File server

Views:
 
Category: Education
     
 

Presentation Description

No description available.

Comments

Presentation Transcript

Windows Server 2003 Performance Benchmarks:

Windows Server 2003 Performance Benchmarks Compared to Microsoft Windows ® NT Server 4.0 and Microsoft Windows Server ™ 2000 Source: VeriTest

Contents:

Contents File Server Performance Web Server Performance Static Mix Dynamic (ISAPI) Mix Dynamic (CGI) Mix E-commerce (SSL ISAPI) Mix E-commerce (SSL CGI) Mix Active Directory ® performance

File Server Performance NetBench Benchmark:

File Server Performance NetBench Benchmark File Server Performance: 64% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems 148% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on eight-processor systems Requests per Second  59%  102%  148%  64% Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 En terprise Edition File Server Performance Measurement of how well a file server handles file I/O requests from 32-bit Windows clients through network file operations Windows XP clients with Windows Server 2003 Windows 2000 clients with Windows 2000 Windows NT clients with Windows NT Up to 1.2 Gbps Netbench throughput over gigabit network adapters Up to 1.6 Gbps using network adapters that support TCP Offload Engine (TOE) technology Hardware for all tests: HP ProLiant DL760 Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors 4 GB RAM Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest

Web Server Performance WebBench Benchmark: Static Mix:

Web Server Performance WebBench Benchmark: Static Mix Static Web Server Performance: 162% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems 487% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on eight-processor systems Static Web Server Performance Requests per Second  162%  197%  296%  487% Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 En terprise Edition Small, cacheable static file set of 60 MB 2% of requests result in not-found responses (status 404) 6 KB average response size All requests non-keep-alive Hardware for all tests: HP ProLiant DL760 Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors 4 GB RAM Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest

Web Server Performance WebBench Benchmark: Dynamic (ISAPI) Mix:

Web Server Performance WebBench Benchmark: Dynamic (ISAPI) Mix Dynamic (ISAPI-based) Web Server Performance: 109% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems 368% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on eight -processor systems Dynamic (ISAPI) Web Server Performance Requests per Second  134%  176%  368%  109% Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 En terprise Edition Small static file set of 60 MB Simple dynamic ISAPI DLL that generates dynamic responses Request mix: 80% of requests are for static data 20% of requests are for dynamic ISAPI-based content All requests non-keep-alive Hardware for all tests: HP ProLiant DL760 Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors 4 GB RAM Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest

Web Server Performance WebBench Benchmark: Dynamic (CGI) Mix:

Web Server Performance WebBench Benchmark: Dynamic (CGI) Mix Dynamic (CGI-based) Web Server Performance: 39% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems 263% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on eight -processor systems Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 En terprise Edition Test Configurations Dynamic (CGI-based) Web Server Performance Requests per Second  84%  175%  263%  39% Small static file set of 60 MB Simple dynamic CGI DLL that generates dynamic responses Request mix: 80% of requests are for static data 20% of requests are for dynamic CGI-based content All requests non-keep-alive Hardware for all tests: HP ProLiant DL760 Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors 4 GB RAM Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest

Web Server Performance WebBench: E-commerce (SSL ISAPI) Mix:

Web Server Performance WebBench: E-commerce (SSL ISAPI) Mix E-commerce (SSL ISAPI) Web Server Performance: 74% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems 158% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on four-processor systems  110%  158%  152% (vs. Windows 2000)  74% Requests per Second Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 En terprise Edition E-commerce (SSL ISAPI) Web Server Performance Static file set of 60 MB with ISAPI and SSL requests Request mix very similar to dynamic mix: 76% static content 16% dynamic ISAPI content 8% of requests are SSL (2% dynamic SSL, 6% static SSL) All requests non-keep-alive Hardware for all tests: HP ProLiant DL760 Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors 4 GB RAM Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest

Web Server Performance WebBench: E-commerce (SSL CGI) Mix:

Test Configurations Requests per Second E-commerce (SSL CGI) Web Server Performance Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 En terprise Edition  85%  349%  330%  50% Web Server Performance WebBench: E-commerce (SSL CGI) Mix E-commerce (SSL CGI) Web Server Performance: 50% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems 330% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on eight-processor systems Static file set of 60 MB with CGI and SSL requests Request mix very similar to dynamic mix: 76% static content 16% dynamic CGI content 8% of requests are SSL (2% dynamic SSL, 6% static SSL) All requests non-keep-alive Hardware for all tests: HP ProLiant DL760 Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors 4 GB RAM Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest

Active Directory DirectoryMark Benchmark: Messaging Mix:

Active Directory Performance: 102% faster than Windows 2000 on single-processor systems 439% faster than Windows 2000 on eight-processor systems Active Directory DirectoryMark Benchmark: Messaging Mix Simulates e-mail server’s use of a directory based on LDAP protocol 1 million-user database with more than 10 organizational units Hardware for all tests: HP DL760 Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors 4 GB RAM Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server  102%  116%  149%  439% 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 1P 2P 4P 8P Searches/sec Active Directory (Messaging) Performance

Slide 11:

Active Directory DirectoryMark Benchmark: Address Mix Active Directory Performance: 10x faster than Windows 2000 on single-processor systems 19x faster than Windows 2000 on eight-processor systems Simulates users looking up names in address book and expanding group for e-mail based on LDAP protocol 1 million-user database with more than 10 organizational units Hardware for all tests: HP DL760 Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors 4 GB RAM Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest Active Directory (Address Lookup) Performance 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 1P 2P 4P 8P  10x  13x  17x  19x Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Searches/sec

Slide 12:

© 2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. This presentation is for informational purposes only. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, in this summary.

authorStream Live Help