Presentation Transcript
Research methods in clinical psychology:An introduction for students and practitionersChris Barker, Nancy Pistrang, and Robert Elliott :Research methods in clinical psychology:An introduction for students and practitionersChris Barker, Nancy Pistrang, and Robert Elliott CHAPTER 5
Foundations of qualitative methods
Features of qualitative research :Features of qualitative research Uses language as its raw material
Sources of data: interviews, conversations, field notes, policy statements, newspaper articles
Aims to study people’s thoughts, feelings, or use of language in depth and detail
Emphasises description and understanding rather than explanation and prediction
Emphasises the meaning of experience/behaviour in context
Inductive
Quantitative - qualitative debate :Quantitative - qualitative debate technical
epistemological
Advantages of qualitative methods :Advantages of qualitative methods Enable the individual to be studied in depth and detail
Can address complex issues or processes
Avoid the simplifications imposed by quantification
Data vivid and easy to grasp
Good for hypothesis generation and for exploratory research
Participant has more freedom
May find things that you weren’t looking for
Can integrate with clinical work
Disadvantages of qualitative methods :Disadvantages of qualitative methods Less control
Longer to carry out
Data hard to analyse (data overload)
Reliability and validity harder to evaluate
Qualitative traditions :Qualitative traditions Phenomenology
Social constructionism
Phenomenology :Phenomenology (Husserl)
The study of people’s experiences, “life worlds” and underlying assumptions
Understanding is the true end of science
Multiple valid perspectives (“epistemological pluralism”)
Types of phenomenological research :Types of phenomenological research Grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss)
Interpretative phenomenological analysis (Smith)
Life history research (Denzin)
Participant observation (Taylor & Bogdan)
Protocol analysis (Ericsson & Simon)
Doing phenomenological research :Doing phenomenological research The role of theory
Personal biases/expectations
“Bracketing”
setting one’s beliefs aside
Empathic stance
Social constructionism :Social constructionism Part of the post-modernist and post-structuralist movements
Non-realist
“Radical pluralism”
Often focuses on language in text or speech
indeterminacy of language and meaning
language as social action
doesn’t assume that language reflects cognition
Emphasises the reflexivity of psychological theory
Types of constructionist research :Types of constructionist research Critical approaches (Reason & Rowan)
Discourse analysis (Potter & Wetherell)
Radical feminist research (Belenky et al.)
Social representation (Moscovici)
Ways of evaluating qualitative research :Ways of evaluating qualitative research 1. Owning one’s perspective
2. Situating the sample
3. Grounding in examples
4. Providing credibility checks
5. Coherence
6. Accomplishing general v. specific research tasks
7. Resonating with readers
(Elliott, Fischer & Rennie, 1999)
Conclusions :Conclusions When best to use qualitative or quantitative methods?
“Methodological pluralism”
Triangulation
best not to rely solely on one perspective, source or approach
Can combine qualitative and quantitative methods