logging in or signing up powerpoint presentation 02 WendyCKing Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 02, 2009 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Theft Reimbursement, Twice : Case Study Theft Reimbursement, Twice Overview : Overview AP Clerk working for an unspecified non-profit company steals $16,563 by altering checks Assistant Controller makes an insurance claim Bank reimburses the company Insurance Company also reimburses the loss Controller decides to keep the money until the court case is settled Key People : Key People AP Clerk – Stole the money Assistant Controller – Discovered the theft Controller – Decided to keep both reimbursements and earn interest on the money for a period of time Ethical or Moral Issues : Ethical or Moral Issues Employee committed theft Controller felt justified in earning tax-free interest on the duplicate payment Time spent in court Aggravation employees endured Bank should have never cashed the altered checks Assistant Controller was afraid to call attention to the matter because he hired the clerk Who was hurt? : Who was hurt? The non-profit spent time and money dealing with the theft and court case The bank was out $16,583 The insurance company was out $16,583 until the money was returned (if it was returned) The AP Clerk lost her job The co-workers felt violated and abused What should have been done? : What should have been done? AP Clerk – Should have been trustworthy Assistant Controller – Should inform the CFO of the Controllers intentions Controller – Should return the money immediately Courage of Ethical Conviction : Courage of Ethical Conviction AP Clerk would have found honest ways to handle her financial issues Assistant Controller Would have not worried about what the Controller thinks about being transparent with the intentions Would not care that he may look bad himself for having hired the AP Clerk Controller would have returned the money without rationalizing his unethical decision making Conclusion : Conclusion Rationalizations for unethical behavior: Controller - Denial of injury & victim Thinks the bank deserves to pay interest after their mistake Does not consider the effect on the Insurance Company’s cash position by keeping the money AP Clerk – Entitlement Felt it was OK to take money she did not earn Assistant Controller – Appeal to higher loyalties Did not want to question the Controller You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
powerpoint presentation 02 WendyCKing Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT lite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 02, 2009 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Theft Reimbursement, Twice : Case Study Theft Reimbursement, Twice Overview : Overview AP Clerk working for an unspecified non-profit company steals $16,563 by altering checks Assistant Controller makes an insurance claim Bank reimburses the company Insurance Company also reimburses the loss Controller decides to keep the money until the court case is settled Key People : Key People AP Clerk – Stole the money Assistant Controller – Discovered the theft Controller – Decided to keep both reimbursements and earn interest on the money for a period of time Ethical or Moral Issues : Ethical or Moral Issues Employee committed theft Controller felt justified in earning tax-free interest on the duplicate payment Time spent in court Aggravation employees endured Bank should have never cashed the altered checks Assistant Controller was afraid to call attention to the matter because he hired the clerk Who was hurt? : Who was hurt? The non-profit spent time and money dealing with the theft and court case The bank was out $16,583 The insurance company was out $16,583 until the money was returned (if it was returned) The AP Clerk lost her job The co-workers felt violated and abused What should have been done? : What should have been done? AP Clerk – Should have been trustworthy Assistant Controller – Should inform the CFO of the Controllers intentions Controller – Should return the money immediately Courage of Ethical Conviction : Courage of Ethical Conviction AP Clerk would have found honest ways to handle her financial issues Assistant Controller Would have not worried about what the Controller thinks about being transparent with the intentions Would not care that he may look bad himself for having hired the AP Clerk Controller would have returned the money without rationalizing his unethical decision making Conclusion : Conclusion Rationalizations for unethical behavior: Controller - Denial of injury & victim Thinks the bank deserves to pay interest after their mistake Does not consider the effect on the Insurance Company’s cash position by keeping the money AP Clerk – Entitlement Felt it was OK to take money she did not earn Assistant Controller – Appeal to higher loyalties Did not want to question the Controller