logging in or signing up Analysis of Data aSGuest124426 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 15 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 19, 2012 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Analysis of Data: Analysis of Data by: Garcia, Rianna Paras, Danielle Reyes, Frances Salazar, Zara Vinco , MeahWhat we did & How we did it: What we did & How we did it SAMPLING The group’s thesis adviser recommended that we use the fishbowl method to determine which rooms to use. To cater to a wider/bigger sample size (to have the batch well represented) the group picked 5 out of 10 rooms to test.What we did & How we did it: What we did & How we did it Rooms 3, 7, 5 and 6 were chosen. The group conducted the tests, however room 7’s tests mostly came out invalid (because of an unanswered self-evaluation or failure to write their names). So there are still 2 more tests to be administered to replace the invalid batch of students.Graphing (Self-evaluation) lexile ranges: Graphing (Self-evaluation) lexile rangesGraphing (Self-evaluation) how did you find the test? : Graphing (Self-evaluation) how did you find the test?Interpretation of Results : Interpretation of Results Nobody answered “easy” Most students who fall under the lexile ranges 1401 to 1500++ answered average. 1500++ is the highest possible lexile score and numerous students managed to obtain it however no one answered easy among the people who got 1500++Interpretation of Results : Interpretation of Results Those who answered “hard” vary greatly because there are many people who have high lexile scores but chose to deem the test “hard” All those with lexile levels below 1000 found the test hard.Graphing (Self-evaluation) were you able to come up with solutions to each problem and answer them efficiently? : Graphing (Self-evaluation) were you able to come up with solutions to each problem and answer them efficiently?Graphing (Self-evaluation) why couldn’t you find the solution?: Graphing (Self-evaluation) why couldn’t you find the solution?Interpretation of Results : Interpretation of Results The option that obtained the most check marks was “no prior knowledge” The whole statement is: Inability to formulate the equation due to no prior knowledge of the topic (topic may either be forgotten by now or never tackled in class) You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Analysis of Data aSGuest124426 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 15 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 19, 2012 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Analysis of Data: Analysis of Data by: Garcia, Rianna Paras, Danielle Reyes, Frances Salazar, Zara Vinco , MeahWhat we did & How we did it: What we did & How we did it SAMPLING The group’s thesis adviser recommended that we use the fishbowl method to determine which rooms to use. To cater to a wider/bigger sample size (to have the batch well represented) the group picked 5 out of 10 rooms to test.What we did & How we did it: What we did & How we did it Rooms 3, 7, 5 and 6 were chosen. The group conducted the tests, however room 7’s tests mostly came out invalid (because of an unanswered self-evaluation or failure to write their names). So there are still 2 more tests to be administered to replace the invalid batch of students.Graphing (Self-evaluation) lexile ranges: Graphing (Self-evaluation) lexile rangesGraphing (Self-evaluation) how did you find the test? : Graphing (Self-evaluation) how did you find the test?Interpretation of Results : Interpretation of Results Nobody answered “easy” Most students who fall under the lexile ranges 1401 to 1500++ answered average. 1500++ is the highest possible lexile score and numerous students managed to obtain it however no one answered easy among the people who got 1500++Interpretation of Results : Interpretation of Results Those who answered “hard” vary greatly because there are many people who have high lexile scores but chose to deem the test “hard” All those with lexile levels below 1000 found the test hard.Graphing (Self-evaluation) were you able to come up with solutions to each problem and answer them efficiently? : Graphing (Self-evaluation) were you able to come up with solutions to each problem and answer them efficiently?Graphing (Self-evaluation) why couldn’t you find the solution?: Graphing (Self-evaluation) why couldn’t you find the solution?Interpretation of Results : Interpretation of Results The option that obtained the most check marks was “no prior knowledge” The whole statement is: Inability to formulate the equation due to no prior knowledge of the topic (topic may either be forgotten by now or never tackled in class)