PrcAgendaNrega

Views:
 
Category: Others/ Misc
     
 

Presentation Description

No description available.

Comments

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1: 

Agenda Notes on NREGA for Performance Review Committee October 08-09, 2009 1

Slide 2: 

Structure National Overview for FY 2009-10 of States on key physical and financial parameters Detailed analysis of Statewise performance in FY 2009-10 on following parameters: unmet demand in FY 2009-10, districts with declining performance, works related:completion rate & wage-material ratio, notified wages & average wages paid wage disbursement through accounts transparency & accountability capacity building: Personnel Recruited & trainings State cell State fund MIS Operationalization as on FY 2009-10 Social Audit Ombudsman Status of complaints: forwarded by MORD & VIP references 2

NREGA National Overview : 

NREGA National Overview 3

OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Employment Provided (In Lakhs) : 

OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Employment Provided (In Lakhs) Employment Provided: 3.04 crore HHs 4

OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Employment Provided (In Lakhs) : 

OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Employment Provided (In Lakhs) 5

Slide 6: 

OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Persondays Generated (in Crore) Total Persondays Generated: 118.54 crore HHs 6

Slide 7: 

OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Persondays Generated (in Crore) 7

Slide 8: 

OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August, 09) Average Personday per Household National Average: 39 Days Phase-I:40 days Phase-II:35 days Phase-III:40 days 8

Slide 9: 

OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August, 09) Average Personday per Household 9

Slide 10: 

OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10) Women Participation At least 1/3rd of the beneficiaries shall be women who have registered and requested for work under the Scheme (NREGA ACT, Schedule II, Section 6) Year-2008-09 National Average: 51% 10

Slide 11: 

OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10) Major Share of SC/ST Households in Employment 11

Slide 12: 

FINANCIAL OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Total Expenditure (in Crore) Total Available Fund : Rs. 26831.21 Crore Total Expenditure: Rs. 14398.64 Crore (54% utilization) Wage Expenditure: Rs. 10476.67 Crore (73% of total expenditure) 12

Slide 13: 

FINANCIAL OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Total Expenditure (in Crore) 13

Slide 14: 

State wise Analysis for FY 2009-10 Detailed analysis of Statewise performance in FY 2009-10 on following parameters: unmet demand in FY 2009-10, districts with declining performance, works related:completion rate & wage-material ratio, notified wages & average wages paid wage disbursement through accounts transparency & accountability capacity building: Personnel Recruited & trainings State cell State fund 14

Slide 15: 

Andhra Pradesh 15

Slide 16: 

Andhra Pradesh Districts with high scale of employment & persondays per households Cuddapah, Rangareddy, Kurnool, Vijaynagaram Concerns: Krishna, W. Godavari, Guntoor Strengths Administrative structure in place High coverage for BPL as well as rural HHs 1.22 crore accounts opened & strong MOU with Dept of Posts Social Audits rules formed for the State Intensive trainings held 100% wage disbursement through Accounts. State HR policy for accidental insurance & medi-claim policy for 4000 dedicated NREGA personnel Issues in NREGA implementation in the State: Decline in HH provided employment as compare to Aug, 08: Adilabad, Khammam, E. Godavari, Guntoor, Kurnool, Nellore and W. Godawari Average wage paid higher than Notified wage- most of the districts (State Average Rs. 89) Low work completion rate: Work completion rate is only 18% in the state, even though MPR reports work of small scale: with average 7 households and 321 persondays should have high completion rate AP to integrate state MIS with national MIS (NREGAsoft) or populate MIS modules 16

Slide 17: 

Assam 17

Slide 18: 

Assam Strengths Districts with high scale of employment & persondays per households Kokhrajhar, Concerns: Decline in HH provided employment as compare to Aug, 08 : Goalpara, Karbi Anglong, Darrang, Hailakandi, Marigaon and Nalbari No works completed in Bogaigaon, N C Hills, Golaghat, Kamrup (Metro), Karimganj, Nagaon, Sivsagar, 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained at district level in Dhemaji, Darrang, Nalbari, Chirang, Kamrup, Sivsagar, Sonitpur and Tinsukia Significant variation in avg wages paid from Notified wage: Karbi Anglong (Rs. 139), Jorhat (Rs. 106), Karimganj (Rs.350), Kamrup Metro (Rs. 11). No wage disbursement through accounts in N.C. Hills, Goalpara and Kamrup (Metro). no reports on MR used/verified: N C Hills GRS not appointed 10 districts State Cell non constituted State Fund not operationalized 18

Slide 19: 

Arunachal Pradesh 19

Slide 20: 

Arunachal Pradesh Concerns: No reporting Upper Subansari, Changlang, East Kameng, East Siang, Kurung Kumay, Lower Dibang, Lower Subansari, Papum Pare, Upper Dibang, Upper Siang and West Siang No wage expenditure in Lohit and Tawang. Significant variation in avg wages paid from Notified wage: Tirap (Rs. 71) and West Kemang (Rs. 736) No wage disbursement through accounts across the state No reporting on transparency & capacity building MPR except partial reporting from Tirap. No GRS appointment State Cell non constituted State Fund not operationalized 20

Slide 21: 

BIHAR 21

Slide 22: 

BIHAR Strengths: Districts with high persondays per households Katihar, Supaul, Lakhisarai 100% Wage disbursement through Accounts. Concerns: More than 10% decline in HH employed in Jamui, Madhubani, Munger, Nalanda, Purnia, Rohtas, Samastipur, Vaishali and Most of the Phase-II districts. Districts with low persondays per households (less than 14): Madhubani, Nawada, Khagaria, Paschim & Purbi Champaran and Shiekhpura Low BPL coverage: HH employed as % BPL households: 19% at State level Low works completion rate (less than 15%): Sheohar, Vaishali, Champaran, Sitamarhi. (State Average 30%) 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: Bhojpur, Munger, Muzaffarpur, Vaishali, Banka, Bhagalpur, Gopalganj and Purbi Champaran. Significant variation in avg wages: Vaishali (Rs. 103), Banka (Rs. 105), Khagaria (Rs. 185), Saran (Rs. 98) State Cell non constituted State Fund not operationalized 22

Slide 23: 

CHHATTISGARH 23

Slide 24: 

CHHATTISGARH Strengths More than 90% Wage Disbursment through Accounts. Districts with high persondays per households (more than 50) Bilaspur, Dantewada, Dhamtari, Jaspur, Kanker, Kawardha, and Durg Concerns: Decline in HH employed & persondays generated in almost all phase I districts except Rajnandgaon and Surguja Districts with low persondays per households (less than 30): Surguja and Baster Low works completion rate (less than 20%): Surguja & Mahasamand 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained : Bilaspur, Korea and Korba. Low wage disbursement through accounts (Less than 50%): Raigarh, Dantewada and Jaspur Significant variation in average wage: Korea (Rs. 89) State Fund not operationalized 24

Slide 25: 

MADHYA PRADESH 25

Slide 26: 

MADHYA PRADESH Districts with high persondays per households (Greater than 60): E. Nimar, Umaria, Anuppur, Shajapur. Concerns: More than 10% decline in HH employed in over 31 districts out of 48 shows decline . overall decline is 18% Districts with low persondays per households (less than 20): Datia and Hoshangabad Less than 25% coverage of BPL households: Ashok Nagar, Harda, Bhind ,Gwalior, Jabalpur, Neemuch, Raisen, Shajapur, Ujjain & Vidisha Low works completion rate (less than 10%): Sheoni, Sheopur, Ashok Nagar, Datia, Bhind, Gwalior, Hoshangabad, Narsingpur, Sheohar and Ujjain 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: 23 districts out of 48 Districts Significant variation in avg wages: Jabalpur (Rs. 132), Mandsaur (Rs. 127), Neemuch (Rs. 144), Raisen (Rs. 103) 26

Slide 27: 

MAHARASHTRA 27

Slide 28: 

MAHARASHTRA Districts with high persondays per households more than 55: Aurangabad, Bhandara, Nandurbar, Yavatmal, Concerns: Low coverage of BPL households: 9% at State level Districts with low persondays per households (less than 14): Raigad, Ratnagiri, Sangli, Jalgaon, Thane and Wardha No work completed in Districts: Bhandara, Beed, Jalgaon, Latur and Pune expenditure on contingency more than 6%: Akola, Jalna, Kolhapur, Parbhani, Raigad, Ratangiri, Sangli, Satara, Sindhudurg and Solpur. Significant variation in avg wages: (more than Rs. Gondia, Buldhana, Osmanabad, Thane, Wardha, Jalgaon, Latur, Nagpur, Parbhani and Sagli No wage disbursement through accounts: It is only 15% in Phase-II and 45% in Phase-III districts. GRS not appointed in Wardha, Ratanagiri, Satara, Sindhudurg. No P.O.s in Washim, Kohlpour, Nagpur, Pune, Satara, Sindhudurg Poor quality reporting on MPR some of the districts shows more than 100 days per HH like Akola, Wasim and Hingoli. 28

Slide 29: 

MANIPUR 29

Slide 30: 

MANIPUR Strengths HHs employed as % of BPL HH: 190% Concerns: Districts with low persondays per households (less than 20): Ukhrul, Thoubal and Tamenlong No report from Vishnupur and Imphal East No works reported completed in Tamenlong, Chandel and Churachandpur (only 21 % works completed in the State) Significant variation in avg wages:Tamnelong(Rs. 158), Ukhrool(Rs 3099) No wage disbursement through accounts in Imphal West,Tamenlng and Senapati No GRS reported as appointed in Tamenlong and Thoubal No P.O reported as appointed in Tamenlong State Fund not operationalized State Cell not constituted 30

Slide 31: 

MEGHALAYA 31

Slide 32: 

MEGHALAYA Strengths 87% increase in Phase II districts in employment provided Women participation rate 42% Concerns: 29% decline in HHs provided employment in West Garo Hills Districts with low persondays per households (less than 20): West Garo Hills, East Khasi Hills, Jaintia Hills and all Phase III districts Low coverage of BPL households : 21% in West Khasi Hills, 37% in East Khasi Hills Low works completion rate less than 20%: Jaintia Hill(18%) 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: Jaintai (hills (58%) and Phase II districts (58%) No report regarding accounts: West Garo Hills Jaintia Hills and West Khasi Hills State Cell non constituted State Fund not operationalized 32

Slide 33: 

MIZORAM 33

Slide 34: 

MIZORAM BPL Coverage: 477% Districts with high persondays per households: Champai (49 ) Lawngtlai (46) GRS appointed in almost all Gram Panchayats Concerns: Districts with low persondays per households : Lunglei (7 days) Low works completion rate: No works completed in Lunglei and Kolasib Significant variation in avg wages in all districts: Lawndtlei (Rs. 79) State Averages for wage disbursement through accounts is only 29% State Cell non constituted State Fund not operationalized 34

Slide 35: 

NAGALAND 35

Slide 36: 

NAGALAND Strengths 196% BPL coverage High persondays of employment provided (>50): Mokochung (53), Paren (70), Zunheboto (57) Concerns: No works completed in Wokha, Dimapur, Lawngleg, Zunheboto 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained in Dimapur (56%), Kiphire(56%) Significant variation in average wages: Mon (Rs. 330),Phase III districts (Rs. 48), Phase II( Rs. 74) Low wage disbursement through accounts in Kohima (26%) No P.Os reported as appointed in Phek State Cell non constituted State Fund not operationalized 36

Slide 37: 

ORISSA 37

Slide 38: 

ORISSA Strengths 94% wage disbursement through accounts 100% MIS operationalization Concerns: Overall declines in HHs provided employment: 23% Districts with low persondays per households (less than 20): All Phase III districts (average 19), Anugul (19), Sundergarh (16), Kalahandi (19) Low work completion rate: Only 2 % for the State 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: Jharsuguda (34%), Navarangpur (49%), Nuapara (39%), Sambalpur (49), Bhadrak (48) Avg wages paid higher than Notified wage: State Average is Rs. 92 Less than 50% wage disbursement through accounts: Kandhamal (49%), Malkangiri (11%), Khordha (0%) P.Os not reported as appointed in Puri Only 43% accountants are in place 38

Slide 39: 

GUJARAT 39

Slide 40: 

GUJARAT Strengths 80% increase in employment provided from FY 2008-09 to FY 2009-10 (upto Aug) Full ICT infrastructure upto the level of the Gram Panchayat Districts with high persondays per households: Amreli (52), Junagarh (57), Mahisana (55), Porbandhar (51), Rajkot (61) 100% wage disbursement through accounts in the state Concerns: Decline in HHs provided employment : Banaskantha(40%), Narmada (53%), Navsari (26%), Mahisana (27%), Surat (22%) Districts with low persondays per households (less than 14):Tapi (9), Surat (11) Low BPL coverage- HH employed as % of BPL less than 25% in Dang (19%), Bahruch (20%), Valsad (9%), Anand (9%), Mahisana (6%), Surat (17%) Low works completion rate (less than 10%): Banaskantha (4%), Dohad (6%), Navsari (3%), Valsad (.4%), Surendranagar (4%) State Cell non constituted State Fund not operationalized 40

Slide 41: 

HARYANA 41

Slide 42: 

HARYANA Strengths 100% wage disbursement through accounts High SC participation (59%) Concerns: Low outreach: Only 9% of the HHs as % of BPL provided employment Decline in HHs provided employment: Sirsa(6%), Mewat(39%), Gurgaon(27%), Jhajhar(23%), Rohtak(23%), Sonepat (10%) Districts with low persondays per households (less than 20): Faridabad (10), Gurgaon (16), Palwal (14) Low works completion rate for the State: 21% No work completed in Gurgaon, Kurukshetra and Yamunagar Administrative exp more than 6% in Faridabad, Panchkula, Panipat, Sonepat Significant variation in avg wages: Jind(Rs. 221), Kaithal (Rs. 165), Karnal(Rs. 155), Rewari (Rs. 22) GRS not appointed in Bhiwani, Hissar, Kaithal, Karnal State Fund not operationalized 42

Slide 43: 

HIMACHAL PRADESH 43

Slide 44: 

HIMACHAL PRADESH Strengths: Increase in employment provided and persondays generated in FY 2008-09 as compared to FY 2009-10 100% wage disbursements through accounts State Fund operationalized State Cell constituted Concerns: Decline in employment provided: Hamirpur(15%), Kullu (9%) 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: Overall 58% Administrative Expenditure more than 6%: Lahaul & Spiti (7%) Significant variation in avg wages: Kinnaur (Rs. 133), Lahul & Spiti (Rs. 123) Works completed less than 20%: Kinnaur (17%), Lahaul & Spiti (17%) 44

Slide 45: 

JAMMU & KASHMIR 45

Slide 46: 

JAMMU & KASHMIR Strengths High persondays of employment Kupwara (50), Poonch (51), Kishtwar (66) 100% wage disbursement through accounts in Jammu, Kupwara, Baramulla, Kathua, Kargil, Pulwana, Samba Concerns: Low Outreach: Only 13 % HHs as % of total BPL provided employment Decline in HHs provided employed: Poonch (38%), Samba (48%) Districts with low persondays per households (less than 20):Baramulla(9) Kathua (15) No reporting from Leh, Rajouri, Reasi Only 3% woman participation in the State No work completed in Bandipore, Baramulla, Kargil, Udhampur 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: Kupwara (56%), Jammu (42%), Kargil (42%) Significant variation in avg wages: Kargil (Rs. 101), Baramulla (93%) No GRS reported as appointed: Jammu, Budgam, Kargil, Kulgam, Rajouri, Srinagar State Fund not operationalized 46

Slide 47: 

JHARKHAND 47

Slide 48: 

JHARKHAND Strengths More than 60 persondays per households: Latehar (89) 97% wage disbursement in 12 districts Lok Adalats held with help of NALSA 100% reporting of Social Audits on MIS Concerns: Decline in HHs provided employment: 11 Phase I districts (out of 20) (9% decline) Districts with low persondays per households (less than 20): Khutni (13) Low BPL coverage : Only 34% of total BPL HHs provided employment Low works completion rate (less than 10%): Giridih, (4%), Jamatara (7%), Ranchi (0.1%), Deogarh (4%) 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: Hazaribagh (50%), Jamtara(56%), Ranchi (57%), West Singhbhum (56%), East Singhbhum (52%), Khunti (52%), Ramgarh (46%) Less than 50% wage disbursement through accounts: Latehar (17%) State Fund not operationalized 48

Slide 49: 

KARNATAKA 49

Slide 50: 

KARNATAKA Strengths High Average Persondays/HH: Bellary(56), Kolar (50) 91% wage disbursement through wages in the State State Fund operationalized State Cell constituted Full MIS operationalization Concerns: Decline in HH employed: Bellary, Bidar, Chitradurg, Devangere, Raichur Low BPL coverage: 34% HH employed as % of BPL HHs at the State Level Low completion of works: Only 2% at State level No works completed in 12 districts 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: Dharwar (58%), Ramnagara(55%), Uttar Kannada (54%) Significant variation in avg wages: Overall avg. wage Rs. 92 (Phase I: Rs. 119) No GRS appointed in Bidar, Ramnagar, Udupi and Uttar Kannada 50

Slide 51: 

KERALA 51

Slide 52: 

KERALA Strengths 85% women workforce participation in the State 66% work completion rate in the State: Ernakulum(86%), Kannur (84%) Pathanamthitta (90%) 100% wage disbursement through wages State Cell constituted Concerns: Decline in HHs provided employment: Phase II districts (9% decline) Districts with low persondays per households (less than 20): All Phase III districts High contingency expenditure : All phase III districts (avg. 12%), State Average (9%) Significant variation in avg wages: Wayanad(Rs. 135), Ernakulum(Rs.204), Malappuram (Rs.138), Tiruvananthapuram(Rs.149), Thrissur(Rs. 141) Inadequate computer assistants in all districts except Idukki State Fund not operationalized 52

Slide 53: 

RAJASTHAN 53

Slide 54: 

RAJASTHAN Strengths: Households employed as % of BPL households: 297% Women workforce participation 69% at the State level High persondays of employment per Household: State Average 53 days State Cell constituted State Fund operationalized Concerns: Decline in HHs provided employment: Sirohi (18%), Chittorgarh (21%), Tonk(13%), Awlar(11%), Baran(18%), Bikaner(41%), Chruru(14%), Dholpur(13%),Jodhpur(10%) Low work completion rate: State average 16% No works completed in Tonk, Bikaner 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: Karauli (58%) Less than 50% wage disbursement through accounts: Jhalwar, Barmer, Sawai Madhopur, Tonk, Bharatpur, Bundi, Hanumangarh, Jaipur, Rajsamand No P.O.s reported as appointed in any of the districts except Dausa 54

Slide 55: 

TAMIL NADU 55

Slide 56: 

TAMIL NADU Strengths Districts with high persondays per households: Nagapattinam(77), Ariyalur(60), Dharmapuri(64), Thiruvallur(65) 98% expenditure on wages GRS appointed in all GPs & P.O.s in all Blocks Concerns: Decline in HHs provided employment: Thanjavur(15%), Turunelveli(13%), Tiruvarur(21%), decline in 10 districts out of 20 Phase III districts (avg. 10% decline) Districts with low persondays per households : Ramanathapuram(13) 2 districts reporting more than 100 days/HH: Kanchipuram(162), Pudukkottai(134) Low coverage of BPL households (<25%): Dharmapuri(23%), Kanchipuram(20%), Perambalur(24%), Nilgiri(10%) Low works completion rate : 17% State Average No work completed in Cuddalore, Sivagangai, Dharmapuri, Erode No wage disbursement through accounts at the State Level State Fund not operationalized 56

Slide 57: 

PUNJAB 57

Slide 58: 

PUNJAB Strengths High SC participation: 75% More than 80% wage disbursement through accounts Concerns: Low persondays per households: State Average 19 days, Phase II-25 days, Phase III-17 days Low BPL HHs employed as % of BPL HHs: State average 27%, Phase II-29%, Phase III-23% Low women workforce participation 26% at the State level 17% works completion rate at the State level No works completed in Amritsar, Nawanshahar, Barnala, Fatehgarhsahib, SAS Nagar 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: Amritsar, Barnala, Gurdaspur, Moga, Sangrur, Tara Taaran More than 6% administrative expenditure: Amritsar, Jullundhur, Gurdaspur,k, Sangrur No wage disbursement through accounts: Moga, Taran Taran GRS not appointed in Faridkot, Kapurthala, Ludhiana, Mansa, Moga, Rupnagar, SAS Nagar, Taran Taaran State Cell non constituted State Fund not operationalized 58

Slide 59: 

SIKKIM 59

Slide 60: 

SIKKIM Strengths Districts with high persondays per households: South district (49 days) 100 % deployment of GRS Concerns: No work completed in East District, only 20% works completed in North District More than 6% contingency expenditure in North District (16%) Significant variation in avg wages: North District (Rs.37), West District (Rs. 129) Less than 50% wage disbursement through accounts: West District P.O.s not appointed in any district State Cell non constituted State Fund not operationalized 60

Slide 61: 

TRIPURA 61

Slide 62: 

TRIPURA Strengths 53% women workforce participation in State 77% works completion rate in State Almost 100% MIS operationalization Concerns: Decline in HHs provided employment: Phase II districts(84% decline) Low persondays per HH: Dhalai (7), South Tripura(7) West Tripura reporting 147 average persondays per HH 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: South Tripura (55%) Less than 50% wage disbursement through accounts in all Phase I and Phase II districts Low work completion rate in South Tripura(23%), North Tripura(33%) State Cell non constituted State Fund not operationalized 62

Slide 63: 

UTTAR PRADESH 63

Slide 64: 

UTTAR PRADESH Strengths Districts with high persondays per households (>60): Chandauli(71), Kaushambi(67), Jhansi(61), Allahabad(62), Mainpuri(81), Varanasi(60) 100% wage disbursement through accounts High SC participation:54% State Fund operationalized Concerns: Decline in HH employed in 26 districts Districts with low persondays per households (less than 20): Ghaziabad (19), Meerut (16) Low coverage of BPL households 25 % at State level Women participation is only 18% in the State Low works completion rate (less than 10%): Chitrakoot(4%), Kaushambi(6%), Bahgpat (5%), Kashiram Nagar(3%) No work reported from Lucknow, Saharanpur 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained in 19 districts GRS not appointed Faizabad, G.B Nagar, Mahamayanage, Meerut 64

Slide 65: 

UTTARAKHAND 65

Slide 66: 

UTTARAKHAND Strengths Districts with high persondays per households: Tehri Garhwal(56), Naintal(49) 37% women participation rate at State level More than 99% wage disbursement through accounts in all districts Concerns: Decline in HHs provided employment: Chamoli(8%), Nainital(51%) Districts with low persondays per households (less than 20): Almora(11), pauri Garhwal(16), Uttarkashi(17) Less than 25% BPL HHs provided employment :all Phase II districts, Dehradun, Naintaal, Rudraprayag Women participation less than 1/3: Champawat, all Phase II and III districts Low works completion rate (less than 20%):Haridwar(11%), Dehradun(13%) 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: Champawat (56%), Uttar Kashi(53%) More than 6% contingency expenditure: Almora(9%), Pauri Garhwal(10%), Rudraprayag (10%) GRS not appointed in Bageshwar, Dehradun, Rudraprayag State Cell non constituted State Fund not operationalized 66

Slide 67: 

WEST BENGAL 67

Slide 68: 

WEST BENGAL Strengths Overall 37% increase in employment provided as compared to last FY 2008-09 88 % wage disbursement through accounts State Cell constituted State Fund operationalized Concerns: Decline in HHs provided employment: Cooch Bihar(19%), Hooghly(7%) Low avg. persondays per HH: State Average-19 days, Phase I-20 days, Phase II-18 days, Phase III-11 days 71% coverage of BPL households at State level 60:40 wage-material ratio not maintained: Howarah (50%) Significant variation in avg wage: State Avg- Rs. 84 Wage disbursement less than 50%: 24 Parganas South GRS deployment less than 50%: Dinajpur Dakshin, Cooch Bihar, Purbi Medinipur, Siliguri Mahakuma Parishad 68

MIS-Issues for Discussion : 

MIS-Issues for Discussion Full MIS Operationalization MIS operationalization status Unemployment Allowance Delayed Payments Asset Created Work execution level Updation of the Job cards for information on small and Marginal farmers, RSBY, Bank & post Office Account details, Photos on the Job Card. ICT infrastructure at Block & penetration of ICT infrastructure at GP level. Strengthening of the GPs (ICT infrastructure & Manpower). Technical Secretariat at State / District level. 69

Job Cards & Muster Rolls in Public Domain (http://nrega.nic.in) : 

Job Cards & Muster Rolls in Public Domain (http://nrega.nic.in) Daily 40-50 thousand Muster Rolls are uploaded on the website by the States. 70

STATUS OF MIS OPERATIONLIZATION [FY: 2009-10] : 

STATUS OF MIS OPERATIONLIZATION [FY: 2009-10] 71

STATUS OF MIS OPERATIONLIZATION [FY: 2009-10] : 

STATUS OF MIS OPERATIONLIZATION [FY: 2009-10] 72

MIS OPERATIONALIZATION : 

MIS OPERATIONALIZATION MIS Fully Operationalised States like Orissa, Karnataka, A.P. M.P has declared phase-II & III to start reporting on MIS from Sep,09 onwards. REASONs: States have adequate number of GRS at GP Level, Computer Assistant & ICT infrastructure at Block Level. States Which have been requested to switch to full MIS reporting from Oct, 09. States like Tripura, Kerala, Jharkhand, Haryana and M.P. (Phase-I). GRS: Tripura (75%), Kerala (98%), Jharkhand (93%) and Haryana (68%) Computer Assistant at Block Level: Tripura (98%) ,Kerala (100%), Jharkhand (61%) and Haryana (93%). Computers at Block Level: 100 % computers in Tripura and Kerala. AVERAGA PERFORMING STATES ON MIS Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Nagaland, West Bengal, Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat, Sikkim, Maharashtra. STATES NOT PERFORMING ON MIS (Expenditure less than 20%) Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Punjab, Mizoram, Bihar, Uttranchal, J&K, Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh. 73

MIS OPERATIONALIZATION : 

MIS OPERATIONALIZATION AVERAGA PERFORMING STATES ON MIS Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, West Bengal, Maharashtra , Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Nagaland. REASON-?: Chhattisgarh Rajasthan West Bengal Maharashtra Gujarat Himachal Pradesh Sikkim Nagaland. 74

MIS OPERATIONALIZATION : 

MIS OPERATIONALIZATION STATES NOT PERFORMING ON MIS (Expenditure less than 20%) Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Punjab, Mizoram, Bihar, Uttranchal, J&K, Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh. REASON-?: 75

STATEs/DISTRICTs which have not started reporting on MIS : 

STATEs/DISTRICTs which have not started reporting on MIS JAMMU AND KASHMIR (4): Ganderwal, Kargil, Leh (Ladakh), Srinagar ARUNACHAL PRADESH (14): Changlang, Lohit, Anjaw, East Kameng, East Siang, Kurung Kumey, Lower Dibang Valley, Lower Subansiri, Tawang, Tirap, Upper Dibang Valley, Upper Siang, West Kameng, West Siang. MANIPUR (1): Ukhrul PONDICHERRY(1): Karaikal ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR (1): NORTH AND MIDDLE ANDAMAN STATES/UTs: DAMAN & DIU, DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI and CHANDIGARH 76

STATUS OF UNEMPLOYMENT ALLOWANCE [FY: 2009-10] : 

STATUS OF UNEMPLOYMENT ALLOWANCE [FY: 2009-10] 77

STATUS OF DELAYED PAYMENT [FY: 2009-10] : 

STATUS OF DELAYED PAYMENT [FY: 2009-10] 78

No. Of WORKS COMPLETED (Asset Created) [FY: 2009-10] : 

No. Of WORKS COMPLETED (Asset Created) [FY: 2009-10] Very few works have been reported completed in the MIS as compared to the MPR 79

STATUS OF WORK EXECUTION LEVEL [FY: 2009-10] : 

STATUS OF WORK EXECUTION LEVEL [FY: 2009-10] 80

Slide 81: 

Status of Information on MIS BPL-Families Registered, Applicants A/C No., HH Photos Uploaded 81

STATUS OF COMPUTERS AT GP LEVEL : 

STATUS OF COMPUTERS AT GP LEVEL 82

STATUS OF ICT INFRASTRUCTURE at BLOCK LEVEL : 

STATUS OF ICT INFRASTRUCTURE at BLOCK LEVEL COMPUTER AT BLOCK LEVEL (92% at National Level) 24 States/ UTs have more than 80% of computers at the Block Level. 10 States / UTs have less than 80% of computers at the Block Level :- Nagaland (65%), Punjab (65%), J&K (41%), Aru. Pradesh (19%), Manipur (3%) and States which have reported no Blocks with computers are Chandigarh, D & NH, Lakshdeep and Pondicherry. INTERNET AT BLOCK OFFICE (57% at National Level) 14 states/UTs have internet connectivity greater than 50% at Block Level. 9 States/UTs have internet connectivity between 50-20% at the Block level. 11 States/UTs have internet connectivity less than 20% are: Meghalaya, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, A&Nicobar, Goa, Manipur, Chandigarh, D&Nhaveli, Daman & Diu, Lakshadweep and Pondicherry. 83

STATUS OF ICT INFRASTRUCTURE AT BLOCK LEVEL : 

STATUS OF ICT INFRASTRUCTURE AT BLOCK LEVEL 84

Slide 85: 

Social Audit as envisioned under NREGA An innovative feature of NREGA, included for the first time in the history of rural development in India is A tool to ensure transparency and accountability in all aspects of implementation of NREGA & a medium to safeguard workers rights’ Gram Panchayats to conduct the Social Audits of all works undertaken in NREGA Amendment in the NREG Act Amendment in the Act on 31/12/08 for laying down the processes and procedures of Social Audit Social Audit under 100 days plan Social Audit included in the 100 days plan of the President’s address Social Audits conducted in campaign mode from June, 2009 to September, 2009 Coverage SOCIAL AUDIT 85

Slide 86: 

SOCIAL AUDIT PERFORMANCE (June 2009 – September 2009) 86

Ombudsman : 

Ombudsman 87

Slide 88: 

88

Slide 89: 

89

Slide 90: 

90

Slide 91: 

91

Slide 92: 

92

Slide 93: 

93

Slide 94: 

94

Slide 95: 

95

Helpline and Greivance Redressal Rules : 

Helpline and Greivance Redressal Rules 96