logging in or signing up contingency theory ppt ayushi3101 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: Embed: Flash iPad Dynamic Copy Does not support media & animations Automatically changes to Flash or non-Flash embed WordPress Embed Customize Embed URL: Copy Thumbnail: Copy The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 853 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: November 21, 2011 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript PowerPoint Presentation: Contingency TheoriesContingency Theories : Contingency Theories Contingency theory is a class of behavioural theory that claims that there is no best way to organize a corporation or to make decisionsPowerPoint Presentation: The two contingency theories of leadership are: The Fiedler model Path -goal theoryFiedler model : Fiedler model Leadership styles are either task motivated or relationship motivated Least preferred co-worker (LPC) questionnaire A high LPC score suggests that the leader has a human relations orientation A low LPC score indicates a task orientationLeast Preferred Coworker (LPC) Scale: Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) Scale Pleasant 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unpleasant Friendly 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unfriendly Rejecting 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Accepting Tense 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Relaxed Cold 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Warm Supportive 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Hostile Boring 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Interesting Quarrelsome 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Harmonious Gloomy 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Cheerful Open 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Closed Backbiting 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Loyal Untrustworthy 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Trustworthy Considerate 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Inconsiderate Nasty 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Nice Agreeable 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Disagreeable Insincere 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Sincere Kind 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 UnkindScoring: Scoring The final score is the total of the numbers you circled on the 18 scales 57 or less = Low LPC (task motivated) 58-63 = Middle LPC (socio-independent leaders, self directed and not overly concerned with the task or with how others view them) 64 or above = High LPC (motivated by relationships)Defining the Situation : Defining the Situation Three situational components determine the favourableness of situational control: 1. Leader-Member Relations 2. Task Structure 3. Leader Position PowerPowerPoint Presentation: Findings of the Fiedler Model Category Leader-Member Relations Task Structure Position Power I Good High Strong II Good High Weak III Good Low Strong IV Good Low Weak V Poor High Strong VI Poor High Weak VII Poor Low Strong VIII Poor Low Weak Good Poor Performance Relationship -Oriented Task-Oriented Favorable Moderate UnfavorablePowerPoint Presentation: Situational Control High Control Situations Moderate Control Situations Low Control Situations Leader-member relations Task Structure Position Power Good Good Good High High High Strong Weak Strong Good Poor Poor Low High High Weak Strong Strong Poor Poor Low Low Strong Weak Situation I II III IV V VI VII VIII Optimal Leadership Style Task Motivated Leadership Relationship Motivated Leadership Task Motivated Leadership Representation of Fiedler’s Contingency ModelPowerPoint Presentation: Two ways in which we can improve leader effectiveness. change the leader 2) change the situationEvaluation : Evaluation Pros Empirical research supports this theory Includes the impact of situations on leaders This theory is predictive and therefore provides useful information about the type of leadership that is most likely to be successful in a specific context Does not require people to be successful in all situations (perfection is not required) Data from this theory could be useful to organizations in developing leadership profilesPowerPoint Presentation: Fails to fully explain why people with certain leadership styles are more effective in situations than others Questions regarding the LPC scale have been made because it does not correlate well with other standard leadership measures. LPC instructions are not clear – leaders are unsure how to choose a least preferred coworker Also fails to explain what to do when there is a mismatch between the leader and the situation in the workplace ConsPath Goal Theory : Path Goal Theory Path Goal theory is about how leaders motivate subordinates to accomplish designated goals The stated goal of leadership is to enhance employee performance and employee satisfaction by focusing on employee motivation Emphasizes the relationship between the leader’s style and characteristics of the subordinates and the work setting The leader must use a style that best meets the subordinates motivational needsPath-Goal Theory: Path-Goal TheoryPowerPoint Presentation: Leadership Behaviors Directive leadership Supportive Leadership Participative Leadership Achievement-Oriented LeadershipPowerPoint Presentation: Subordinate Characteristics Need for affiliation Preferences for structure Desires of control Self-perceived level of task abilityEvaluation: Evaluation Pros Helps understand how leader behavior effects subordinates satisfaction and work performance Deals directly with motivation – one of the only theories to address this Provides a very practical model – make a clear path and follow itPowerPoint Presentation: Cons This is a very complex theory that incorporates many aspects of leadership Research only partially supports the theory Fails to explain adequately the relationship between leader behavior and subordinate motivation Treats leadership as a one way street, places a majority of the responsibility on the leader You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.