logging in or signing up pdf_mtg_em_rep11 aSGuest56046 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 11 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: July 22, 2010 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Cloud Top Pressure from Geostationary Satellite Observations in the Oxygen A-Band : Cloud Top Pressure from Geostationary Satellite Observations in the Oxygen A-Band Jürgen Fischer, Rene Preusker Carsten Rathke Free University of Berlin User requirements : User requirements Outline : Outline Review of existing concepts Oxygen A-band principle, history, algorithm, applications CO2 slicing Assessment Sensitivity, error analysis Summary System requirements Spectral, radiometric, auxiliary data Conclusions and recommendations Review of existing concepts to derive cloud top pressure : Review of existing concepts to derive cloud top pressure Part I Principle (1) : Principle (1) radiance ratio between an absorbing and a window channel depends on photon path length photon path length is mainly determined by air-mass above the cloud = cloud top pressure algorithm has to account for: multiple scattering surface reflection multi-layer cloud system Principle (2) : Principle (2) History : History 1961 Yamamoto and Wark: “Determination of Cloud Altitude from Satellite“ 1967 Gemini-5 1996 POLDER (†) 1996 MOS 2002 MERIS (2003 GLI) Algorithms (1) : Algorithms (1) Apparent pressure method: Calculation of air mass from geometry Vicarious calibration Inversion method Radiative transfer calculations Inversion using Regression/LUT/fast RTM /artificial neural networks Consistency Algorithms (2) : Algorithms (2) 1. Radiative transfer: Matrix operator model Mie-theory Spectral optical properties 1D (3D?) - simulations Algorithms (3) : Algorithms (3) 2. Inversion : Regression LUT Fast forward models + Artificial neural networks Algorithms (4) : Algorithms (4) 3. Consistency check fast forward (ann) calculations/estimations from retrieved parameter comparison (inversion of the inversion) Applications (1) : Applications (1) CTP from aircraft measurements ACE 2 campaign 1997 Application (2.1) : Application (2.1) CTP from MOS Application (2.2) : Application (2.2) CTP from MOS Application (2.3) : Application (2.3) MOS vs. radiosondes Application (2.4) : Application (2.4) MOS vs. radiosondes Application (2.5) : Application (2.5) MOS vs. radiosondes Application (2.6) : Application (2.6) MOS vs. ATSR2 CO2-sclicing (1) : CO2-sclicing (1) Normalized weighting functions for the HIRS-1 channels (from Wielicki and Coakley [1981]) CO2-sclicing (1) : CO2-sclicing (1) Wylie and Menzel [1989] CO2-sclicing (3) : CO2-sclicing (3) Assessment of geo-stationary satellite observations to derive cloud top pressure : Assessment of geo-stationary satellite observations to derive cloud top pressure Part II Sensitivity (1) : Sensitivity (1) ffff Sensitivity (2) : Sensitivity (2) fff Sensitivity (3) : Sensitivity (3) ctp=500 hPa Sensitivity (4) : Sensitivity (4) ctp=500 hPa Sensitivity (5) : Sensitivity (5) . Sensitivity (6) : Sensitivity (6) fff Procedure (1) : Procedure (1) Inversion Real world data: Lin Lout albedo geometry RTM ctp Procedure (2) : Procedure (2) . Hidden layer Input layer Output layer L0 R a Jv JS j ctp=s(Wout#s(Win#I)) Error (1) : Error (1) . Error (2) : Error (2) . Error (3) : Error (3) . Summary (1) : Summary (1) CTP has been retrieved successfully from satellite measurements in the O2A-Band (POLDER, MOS) and aircraft campaigns The accuracy is in the order of 30hPa (MOS vs. radiosondes; MOS vs. ATSR2) MERIS will give the opportunity to test and improve algorithms within the next 5-? Years. Summary (2) : Summary (2) Lin/Lout = R ctp x=dR/(R dctp) Sensititivity x is between 0.03 %/hPa and 0.2%/hPa for a bandwitdh between 10nm and 0.7nm Surface influence TOA radiance (even for thick clouds) R is sensitive to cloud optical and geometrical thickness x is variable with respect to cloud optical thickness and surface albedo Summary (3) : Summary (3) Error is between 20 and 70hPa as a function of cloud optical/geometrical thickness and surface albedo Accuracy of albedo should be better than 0.1 Geometry does not influence accuracy Summary (L) : Summary (L) Wishlist: 2 reference channels (to correct spectral surface albedo) 2 absorption channels (to correct for penetration depth) You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
pdf_mtg_em_rep11 aSGuest56046 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 11 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: July 22, 2010 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Cloud Top Pressure from Geostationary Satellite Observations in the Oxygen A-Band : Cloud Top Pressure from Geostationary Satellite Observations in the Oxygen A-Band Jürgen Fischer, Rene Preusker Carsten Rathke Free University of Berlin User requirements : User requirements Outline : Outline Review of existing concepts Oxygen A-band principle, history, algorithm, applications CO2 slicing Assessment Sensitivity, error analysis Summary System requirements Spectral, radiometric, auxiliary data Conclusions and recommendations Review of existing concepts to derive cloud top pressure : Review of existing concepts to derive cloud top pressure Part I Principle (1) : Principle (1) radiance ratio between an absorbing and a window channel depends on photon path length photon path length is mainly determined by air-mass above the cloud = cloud top pressure algorithm has to account for: multiple scattering surface reflection multi-layer cloud system Principle (2) : Principle (2) History : History 1961 Yamamoto and Wark: “Determination of Cloud Altitude from Satellite“ 1967 Gemini-5 1996 POLDER (†) 1996 MOS 2002 MERIS (2003 GLI) Algorithms (1) : Algorithms (1) Apparent pressure method: Calculation of air mass from geometry Vicarious calibration Inversion method Radiative transfer calculations Inversion using Regression/LUT/fast RTM /artificial neural networks Consistency Algorithms (2) : Algorithms (2) 1. Radiative transfer: Matrix operator model Mie-theory Spectral optical properties 1D (3D?) - simulations Algorithms (3) : Algorithms (3) 2. Inversion : Regression LUT Fast forward models + Artificial neural networks Algorithms (4) : Algorithms (4) 3. Consistency check fast forward (ann) calculations/estimations from retrieved parameter comparison (inversion of the inversion) Applications (1) : Applications (1) CTP from aircraft measurements ACE 2 campaign 1997 Application (2.1) : Application (2.1) CTP from MOS Application (2.2) : Application (2.2) CTP from MOS Application (2.3) : Application (2.3) MOS vs. radiosondes Application (2.4) : Application (2.4) MOS vs. radiosondes Application (2.5) : Application (2.5) MOS vs. radiosondes Application (2.6) : Application (2.6) MOS vs. ATSR2 CO2-sclicing (1) : CO2-sclicing (1) Normalized weighting functions for the HIRS-1 channels (from Wielicki and Coakley [1981]) CO2-sclicing (1) : CO2-sclicing (1) Wylie and Menzel [1989] CO2-sclicing (3) : CO2-sclicing (3) Assessment of geo-stationary satellite observations to derive cloud top pressure : Assessment of geo-stationary satellite observations to derive cloud top pressure Part II Sensitivity (1) : Sensitivity (1) ffff Sensitivity (2) : Sensitivity (2) fff Sensitivity (3) : Sensitivity (3) ctp=500 hPa Sensitivity (4) : Sensitivity (4) ctp=500 hPa Sensitivity (5) : Sensitivity (5) . Sensitivity (6) : Sensitivity (6) fff Procedure (1) : Procedure (1) Inversion Real world data: Lin Lout albedo geometry RTM ctp Procedure (2) : Procedure (2) . Hidden layer Input layer Output layer L0 R a Jv JS j ctp=s(Wout#s(Win#I)) Error (1) : Error (1) . Error (2) : Error (2) . Error (3) : Error (3) . Summary (1) : Summary (1) CTP has been retrieved successfully from satellite measurements in the O2A-Band (POLDER, MOS) and aircraft campaigns The accuracy is in the order of 30hPa (MOS vs. radiosondes; MOS vs. ATSR2) MERIS will give the opportunity to test and improve algorithms within the next 5-? Years. Summary (2) : Summary (2) Lin/Lout = R ctp x=dR/(R dctp) Sensititivity x is between 0.03 %/hPa and 0.2%/hPa for a bandwitdh between 10nm and 0.7nm Surface influence TOA radiance (even for thick clouds) R is sensitive to cloud optical and geometrical thickness x is variable with respect to cloud optical thickness and surface albedo Summary (3) : Summary (3) Error is between 20 and 70hPa as a function of cloud optical/geometrical thickness and surface albedo Accuracy of albedo should be better than 0.1 Geometry does not influence accuracy Summary (L) : Summary (L) Wishlist: 2 reference channels (to correct spectral surface albedo) 2 absorption channels (to correct for penetration depth)