Presentation Transcript
Impact of the cost of reform on social support for reform:A study of power sector in Indian states : Impact of the cost of reform on social support for reform: A study of power sector in Indian states V. Santhakumar
India Development Foundation
Gurgaon, India
andamp;
Centre for Development Studies,
Trivandrum, India
Relevance: : Relevance: Impact of the distribution of the costs and benefits of reform on its implementation
Recent reviews on politics of reform: Fidrmuc and Noury (2002)
`Lack of systematically collected and analyzed empirical data'
`Problems in collecting empirical data across different countries for comparison'
Power sector reforms (PSR) in Indian states may provide comparable data
The context: Indian power sector reforms : The context: Indian power sector reforms An Outline of Power Sector Reforms Contd……
The context: Indian power sector reforms : The context: Indian power sector reforms Little progress in PSR in many states on basic issues in spite of several initiatives
Political opposition is seen as a major constraint
Slow progress after recent state elections
Independent regulators unable to resolve issues related to: Open access, Cross subsidy, Government compensation Contd……
The context: Indian power sector reforms : The context: Indian power sector reforms People demand government intervention at the time of regulators’ decisions
Collusion between governments and state owned utilities make regulation ineffective
Subsidy motivates state government to meddle with regulation
Thus the need to analyze the political economy factors making power sector reforms difficult in India Contd……
Factors blocking/facilitating economic reforms in extant literature : Factors blocking/facilitating economic reforms in extant literature War of attrition
Crises facilitating reform
Uncertainty of benefits at the aggregate and individual levels
Resistance of interest groups
Differences in support/opposition to reforms among social groups Contd……
Factors blocking/facilitating reforms in Literature : Factors blocking/facilitating reforms in Literature Role of democracy/autocracy
Role of left wing/right wing governments
Median voter preference
Blocking marginal cost pricing for electricity in Canada
Role of Middle class Contd……
Political economy arguments in Indian power sector : Political economy arguments in Indian power sector Radical political economy argument: ‘External funding agencies pushing market oriented reforms’
Influence of the ‘big’ farmers keeps agricultural tariff low
Big farmers as political intermediaries delivering blocks of voters
Losers few, organized; beneficiaries many, unorganized
Arguments inadequate to explain Indian situation : Arguments inadequate to explain Indian situation Privatization implemented in two states (Orissa and Delhi) without electoral setbacks
Reforms seem to have caused electoral setbacks in two other states (AP and TN)
Reforms blocked also in states with less agricultural consumption
Industry and trade groups demand reforms (including privatization) Contd……
Arguments inadequate to explain Indian situation : Arguments inadequate to explain Indian situation Slow or no progress in PSR in many states
Despite the support from industry and trade
Despite external agencies supporting reforms in all states
Some states could make progress
Despite employees oppose reforms in all the states
Need to analyse the electoral opposition/support to reforms Contd……
Specific issues analysed in the study: : Specific issues analysed in the study: Analyzing Household response to PSR proposals
Do they support efficiency reforms?
Privatization used to gauge response
Are households ready to pay a higher tariff for better quality? Contd……
Specific issues analysed in the study: : Specific issues analysed in the study: Assumption: response will depend on the costs and benefits of reform to households
Cut in subsidy being received - a likely cost of reform
Improvement in quality of supply - a likely benefit of reform
Perception of economy-wide gains of viable power sector (including reduced fiscal deficits) Contd……
Method: : Method: Primary survey of about 7000 households in 14 states
Econometric analysis of the determinants of households' response to reform
Variables analysed
Tariff range (reflecting subsidy)
Units of Consumption
Power interruption
Connectivity
Affecting other services
Problems at work place
Others Contd……
Method : Method Aggregation of households' response at the state-level
Depends on the number of different types of households under each category in each state
Identification of certain patterns using graphs Contd……
Type A : Type A Tamil Nadu
Type B : Type B Rajasthan
Type C : Type C Bihar
Kerala : Kerala
West Bengal : West Bengal
Andhra Pradesh : Andhra Pradesh
Gujarat : Gujarat
Haryana : Haryana
Punjab : Punjab
Karnataka : Karnataka
Maharastra : Maharastra
Uttar Pradesh : Uttar Pradesh
Salient results from regression (multinomial logistic regression) by pooling household data : Salient results from regression (multinomial logistic regression) by pooling household data Those who pay higher tariff (near or above cost of supply) 1.8 times more likely to be ‘indifferent’ and 50% more likely to say ‘yes’ to privatisation, than saying ‘no to’ privatisation.
The influence of power interruptions doesn’t seem to be high.
Direct costs seem to be explaining the attitude to reforms
Pattern in the opposition to reforms? : Pattern in the opposition to reforms? More opposition to reform Rajastan, Haryana, Karnataka
The role of income groups and the support/opposition to reforms : The role of income groups and the support/opposition to reforms The losses of the richer sections 10-20% (including industry and trade groups) seem to be inadequate to push reforms
The gains of the poor (mostly unconnected) seem to be inadequate to generate a support base for reforms
Strong opposition to reform if middle class (from 3 to 7 deciles in an income order) get electricity at heavily subsidized rates
Opposition declines as middle class starts paying near or above the cost of supply
Lessons : Lessons Lessons for the pro-reform and poor quality states
Probable Options for anti-reform states
Continue with voice option
Divide the anti-reform force
Political reform - separation of sector governance : Political reform - separation of sector governance Figure 1: Kerala Contd…… One citizen one vote Consumer voting with weight for consumption
Political reform - separation of sector governance : Political reform - separation of sector governance Figure 2: Tamil Nadu Contd…… One citizen one vote Consumer voting with weight for consumption
Slide33 :
Determinants of opinion on privatisation across states (estimated odd ratios from a multinomial logistic regression model with reference 0 if no to privatisation) : Determinants of opinion on privatisation across states (estimated odd ratios from a multinomial logistic regression model with reference 0 if no to privatisation) Reference category: No to privatisation
Catch the
buzz on authorSTREAM
Copyright © 2002-2008 authorSTREAM. All rights reserved.