expected the more biological repeats should be used.
Cell line samples: preferably 3 or more, at least 2
Lab animals: preferably 4 or more, at least 3
Human samples: 10 or more
Slide 37: Technical repeats Generally there is no need for technical repeats. It is much more technically effective and financially efficient to use biological repeats instead of technical repeats. In most cases, our assay variations are less than biological-repeat variations. Pooled biological samples Generally, pooled samples are not recommended. When samples are pooled, critical formation on sample-to-sample variations (SA and SB in equation (1)) within the same groups are lost and therefore identification of biologically significant miRNA differentials may no longer be possible.
Slide 38: Dual sample vs single sample assay A dual-sample assay is used when two samples are compared with each other. The assay does not involve chip-to-chip variations and therefore may reveal very small differences between the two samples. The assay is especially suitable when paired samples are studied, such as diseased tissue being compared with an adjacent non-diseased tissue. The assay also has an advantage of lower per-sample cost than single sample assay does. However, design considerations should be given to minimize dye-related bias.
A single-sample assay is used when multiple independent samples are compared with each other. The assay has the advantage of free of dye-related bias although it has a higher per-sample cost.
Slide 39: Minimize dye bias in dual-sample assays Dye swap can be used to eliminate false calls due to dye-related bias in dual sample assays. A good design should have half members of each group labeled with Cy3 and the other half labeled with Cy5.
Example 1: 4 samples (A1, A2, B1, and B2) from an experiment of comparing untreated versus treated samples with 2 biological repeats for each sample group.
Slide 40: Minimize dye bias in dual-sample assays Example 2: 12 samples from an experiment involving three sample groups of untreated (A1-A4), treated at dosage 1 (B1-B4), and treated at dosage 2 (C1-C4).
Slide 41: Normalizaton LOWESS (Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing)is one of many "modern" modeling methods that build on "classical" methods, such as linear and nonlinear least squares regression. LOWESS combines much of the simplicity of linear least squares regression with the flexibility of nonlinear regression. It does this by fitting simple models to localized subsets of the data to build up a function that describes the deterministic part of the variation in the data, point by point. In fact, one of the chief attractions of this method is that the data analyst is not required to specify a global function of any form to fit a model to the data, only to fit segments of the data.The trade-off for these features is increased computation.
Your controls (optional)
Our controls (optional)
Slide 42: microRNA Microarray Service Featuring µParaflo™
Biochip Technology 100% CURRENT miRBASE PROBE CONTENT NUMEROUS CUSTOMER PUBLICATIONS OPTIMIZED RNA HYBRIDIZATION PROBES COST EFFECTIVE 1-STOP SOLUTION COMPLETE CONTENT FLEXIBILITY