Changes in Information Systems (IS) and Information Management (IM) :Changes in Information Systems (IS) and Information Management (IM) Phyllis Wise, Provost and Vice President, Academic Affairs
Sara Gomez, Vice Provost for Information Management and CIO
Ron Johnson, Vice President for Computing and Communications
Improve Information Systems (IS) andInformation Management (IM) :Improve Information Systems (IS) andInformation Management (IM) IS Futures report
C&C strategic planning
TACs, deans, and many others
Benchmark with other major research universities
Take advantage of major reorganization in UW administration
Evolving state ISB requirements/relationship
Office of Information Management (OIM) Overview :Office of Information Management (OIM) Overview Created by Provost and Vice President for Computing and Communications in November 2006
Charged with directing information management and information systems throughout the University of Washington
Headed by interim Vice Provost and Chief Information Officer (VP-IM/CIO) Sara Gomez. The VP-IM/CIO:
Provides university-wide leadership in developing and managing information systems and applications
Reports primarily to the Provost, but also to the Vice President for Computing and Communications on technology issues
Slide 4:IS, IM UW’s OLD IS, IM, IT Org. Landscape VP Ext. Aff. VP Med. Aff. Clinical
Systems
&
Devices IS, IM VP C&C C&C’s
AIS,
IS, IM CIO Provost & VP Academic Affairs IS, IM VP
Fin. & Treas. IS, IM VP
H.R. IS, IM AVP
Facilities IS, IM AVP
Bus. Serv. IS, IM AVP
Capital Proj. Strategic
Init. Office
‘SIO’ IS, IM Dept.,
Center,
PI, and
faculty-
based
IT & TC
(Technical
Computing)
etc.
Direct
control
by
faculty &
depts. College,
School;
Tacoma,
Bothell
Campus;
Library;
and
Center-
Level
IS, IM VP Dev.& Alum. Athletic Dir. IS, IM IS, IM VP Minority Aff. EVP IS = Administrative, Management and/or Decision Support ‘Information Systems’. Includes Applications design, development, and maintenance. Also includes control of IS & IM applications operation. No one had/has any overarching/‘cross-silo’ authority or responsibility for IS.
IM = ‘Information Management’. At best, only done locally, not done globally across the UW. IT = Information Technology infrastructure, design, engineering, architecture, deployment and operations. Includes hardware, networks, underlying email, messaging and web infrastructure, middleware, distribution systems, and support. Includes Technical Computing, instruments etc, Direct ‘Line’ Reporting relationship
‘Dotted line’ Reporting Relationship
No institutional IM
UW-wide IS & IM Some Responsibility, little Authority
Largely separate IS/IM authorities/responsibilities
‘IT’ activities - central, departmental, PI etc. UW IT Infrastructure IT & TC Service Delivery Streaming Media, TV
Broadcast, Video Prod. Compliance; Security IT & TC Infrastructure &
Technical Operations President 4 IS, IM Vice Provosts Deans & Chancellors
Slide 5:UW’s NEW IS, IM, IT Org. Landscape VP C&C IS, IM VP
Fin. & Treas. IS, IM VP
H.R. IS, IM AVP
Facilities IS, IM AVP
Bus. Serv. IS, IM AVP
Capital Proj. Dept.,
Center,
PI, &
faculty
based
IT & TC
(Technical
Computing)
etc.
Direct
control
by
faculty and
depts. College,
School;
Tacoma,
Bothell
Campus;
Library;
and
Center-
Level
IS, IM EVP IS = Administrative, Management and/or Decision Support Information Systems. Includes Applications design, development, and maintenance. Also includes control of IS & IM applications operation.
IM = Information Management systems, information architecture, knowledge architecture, and other IM responsibilities & activities, incl. ‘data definition’, ‘data administration’, warehousing, data validation & evaluation. IT = Information Technology infrastructure, design, engineering, architecture, deployment and operations. Includes hardware, networks, underlying email, messaging and web infrastructure, middleware, distribution systems, and support. Includes Technical Computing, instruments etc. Direct ‘Line’ Reporting relationship
‘Dotted line’ Reporting Relationship
IM: Provost, CIO/VP-IM & Data Steward’s IM Authority
Provost’s & CIO/VP-IM IS & IM Authority
‘IT’ activities - central, departmental, PI etc. C&C’s
AIS
IS, IM Vice Provost, Info. Mgmt. & CIO
Office of Info. Mgmt. (OIM) SIO Data
Stwd. Technology Services:
Information Technology;
Infrastructure; Architecture; Engineering & Operations etc. Admin.& Mgmt.
& Decision Support
IS, apps. & IM 5 UW IT Infrastructure IT & TC Service Delivery Streaming Media, TV
Broadcast, Video Prod. Compliance; Security IT & TC Infrastructure &
Technical Operations IS, IM Provost & VP Academic Affairs President Vice Provosts Deans & Chancellors
OIM’s Three-Phase Work Plan :OIM’s Three-Phase Work Plan Discovery/Assessment: Identify challenges and opportunities (Winter 2006-07)
Organizational Design and Transition: Build the future of how we work together (Spring 2007)
Strategic Roadmap: Choose where to invest people, money, and time
Short-term priorities (Spring/Summer 2007)
Long-term priorities (Fall/Winter 2007-08)
Discovery/Assessment Phase: Broad Themes Analysis :Discovery/Assessment Phase: Broad Themes Analysis Collected more than 550 comments from meetings with key stakeholders
Categorized comments into four broad themes and sub-themes
Analyzed how many comments fell into each category to get a sense of proportionality
Slide 8:Broad Themes
Slide 9:Develop strategic roadmap
Review governance structure
Pursue strategic partnerships Strategy, Policy, and Partnership (23% of the Comments)
Slide 10:Identify top five queries
Develop consistent data definitions
Address data access issues Information Management(32% of the Comments)
Slide 11:I-MAC packages recommended for FY 07-08 funding
Core system replacement Business Processes & Information Systems(25% of the Comments)
Slide 12:Enable access to common central services
Provide local development capabilities for specialized needs Information Architecture(20% of the Comments)
Data Management Committee Progress March 2007 :Data Management Committee Progress March 2007 Data and metadata definitions and related business processes
Reviewing and approving data security recommendations
Reviewing past work to build on; identifying “low hanging fruit”
Determining baseline operating assumptions (e.g., access levels/ openness)
Developing processes for data management
Linking with Data Management User Group (DMUG)
Providing support and feedback to the Data Warehouse
Developing UW Data Management Policy Statement
Creating one-stop communications portal with many access points
Reporting to Office of Information Management
Top five questions for Data Warehouse and transaction systems
What’s Next? :What’s Next? Discovery/Assessment Phase:Stakeholder meetings complete. Input being analyzed to inform Strategic Roadmap.
Organizational Design and Transition Phase: Work is underway. Information about OIM’s new structure and leadership team coming in July.
Strategic Roadmap Phase: Work has started on developing a vision for the future of information systems and information management and an action plan for how to move forward.
Slide 15:For more information visit OIM’s Web Site
http://www.washington.edu/provost/oim/