logging in or signing up 15 Keys to Success alexanderdiscipline Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 130 Category: Sports License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: September 15, 2011 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript R.G. Wick Alexander, DDS, MSD Diplomate of the American Board of Orthodontics 840 W. Mitchell St. Arlington, Texas 76013 www.drsalexander.com www.alexanderdiscipline.com : R.G. Wick Alexander, DDS, MSD Diplomate of the American Board of Orthodontics 840 W. Mitchell St. Arlington, Texas 76013 www.drsalexander.com www.alexanderdiscipline.com Copyright 2006 by Dr. Richard G. Alexander. No part of this lecture may be used without permission of author. Alexander Discipline 2006 International Symposium “FACTS vs FICTION in ORTHODONTICS May 11 & 12, 2006 Arlington Wyndham Hotel Arlington, Texas: Alexander Discipline 2006 International Symposium “FACTS vs FICTION in ORTHODONTICS May 11 & 12, 2006 Arlington Wyndham Hotel Arlington, Texas Copyright 2006 by Dr. Richard G. Alexander. No part of this lecture may be used without permission of author.Slide 3: A A F O R E 15 KEYS TO SUCCESSSlide 4: Patient : J.W. # 8715 Age : 12 Yrs. 11 Mos.Slide 5: Class II OB: 5.5 mm OJ: 11 mmSlide 6: Pre - TreatmentSlide 8: 86 79 7 123 25 16 127 85 Pre - TXSlide 9: Treatment Time : 25 monthsSlide 10: Post - TreatmentSlide 12: 81 78 3 107 30 127 16 96 Post - TX25 Years Post- Treatment : 25 Years Post- TreatmentSlide 16: J.W. 1/3/02 40 6 25 Yrs. Post - TX 81 77 4 103 33 16 130 94Slide 17: Age : 40 Yrs. 6 Mos.Case Comparison: Case ComparisonSlide 19: Pre – TX 27.31 mm Post – TX 29.75 mm 25 Yrs. Post – TX 28.91 mm Mandibular Intercanine WidthSlide 20: Pre – TX 33.99 mm Post – TX 37.03 mm 25 Yrs. Post – TX 36.80 mm Maxillary Intermolar WidthSlide 21: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX Curve of Spee Correction & StabilitySlide 22: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX Arch FormsSlide 23: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXSlide 24: Occlusion Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXSlide 25: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXSlide 26: Note : Initial Panoramic X-ray not available. Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXSlide 27: 86 79 7 123 25 127 85 81 78 3 107 30 127 96 Post - TX Pre - TXSlide 28: JW – CompositeSlide 29: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXSlide 30: Post - TX Pre - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXBEGIN WITH THE END IN MIND: BEGIN WITH THE END IN MIND In orthodontics always …GOAL : to place the teeth in a particular position that will produce the most: GOAL : to place the teeth in a particular position that will produce the mostSlide 33: Healthy Functional Aesthetic Stable results possible !Slide 35: Archform templateSlide 38: The FINISHAre there not certain truths that experience has taught us where to best place these teeth?: Are there not certain truths that experience has taught us where to best place these teeth?Are there fundamental requirements we can all agree on?: Are there fundamental requirements we can all agree on?“The more things change … the more they stay the same.”: “The more things change … the more they stay the same.”Today certain facts cannot be disputed.: Today certain facts cannot be disputed. They can be ignored – but not disputed.Why can’t we apply new technology to create results that: Why can’t we apply new technology to create results that good science has already proven?The benchmarks have been established!: The benchmarks have been established!Until science changes the benchmarks, it is our responsibility as professionals to strive to achieve them.: Until science changes the benchmarks, it is our responsibility as professionals to strive to achieve them.By combining the knowledge from:: By combining the knowledge from: Our forefathers Clinical experience ResearchSpecific benchmarks can be followed . . .: Specific benchmarks can be followed . . . to consistently produce quality, stable results .Slide 49: 15 KEYS to SUCCESS GOALS for Orthodontic Treatment“Nothing is new. . .”: “Nothing is new. . .” Socrates “We just discover for ourselves.”A “New” Cephalometric Analysis is presented .: A “New” Cephalometric Analysis is presented . Putting certain established cephalometric measurements together CEPHALOMETRICS :TETRAGON – PLUS Analysis : TETRAGON – PLUS Analysis Definition : Tetragon – four sided figureSlide 53: TetragonTETRAGON – PLUS : TETRAGON – PLUS Definition : Plus : ANB & soft tissue profileSlide 55: SNA SNB ANB U1-SN SN-MP U1-L1 IMPA the TETRAGON PLUSWhat are the goals for these measurements ?: What are the goals for these measurements ?CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS :: Measurement : Angle : Desired Result/ Change : 1. Mandibular Incisor Torque Control IMPA Within 3 degrees of original * *convex and concave profiles may require more changes CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS :Slide 58: 1. Mandibular incisor torque – 5 degrees Mandibular incisor torque control initial rectangular archwire - 6 degrees tip lower 1 st molarSlide 59: MP IMPA Mandibular Incisor Torque Control L1CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS :: Measurement : Angle : Desired Result/ Change: 2. Vertical Control SN TO MP 0 +/-3 degrees CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS :Slide 61: 2. Vertical control – Headgear direction of forceSlide 62: SN-MP SN MP Vertical ControlSlide 63: Measurement : Angle : Desired Result / Change 3. Maxillary Incisor Torque Control U1 TO SN 101 - 105 degrees * * Will differ depending upon vertical skeletal patternSlide 64: 3. Maxillary incisor torque – 17 X 25 SS in .018 slotSlide 65: U1-SN Maxillary Incisor Torque ControlSlide 66: Measurement : Angle : Desired Result / Change 4. Interincisal Angle U1 TO L1 130 –135 degrees * * Will differ depending upon vertical skeletal patternSlide 67: 4. Interincisal angle – 17 X 25 SS in .018 slotSlide 68: U1-L1 Interincisal AngleSlide 69: U1-SN U1-L1 Tetragon SN-MP IMPA CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS:: Measurement : Angle : Desired Result/ Change: 5. Sagital Control SNA 1-3 degrees SNB ANB CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS: “PLUS”Slide 71: 5. Sagittal control – Headgear and Class 2 ElasticsSlide 72: SNA SNB ANB Sagital ControlSlide 73: PLUS … add Soft Tissue ProfileSlide 74: SNA SNB ANB U1-SN SN-MP U1-L1 IMPA the TETRAGON PLUSStudy Model Goals: Study Model Goals Next :Measurements obtained with an Electronic Digital Caliper …: Measurements obtained with an Electronic Digital Caliper …Slide 77: Pre – TX 27.16 mm Post – TX 27.16 mm 25 Yrs. Post – TX 27.62 mm Mandibular Intercanine Width STUDY MODEL GOALS : 6. Mandibular Intercanine Width Within 1.0 mm of originalSlide 78: 6. Mandibular intercanine width – Final ArchwireSlide 79: Evidence throughout the literatureClinically …: Control Mandibular Intercanine Width with Final archwire Clinically …Slide 82: Pre – TX 34.33 mm Post – TX 37.63 mm 25 Yrs. Post – TX 36.37 mm Maxillary Intermolar Width STUDY MODEL GOALS : 7. Maxillary Intermolar Width Between 34-38 mmSlide 83: 7. Maxillary intermolar width - RPE (if necessary) or archwireSlide 84: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX Arch Form STUDY MODEL GOALS : 8. Archform OvoidSlide 85: 8. Arch form – Alexander arch formSlide 86: Archform templateSlide 88: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX … on lower arch use “small” archform .Slide 89: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX Curve of Spee Leveled mandibular Arch STUDY MODEL GOALS : 9. Leveled Mandibular Arch Flat Curve of SpeeSlide 90: 9. Leveled mandibular arch – -6 degrees tip mandibular 1 st molar Reverse curve of Spee in the mandibular archSlide 91: Occlusion Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX STUDY MODEL GOALS : 10. Occlusion Good Intercuspation CR = CO Anterior Guidance Cuspid protectionSlide 92: 10. Occlusion – Bracket Height PlacementPanoramic X-Ray: Panoramic X-Ray Next :PANORAMIC X-RAY :: 11. Root Positioning Anterior roots spread apart Lower 1 st molars upright PANORAMIC X-RAY :Slide 95: 11. Root positioning – Angulation built into bracketPANORAMIC X-RAY :: 11. Root Positioning Extraction sites parallel PANORAMIC X-RAY :Slide 97: 11. Root positioning – Angulation built into bracketPANORAMIC X-RAY :: PANORAMIC X-RAY : 12. Periodontal HealthSlide 99: 12. Periodontal Health - Oral Hygiene Move teeth quickly to final positions and “Let it Cook”PANORAMIC X-RAY :: PANORAMIC X-RAY : 13. Temporal Mandibular Joint (TMJ)Slide 101: 13. TMJ - Cuspid and anterior guidance: Bracket placement CR + CO: Headgear and Class 2 elasticsFacial Photos: Facial Photos Next :FACIAL PHOTOS:: 14. Soft Tissue Profile lips touching when relaxed aesthetic line touches chin & lips and bisects nose FACIAL PHOTOS:Slide 104: 14. Soft tissue profile - Proper diagnosis (Extraction VS Non-Extraction)FACIAL PHOTOS:: 15. Smile symmetric midline smile line smile arc no dark buccal corridors FACIAL PHOTOS:Slide 106: 15. Smile – Proper use of curve in archwires with the Alexander archformDoes anybody agree with these GOALS ?: Does anybody agree with these GOALS ?Slide 108: Then the question is …How can the teeth be placed in the most healthy, functional, esthetic & stable positions possible …: How can the teeth be placed in the most healthy, functional, esthetic & stable positions possible … in a consistent manner … in a : in a consistent manner … in a busy practice ? Our answer is …: Our answer is …The Alexander Discipline and the “Signature Line” Brackets : A A F O R E The Alexander Discipline and the “Signature Line” BracketsSlide 113: A A F O R E The “Signature Line” is designed to reach the 15 GOALS !Slide 114: Literature Review supporting the 15 KEYS :Slide 115: “A Comparative Study of Orthodontic Stability in Class I Extraction Cases” J. Moody Alexander Unpublished Master’s Thesis Baylor 1995 “Non-Extraction Approach to Tooth Size Arch Length Discrepancies with the Alexander Discipline” Buschang, P.H., Horton-Reuland S.J., Legler, L., and Nevant, C. Seminars in Orthodontics,Vol. 7 : No. 2, June 2001:117-131.Slide 116: “Long-Term Post-Retention Stability of Combined RPE / Lip Bumper Therapy Followed by Full Fixed Appliances’’ Tyler Ferris, DDS, MS, Peter Buschang, PhD; Wick Alexander, DDS, MS; Jimmy Boley, DDS, MS, Baylor Dallas 2002 “An Arch Form Designed for use with a Specific Straight Wire Orthodontic Appliance” G.D. Mc Kelvain Baylor June 1982Slide 117: “A Computerized Analysis of the Shape and Stability of Mandibular Arch Form.” Felton, J.M.; Sinclair, P.M.; Jones, D.L.; Alexander, R.G. American Journal of Orthodontics 1987; 92: 478-483. “Leveling the Curve of Spee with a Continuous Archwire Technique – A Long-Term Cephalometric Analysis.” Rael Bernstein Accepted by AJO State University of New York at BuffaloSlide 118: A Office : www.drsalexander.com AFORE : www.alexanderdiscipline.com A F O R E Alexander Discipline 2006 International Symposium “FACTS vs FICTION in ORTHODONTICS May 11 & 12, 2006 Arlington Wyndham Hotel Arlington, Texas: Alexander Discipline 2006 International Symposium “FACTS vs FICTION in ORTHODONTICS May 11 & 12, 2006 Arlington Wyndham Hotel Arlington, Texas Copyright 2006 by Dr. Richard G. Alexander. No part of this lecture may be used without permission of author. You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
15 Keys to Success alexanderdiscipline Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 130 Category: Sports License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: September 15, 2011 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript R.G. Wick Alexander, DDS, MSD Diplomate of the American Board of Orthodontics 840 W. Mitchell St. Arlington, Texas 76013 www.drsalexander.com www.alexanderdiscipline.com : R.G. Wick Alexander, DDS, MSD Diplomate of the American Board of Orthodontics 840 W. Mitchell St. Arlington, Texas 76013 www.drsalexander.com www.alexanderdiscipline.com Copyright 2006 by Dr. Richard G. Alexander. No part of this lecture may be used without permission of author. Alexander Discipline 2006 International Symposium “FACTS vs FICTION in ORTHODONTICS May 11 & 12, 2006 Arlington Wyndham Hotel Arlington, Texas: Alexander Discipline 2006 International Symposium “FACTS vs FICTION in ORTHODONTICS May 11 & 12, 2006 Arlington Wyndham Hotel Arlington, Texas Copyright 2006 by Dr. Richard G. Alexander. No part of this lecture may be used without permission of author.Slide 3: A A F O R E 15 KEYS TO SUCCESSSlide 4: Patient : J.W. # 8715 Age : 12 Yrs. 11 Mos.Slide 5: Class II OB: 5.5 mm OJ: 11 mmSlide 6: Pre - TreatmentSlide 8: 86 79 7 123 25 16 127 85 Pre - TXSlide 9: Treatment Time : 25 monthsSlide 10: Post - TreatmentSlide 12: 81 78 3 107 30 127 16 96 Post - TX25 Years Post- Treatment : 25 Years Post- TreatmentSlide 16: J.W. 1/3/02 40 6 25 Yrs. Post - TX 81 77 4 103 33 16 130 94Slide 17: Age : 40 Yrs. 6 Mos.Case Comparison: Case ComparisonSlide 19: Pre – TX 27.31 mm Post – TX 29.75 mm 25 Yrs. Post – TX 28.91 mm Mandibular Intercanine WidthSlide 20: Pre – TX 33.99 mm Post – TX 37.03 mm 25 Yrs. Post – TX 36.80 mm Maxillary Intermolar WidthSlide 21: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX Curve of Spee Correction & StabilitySlide 22: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX Arch FormsSlide 23: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXSlide 24: Occlusion Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXSlide 25: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXSlide 26: Note : Initial Panoramic X-ray not available. Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXSlide 27: 86 79 7 123 25 127 85 81 78 3 107 30 127 96 Post - TX Pre - TXSlide 28: JW – CompositeSlide 29: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXSlide 30: Post - TX Pre - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TXBEGIN WITH THE END IN MIND: BEGIN WITH THE END IN MIND In orthodontics always …GOAL : to place the teeth in a particular position that will produce the most: GOAL : to place the teeth in a particular position that will produce the mostSlide 33: Healthy Functional Aesthetic Stable results possible !Slide 35: Archform templateSlide 38: The FINISHAre there not certain truths that experience has taught us where to best place these teeth?: Are there not certain truths that experience has taught us where to best place these teeth?Are there fundamental requirements we can all agree on?: Are there fundamental requirements we can all agree on?“The more things change … the more they stay the same.”: “The more things change … the more they stay the same.”Today certain facts cannot be disputed.: Today certain facts cannot be disputed. They can be ignored – but not disputed.Why can’t we apply new technology to create results that: Why can’t we apply new technology to create results that good science has already proven?The benchmarks have been established!: The benchmarks have been established!Until science changes the benchmarks, it is our responsibility as professionals to strive to achieve them.: Until science changes the benchmarks, it is our responsibility as professionals to strive to achieve them.By combining the knowledge from:: By combining the knowledge from: Our forefathers Clinical experience ResearchSpecific benchmarks can be followed . . .: Specific benchmarks can be followed . . . to consistently produce quality, stable results .Slide 49: 15 KEYS to SUCCESS GOALS for Orthodontic Treatment“Nothing is new. . .”: “Nothing is new. . .” Socrates “We just discover for ourselves.”A “New” Cephalometric Analysis is presented .: A “New” Cephalometric Analysis is presented . Putting certain established cephalometric measurements together CEPHALOMETRICS :TETRAGON – PLUS Analysis : TETRAGON – PLUS Analysis Definition : Tetragon – four sided figureSlide 53: TetragonTETRAGON – PLUS : TETRAGON – PLUS Definition : Plus : ANB & soft tissue profileSlide 55: SNA SNB ANB U1-SN SN-MP U1-L1 IMPA the TETRAGON PLUSWhat are the goals for these measurements ?: What are the goals for these measurements ?CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS :: Measurement : Angle : Desired Result/ Change : 1. Mandibular Incisor Torque Control IMPA Within 3 degrees of original * *convex and concave profiles may require more changes CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS :Slide 58: 1. Mandibular incisor torque – 5 degrees Mandibular incisor torque control initial rectangular archwire - 6 degrees tip lower 1 st molarSlide 59: MP IMPA Mandibular Incisor Torque Control L1CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS :: Measurement : Angle : Desired Result/ Change: 2. Vertical Control SN TO MP 0 +/-3 degrees CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS :Slide 61: 2. Vertical control – Headgear direction of forceSlide 62: SN-MP SN MP Vertical ControlSlide 63: Measurement : Angle : Desired Result / Change 3. Maxillary Incisor Torque Control U1 TO SN 101 - 105 degrees * * Will differ depending upon vertical skeletal patternSlide 64: 3. Maxillary incisor torque – 17 X 25 SS in .018 slotSlide 65: U1-SN Maxillary Incisor Torque ControlSlide 66: Measurement : Angle : Desired Result / Change 4. Interincisal Angle U1 TO L1 130 –135 degrees * * Will differ depending upon vertical skeletal patternSlide 67: 4. Interincisal angle – 17 X 25 SS in .018 slotSlide 68: U1-L1 Interincisal AngleSlide 69: U1-SN U1-L1 Tetragon SN-MP IMPA CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS:: Measurement : Angle : Desired Result/ Change: 5. Sagital Control SNA 1-3 degrees SNB ANB CEPHALOMETRIC GOALS: “PLUS”Slide 71: 5. Sagittal control – Headgear and Class 2 ElasticsSlide 72: SNA SNB ANB Sagital ControlSlide 73: PLUS … add Soft Tissue ProfileSlide 74: SNA SNB ANB U1-SN SN-MP U1-L1 IMPA the TETRAGON PLUSStudy Model Goals: Study Model Goals Next :Measurements obtained with an Electronic Digital Caliper …: Measurements obtained with an Electronic Digital Caliper …Slide 77: Pre – TX 27.16 mm Post – TX 27.16 mm 25 Yrs. Post – TX 27.62 mm Mandibular Intercanine Width STUDY MODEL GOALS : 6. Mandibular Intercanine Width Within 1.0 mm of originalSlide 78: 6. Mandibular intercanine width – Final ArchwireSlide 79: Evidence throughout the literatureClinically …: Control Mandibular Intercanine Width with Final archwire Clinically …Slide 82: Pre – TX 34.33 mm Post – TX 37.63 mm 25 Yrs. Post – TX 36.37 mm Maxillary Intermolar Width STUDY MODEL GOALS : 7. Maxillary Intermolar Width Between 34-38 mmSlide 83: 7. Maxillary intermolar width - RPE (if necessary) or archwireSlide 84: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX Arch Form STUDY MODEL GOALS : 8. Archform OvoidSlide 85: 8. Arch form – Alexander arch formSlide 86: Archform templateSlide 88: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX … on lower arch use “small” archform .Slide 89: Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX Curve of Spee Leveled mandibular Arch STUDY MODEL GOALS : 9. Leveled Mandibular Arch Flat Curve of SpeeSlide 90: 9. Leveled mandibular arch – -6 degrees tip mandibular 1 st molar Reverse curve of Spee in the mandibular archSlide 91: Occlusion Pre - TX Post - TX 25 Yrs. Post - TX STUDY MODEL GOALS : 10. Occlusion Good Intercuspation CR = CO Anterior Guidance Cuspid protectionSlide 92: 10. Occlusion – Bracket Height PlacementPanoramic X-Ray: Panoramic X-Ray Next :PANORAMIC X-RAY :: 11. Root Positioning Anterior roots spread apart Lower 1 st molars upright PANORAMIC X-RAY :Slide 95: 11. Root positioning – Angulation built into bracketPANORAMIC X-RAY :: 11. Root Positioning Extraction sites parallel PANORAMIC X-RAY :Slide 97: 11. Root positioning – Angulation built into bracketPANORAMIC X-RAY :: PANORAMIC X-RAY : 12. Periodontal HealthSlide 99: 12. Periodontal Health - Oral Hygiene Move teeth quickly to final positions and “Let it Cook”PANORAMIC X-RAY :: PANORAMIC X-RAY : 13. Temporal Mandibular Joint (TMJ)Slide 101: 13. TMJ - Cuspid and anterior guidance: Bracket placement CR + CO: Headgear and Class 2 elasticsFacial Photos: Facial Photos Next :FACIAL PHOTOS:: 14. Soft Tissue Profile lips touching when relaxed aesthetic line touches chin & lips and bisects nose FACIAL PHOTOS:Slide 104: 14. Soft tissue profile - Proper diagnosis (Extraction VS Non-Extraction)FACIAL PHOTOS:: 15. Smile symmetric midline smile line smile arc no dark buccal corridors FACIAL PHOTOS:Slide 106: 15. Smile – Proper use of curve in archwires with the Alexander archformDoes anybody agree with these GOALS ?: Does anybody agree with these GOALS ?Slide 108: Then the question is …How can the teeth be placed in the most healthy, functional, esthetic & stable positions possible …: How can the teeth be placed in the most healthy, functional, esthetic & stable positions possible … in a consistent manner … in a : in a consistent manner … in a busy practice ? Our answer is …: Our answer is …The Alexander Discipline and the “Signature Line” Brackets : A A F O R E The Alexander Discipline and the “Signature Line” BracketsSlide 113: A A F O R E The “Signature Line” is designed to reach the 15 GOALS !Slide 114: Literature Review supporting the 15 KEYS :Slide 115: “A Comparative Study of Orthodontic Stability in Class I Extraction Cases” J. Moody Alexander Unpublished Master’s Thesis Baylor 1995 “Non-Extraction Approach to Tooth Size Arch Length Discrepancies with the Alexander Discipline” Buschang, P.H., Horton-Reuland S.J., Legler, L., and Nevant, C. Seminars in Orthodontics,Vol. 7 : No. 2, June 2001:117-131.Slide 116: “Long-Term Post-Retention Stability of Combined RPE / Lip Bumper Therapy Followed by Full Fixed Appliances’’ Tyler Ferris, DDS, MS, Peter Buschang, PhD; Wick Alexander, DDS, MS; Jimmy Boley, DDS, MS, Baylor Dallas 2002 “An Arch Form Designed for use with a Specific Straight Wire Orthodontic Appliance” G.D. Mc Kelvain Baylor June 1982Slide 117: “A Computerized Analysis of the Shape and Stability of Mandibular Arch Form.” Felton, J.M.; Sinclair, P.M.; Jones, D.L.; Alexander, R.G. American Journal of Orthodontics 1987; 92: 478-483. “Leveling the Curve of Spee with a Continuous Archwire Technique – A Long-Term Cephalometric Analysis.” Rael Bernstein Accepted by AJO State University of New York at BuffaloSlide 118: A Office : www.drsalexander.com AFORE : www.alexanderdiscipline.com A F O R E Alexander Discipline 2006 International Symposium “FACTS vs FICTION in ORTHODONTICS May 11 & 12, 2006 Arlington Wyndham Hotel Arlington, Texas: Alexander Discipline 2006 International Symposium “FACTS vs FICTION in ORTHODONTICS May 11 & 12, 2006 Arlington Wyndham Hotel Arlington, Texas Copyright 2006 by Dr. Richard G. Alexander. No part of this lecture may be used without permission of author.