logging in or signing up Inference - Conclusion - 7 aSGuest116850 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 46 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 12, 2011 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide 1: Elkhart Community Schools 1 Introducing Strategy #7 Making Inferences & Drawing ConclusionsSlide 2: Elkhart Community Schools 2 “To infer as we read is to go beyond literal interpretation and to open a world of meaning deeply connected to our lives.” ~ Ellin Keene Author of Mosaic of ThoughtSlide 3: Elkhart Community Schools 3 Inference Background Knowledge (schema) Making Connections Questioning Predictions Imagination/ Visualization Analysis of Text: Interpretation/ Judgment Drawing ConclusionsSlide 4: Elkhart Community Schools 4 Inferring through ~ Questioning “Questioning and inferring work in tandem to enhance understanding of text.” ~ Harvey & Goudvis Authors of Strategies That WorkSlide 5: Elkhart Community Schools 5 Inferring through ~ Questioning Students’ language provides a clue to their thinking.Slide 6: Elkhart Community Schools 6 Inferring through ~ Making Connections Readers are able to think inferentially when they connect their background of information, ideas, and experiences with the text.Slide 7: Elkhart Community Schools 7 Inferring through ~ Background Knowledge It is important for the reader to have background knowledge about a text they are reading if they are expected to read inferentially.Slide 8: Elkhart Community Schools 8 Inferring through ~ Background Knowledge Word Clues + Experience InferenceSlide 9: Elkhart Community Schools 9 Inferring through ~ Background Knowledge Dorothy Strickland shares, “For struggling readers, it is critical that we not only activate their knowledge of topics they must read about and study, but also be aware of situations in which they have little or no background knowledge so that we can build essential understandings before they begin reading.”Slide 10: Elkhart Community Schools 10 Inferring through ~ Predictions Predicting is related to inferring - - - BUT what’s the difference?Slide 11: Elkhart Community Schools 11 Inferring through ~ Imagination/Visualization “When you read, you use all your senses. You see things in your ‘mind’s eye’ and hear the sounds you connect to that about which you are reading.” ~ Guided Reading the Four Blocks WaySlide 12: Elkhart Community Schools 12 Inferring through ~ Imagination/Visualization “Proficient readers use images to draw conclusions, to create distinct and unique interpretations of the text, to recall details significant to the text, and to recall a text after it has been read.” ~ Ellin KeeneSlide 13: Elkhart Community Schools 13 Inferring through ~ Analysis of Text: Interpretation/Judgment “Inferring is the process of taking that which is stated in text and extrapolating it to one’s life to create a wholly original interpretation that, in turn, becomes part of one’s beliefs or knowledge.” ~ Ellin KeeneSlide 14: Elkhart Community Schools 14 Inferring through ~ Drawing Conclusions “Proficient readers make connections between conclusions they draw and other beliefs or knowledge.” ~ Ellin KeeneSlide 15: Elkhart Community Schools 15 Inferring All the processes work together. Each works in concert with the others to aid the reader in comprehending text.Slide 16: Elkhart Community Schools 16 Teaching StrategiesSlide 17: Elkhart Community Schools 17 Teacher Modeling Step 1 – The teacher explains the strategy (reading between the lines) using short scenarios, riddles, or charades that require students to add up clues and make a conclusion. Step 2 – The teacher demonstrates how to apply the strategy successfully. Step 3 – The teacher thinks aloud to model the mental processes he/she uses when he/she reads.Slide 18: Elkhart Community Schools 18 The Think Aloud Do several think alouds for this strategy. Use picture books for students of all ages. Students are only observers at this stage. Demonstrate the use of sticky notes to code connections, questions, predictions, conclusions, judgments, etc. Allow students to discuss what they observed following the think aloud.Slide 19: Elkhart Community Schools 19 Guided Practice Use a variety of “lifted text” from different types of books giving everyone a copy or using the overhead. Use whole group to small group model. Use short text such as magazine and newspaper articles and poetry. Encourage students to code their inferences with sticky notes or highlighting. Use concept maps, two-column notes, and margin writing to record thinking. Engage students in conversation about their inferences with the text with partners or whole group.Slide 20: Elkhart Community Schools 20 Guided Practice Guide students’ thinking before reading by using anticipation guides or prediction guides. Show students how to do a chapter tour or preview of nonfiction text to help them make predictions about the chapter. Point out connections between inference and the other strategies they’ve learned. Text sets can be used to have students reflect on inferences and compare them with different books within the set. Use a book that can create an “anchor” experience for the class.Slide 21: Elkhart Community Schools 21 Independent Practice The teacher gives the students text that is easy to read on their own. Students may practice their strategy alone, in pairs, or in small groups such as book clubs or literature circles. Students can discuss and compare their inferences with other students. The teacher confers with the students and gives them feedback.Slide 22: Elkhart Community Schools 22 Independent Application Assessing Application of Inference Keene’s Major Point Interview Anecdotal Records Journal Responses Other Written ResponsesSlide 23: Elkhart Community Schools 23 Fiction and Poetry: Allows a variety of interpretation Nonfiction/Content Area Text: Permits a narrow range of interpretation Best for drawing conclusions, predictions, questioning, and determining importance Inference Using Different Types of TextSlide 24: Elkhart Community Schools 24 Inferring occurs with ~ Word meanings Meanings of text Meanings of larger themes of textsSlide 25: Elkhart Community Schools 25 Inferring Word Meanings ~ Predicting Words In Text (before reading) Vocabulary Strategy: Connect Two Cloze Technique Guess the Covered WordSlide 26: Elkhart Community Schools 26 Classes of Inferences Relevant to Expository Text Anaphoric Inferences: A pronoun or noun- phrase that refers to a previous text constituent or to an entity already introduced in the mental model. Bridging Inferences: These are any inferences that a reader needs to systematically or conceptually relate the sentence being read with the previous content. These are sometimes called backward inferences.Slide 27: Elkhart Community Schools 27 Explanation Based Inferences: The event being read about is explained by a causal chain or network of previous events. These are sometimes called causal antecedent inferences. Goal Inferences: The reader infers that an agent has a motive that explains an intentional action. Elaborative Inferences: These are properties of entities, facts, and other associations that are not explained by causal mechanisms. More Inferences...Slide 28: Elkhart Community Schools 28 Predictive Inferences: The reader forecasts what events will causally unfold after the current event that is being read. These are sometimes called causal consequences or forward references. Process Inferences: These inferences specify the detailed steps, manner, or dynamic characteristics of an event as it unfolds. More Inferences...Slide 29: Elkhart Community Schools 29Slide 30: Elkhart Community Schools 30 “Art is so much more interesting if everything isn’t in the picture. And so it is with inferring.” From: I Read It But I Don’t Get It ~ Cris TovaniSlide 31: Elkhart Community Schools 31 Making Inferences & Drawing Conclusions Strategy #7 You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Inference - Conclusion - 7 aSGuest116850 Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 46 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 12, 2011 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide 1: Elkhart Community Schools 1 Introducing Strategy #7 Making Inferences & Drawing ConclusionsSlide 2: Elkhart Community Schools 2 “To infer as we read is to go beyond literal interpretation and to open a world of meaning deeply connected to our lives.” ~ Ellin Keene Author of Mosaic of ThoughtSlide 3: Elkhart Community Schools 3 Inference Background Knowledge (schema) Making Connections Questioning Predictions Imagination/ Visualization Analysis of Text: Interpretation/ Judgment Drawing ConclusionsSlide 4: Elkhart Community Schools 4 Inferring through ~ Questioning “Questioning and inferring work in tandem to enhance understanding of text.” ~ Harvey & Goudvis Authors of Strategies That WorkSlide 5: Elkhart Community Schools 5 Inferring through ~ Questioning Students’ language provides a clue to their thinking.Slide 6: Elkhart Community Schools 6 Inferring through ~ Making Connections Readers are able to think inferentially when they connect their background of information, ideas, and experiences with the text.Slide 7: Elkhart Community Schools 7 Inferring through ~ Background Knowledge It is important for the reader to have background knowledge about a text they are reading if they are expected to read inferentially.Slide 8: Elkhart Community Schools 8 Inferring through ~ Background Knowledge Word Clues + Experience InferenceSlide 9: Elkhart Community Schools 9 Inferring through ~ Background Knowledge Dorothy Strickland shares, “For struggling readers, it is critical that we not only activate their knowledge of topics they must read about and study, but also be aware of situations in which they have little or no background knowledge so that we can build essential understandings before they begin reading.”Slide 10: Elkhart Community Schools 10 Inferring through ~ Predictions Predicting is related to inferring - - - BUT what’s the difference?Slide 11: Elkhart Community Schools 11 Inferring through ~ Imagination/Visualization “When you read, you use all your senses. You see things in your ‘mind’s eye’ and hear the sounds you connect to that about which you are reading.” ~ Guided Reading the Four Blocks WaySlide 12: Elkhart Community Schools 12 Inferring through ~ Imagination/Visualization “Proficient readers use images to draw conclusions, to create distinct and unique interpretations of the text, to recall details significant to the text, and to recall a text after it has been read.” ~ Ellin KeeneSlide 13: Elkhart Community Schools 13 Inferring through ~ Analysis of Text: Interpretation/Judgment “Inferring is the process of taking that which is stated in text and extrapolating it to one’s life to create a wholly original interpretation that, in turn, becomes part of one’s beliefs or knowledge.” ~ Ellin KeeneSlide 14: Elkhart Community Schools 14 Inferring through ~ Drawing Conclusions “Proficient readers make connections between conclusions they draw and other beliefs or knowledge.” ~ Ellin KeeneSlide 15: Elkhart Community Schools 15 Inferring All the processes work together. Each works in concert with the others to aid the reader in comprehending text.Slide 16: Elkhart Community Schools 16 Teaching StrategiesSlide 17: Elkhart Community Schools 17 Teacher Modeling Step 1 – The teacher explains the strategy (reading between the lines) using short scenarios, riddles, or charades that require students to add up clues and make a conclusion. Step 2 – The teacher demonstrates how to apply the strategy successfully. Step 3 – The teacher thinks aloud to model the mental processes he/she uses when he/she reads.Slide 18: Elkhart Community Schools 18 The Think Aloud Do several think alouds for this strategy. Use picture books for students of all ages. Students are only observers at this stage. Demonstrate the use of sticky notes to code connections, questions, predictions, conclusions, judgments, etc. Allow students to discuss what they observed following the think aloud.Slide 19: Elkhart Community Schools 19 Guided Practice Use a variety of “lifted text” from different types of books giving everyone a copy or using the overhead. Use whole group to small group model. Use short text such as magazine and newspaper articles and poetry. Encourage students to code their inferences with sticky notes or highlighting. Use concept maps, two-column notes, and margin writing to record thinking. Engage students in conversation about their inferences with the text with partners or whole group.Slide 20: Elkhart Community Schools 20 Guided Practice Guide students’ thinking before reading by using anticipation guides or prediction guides. Show students how to do a chapter tour or preview of nonfiction text to help them make predictions about the chapter. Point out connections between inference and the other strategies they’ve learned. Text sets can be used to have students reflect on inferences and compare them with different books within the set. Use a book that can create an “anchor” experience for the class.Slide 21: Elkhart Community Schools 21 Independent Practice The teacher gives the students text that is easy to read on their own. Students may practice their strategy alone, in pairs, or in small groups such as book clubs or literature circles. Students can discuss and compare their inferences with other students. The teacher confers with the students and gives them feedback.Slide 22: Elkhart Community Schools 22 Independent Application Assessing Application of Inference Keene’s Major Point Interview Anecdotal Records Journal Responses Other Written ResponsesSlide 23: Elkhart Community Schools 23 Fiction and Poetry: Allows a variety of interpretation Nonfiction/Content Area Text: Permits a narrow range of interpretation Best for drawing conclusions, predictions, questioning, and determining importance Inference Using Different Types of TextSlide 24: Elkhart Community Schools 24 Inferring occurs with ~ Word meanings Meanings of text Meanings of larger themes of textsSlide 25: Elkhart Community Schools 25 Inferring Word Meanings ~ Predicting Words In Text (before reading) Vocabulary Strategy: Connect Two Cloze Technique Guess the Covered WordSlide 26: Elkhart Community Schools 26 Classes of Inferences Relevant to Expository Text Anaphoric Inferences: A pronoun or noun- phrase that refers to a previous text constituent or to an entity already introduced in the mental model. Bridging Inferences: These are any inferences that a reader needs to systematically or conceptually relate the sentence being read with the previous content. These are sometimes called backward inferences.Slide 27: Elkhart Community Schools 27 Explanation Based Inferences: The event being read about is explained by a causal chain or network of previous events. These are sometimes called causal antecedent inferences. Goal Inferences: The reader infers that an agent has a motive that explains an intentional action. Elaborative Inferences: These are properties of entities, facts, and other associations that are not explained by causal mechanisms. More Inferences...Slide 28: Elkhart Community Schools 28 Predictive Inferences: The reader forecasts what events will causally unfold after the current event that is being read. These are sometimes called causal consequences or forward references. Process Inferences: These inferences specify the detailed steps, manner, or dynamic characteristics of an event as it unfolds. More Inferences...Slide 29: Elkhart Community Schools 29Slide 30: Elkhart Community Schools 30 “Art is so much more interesting if everything isn’t in the picture. And so it is with inferring.” From: I Read It But I Don’t Get It ~ Cris TovaniSlide 31: Elkhart Community Schools 31 Making Inferences & Drawing Conclusions Strategy #7