stewart

Views:
 
Category: Entertainment
     
 

Presentation Description

No description available.

Comments

Presentation Transcript

A Security Protocol for Sensor Networks: 

A Security Protocol for Sensor Networks Khadija Stewart, Themistoklis Haniotakis and Spyros Tragoudas Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Southern Illinois University

Outline: 

2 Outline Abstract Previous work Proposed method Uncorrelating the bits Encryption scheme Reverse uncorrelation and decryption scheme Hardware overhead Experimental results Conclusions

Abstract: 

3 Abstract Sensor networks are extensively used in military and rescue operations Need for secure communications Memory, computational and energy resource constraints Security protocol must use minimal resources Available security schemes are either inefficient or expensive

Previous Work: 

4 Previous Work Key based schemes Frankel et al 1989 Eshenaur et al 2002 Chan et al 2003 Liu et al 2003 Du et al 2005

Previous Work: 

5 Previous Work Keyless methods target flexibility Rabin 1989 Papadimitratos et al 2003

Proposed Method: Outline: 

6 Proposed Method: Outline Message split into 2n sub-messages Sub-messages uncorrelated using an LFSR Sub-messages encrypted Encrypted sub-messages are routed through transmission disjoint routes At the destination, sub-messages are decrypted and uncorrelation is reversed

Proposed Method: Splitting of the message: 

Globecom 05 7 Proposed Method: Splitting of the message a 0 a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 a 6 a 7 a 8 a 9 a 10 a 11 b 0,0 ( a 0 ) b 0,1 ( a 1 ) b 0,2 ( a 2 ) b 0,3 ( a 3 ) b 1,0 ( a 4 ) b 1,1 ( a 5 ) b 1,2 ( a 6 ) b 1,3 ( a 7 ) b 2,0 ( a 8 ) b 2,1 ( a 9 ) b 2,2 ( a 10 ) b 2,3 ( a 11 ) Number of columns of array B = Number of node disjoint paths

Proposed Method: Uncorrelating the bits: 

8 Proposed Method: Uncorrelating the bits LFSRs primarily used in circuit testing to produce pseudo-random patterns A different LFSR chosen for each sub-message i Characteristic polynomial and t i are encoded and appended to the outgoing sub-message Example of an LFSR with k = 3 and T = 7 011 001 100 010 101 110 111

Proposed Method: Encryption Scheme: 

9 Proposed Method: Encryption Scheme For i=0 to m-1 X i = b i,0 XOR b i,1 XOR … XOR b i,2n-1 For i=0 to m-1 For j=0 to 2n-1 C i,j = X i XOR b i,j

Proposed Method: 

Globecom 05 10 Proposed Method Sub-messages are routed through node disjoint routes Routes only need to be node disjoint due to the use of directional antennas A mote can overhear transmission if and only if it is within transmission range and in angular span of sending node

Proposed Method: De-uncorrelation and decryption Scheme: 

Globecom 05 11 Proposed Method: De-uncorrelation and decryption Scheme Procedure decode For i=0 to m-1 X i = c i,0 XOR c i,1 XOR … XOR c i,2n-1 For i=0 to m-1 For j=0 to 2n-1 b i,j = X i XOR c i,j Sub-messages reverse uncorrelated in a similarly designed LFSR

Hardware Overhead: 

12 Hardware Overhead The hardware requirements are: An m bit LFSR Two levels of XOR gates One level is used for encryption and the other is used with the LFSR Three levels of multiplexers 2x1 multiplexers at the inputs of XOR gates 4nx2n multiplexers to initiate LFSR

Experimental Results: Area and power requirements: 

13 Experimental Results: Area and power requirements Power consumption of RSA chip is in the order of 500 mW Power and area of ECC module is over 300 mW and 24,000 square microns Security module designed and synthesized in VHDL for a 512 bit ckt Power consumption 5 micro Watts Area less than 25 square microns

Experimental Results: Performance measurements using OPNET: 

14 Experimental Results: Performance measurements using OPNET Experiments conducted on networks of 60 , 70 , 80 , 90 and 100 motes with 90 degree directional antennas Wireless transmission range set to 25 meters

Experimental Results: One intruder: 

15 Experimental Results: One intruder Experiments ran 10 times for each network size. In each run, a random node chosen as intruder Number of paths = maximum even number of node disjoint paths Used destinations at least two hops away No single intruder node was able to intercept a complete message

Experimental Results: Multiple intruders: 

16 Experimental Results: Multiple intruders 70 motes # intruders # of disjoint paths 2 4 6 max 2 6 3 0 0 4 8 6 2 1 6 10 8 4 2 8 12 8 6 2 Percentage of messages intercepted for different numbers of paths As the number of paths increases, the number of intercepted messages decreases

Experimental Results: Performance of scheme in presence of several intruders: 

17 Experimental Results: Performance of scheme in presence of several intruders # motes # paths # intruders 2 4 6 8 10 60 4 0 2 4 4 4 70 6 0 1 2 2 4 80 8 0 1 3 3 4 90 10 0 1 2 2 3 100 12 0 1 2 2 3 Percentage of messages intercepted in the presence of different numbers of collaborating nodes Low interception rates even for large number of intruders

Conclusions: 

18 Conclusions An encryption method and uncorrelation scheme for secure message transmission in sensor networks Experimental results show Low resource requirements of proposed method Efficiency of proposed method in protecting secrecy of messages

Questions?: 

19 Questions? Thank you