Needs Analysis:1 Needs Analysis “Analysed opportunities and constraints in using C&IT”
i.e. analysed the needs or requirements
Put simply, the goal is to describe the gap between where the students are and where we want them to be, before we can design the bridge they can cross.
Sources of needs analysis(more of later?):2 Sources of needs analysis(more of later?) Learning technology integratione.g. Stoner, Laurillard, Conole & Oliver
Instructional design e.g. Gagné , Shuell
Curriculum design e.g. Taba
Action research e.g. Kemmis & McTaggart
Training needs analysis e.g. Peterson
Learning needs analysis
Systems analysis for software development e.g. Yourdon
A needs analysis :3 A needs analysis Tasks – some or all of
Review the current course, if any
Analyze the stakeholders especially students
Analyze the subject domain
Analyze the learning outcomes
Analyze the teaching/learning activities
Analyze the constraints and resources
Analyze the evaluation methods needed
Stakeholder analysis:4 Stakeholder analysis Who are they? Who cares?
What will they want from the intervention?
Are we prepared to give it them?
They include
The tutor, programme assessment
Students
Colleagues
The department
The QA office, the QAA
‘The university’
The students:5 The students What relevant knowledge and skills?
How varied are they in knowledge and learning styles?
How well can they learn? What study skills?
What motivation and interests, attitudes to teaching/learning methods?
What obstacles to their learning, such as anxiety, colour blindness, lack of concentration, computer access?
The subject domain:6 The subject domain In commercial training needs analysis only task performance counts
In higher education emphasis is on the knowledge underpinning performance, and generic cognitive skills
We may need to represent the knowledge domain, the context of learning activities and outcomes
So we might use knowledge elicitation and knowledge representation techniques
Knowledge elicitation:7 Knowledge elicitation Informal interviews with experts.This reveals their view of the domain.
Observation of actual performance of expertise done in a natural context.
Verbal protocols in an assessment situation.A protocol provides a framework for capturing the knowledge in a skilled performance.
Knowledge represented as …:8 Knowledge represented as … living things mammals animals humans dogs female humans Julia movement respiration growth plants movement have have have not have ako ako ako ako ako isa ako = class is A Kind Ofisa = individual Is A orchids ako Danny whippets ako isa Semantic net
Slide 9:9 Pyramid of learning outcomes to be able to to be able to to be able to to be able to to be able to to be able to to be able to to be able to to be able to to be able to to be able to Pre-requisites to be able to to be able to
TLAs: traditional:10 TLAs: traditional Acquisition – reading, lectures
Practice - exercises, problems
Discussion – seminars, tutorials
Discovery – field trips, practicals
Assessment – essays, exams
TLAs Laurillard’s teaching strategy:11 TLAs Laurillard’s teaching strategy Four aspects of TLAs
Discursive discussion of goals and conceptions
Adaptivestudents relate feedback on their work to their conceptions
Interactiveacting to achieve a goal and receive feedback
Reflectivereflect on their actions in the light of conceptions
TLAs: Laurillard’s Conversational Framework:12 TLAs: Laurillard’s Conversational Framework In more detail, 12 activities of which 10 are:
Receiving information
Describing own conceptions (verbally, writing..)
Correcting misconceptions from feedback
Re-describing improved conceptions
Performing tasks
Receiving feedback on tasks
Improving performance of tasks
Reflecting on performance to improve conceptions
Reflecting on conceptions to improve performance
TLAs: Kolb’s cycle:13 concrete experience abstract conceptualization reflective observation active experimentation four stages of learning from experience: TLAs: Kolb’s cycle
TLAs: Robert Gagné The nine instructional events:14 TLAs: Robert Gagné The nine instructional events Use LT to support
1. Gain attention
2. Tell learners the learning objective
3. Stimulate recall
4. Present the stimulus, content
5. Provide guidance, relevance, organization
6. Elicit the learning by demonstrating it
7. Provide feedback on performance
8. Assess performance, give feedback and reinforcement
9. Enhance retention and transfer to other contexts
TLAs: Shuell’s Learning Functions:15 TLAs: Shuell’s Learning Functions 1. Expectations must be set
2. Motivation must be gained and maintained
3. Prior knowledge needs activation
4. Draw attention to important items
5. Encoding: help remembering, give personal meaning with diagrams, examples
6. Comparisons: encourage with diagrams, charts, questions
Shuell’s Learning Functions - 2:16 Shuell’s Learning Functions - 2 7. Hypothesis generation, encourage thinking of alternative actions
8. Repetition: guided practice or reflection, multiple examples or perspectives
9. Relevant feedback and correction
10. Evaluation of feedback as basis of next activity
11. Monitoring - check for understanding
12. Integration: provide ways to combine, integrate, synthesize, with graphics, multimedia
Constraints & resources:17 Constraints & resources Learning technology availability
When: deadlines, time available
Who is available to do what
How tools and resources available
Other costs
The evaluation in outline:18 Summative evaluation, what will count as success? (from Kirkpatrick, four ripples)
What happened in use? Did learners, teachers use it? Like it?
Were learning outcomes achieved?Was student performance improved?
Were the outcomes transferable to real situations?
What were the wider effects? On students, staff departments, institution… The evaluation in outline
Criticisms of needs analysis:19 Criticisms of needs analysis The unit of analysis is too small. Decomposition emphasizes elements but not their integration or application - does not encourage constructivist learning, synthesis, generic skills.
Hierarchies of objectives (or content) are too simple for the richer interrelations of real domains.
Instructional strategies can become just the integration of small items of learning.
…?
References 1:20 References 1 Bostock S.J. 1996 A critical review of Laurillard’s classification of educational media Journal of Instructional Science 24,71-88
Gagné R M and Medsker K L, The conditions of learning: training applications 1996, Harcourt Brace
Harmon, P. and King, D. 1985 Representing knowledge New York: Wiley
Kirkpatrick D L Evaluating Training Programs
Kemmis S & McTaggart R 1988 (eds) The Action Research Planner 3rd ed. Deakin University Press
Laurillard D. Rethinking University Education, 1994 Routledge and second edition 2002
Marshall, I.M., Samson, W.B., Dugard, P.I. & Scott, WA Predicting the development effort of multimedia courseware Information and Software Technology 1994 36 (5) 251-258
Oliver, M. and Conole, G. 1998 A pedagogical framework for embedding C&IT into the curriculum ALT-J 6 (2)
References 2:21 References 2 Pederson, K. Expert systems programming: practical techniques for rule-based systems 1989 London: John Wiley
Peterson, R. 1992 Training needs analysis in the workplace London: Kogan Page
Shuell, T. 1992, Designing Instructional Computing Systems for Meaningful Learning, in P. Winne & M.Jones (eds) Adaptive Learning Environments: foundations and Frontiers, New York: Springer Verlag
Stoner G. A conceptual framework for the integration of learning technology, chapter 3 in Implementing Learning Technology, LTDI, Heriot-Watt 1996http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/implementing-it/implt.pdf
Taba H. 1971 The functions of a conceptual framework for curriculum design 134-152 in R. Hooper (ed.) The Curriculum: context, design and development Open University Press
Learning technology frameworkse.g. Stoner, LTDI:22 Learning technology frameworkse.g. Stoner, LTDI Analysis and evaluation
Determine course objectives
Collect data on students, course, resources, policy
Evaluate extant system
Identify potential courses of action
Selection of Learning Technologies
Generate alternative solutions
Evaluate alternative against course objectives
Choose the technology and mode of use
Action research:23 Action research Cycles (spirals) of interventions each consisting of
Plan
Act
Observe
Reflect
Relevant for 3 reasons
It is in the EFFECTS documentation and background
Participant projects are action research (loosely)
In Keele workshop on learning technology project planning, lifecycles
Traditional curriculum designe.g. Taba 1971:24 Traditional curriculum designe.g. Taba 1971 Learning objectiveswhat is the purpose?
Contentwhat is the subject?
Methods*what are the learning experiences?
Evaluation*how are results (student performances) to be assessed?* Teaching/ Learning activities might involve IT
Training needs analysis:25 Training needs analysis Identify task-specific performance objectives.
Identify the gap between actual and desired performance?
Is it a training problem?
Analyze the knowledge, skills, & attitudes needed for the performance, to bridge the gap.
Identify constraints e.g. time, equipment
Maybe suitable for computer based instruction
Learning needs analysis:26 Learning needs analysis In education as opposed to training, emphasis is on the knowledge underpinning performance, not just the observable task performance
Analysis involves subject knowledge acquisition and representation
Related to methods used in knowledge engineering e.g. developing expert systems
Maybe suitable for developing hypermedia
Systems analysis (E Yourdon Modern Structured Analysis 1989):27 Systems analysis (E Yourdon Modern Structured Analysis 1989) Inputs are
initial project charter
user policy and
constraints
Modelling processes develop this into a clear specification
Statement of purpose
This feeds into
the design activity,
cost/benefit report and
acceptance test specification (evaluation)
Time dependency:28 Time dependency Initiation
Analysis of requirements, review of solutions, selection
Design
Implementation
Evaluation
The evaluation in outline:29 The evaluation in outline Maybe, formative evaluation as part of the development e.g.
Quality review using checklists for content and usability
By experts or peers, walkthroughs
Pilot tests
Observations of use, automatic logging …
Maier and Warren 2000:30 Maier and Warren 2000 Section 3.3.1 Planning resource based environments
Learner model - academic needs, expectations, IT skills, variety
Pedagogical model - values and philosophy, learning outcomes, how to achieve them, how to assess
Domain model- level & content, learning outcomes, cross references, resources needed
Implementation model - select technology to deliver
Evaluation model - how to evaluate