logging in or signing up 2003 gwalker pricingcatastropheri sk Woodwork Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 135 Category: Business & Fin.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: April 16, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Pricing Catastrophe Risk: Pricing Catastrophe Risk George R Walker Senior Risk Analyst Aon Re Australia 2003 Aon Re Australia Hazards Conference, Gold Coast, 18-19 AugustFactors Affecting Catastrophe Risk Price: Factors Affecting Catastrophe Risk Price Probable Maximum Loss (PML) Expected Annual Loss Spread of Risk Historical Experience Expenses – Premiums, Claims, Tax Competition Solvency Profitability Uncertainty - Loss Occurrence & Magnitude Portfolio Data Risk ToleranceTraditional Approach: Traditional Approach Insurance in General Actuarial Analysis Based on Projection of Past Losses Problem of Catastrophic Losses Sparse Past Losses Made Actuarial Analysis Unreliable Consequence for Pricing of Catastrophe Risk Avoided by Insurers through Transfer to Reinsurers Based on Intuition + Empirical Heuristic Approaches Modern Approach: Modern Approach Use Information TechnologyGIS Earthquake Loss Model: GIS Earthquake Loss ModelAsset / Liability Modelling: Asset / Liability ModellingSlide8: Minerva Earthquake Loss Sub-system Financial Management Sub-system EQC Building Costs Database External Databases & Systems Quotable Value Database Minerva Database User Interface CIMS Aon Soils Database Portfolio Model Minerva ISC Earthquake Database NZ Earthquake Commission’s MinervaCharacteristics: Characteristics Complex Expert Systems Expensive to Develop Cheap Relative to Potential Catastrophe LossesSlide11: Theory of Risk PricingSlide12: Principal Flow of Money – Primary Reinsurance CompanySlide13: Average Loss Ratio Initial Capital For Specified Rate of Return For Specified Probability of Insolvency Maximum Average Loss Ratio Optimisation of Premium and Capital Requirements Optimum Initial CapitalApplication to Reinsurance Pricing: Application to Reinsurance Pricing Assumed Characteristics of Reinsurance Company Uniform exposure to total reinsurance risk Target annual rate of return on capital = 15% Maximum risk of insolvency = 4% in next 10 years Expected annual growth in exposure = 4% Average return on invested funds = 5% Expenses including tax = 30% of premium incomeProcess: Process Establish Risk Characteristics - EP Curve Annual Aggregate Losses - Will base on Swiss Re Sigma data Model Financial Performance over Time - DFA model - Will model over 10 years Determine Optimum Values - Average loss ratio - Initial capital10 Worst Disaster Insurance Losses 1970 - 2002: 10 Worst Disaster Insurance Losses 1970 - 2002 Typhoon Bart Winterstorm Vivian European Storms & Floods Hurricane Hugo Winterstorm Lothar Winterstorm Daria Typhoon Mirelle Northridge Earthquake 911 Terrorist Attack Hurricane Andrew 0 5 10 15 20 Insured Loss (2002 USD Billion) From Sigma No 2/ 2003, Swiss Re Slide18: Probability Plot - 34 Worst Natural Disaster Insurance Losses 1988 – 2002 (2002 Values in USD)Slide21: Average Annual Loss (USD 12 Billion) (USD 12 Billion) Optimum for Industry Average Loss Ratio = 0.5 ie Premium Ratio = 2 & = 1 Initial Capital = USD 30 Billion ie 2.5 x Average Annual LossSlide22: Layer Pricing – World Catastrophe Event Loss Level Layer Capital – World Catastrophe Event Loss Level: Layer Capital – World Catastrophe Event Loss Level 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Midpoint of Event Loss Range (USD Billion) Initial Capital / Average Annual Loss Slide25: Australian Catastrophe Insurance Event Loss RiskSlide26: Average Annual Loss (USD 9.6 Billion) (USD 6.3 Billion) Optimum for Industry Average Loss Ratio = 0.57 ie Premium Ratio = 1.75 & = 1.2 Initial Capital = USD 14 Billion ie 1.5 x Average Annual LossSlide27: Average Annual Loss (USD 12 Billion) (USD 12 Billion) Optimum for Industry Average Loss Ratio = 0.5 ie Premium Ratio = 2 & = 1 Initial Capital = USD 30 Billion ie 2.5 x Average Annual LossSlide28: Average Annual Loss (USD 9.6 Billion) (USD 6.3 Billion) Optimum for Industry Average Loss Ratio = 0.57 ie Premium Ratio = 1.75 & = 1.2 Initial Capital = USD 14 Billion ie 1.5 x Average Annual LossSlide29: Average Annual Loss (AUD 0.45 Billion) (AUD 1.7 Billion)Australian Reinsurance Premium: Australian Reinsurance Premium Required Premium from Australia = 0.03 x 9.6 / 0.57 = USD 0.5 Billion = AUD 0.75 Billion = AUD 0.45 + 0.30 Billion = + 1.2 Slide31: Estimated RoL = Average ALEL + 0.2 x Standard Deviation of ALEL ALEL = Annual Layer Event Loss Comparison of Actual & Estimated Australian Reinsurance PricesEP Curves for Different Building Types: EP Curves for Different Building Types All D E A B Insured Loss ($) Return Period CAnalysis Of Building Type Risk: Analysis Of Building Type Risk If Total Insured Value = Iv Annual Average Loss = AAL Building Type Risk Contribution Insured Value A 0.15 x AAL 0.2 x Iv B 0.20 0.2 C 0.50 0.2 D 0.05 0.2 E 0.10 0.2Slide35: All 1 5 4 3 2 Location All I V IV III II Soil Type All a e d c b Policy Conditions Different Variables – EP CurvesRisk Factor Analysis: Risk Factor Analysis Building Type A B C D E Risk Contribution 0.15 0.2 0.5 0.05 0.1 Proportion of Insured Value 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 Location 1 2 3 4 5 Risk Contribution 0.3 0.4 0.05 0.1 0.15 Proportion of Insured Value 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.15 0.05 Soil Type I II III IV V Risk Contribution 0.02 0.08 0.2 0.5 0.2 Proportion of Insured Value 0.1 0.25 0.4 0.2 0.05 Policy Conditions a b c d e Risk Contribution 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.05 Proportion of Insured Value 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.4 0.15 Premium Rate Analysis: Premium Rate Analysis Pure Risk Premium Rate = 0.15 x 0.05 x 0.5 x 0.2 x 600/(0.2 x 0.1 x 0.2 x 0.4 x 120,000) for A/3/IV/d = 0.16% Assume Average Total Annual Loss = $600 million Total Insured Value = $120 billion Require Premium Rate for following combination Building Type A Location 3 Soil Type IV Policy Conditions dConclusion: Conclusion Technology has provided the tools to take much of the uncertainty out of catastrophe risk pricing You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
2003 gwalker pricingcatastropheri sk Woodwork Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 135 Category: Business & Fin.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: April 16, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Pricing Catastrophe Risk: Pricing Catastrophe Risk George R Walker Senior Risk Analyst Aon Re Australia 2003 Aon Re Australia Hazards Conference, Gold Coast, 18-19 AugustFactors Affecting Catastrophe Risk Price: Factors Affecting Catastrophe Risk Price Probable Maximum Loss (PML) Expected Annual Loss Spread of Risk Historical Experience Expenses – Premiums, Claims, Tax Competition Solvency Profitability Uncertainty - Loss Occurrence & Magnitude Portfolio Data Risk ToleranceTraditional Approach: Traditional Approach Insurance in General Actuarial Analysis Based on Projection of Past Losses Problem of Catastrophic Losses Sparse Past Losses Made Actuarial Analysis Unreliable Consequence for Pricing of Catastrophe Risk Avoided by Insurers through Transfer to Reinsurers Based on Intuition + Empirical Heuristic Approaches Modern Approach: Modern Approach Use Information TechnologyGIS Earthquake Loss Model: GIS Earthquake Loss ModelAsset / Liability Modelling: Asset / Liability ModellingSlide8: Minerva Earthquake Loss Sub-system Financial Management Sub-system EQC Building Costs Database External Databases & Systems Quotable Value Database Minerva Database User Interface CIMS Aon Soils Database Portfolio Model Minerva ISC Earthquake Database NZ Earthquake Commission’s MinervaCharacteristics: Characteristics Complex Expert Systems Expensive to Develop Cheap Relative to Potential Catastrophe LossesSlide11: Theory of Risk PricingSlide12: Principal Flow of Money – Primary Reinsurance CompanySlide13: Average Loss Ratio Initial Capital For Specified Rate of Return For Specified Probability of Insolvency Maximum Average Loss Ratio Optimisation of Premium and Capital Requirements Optimum Initial CapitalApplication to Reinsurance Pricing: Application to Reinsurance Pricing Assumed Characteristics of Reinsurance Company Uniform exposure to total reinsurance risk Target annual rate of return on capital = 15% Maximum risk of insolvency = 4% in next 10 years Expected annual growth in exposure = 4% Average return on invested funds = 5% Expenses including tax = 30% of premium incomeProcess: Process Establish Risk Characteristics - EP Curve Annual Aggregate Losses - Will base on Swiss Re Sigma data Model Financial Performance over Time - DFA model - Will model over 10 years Determine Optimum Values - Average loss ratio - Initial capital10 Worst Disaster Insurance Losses 1970 - 2002: 10 Worst Disaster Insurance Losses 1970 - 2002 Typhoon Bart Winterstorm Vivian European Storms & Floods Hurricane Hugo Winterstorm Lothar Winterstorm Daria Typhoon Mirelle Northridge Earthquake 911 Terrorist Attack Hurricane Andrew 0 5 10 15 20 Insured Loss (2002 USD Billion) From Sigma No 2/ 2003, Swiss Re Slide18: Probability Plot - 34 Worst Natural Disaster Insurance Losses 1988 – 2002 (2002 Values in USD)Slide21: Average Annual Loss (USD 12 Billion) (USD 12 Billion) Optimum for Industry Average Loss Ratio = 0.5 ie Premium Ratio = 2 & = 1 Initial Capital = USD 30 Billion ie 2.5 x Average Annual LossSlide22: Layer Pricing – World Catastrophe Event Loss Level Layer Capital – World Catastrophe Event Loss Level: Layer Capital – World Catastrophe Event Loss Level 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Midpoint of Event Loss Range (USD Billion) Initial Capital / Average Annual Loss Slide25: Australian Catastrophe Insurance Event Loss RiskSlide26: Average Annual Loss (USD 9.6 Billion) (USD 6.3 Billion) Optimum for Industry Average Loss Ratio = 0.57 ie Premium Ratio = 1.75 & = 1.2 Initial Capital = USD 14 Billion ie 1.5 x Average Annual LossSlide27: Average Annual Loss (USD 12 Billion) (USD 12 Billion) Optimum for Industry Average Loss Ratio = 0.5 ie Premium Ratio = 2 & = 1 Initial Capital = USD 30 Billion ie 2.5 x Average Annual LossSlide28: Average Annual Loss (USD 9.6 Billion) (USD 6.3 Billion) Optimum for Industry Average Loss Ratio = 0.57 ie Premium Ratio = 1.75 & = 1.2 Initial Capital = USD 14 Billion ie 1.5 x Average Annual LossSlide29: Average Annual Loss (AUD 0.45 Billion) (AUD 1.7 Billion)Australian Reinsurance Premium: Australian Reinsurance Premium Required Premium from Australia = 0.03 x 9.6 / 0.57 = USD 0.5 Billion = AUD 0.75 Billion = AUD 0.45 + 0.30 Billion = + 1.2 Slide31: Estimated RoL = Average ALEL + 0.2 x Standard Deviation of ALEL ALEL = Annual Layer Event Loss Comparison of Actual & Estimated Australian Reinsurance PricesEP Curves for Different Building Types: EP Curves for Different Building Types All D E A B Insured Loss ($) Return Period CAnalysis Of Building Type Risk: Analysis Of Building Type Risk If Total Insured Value = Iv Annual Average Loss = AAL Building Type Risk Contribution Insured Value A 0.15 x AAL 0.2 x Iv B 0.20 0.2 C 0.50 0.2 D 0.05 0.2 E 0.10 0.2Slide35: All 1 5 4 3 2 Location All I V IV III II Soil Type All a e d c b Policy Conditions Different Variables – EP CurvesRisk Factor Analysis: Risk Factor Analysis Building Type A B C D E Risk Contribution 0.15 0.2 0.5 0.05 0.1 Proportion of Insured Value 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 Location 1 2 3 4 5 Risk Contribution 0.3 0.4 0.05 0.1 0.15 Proportion of Insured Value 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.15 0.05 Soil Type I II III IV V Risk Contribution 0.02 0.08 0.2 0.5 0.2 Proportion of Insured Value 0.1 0.25 0.4 0.2 0.05 Policy Conditions a b c d e Risk Contribution 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.05 Proportion of Insured Value 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.4 0.15 Premium Rate Analysis: Premium Rate Analysis Pure Risk Premium Rate = 0.15 x 0.05 x 0.5 x 0.2 x 600/(0.2 x 0.1 x 0.2 x 0.4 x 120,000) for A/3/IV/d = 0.16% Assume Average Total Annual Loss = $600 million Total Insured Value = $120 billion Require Premium Rate for following combination Building Type A Location 3 Soil Type IV Policy Conditions dConclusion: Conclusion Technology has provided the tools to take much of the uncertainty out of catastrophe risk pricing