logging in or signing up wang Vilfrid Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 166 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: February 15, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Enterprise Risk Management: Enterprise Risk Management Shaun Wang, Ph.D., FCAS, ASA Director of Actuarial Science Program Georgia State University shaunwang@gsu.edu 2004 C.A.S.E. ForumOutline: Outline Concept of Risk Inherent Risks for P&C insurers ERM Approaches ERM Education at GSU ERM as a New Discipline: ERM as a New Discipline High expectations & excitements!! ERM takes integrated approaches to major risks of an enterprise ERM represents new ways of understanding & managing risks ERM is a new and evolving disciplineConcept of Risk: Concept of Risk Risk = Random “Volatility” Risk = Not knowing reality (lack of info, driving in dark) Risk = Wrong Existing Structure Poor coordination & communication Organizational cancer; needs structural reform! Risk = Opportunity for the Prepared & Discerning(I) Risk & Diversification : (I) Risk & Diversification “Offset” produces the highest benefits: long and short positions of the same asset “Random drivers” offer good benefits natural catastrophe events in various regions “Expertise Intensive”: pooling across sectors may yield little or even negative risk diversification Different market dynamics; different sets of expertise “Drag effort”: legal or reputation spillover Right and Wrong Diversifications: Right and Wrong Diversifications Years of under-pricing were partially caused by the “low correlation” argument by some multi-line players Diversification needs to match with areas of expertise Renaissance Re, a mono-line CAT-writer, achieves diversification by geographic region and by peril “ART” benefited buyers, but not sellers (II) Risk & Information: (II) Risk & Information Quality and timeliness of information are critical for decision-making Relative to their banking counterparts, many insurers have poor grades on this ERM modeling needs forward-looking data Need aggregate risk info, as well as every way we want to look at the business (III) Risk & Incentive Misalignment: (III) Risk & Incentive Misalignment Many “risks” are created by misalignment of incentives Underwriters short-term goal v.s. long-tailed liabilities Managers’ expansion of his/her own kingdom CEO’s compensation linked to growth and acquisition Trial Attorneys and the U.S. legal dynamics Lawyer Contingent Fees & Punitive Damages(IV) Risk & Valuation/Market Dynamics: (IV) Risk & Valuation/Market Dynamics Risk often manifested in changes in value Market participants can drive value changes Real estate bubble Momentum investing Portfolio insurance strategies UK FSA experience Current versus Long-term Valuation Pension funding deficit Outline: Outline Concept of Risk Inherent Risks for P&C insurers ERM Approaches ERM Education at GSU US Insured CAT Losses (in $billion) and Rate On Line Index (1989=100): US Insured CAT Losses (in $billion) and Rate On Line Index (1989=100) Source: Guy Carpenter & *III Estimate ROL showed big jump after major CAT losses, and then came down gradually …Inherent Risks for P&C Insurers : Inherent Risks for P&C Insurers The infamous underwriting/reserving cycle Independent from equity market risks Not knowing final result for years Lack of feedback on estimated reserves Hedging using reinsurance (within sector): high information asymmetry & transaction costs S&P Report 19-Nov-2003Insurance Actuaries – A Crisis of Credibility: S&P Report 19-Nov-2003 Insurance Actuaries – A Crisis of Credibility S&P report: “Actuaries are signing off on reserves that turn out to be wildly inaccurate” … It sent a shockwave around the globe in the actuarial and insurance community!! American Academy of Actuaries countered 2 days after S&P release: “It is an obvious attempt to explain away the errors that some analysts have made in estimating property/casualty insurers’ earnings.” Both agree It is high-time for “Reserving Reformation”P/C Insurance Industry Prior Year Reserve Development*: P/C Insurance Industry Prior Year Reserve Development* *Year 2003 number is an estimate by S&P. Source: A.M. Best, Morgan Stanley, Dowling & Partners Securities $23 billion reserve increase = Hurricane Andrew Reserve Cycle & Pricing Cycle are correlatedReason for P/C Insolvencies (218 Insolvencies, 1993-2002): Reason for P/C Insolvencies (218 Insolvencies, 1993-2002) Source: A.M. Best, Insurance Information Institute Reserve deficiencies account for more than half of all p/c insurers insolvenciesCyclical Nature of Reserve Estimates: Cyclical Nature of Reserve Estimates The adequacy of reserve estimates showed a clear cycle over the years Reserve cycle coupled with the pricing UW cycle Pressure on short-term performance Following the competitors Smoothing taxes for some players A slow-death sentence for many companiesOutline: Outline Concept of Risk Inherent Risks for P&C insurers ERM Approaches ERM Education at GSU ERM Focuses on “Business Processes”: ERM Focuses on “Business Processes” Loss Modeling Is Only Part of the Story A company had the state-of-the-art actuarial pricing model, but in the end still lost so much money Need to quantify the Business Process Risk Top-line growth in a soft market poses a major risk Over-crowded competitive market poses a major risk Need to enter the deep water by understanding the risk drivers and market dynamics ERM Model of Market Competition: ERM Model of Market Competition Result = Min{Quote1, …, Quotek} Loss, where Quotek Normal(k, k) For long-tailed lines, delayed info higher k higher chance of premium deficiency more bidders k higher chance of premium deficiency The Winner’s Curse: In insurance competitive pricing, the lowest price gets the business, but may be cursed with financial losses ERM Solution on Reserving: Contingent Payoffs: ERM Solution on Reserving: Contingent Payoffs Payoff contingent on magnitude of reserve development for a fixed block of business As deferred compensation (or tradable index) Force decision-makers (managers, actuaries) to put their money where their mouth is Provide feedback channel for a block of businessSlide21: Tame U/W Cycle by financial engineering: Contingent payoff on reserve estimatesOutline: Outline Concept of Risk Inherent Risks for P&C insurers ERM Approaches ERM Education at GSU ERM Education at GSU: ERM Education at GSU Actuarial Education Scale back traditional components Go deeper and go wider Mathematical Risk Management Financial risk modeling and … Enterprise Risk ManagementAn actuarial/engineer approach: An actuarial/engineer approach Look risk as a “dynamics” Model each agent? External dynamics Financial risk modeling and … Internal dynamicsQ & A: Q & A DFA versus ERM: DFA versus ERM DFA has not yet fulfilled its promises Did not focus on dominant risks Fancy stochastic model without benchmark parameters Weak organizational backing & poor communication How does ERM differ from DFA? ERM offers these missing elements for successDid “U.S. Risk Based Capital” Help?: Did “U.S. Risk Based Capital” Help? U.S. Benchmark RBC has only limited success: Factor based reserve charges ignored the bigger issue of reserve adequacy Incentives for putting up inadequate reserves Same capital charge factor for premium written in a hard market versus in a soft market A point-in-time measure, without reference to future direction and sensitivity over timeOpportunities for Creating Industry Benchmarks: Opportunities for Creating Industry Benchmarks Industry benchmarks on risk parameters and capital charges are badly needed Benchmarks should reflect the inherent risks of the business, regardless of risk portfolio Parameters are more important than the model It will take much fundamental analysis, expert opinion, and timely updatesExtras: Extras Quality of Information: Quality of Information Information asymmetry -- major hurdle for securitization (and reinsurers) Value of Information? Think about the US search for Al Qaeda Do we have a measure for “quality of information”?Ideology v.s. Reality Check: Ideology v.s. Reality Check Major Culture Differences in merger and acquisition, and in international operations A Noble Cause or Being Good Hearted does not guarantee good outcomes What Creates Value?: What Creates Value? Stability and liquidity Value creation Preparing a delicious meal Well-run organization creates franchise value 70% of US GDP are from services? Hassle-free Quality of life My moving experience with Mayflower What Destroys Value?: What Destroys Value? Sept 11 terror attach changed everything Connectivity: a small part of a huge machine Negligence in medical malpractice Can we make a patient whole through large sum of compensation? What effects on the society as a whole Reaction Time: Reaction Time “Reaction Time” is an important aspect of risk XOL reinsurance has a higher severity volatility than proportional reinsurance. However, the reaction time for rate increase is quicker for XOL Rate increase delays in some jurisdictions For long-tailed liabilities or long-term guarantees: the ability to react is much limited. You have a stack of policies written in the past Too late to re-act You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
wang Vilfrid Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 166 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: February 15, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Enterprise Risk Management: Enterprise Risk Management Shaun Wang, Ph.D., FCAS, ASA Director of Actuarial Science Program Georgia State University shaunwang@gsu.edu 2004 C.A.S.E. ForumOutline: Outline Concept of Risk Inherent Risks for P&C insurers ERM Approaches ERM Education at GSU ERM as a New Discipline: ERM as a New Discipline High expectations & excitements!! ERM takes integrated approaches to major risks of an enterprise ERM represents new ways of understanding & managing risks ERM is a new and evolving disciplineConcept of Risk: Concept of Risk Risk = Random “Volatility” Risk = Not knowing reality (lack of info, driving in dark) Risk = Wrong Existing Structure Poor coordination & communication Organizational cancer; needs structural reform! Risk = Opportunity for the Prepared & Discerning(I) Risk & Diversification : (I) Risk & Diversification “Offset” produces the highest benefits: long and short positions of the same asset “Random drivers” offer good benefits natural catastrophe events in various regions “Expertise Intensive”: pooling across sectors may yield little or even negative risk diversification Different market dynamics; different sets of expertise “Drag effort”: legal or reputation spillover Right and Wrong Diversifications: Right and Wrong Diversifications Years of under-pricing were partially caused by the “low correlation” argument by some multi-line players Diversification needs to match with areas of expertise Renaissance Re, a mono-line CAT-writer, achieves diversification by geographic region and by peril “ART” benefited buyers, but not sellers (II) Risk & Information: (II) Risk & Information Quality and timeliness of information are critical for decision-making Relative to their banking counterparts, many insurers have poor grades on this ERM modeling needs forward-looking data Need aggregate risk info, as well as every way we want to look at the business (III) Risk & Incentive Misalignment: (III) Risk & Incentive Misalignment Many “risks” are created by misalignment of incentives Underwriters short-term goal v.s. long-tailed liabilities Managers’ expansion of his/her own kingdom CEO’s compensation linked to growth and acquisition Trial Attorneys and the U.S. legal dynamics Lawyer Contingent Fees & Punitive Damages(IV) Risk & Valuation/Market Dynamics: (IV) Risk & Valuation/Market Dynamics Risk often manifested in changes in value Market participants can drive value changes Real estate bubble Momentum investing Portfolio insurance strategies UK FSA experience Current versus Long-term Valuation Pension funding deficit Outline: Outline Concept of Risk Inherent Risks for P&C insurers ERM Approaches ERM Education at GSU US Insured CAT Losses (in $billion) and Rate On Line Index (1989=100): US Insured CAT Losses (in $billion) and Rate On Line Index (1989=100) Source: Guy Carpenter & *III Estimate ROL showed big jump after major CAT losses, and then came down gradually …Inherent Risks for P&C Insurers : Inherent Risks for P&C Insurers The infamous underwriting/reserving cycle Independent from equity market risks Not knowing final result for years Lack of feedback on estimated reserves Hedging using reinsurance (within sector): high information asymmetry & transaction costs S&P Report 19-Nov-2003Insurance Actuaries – A Crisis of Credibility: S&P Report 19-Nov-2003 Insurance Actuaries – A Crisis of Credibility S&P report: “Actuaries are signing off on reserves that turn out to be wildly inaccurate” … It sent a shockwave around the globe in the actuarial and insurance community!! American Academy of Actuaries countered 2 days after S&P release: “It is an obvious attempt to explain away the errors that some analysts have made in estimating property/casualty insurers’ earnings.” Both agree It is high-time for “Reserving Reformation”P/C Insurance Industry Prior Year Reserve Development*: P/C Insurance Industry Prior Year Reserve Development* *Year 2003 number is an estimate by S&P. Source: A.M. Best, Morgan Stanley, Dowling & Partners Securities $23 billion reserve increase = Hurricane Andrew Reserve Cycle & Pricing Cycle are correlatedReason for P/C Insolvencies (218 Insolvencies, 1993-2002): Reason for P/C Insolvencies (218 Insolvencies, 1993-2002) Source: A.M. Best, Insurance Information Institute Reserve deficiencies account for more than half of all p/c insurers insolvenciesCyclical Nature of Reserve Estimates: Cyclical Nature of Reserve Estimates The adequacy of reserve estimates showed a clear cycle over the years Reserve cycle coupled with the pricing UW cycle Pressure on short-term performance Following the competitors Smoothing taxes for some players A slow-death sentence for many companiesOutline: Outline Concept of Risk Inherent Risks for P&C insurers ERM Approaches ERM Education at GSU ERM Focuses on “Business Processes”: ERM Focuses on “Business Processes” Loss Modeling Is Only Part of the Story A company had the state-of-the-art actuarial pricing model, but in the end still lost so much money Need to quantify the Business Process Risk Top-line growth in a soft market poses a major risk Over-crowded competitive market poses a major risk Need to enter the deep water by understanding the risk drivers and market dynamics ERM Model of Market Competition: ERM Model of Market Competition Result = Min{Quote1, …, Quotek} Loss, where Quotek Normal(k, k) For long-tailed lines, delayed info higher k higher chance of premium deficiency more bidders k higher chance of premium deficiency The Winner’s Curse: In insurance competitive pricing, the lowest price gets the business, but may be cursed with financial losses ERM Solution on Reserving: Contingent Payoffs: ERM Solution on Reserving: Contingent Payoffs Payoff contingent on magnitude of reserve development for a fixed block of business As deferred compensation (or tradable index) Force decision-makers (managers, actuaries) to put their money where their mouth is Provide feedback channel for a block of businessSlide21: Tame U/W Cycle by financial engineering: Contingent payoff on reserve estimatesOutline: Outline Concept of Risk Inherent Risks for P&C insurers ERM Approaches ERM Education at GSU ERM Education at GSU: ERM Education at GSU Actuarial Education Scale back traditional components Go deeper and go wider Mathematical Risk Management Financial risk modeling and … Enterprise Risk ManagementAn actuarial/engineer approach: An actuarial/engineer approach Look risk as a “dynamics” Model each agent? External dynamics Financial risk modeling and … Internal dynamicsQ & A: Q & A DFA versus ERM: DFA versus ERM DFA has not yet fulfilled its promises Did not focus on dominant risks Fancy stochastic model without benchmark parameters Weak organizational backing & poor communication How does ERM differ from DFA? ERM offers these missing elements for successDid “U.S. Risk Based Capital” Help?: Did “U.S. Risk Based Capital” Help? U.S. Benchmark RBC has only limited success: Factor based reserve charges ignored the bigger issue of reserve adequacy Incentives for putting up inadequate reserves Same capital charge factor for premium written in a hard market versus in a soft market A point-in-time measure, without reference to future direction and sensitivity over timeOpportunities for Creating Industry Benchmarks: Opportunities for Creating Industry Benchmarks Industry benchmarks on risk parameters and capital charges are badly needed Benchmarks should reflect the inherent risks of the business, regardless of risk portfolio Parameters are more important than the model It will take much fundamental analysis, expert opinion, and timely updatesExtras: Extras Quality of Information: Quality of Information Information asymmetry -- major hurdle for securitization (and reinsurers) Value of Information? Think about the US search for Al Qaeda Do we have a measure for “quality of information”?Ideology v.s. Reality Check: Ideology v.s. Reality Check Major Culture Differences in merger and acquisition, and in international operations A Noble Cause or Being Good Hearted does not guarantee good outcomes What Creates Value?: What Creates Value? Stability and liquidity Value creation Preparing a delicious meal Well-run organization creates franchise value 70% of US GDP are from services? Hassle-free Quality of life My moving experience with Mayflower What Destroys Value?: What Destroys Value? Sept 11 terror attach changed everything Connectivity: a small part of a huge machine Negligence in medical malpractice Can we make a patient whole through large sum of compensation? What effects on the society as a whole Reaction Time: Reaction Time “Reaction Time” is an important aspect of risk XOL reinsurance has a higher severity volatility than proportional reinsurance. However, the reaction time for rate increase is quicker for XOL Rate increase delays in some jurisdictions For long-tailed liabilities or long-term guarantees: the ability to react is much limited. You have a stack of policies written in the past Too late to re-act