Presentation Transcript
SBA to GLE: The Road : SBA to GLE: The Road Les Morse, Director
Assessment & Accountability
Alaska Department of Education & Early Development
No Child Left Behind Winter Conference
January 18, 2006
Anchorage, Alaska Les s Traveled
Presentation Outline : Presentation Outline Materials
History
Assessment types
Standards Based Assessment
Questions
From SBA to GLE Cell phones
EVERYONE is essential
Timed activities
Partner Sharing
Table activities
Table Moderator
Table Timer
Whole group
Breaks
Materials : Materials Table Folders
School Report
One content area/grade per table
Related Test Blueprint
Related Proficiency Level Descriptor
Scale Proficiency Score Chart
Alaska Standards booklet
GLE History : GLE History January 2004 – content teacher review
March 2004 – stakeholder review
Teachers, school board, administrator, public
March 2004 – State Board approved
June 2005 – State Board adopted into regulation after a period of public comment
GLE History : GLE History
SBA History : SBA History April 2004 – teacher item writing workshop
August 2004 – content/bias review
October 2004 – field test
December 2004 – data review
April 2005 – operational assessments (3-9)
April 2006 – operational assessments (3-10)
Assessment Types : Assessment Types Formative assessment
Occurs while the topic is being taught, provides diagnostic information on specific mistakes and misconceptions, leads to instructional adaptations. Summative assessment
The process of evaluating (and grading) the learning of students at a point in time. Accountability decisions are derived from summative assessment data.
Assessment Types : Assessment Types School Accountability
Standards Based Assessment
Alternate Assessment
Student Accountability
High School Graduation Qualifying Examination Program Accountability
English Language Proficiency Assessment
Classroom/Grade Accountability
End of course/unit/year tests Program Change
Pre/post & intermediate checks Summative
Assessment Types : Assessment Types Besides the Standards Based Assessments (SBA), what summative assessments are used within our district to monitor student progress? Partner Sharing
Protocol (4 minutes)
Partner: A person who does not work in your district or agency
2 minutes A shares
2 minutes B shares
Standards Based Assessment : Standards Based Assessment Standards Based Assessments
Grades 3-10
Criterion, based on Alaska GLEs
Items written by educators, including Alaska teachers
Reading, writing, and mathematics
Science in 2008
Meets NCLB and state accountability requirements
Multiple choice and constructed response
Given once each year
Developing Questions : Developing Questions Proficiency Level Descriptors (PLD): what does performance at the different proficiency
levels look like?
Advanced
Proficient
Below Proficient
Far Below Proficient
Slide12 : Test Item Proficiency Level Descriptor Grade Level Expectation
“Standards” Developing Questions
Mathematics: Grade 5 : Mathematics: Grade 5 William is buying equipment for his bicycle. He buys a helmet for $19.99, a tire pump for $8.86, and a new seat for $13.45. What is the total cost of the items he purchased rounded to the nearest $10?
$20
$30
$40
$50 Example
Mathematics: Grade 5 : Mathematics: Grade 5 Example Partner Sharing
(5 minutes)
1 minute: Review problem and turn to math GLEs in standards booklet, pages 79-108
2 minutes: Identify appropriate GLE that serves as foundation to this item
3 minutes: Discuss how the GLE is evident in the item
Item Samplers : Item Samplers http://www.eed.state.ak.us/tls/assessment/SBA_ItemSamplers.html
SBA to GLE : SBA to GLE Area of emphasis Grade Level Expectation addressed Reporting Category
SBA to GLE : SBA to GLE Scale Score Information by school, district and state (300 is proficient) Overall Proficiency level information
#/% proficient Content Area
SBA to GLE : SBA to GLE Drill down from reporting category to GLE
SBA to GLE : SBA to GLE Test connected to standards.
SBA Data Review : SBA Data Review Identify School Summary Report
Identify area of greatest challenge
Identify specific GLEs using test blueprint Table Discussion
Protocol (10 minutes)
2 minutes: Complete tasks to left
8 minutes: Discussion Rounds
1 minute per person
What aspects of district program need to be reviewed to address challenge?
Individual Student Report : Individual Student Report Student scale score by reporting category and reported with error band. Proficiency Level Descriptor
Micro Lab Discussion : Micro Lab Discussion Partner Activity
Purpose: Share ideas and build understanding around use of GLEs.
Protocol
One partner speaks, other partner listens and CANNOT speak.
Partner A answers first question and has one minute.
Partner B answers second question and has one minute.
Repeat twice through 4th question.
Micro Lab Questions 1 & 2 : Micro Lab Questions 1 & 2
How do we make sure EVERYONE understands the connection between the SBAs and GLEs?
How do we organize all summative assessments to develop our understanding of students?
Micro Lab Questions 3 & 4 : Micro Lab Questions 3 & 4
How can we appropriately use the item samplers and information about item development to improve instruction?
What methods can one use to have assurance the curriculum is REALLY aligned to the GLEs?
Slide25 : Grade Level Expectations (GLE) – The Standard!
Standards Based Assessment – accountability . . . The Road . . .
Catch the
buzz on authorSTREAM
Copyright © 2002-2008 authorSTREAM. All rights reserved.