Sample PowerPoint 1

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR REGIONAL TRANSIT LIGHT RAIL STATION RETROFIT:WATT/MANLOVE STATION : 

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR REGIONAL TRANSIT LIGHT RAIL STATION RETROFIT:WATT/MANLOVE STATION

OUTLINE : 

OUTLINE Introduction Purpose and Need Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation and Next Steps Project Considerations

PROJECT LOCATION : 

Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation PROJECT LOCATION

PURPOSE AND NEED : 

PURPOSE AND NEED Proposed Light Rail Transit (LRT) expansion Meadowview to Cosumnes River College Downtown Natomas Airport (DNA) Line Implementing Low Floor Cars (LFCs) Use of LFCs requires full LRT system retrofit Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

PROJECT GOALS : 

PROJECT GOALS At-grade access to LFCs At-grade track crossing Agency standards Account for Rider Suggestions Integrate alternatives into future Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

SITE LOCATION : 

SITE LOCATION Commercial and Business Parking Lot Watt/Manlove Station Residential Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation Folsom Watt Manlove

EXISTING CONDITIONS/CONSTRAINTS : 

EXISTING CONDITIONS/CONSTRAINTS Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

FUTURE CONDITIONS : 

FUTURE CONDITIONS South Watt Improvement Project Construct S. Watt Ave. LRT Overcrossing S. Watt Ave. & Folsom Blvd. Widening Station Relocation To meet proposed LRT Bridge, station will be relocated 30’ to the East Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

STAKEHOLDERS : 

STAKEHOLDERS Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) County of Sacramento Community and Businesses Light Rail Riders Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

DESIGN STANDARDS : 

DESIGN STANDARDS American with Disabilities Act (ADA) California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) RT General Station Design Recommendations Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

Slide 11: 

Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation Incorporate the South Watt Improvement Project Railings Bordering Platforms Station Benches Incorporate Station Drainage Do not Require Track Realignment GENERAL ALTERNATIVE DESIGN CONCEPTS Platforms 13 inches above Existing Grade

Slide 12: 

ALTERNATIVE 1: INTEGRATED PLATFORM AND RAMPS Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative 1 Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

ALTERNATIVE 2: MULTIPLE ENTRANCE RAMPS : 

ALTERNATIVE 2: MULTIPLE ENTRANCE RAMPS Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative 2 Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

Slide 14: 

ALTERNATIVE 3: METAL PLATFORM OVERHANG Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative 3 Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

COST COMPARISON : 

COST COMPARISON Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

OPTIONAL ENHANCEMENTS : 

OPTIONAL ENHANCEMENTS Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Options Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

REJECTED ALTERNATIVES : 

REJECTED ALTERNATIVES Fully Enclosed Station Single Center Platform Platform Drawbridge Mechanical Lift Platform Walkway Overpass Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Rejected Alternatives Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

Slide 18: 

RANKING CRITERIA Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

SCORING OF ALTERNATIVES : 

Conducive to Ease of Rider Use SCORING OF ALTERNATIVES Lowest Retrofit Cost Minimal Construction Impacts Blends with Existing Community 30/35 25/25 21/25 11/15 Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

SCORING OF ALTERNATIVES : 

Some Hindrance to Ease of Rider Use SCORING OF ALTERNATIVES Moderate Retrofit Cost Some Construction Impacts Blends with Existing Community 30/35 14/25 19/25 9/15 Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

SCORING OF ALTERNATIVES : 

Some Construction Obstacles SCORING OF ALTERNATIVES High Retrofit Cost Minimal Construction Impacts Inherent Aesthetic Differences to Existing Community 23/35 16/25 21/25 11/15 Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

Slide 22: 

SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE SCORING Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

DESIGN RECOMMENDATION AND NEXT STEPS : 

DESIGN RECOMMENDATION AND NEXT STEPS ALTERNATIVE 1: INTEGRATED PLATFORM AND RAMPS Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation Permitting Complete Alternative Design Coordinate System Retrofit Implement LFCs

Slide 24: 

Option 1 – Construct in Halves Stage 1 Stage 2 NEXT STEPS: CONSTRUCTION COORDINATION Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

Slide 25: 

Option 2 – Direct to one track Option 1 – Construct in Halves Stage 1 Stage 2 NEXT STEPS: CONSTRUCTION COORDINATION Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

Slide 26: 

SPECIAL THANKS T0 All CSUS Faculty and Staff Mr. Greg Oslund, Advisor Professor Ed Dammel Our Clients: Mr. Dave Robinson Mr. Brian Stephenson Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation

Slide 27: 

ANY QUESTIONS? Introduction Purpose and Need Project Considerations Alternative Descriptions Ranking Criteria and Scoring of Alternatives Recommendation