logging in or signing up HD- IOI-HA results May04 aSGuest7775 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 150 Category: Others/ Misc License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 22, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript The International Outcomes Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)Australian results and the impact of hearing loss on outcomes : The International Outcomes Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)Australian results and the impact of hearing loss on outcomes Harvey Dillon National Acoustic Laboratories A problem : A problem PIPSL SHI HHS SHAPIE HPI HHIE HCA HAUQ HHIA APHAB HAPI SAC OI SSQ PHAP GP HMS COSI DSCF GHABP CPHI SHAPI SADL Dillon, NAL Slide 3: IOI-HA concepts The result of an expert group – Eriksholme Workshop 1999 Capture all major dimensions of outcomes Short and simple Intended so that different delivery systems and countries can be compared Translated to 21 languages International Outcomes Inventory – Hearing Aids Dillon, NAL IOI-HA questions (paraphrased slightly) : IOI-HA questions (paraphrased slightly) 1. On an average day, how many hours did you use the hearing aid? 2. How much has the hearing aid helped in the situation where you most wanted to hear better? 3. How much difficulty do you still have in that situation? 4. Overall, is your hearing aid worth the trouble? 5. How much do your hearing difficulties still affect the things you can do? 6. How much are other people still bothered by your hearing difficulties? 7. How much have your hearing aids changed you enjoyment of life? Use Benefit Residual activity limitation Satisfaction Residual participation restriction Impact on others Quality of life Dillon, NAL IOI-HA Response scale : IOI-HA Response scale Five-point scale e.g. Question 3 – residual difficulty Very much difficulty Quite a lot of difficulty Moderate difficulty Slight difficulty No difficulty Scaled so that better outcomes (more benefit, less residual difficulties) have bigger numbers Dillon, NAL International studies : International studies Dillon, NAL International Outcomes Inventory - Hearing AidsIOI-HA : International Outcomes Inventory - Hearing AidsIOI-HA Dillon, NAL Factor analysis : Factor analysis Which questions tend to be marked high or low together by the same people? Dillon, NAL Two subscales : Two subscales Subscale 1 1. Use 2. Benefit 4. Satisfaction 7. Impact on quality of life Subscale 2 3. Residual activity limitation 5. Residual participation limitation 6. Residual impact on others Change Residual difficulty Dillon, NAL Correcting for demographics : Correcting for demographics Hearing level in better ear Hearing level in worse ear Gender Age New or return client Scorei = c1 HLbetter + c2.HLworse + c3.Gender + c4.Age + c5.Type + ai B or Beta values Dillon, NAL Multi-linear regression: beta values : Multi-linear regression: beta values Dillon, NAL Multi-linear regression: beta values : Multi-linear regression: beta values Dillon, NAL Important demographic variables : Important demographic variables Hearing loss Age New or return clients Dillon, NAL Effect of demographics on total scores : Effect of demographics on total scores Dillon, NAL Effect of demographics on total scores : Effect of demographics on total scores Biggest single effect: Return versus new clients rate use 0.44 scale points higher Dillon, NAL Summary : Summary Simple measure available Australian results good Slightly affected by demographics Hearing loss Age New versus return clients Demographic effects strongest for individual questions and subscales Can correct data to allow for different demographics Dillon, NAL Slide 17: The end You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
HD- IOI-HA results May04 aSGuest7775 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 150 Category: Others/ Misc License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 22, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript The International Outcomes Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)Australian results and the impact of hearing loss on outcomes : The International Outcomes Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)Australian results and the impact of hearing loss on outcomes Harvey Dillon National Acoustic Laboratories A problem : A problem PIPSL SHI HHS SHAPIE HPI HHIE HCA HAUQ HHIA APHAB HAPI SAC OI SSQ PHAP GP HMS COSI DSCF GHABP CPHI SHAPI SADL Dillon, NAL Slide 3: IOI-HA concepts The result of an expert group – Eriksholme Workshop 1999 Capture all major dimensions of outcomes Short and simple Intended so that different delivery systems and countries can be compared Translated to 21 languages International Outcomes Inventory – Hearing Aids Dillon, NAL IOI-HA questions (paraphrased slightly) : IOI-HA questions (paraphrased slightly) 1. On an average day, how many hours did you use the hearing aid? 2. How much has the hearing aid helped in the situation where you most wanted to hear better? 3. How much difficulty do you still have in that situation? 4. Overall, is your hearing aid worth the trouble? 5. How much do your hearing difficulties still affect the things you can do? 6. How much are other people still bothered by your hearing difficulties? 7. How much have your hearing aids changed you enjoyment of life? Use Benefit Residual activity limitation Satisfaction Residual participation restriction Impact on others Quality of life Dillon, NAL IOI-HA Response scale : IOI-HA Response scale Five-point scale e.g. Question 3 – residual difficulty Very much difficulty Quite a lot of difficulty Moderate difficulty Slight difficulty No difficulty Scaled so that better outcomes (more benefit, less residual difficulties) have bigger numbers Dillon, NAL International studies : International studies Dillon, NAL International Outcomes Inventory - Hearing AidsIOI-HA : International Outcomes Inventory - Hearing AidsIOI-HA Dillon, NAL Factor analysis : Factor analysis Which questions tend to be marked high or low together by the same people? Dillon, NAL Two subscales : Two subscales Subscale 1 1. Use 2. Benefit 4. Satisfaction 7. Impact on quality of life Subscale 2 3. Residual activity limitation 5. Residual participation limitation 6. Residual impact on others Change Residual difficulty Dillon, NAL Correcting for demographics : Correcting for demographics Hearing level in better ear Hearing level in worse ear Gender Age New or return client Scorei = c1 HLbetter + c2.HLworse + c3.Gender + c4.Age + c5.Type + ai B or Beta values Dillon, NAL Multi-linear regression: beta values : Multi-linear regression: beta values Dillon, NAL Multi-linear regression: beta values : Multi-linear regression: beta values Dillon, NAL Important demographic variables : Important demographic variables Hearing loss Age New or return clients Dillon, NAL Effect of demographics on total scores : Effect of demographics on total scores Dillon, NAL Effect of demographics on total scores : Effect of demographics on total scores Biggest single effect: Return versus new clients rate use 0.44 scale points higher Dillon, NAL Summary : Summary Simple measure available Australian results good Slightly affected by demographics Hearing loss Age New versus return clients Demographic effects strongest for individual questions and subscales Can correct data to allow for different demographics Dillon, NAL Slide 17: The end