Presentation Transcript
Service Quality 2 :Service Quality 2 Designing and Achieving Service Quality
Objectives :Objectives After this session you will be able to;
Discuss the scope of service quality
Illustrate methods applied to design quality in Services
Describe tools used in achieving Service Quality
Use a fishbone chart in a cause and effect analysis
Scope of Service Quality :Scope of Service Quality Fitzsimmons proposes viewing quality from five perspectives
Content
Are standard procedures being followed?
Process
Is the sequence of events in the service process appropriate?
Structure
Are the physical facilities and organisational design adequate for the service?
Outcome
What change in status has the service effected?
Impact
What is the long range effect of the service on the consumer?
Quality Service by Design :Quality Service by Design Incorporation of Quality in the Service Package
Supporting facility
Facilitating goods
Explicit services
Implicit services
Table 10.4 (text pp 281) :Table 10.4 (text pp 281) Service
Package
Feature Attribute
or
Requirement Measurement Nonconformance
Corrective
action
Definition of Quality :Definition of Quality By using a quality system to maintain conformance to the design requirements which definitional approach to quality is being used?
Definition of Quality :Definition of Quality Crosby defines quality as “conformance to requirements”
This means defining explicitly in measurable terms what constitutes conformance to requirements
Quality is seen as an action-oriented activity requiring corrective measures when non-conformance occurs
Quality Service by Design :Quality Service by Design Methods
Taguchi methods
Robust design to ensure proper functioning under adverse conditions
Poka-yoke
Checklists or devises that do not let the employee make a mistake
Quality Function Deployment
House of quality
Central belief that products should be designed to reflect the customers’ desires and tastes thereby coordinating design, manufacturing and marketing
Achieving Service Quality :Achieving Service Quality Cost of Quality
Prevention
Detection
Internal failure
External failure
Prevention :Prevention Costs associated with operations or activities that keep failure from happening and minimise detection costs
Examples
Quality planning
Recruitment and selection
Training programmes
Quality improvement projects
Detection :Detection Costs incurred to ascertain the condition of a service to determine whether it conforms to quality standards
Examples
Periodic inspection
Process control
Collecting quality data
Internal failure :Internal failure Costs incurred to correct nonconforming work before delivery to the customer
Examples
Scrapped reports and forms
Rework
Downtime
External failure :External failure Costs incurred to correct nonconforming work after delivery to the customer or to correct work that did not satisfy a customers specified needs
Examples
Negative word of mouth
Loss of future business
Investigation time
Slide 14:In manufacturing companies external and internal failure costs together accounted for 50% to 80% of the total cost of quality
Juran suggests that $1 invested in prevention is worth $100 in detection costs and $10,000 in failure costs
Tools for Achieving Service Quality :Tools for Achieving Service Quality Service Process Control
Statistical Process Control
Service Process Control :Service Process Control The manufacturing based approach to quality focuses on conformance to internally developed specifications.
The control of quality is viewed as a feedback control system comparing output with a standard
The next overhead shows the basic control cycle as applied to service control process
Service Process Control :Service Process Control Resources Identify reason
for
nonconformance Establish
measure of
performance Monitor
conformance to
requirements Take
corrective
action Service
concept Customer
input Customer
output Service
process
Difficulties in implementation :Difficulties in implementation Defining service performance measures
Intangibility of services
Simultaneous production and consumption
Customers are asked to evaluate the service “after the fact”
By focusing on the delivery process itself these difficulties may be overcome – statistical process control
Statistical Process Control :Statistical Process Control What should happen if the process is not performing as expected?
An investigation to identify the cause and to suggest corrective action
Could the variance be a result of random occurrences and not a process failure?
Is change necessary?
Constructing and Using a Quality Control Chart :Constructing and Using a Quality Control Chart Decide on some measure of service system performance
Collect representative historical data form which estimates of population mean and variance for the system performance can be made
Decide on a sample size and calculate +/-3 standard deviation control limits
Graph the control chart as a function of sample mean values versus time
Constructing and Using a Quality Control Chart :Constructing and Using a Quality Control Chart Plot sample means collected at random on the chart
Process in control (sample mean falls within control limits
Process out of control (sample mean falls outside control limits, therefore;
Evaluate the situation
Take corrective action
Check results of action
Update the control chart and incorporate new data
Control Charts :Control Charts Two types based on the type of performance measure
Variable control charts record measurements that permit fractional values e.g. length, weight, time
Attribute control charts record discrete data e.g. the number of errors as a percentage of the total
Slide 23:Fishbone Chart Equipment Personnel Procedure Material Other Delayed
Flight
Departure
Fishbone analysis (Ishikawa chart) :Fishbone analysis (Ishikawa chart) The analysis begins with the problem at the head and traces the major categories of causes along the spine
Usual causes
Personnel
Procedure
Equipment
Material
Other
Fishbone Analysis :Fishbone Analysis Causes are eliminated through discussion and consensus and remaining causes targeted for additional data gathering
See Midway example pp 293 in text
Control Chart of Departure Delays :Control Chart of Departure Delays 1983 target 1983 lower limit 1982 1983
Flight Departure Delay Fishbone Chart :Flight Departure Delay Fishbone Chart Equipment Personnel Procedure Material Other Aircraft late to gate Late arrival Gate occupied Mechanical failures Late pushback tug Weather Air traffic Late food service Late fuel Late baggage to aircraft Gate agents cannot process passengers quickly enough Too few agents Agents undertrained Agents undermotivated Agents arrive at gate late Late cabin cleaners Late or unavailable cockpit crews Late or unavailable cabin crews Poor announcement of departures Weight an balance sheet late Delayed checkin procedure Confused seat selection Passengers bypass checkin counter Checking oversize baggage Issuance of boarding pass Acceptance of late passengers Cutoff too close to departure time Desire to protect late passengers Desire to help company’s income Poor gate locations Delayed
Flight
Departure
Pareto Analysis :Pareto Analysis Data is arranged so that causes of a problem are ordered in descending frequency of occurrence
80/20 rule
Apply the rule to the Midway example
Pareto Analysis of Flight Departure Delay :Pareto Analysis of Flight Departure Delay All stations, except hub Newark Washington(national)
Percentage Percentage Percentage
of Cumulative of Cumulative of Cumulative
incidences percentage incidences percentage incidences percentage
Late 53.3 53.3 Late 23.1 23.1 Late 33.3 33.3
passengers passengers passengers
Waiting for 15.0 68.3 Waiting for 23.1 46.2 Waiting for 33.3 66.6
pushback pushback pushback
Waiting for 11.3 79.6 Waiting for 23.1 69.3 Late weight 19.0 85.6
fueling fueling and balance
sheet
Late weight 8.7 88.3 Cabin 15.4 84.7 Waiting for 9.5 95.1
and balance cleaning and fueling
sheet supplies
Summary :Summary In this session we
Discussed the scope of service quality
Illustrated methods applied to design quality in Services
Described tools used in achieving Service Quality
Used a fishbone chart in a cause and effect analysis
Essay :Essay “Customer loyalty is only due to the lack of a better alternative”Discuss