wg3 edgecock

WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies: 

WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies Introduction View from Europe - RE “ “ Japan - Yoshi Kuno “ “ US - Mike Zisman Conclusions from the discussion

Introduction: 

Introduction Two years since Study II A lot has been done since then Time to start thinking about a third study Much better: world study Europe, Japan and US Parallel session of WG3 devoted to this Views of each region Discussion on how to form world-wide study

View from…….Europe: 

View from…….Europe No design study so far Work started late 1990s Much achieved Two layouts: CERN (complete) RAL (under development) Effort dramatically reduced by CERN budget cuts ECFA task forces re-organised  European Neutrino Group Very important: rejuvenate EU activities

Design Study – European View: 

Design Study – European View Fixed by EU Framework 6 programme FP5: 2 Neutrino Factory related bids, both failed FP6: ESGARD formed - coordinated bid for accelerator R&D Two areas of interest: Integrating Activities Design Studies IA proposal already submitted: LHC upgrade, LC, NF Basically for improving existing infrastructure IA  Neutrino Factory, superbeam, beta beam network HIPPI JRA

FP6 Design Studies: 

FP6 Design Studies EC will contribute to: Feasibility studies – paper studies Technical Preparatory Work – hardware On new research infrastructures with a clear European dimension and interest. Includes: future facilities of world-wide relevance not existing in Europe infrastructures constructed outside EU!

FP6 Design Studies: 

FP6 Design Studies Feasibility studies Aim: Lay conceptual foundations for new infrastructure Methods: Basic feasibility study Explore new fundamental technology Detailed engineering design, particularly most advanced TPW Includes: Development and testing of critical components, sub-systems, materials or techniques, including software Does not include: preparatory work based on existing or proven techniques reproduction of available components or materials

FP6 Design Studies: 

FP6 Design Studies Funding: Total budget: 200M€; 70M€ in first call EC contribution per project  10M€ 50% matching required(?) Timing: Call for proposals: October 2003 Deadline: Spring 2004 Evaluation results: Summer 2004 Contract signatures: Start 2005

Design Study Bid: 

Design Study Bid EU will make FP6 Design Study bid Essential to re-build activities in Europe Host laboratory: RAL (possibly!) Much better if part of world-wide design study FP6 allows for/encourages this May also provide some funding Aim: ?DR for a Neutrino Factory ~2009

View from……Japan: 

View from……Japan Design study published July 2002 Little support from KEK management Based on FFAGs

View from……Japan: 

View from……Japan

View from……Japan: 

View from……Japan

View from……Japan: 

View from……Japan Staging High Power Proton Driver Muon g-2 Muon Factory (PRISM) Muon LFV Muon Factory-II (PRISM-II) Muon EDM Neutrino Factory Based on 1 MW proton beam Neutrino Factory-II Based on 4.4 MW proton beam Muon Collider Physics outcomes at each stage

View from……Japan: 

View from……Japan Would support a world-wide design study Concern expressed about overlap due to FFAGs Would prefer some level of overlap for active participation Timescale depends on J-PARCnu, LC, etc My interpretation of conclusions

View from……..US: 

View from……..US Two feasibility studies so far in US FS1: Instigated by FNAL director MC invited to participate Focus was on feasibility First attempt to specify NF from end-to-end Design based on (reasonably) well understood technology No attempt to optimise cost Cost was a deliverable Feasibility was established Performance poor, costs high

View from……..US: 

View from……..US FS2: Collaboration between MC and BNL director BNL managers able to draw on resources Goal: maintain feasibility, but improve performance Cost optimisation again given lower priority Performance: 6x Study I Cost: 75% (but only one RLA) Still too high

View from……..US: 

View from……..US FS3: Need to reduce cost Much progress already: Neuffer RF phase rotation FFAG ring or VRCS Ring coolers Need to look for optimum between Proton driver Cooling Acceleration Detector But much better if world-wide study Possible host site (MICE): RAL

Discussion: 

Discussion Should there be a world-wide design study? Yes How should we proceed? Create a steering group US: Steve Geer Bob Palmer Mike Zisman Japan: Yoshi Kuno Yoshi Mori Kenso Nakamura Europe: Alain Blondel(?) Rob Edgecock Helmut Haseroth What should be included? Accelerator and detector Name? WDS1(?)

Discussion: 

Discussion Timescale? Format? Host laboratory? Aim? Etc…..