logging in or signing up KM Techniques Examples 2005 Urania Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 410 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: March 08, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Knowledge Management Systems: Development and ApplicationsPart II: Techniques and Examples: Knowledge Management Systems: Development and Applications Part II: Techniques and Examples Hsinchun Chen, Ph.D. McClelland Professor, Director, Artificial Intelligence Lab and Hoffman E-Commerce Lab The University of Arizona Founder, Knowledge Computing Corporation 美國亞歷桑那大學,陳炘鈞 博士 Acknowledgement: NSF DLI1, DLI2, NSDL, DG, ITR, IDM, CSS, NIH/NLM, NCI, NIJ, CIA, NCSA, HP, SAPSlide2: Discovering and Managing Knowledge: Text/Web Mining and Digital Library Knowledge: Knowledge Revealed underlying assumptions in KM Implied different roles of knowledge in organizations Textual knowledge - Most efficient way to store, retrieve, and transfer vast amount of information Advanced processing needed to obtain knowledge Traditionally done by humans It is useful to review the discipline of Human-Computer Interaction to understand human analysis needs Slide6: Text Mining: Intersection of IR and AI Information Retrieval (IR) and Gerald Salton • Inverted Index, Boolean, and Probabilistic, 1970s • Expert Systems, User Modeling and Natural Language Processing, 1980s • Machine Learning for Information Retrieval, 1990s • Search Engines and Digital Libraries, late 1990s and 2000s Slide7: Text Mining: Intersection of IR and AI Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Herbert Simon • General Problem Solvers, 1970s • Expert Systems, 1980s • Machine Learning and Data Mining, 1990s • Agents, Network/Graph Learning, late 1990s and 2000sSlide8: Representing Knowledge •IR Approach •Indexing and Subject Headings •Dictionaries, Thesauri, and Classification Schemes •AI Approach •Cognitive Modeling •Semantic Networks, Production Systems, Logic, Frames, and Ontologies Slide9: For Web Mining: Web mining techniques: resource discovery on the Web, information extraction from Web resources, and uncovering general patterns (Etzioni, 1996) Pattern extraction, meta searching, spidering Web page summarization (Hearst, 1994; McDonald & Chen, 2002) Web page classification (Glover et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2002; Kwon & Lee, 2003) Web page clustering (Roussinov & Chen, 2001; Chen et al., 1998; Jain & Dube, 1988) Web page visualization (Yang et al., 2003; Spence, 2001; Shneiderman, 1996)Slide11: Text Mining Techniques: Linguistic analysis/NLP: identify key concepts (who/what/where…) Statistical/co-occurrence analysis: create automatic thesaurus, link analysis Statistical and neural networks clustering/categorization: identify similar documents/users/communities and create knowledge maps Visualization and HCI: tree/network, 1/2/3D, zooming/detail-in-contextSlide12: Text Mining Techniques: Linguistic Analysis Word and inverted index: stemming, suffixes, morphological analysis, Boolean, proximity, range, fuzzy search Phrasal analysis: noun phrases, verb phrases, entity extraction, mutual information Sentence-level analysis: context-free grammar, transformational grammar Semantic analysis: semantic grammar, case-based reasoning, frame/scriptAutomatic Generation of CL: Foundation from NSF/DARPA/NASA Digital Library Initiative-1 : Automatic Generation of CL: Foundation from NSF/DARPA/NASA Digital Library Initiative-1 Slide14: Text Mining Techniques: Statistical/Co-Occurrence Analysis Similarity functions: Jaccard, Cosine Weighting heuristics Bi-gram, tri-gram, N-gram Finite State Automata (FSA) Dictionaries and thesauriSlide15: Automatic Generation of CL: Foundation from NSF/DARPA/NASA Digital Library Initiative-1 Slide16: Text Mining Techniques: Clustering/Categorization Hierarchical clustering: single-link, multi-link, Ward’s Statistical clustering: multi-dimensional scaling (MDS), factor analysis Neural network clustering: self-organizing map (SOM) Ontologies: directories, classification schemesAutomatic Generation of CL: Foundation from NSF/DARPA/NASA Digital Library Initiative-1 : Automatic Generation of CL: Foundation from NSF/DARPA/NASA Digital Library Initiative-1 Slide18: KMS Techniques: Visualization/HCI Structures: trees/hierarchies, networks Dimensions: 1D, 2D, 2.5D, 3D, N-D (glyphs) Interactions: zooming, spotlight, fisheye views, fractal viewsAutomatic Generation of CL: : Automatic Generation of CL: Slide20: Entity Extraction and Co-reference based on TREC and MUG Visualization techniques and HCI Text segmentation and summarization Automatic Generation of CL: (Continued)Slide21: Ontology-enhanced semantic tagging (e.g., UMLS Semantic Nets) Ontology-enhanced query expansion (e.g., WordNet, UMLS Metathesaurus) Integration of CL: Spreading-activation based term suggestion (e.g., Hopfield net)YAHOO vs. OOHAY:: YAHOO vs. OOHAY: YAHOO: manual, high-precision OOHAY: automatic, high-recall Acknowledgements: NSF, NIH, NLM, NIJ, DARPASlide23: From YAHOO! To OOHAY? Y A H O O ! ? Object Oriented Hierarchical Automatic YellowpageSlide24: Text and Web Mining in Digital Libraries: AI Lab Research Prototypes Web Analysis (1M):Web pages, spidering, noun phrasing, categorization: Web Analysis (1M): Web pages, spidering, noun phrasing, categorizationOOHAY: Visualizing the Web: OOHAY: Visualizing the WebSlide28: OOHAY: Visualizing the WebSlide29: Lessons Learned: Web pages are noisy: need filtering Spidering needs help: domain lexicons, multi-threads SOM is computational feasible for large-scale application SOM performance for web pages = 50% Web knowledge map (directory) is interesting for browsing, not for searching Techniques applicable to Intranet and marketing intelligenceNews Classification (1M):Chinese news content, mutual information indexing, PAT tree, categorization: News Classification (1M): Chinese news content, mutual information indexing, PAT tree, categorizationSlide37: Lessons Learned: News readers are not knowledge workers News articles are professionally written and precise. SOM performance for news articles = 85% Statistical indexing techniques perform well for Chinese documents Corporate users may need multiple sources and dynamic search help Techniques applicable to eCommerce (eCatalogs) and ePortalPersonal Agents (1K):Web spidering, meta searching, noun phrasing, dynamic categorization: Personal Agents (1K): Web spidering, meta searching, noun phrasing, dynamic categorizationSlide40: 2. Search results from spiders are displayed dynamically 1. Enter Starting URLs and Key Phrases to be searched OOHAY: CI Spider For project information and free download: http://ai.bpa.arizona.eduSlide41: 2. Search results from spiders are displayed dynamically 1. Enter Starting URLs and Key Phrases to be searched OOHAY: CI Spider, Meta Spider, Med Spider For project information and free download: http://ai.bpa.arizona.eduSlide42: OOHAY: Meta Spider, News Spider, Cancer Spider For project information and free download: http://ai.bpa.arizona.eduSlide43: 4. SOM is generated based on the phrases selected. Steps 3 and 4 can be done in iterations to refine the results. 3. Noun Phrases are extracted from the web ages and user can selected preferred phrases for further summarization. OOHAY: CI Spider, Meta Spider, Med Spider For project information and free download: http://ai.bpa.arizona.eduSlide44: Lessons Learned: Meta spidering is useful for information consolidation Noun phrasing is useful for topic classification (dynamic folders) SOM usefulness is suspect for small collections Knowledge workers like personalization, client searching, and collaborative information sharing Corporate users need multiple sources and dynamic search help Techniques applicable to marketing and competitive analysesCRM Data Analysis (5K):Call center Q/A, noun phrasing, dynamic categorization, problem analysis, agent assistance: CRM Data Analysis (5K): Call center Q/A, noun phrasing, dynamic categorization, problem analysis, agent assistanceSlide48: Lessons Learned: Call center data are noisy: typos and errors Noun phrasing useful for Q/A classification Q/A classification could identify problem areas Q/A classification could improve agent productivity: email, online chat, and VoIP Q/A classification could improve new agent training Techniques applicable to virtual call center and CRM applicationsNano Patent Mapping (100K):Nano patents, content/network analysis and visualization, impact analysis: Nano Patent Mapping (100K): Nano patents, content/network analysis and visualization, impact analysisData: U.S. NSE Patents: Data: U.S. NSE Patents Top assignee countries and institutionsData: U.S. NSE Patents (cont.): Data: U.S. NSE Patents (cont.) Top technology fields (US Patent Classification first-level categories)Content Map Analysis: Content Map Analysis NSE Grant Content Map (1991 – 1995) NSE Patent Content Map (1991 – 1995) Content Map Analysis: Content Map Analysis NSE Patent Content Map (1996 – 2000) NSE Grant Content Map (1996 – 2000) * Region color indicates the growth rate of the associated technology topic. The number associated with the colors were the actual growth rate: # of grants/patents during 1991-1995 / # of grants/patents during 1996-2000 for a particular topic (region). Regions with comparable growth rate as the entire field were assigned the green color. Sample Patent Citation Networks: Sample Patent Citation Networks Backbone citation network for the field “Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology (all patents shown were cited by more than five times) PI-inventors and their patents form a closely linked cluster within the largest connected component of the backbone citation networkH1.1 Patent – Number of Cites: H1.1 Patent – Number of Cites H1.1 supported: PI-inventors’ patents had significantly higher number of cites measure than most other comparison groups (except IBM) Order of the groups: NSF, IBM > Top10, UC, US > EntireSet, Japan > European, OthersH2.1 Inventor – Number of Cites: H2.1 Inventor – Number of Cites H2.1 supported: PI-inventors had significantly higher number of cites measure than most other comparison groups Order of the groups: NSF > Top10, Japan, EntireSet, US, IBM > UC, European, Others Japanese inventors had high number of cites measure despite the small number of cites for each patent they fileSlide57: Lessons Learned: Units of analysis: inventors, institutions, and countries USPTO patents are clean and comprehensive Content and network analyses help reveal trends and key innovations/inventors Patent analyses help with impact studyNewsgroup Categorization (1K):Workgroup communication, noun phrasing, dynamic categorization, glyphs visualization: Newsgroup Categorization (1K): Workgroup communication, noun phrasing, dynamic categorization, glyphs visualizationSlide59: Thread Disadvantages: No sub-topic identification Difficult to identify experts Difficult to learn participants’ attitude toward the communitySlide60: Thread Representation Time Message Person Length of TimeSlide61: People Representation Time Message Thread Length of TimeSlide62: Visual Effects: Thickness = how active a subtopic is Length in x-dimension = the time duration of a sub-topic Slide63: Proposed Interface (Interaction Summary) Visual Effects: Healthy sub-garden with many blooming high flowers = popular active sub-topic A long, blooming flower is a healthy threadSlide64: Proposed Interface (Expert Indicator) Visual Effects: Healthy sub-garden with many blooming high flowers = popular sub-topic A long, blooming people flower is a recognized expert.Slide65: Lessons Learned: P1000: A picture is indeed worth 1000 words Expert identification is critical for KM support Glyphs are powerful for capturing multi-dimensional data Techniques applicable to collaborative applications, e.g., email, online chats, newsgroup, and suchGIS Multimedia Data Mining (10GBs):Geoscience data, texture image indexing, multimedia content: GIS Multimedia Data Mining (10GBs): Geoscience data, texture image indexing, multimedia contentSlide67: Airphoto analysis: Texture (Gabor filter)Slide68: AVHRR satellite data: Temperature/vegetationSlide69: Lessons Learned: Image analysis techniques are application dependent (unlike text analysis) Image killer apps not found yet Multimedia applications require integration of data, text, and image mining techniques Multimedia KMS not ready for prime-time consumption yetSlide70: Knowledge Management Systems: Future Other Emerging Categorization Challenges/Opportunities:: Other Emerging Categorization Challenges/Opportunities: Multilingual terminology and semantic issues Web analysis and categorization issues E-Commerce information (transactions) classification issues Multimedia content and wireless delivery issues Future: semantic web, multilingual web, multimedia web, wireless web! Slide72: The Road Ahead The Semantic Web: XML, RDF, Ontologies The Wireless Web: WML, WIFI, display The Multimedia Web: content indexing and analysis The Multilingual Web: cross-lingual MT and IRSlide73: For Project Information at AI Lab: http://ai.arizona.edu hchen@eller.arizona.edu You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
KM Techniques Examples 2005 Urania Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 410 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: March 08, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Knowledge Management Systems: Development and ApplicationsPart II: Techniques and Examples: Knowledge Management Systems: Development and Applications Part II: Techniques and Examples Hsinchun Chen, Ph.D. McClelland Professor, Director, Artificial Intelligence Lab and Hoffman E-Commerce Lab The University of Arizona Founder, Knowledge Computing Corporation 美國亞歷桑那大學,陳炘鈞 博士 Acknowledgement: NSF DLI1, DLI2, NSDL, DG, ITR, IDM, CSS, NIH/NLM, NCI, NIJ, CIA, NCSA, HP, SAPSlide2: Discovering and Managing Knowledge: Text/Web Mining and Digital Library Knowledge: Knowledge Revealed underlying assumptions in KM Implied different roles of knowledge in organizations Textual knowledge - Most efficient way to store, retrieve, and transfer vast amount of information Advanced processing needed to obtain knowledge Traditionally done by humans It is useful to review the discipline of Human-Computer Interaction to understand human analysis needs Slide6: Text Mining: Intersection of IR and AI Information Retrieval (IR) and Gerald Salton • Inverted Index, Boolean, and Probabilistic, 1970s • Expert Systems, User Modeling and Natural Language Processing, 1980s • Machine Learning for Information Retrieval, 1990s • Search Engines and Digital Libraries, late 1990s and 2000s Slide7: Text Mining: Intersection of IR and AI Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Herbert Simon • General Problem Solvers, 1970s • Expert Systems, 1980s • Machine Learning and Data Mining, 1990s • Agents, Network/Graph Learning, late 1990s and 2000sSlide8: Representing Knowledge •IR Approach •Indexing and Subject Headings •Dictionaries, Thesauri, and Classification Schemes •AI Approach •Cognitive Modeling •Semantic Networks, Production Systems, Logic, Frames, and Ontologies Slide9: For Web Mining: Web mining techniques: resource discovery on the Web, information extraction from Web resources, and uncovering general patterns (Etzioni, 1996) Pattern extraction, meta searching, spidering Web page summarization (Hearst, 1994; McDonald & Chen, 2002) Web page classification (Glover et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2002; Kwon & Lee, 2003) Web page clustering (Roussinov & Chen, 2001; Chen et al., 1998; Jain & Dube, 1988) Web page visualization (Yang et al., 2003; Spence, 2001; Shneiderman, 1996)Slide11: Text Mining Techniques: Linguistic analysis/NLP: identify key concepts (who/what/where…) Statistical/co-occurrence analysis: create automatic thesaurus, link analysis Statistical and neural networks clustering/categorization: identify similar documents/users/communities and create knowledge maps Visualization and HCI: tree/network, 1/2/3D, zooming/detail-in-contextSlide12: Text Mining Techniques: Linguistic Analysis Word and inverted index: stemming, suffixes, morphological analysis, Boolean, proximity, range, fuzzy search Phrasal analysis: noun phrases, verb phrases, entity extraction, mutual information Sentence-level analysis: context-free grammar, transformational grammar Semantic analysis: semantic grammar, case-based reasoning, frame/scriptAutomatic Generation of CL: Foundation from NSF/DARPA/NASA Digital Library Initiative-1 : Automatic Generation of CL: Foundation from NSF/DARPA/NASA Digital Library Initiative-1 Slide14: Text Mining Techniques: Statistical/Co-Occurrence Analysis Similarity functions: Jaccard, Cosine Weighting heuristics Bi-gram, tri-gram, N-gram Finite State Automata (FSA) Dictionaries and thesauriSlide15: Automatic Generation of CL: Foundation from NSF/DARPA/NASA Digital Library Initiative-1 Slide16: Text Mining Techniques: Clustering/Categorization Hierarchical clustering: single-link, multi-link, Ward’s Statistical clustering: multi-dimensional scaling (MDS), factor analysis Neural network clustering: self-organizing map (SOM) Ontologies: directories, classification schemesAutomatic Generation of CL: Foundation from NSF/DARPA/NASA Digital Library Initiative-1 : Automatic Generation of CL: Foundation from NSF/DARPA/NASA Digital Library Initiative-1 Slide18: KMS Techniques: Visualization/HCI Structures: trees/hierarchies, networks Dimensions: 1D, 2D, 2.5D, 3D, N-D (glyphs) Interactions: zooming, spotlight, fisheye views, fractal viewsAutomatic Generation of CL: : Automatic Generation of CL: Slide20: Entity Extraction and Co-reference based on TREC and MUG Visualization techniques and HCI Text segmentation and summarization Automatic Generation of CL: (Continued)Slide21: Ontology-enhanced semantic tagging (e.g., UMLS Semantic Nets) Ontology-enhanced query expansion (e.g., WordNet, UMLS Metathesaurus) Integration of CL: Spreading-activation based term suggestion (e.g., Hopfield net)YAHOO vs. OOHAY:: YAHOO vs. OOHAY: YAHOO: manual, high-precision OOHAY: automatic, high-recall Acknowledgements: NSF, NIH, NLM, NIJ, DARPASlide23: From YAHOO! To OOHAY? Y A H O O ! ? Object Oriented Hierarchical Automatic YellowpageSlide24: Text and Web Mining in Digital Libraries: AI Lab Research Prototypes Web Analysis (1M):Web pages, spidering, noun phrasing, categorization: Web Analysis (1M): Web pages, spidering, noun phrasing, categorizationOOHAY: Visualizing the Web: OOHAY: Visualizing the WebSlide28: OOHAY: Visualizing the WebSlide29: Lessons Learned: Web pages are noisy: need filtering Spidering needs help: domain lexicons, multi-threads SOM is computational feasible for large-scale application SOM performance for web pages = 50% Web knowledge map (directory) is interesting for browsing, not for searching Techniques applicable to Intranet and marketing intelligenceNews Classification (1M):Chinese news content, mutual information indexing, PAT tree, categorization: News Classification (1M): Chinese news content, mutual information indexing, PAT tree, categorizationSlide37: Lessons Learned: News readers are not knowledge workers News articles are professionally written and precise. SOM performance for news articles = 85% Statistical indexing techniques perform well for Chinese documents Corporate users may need multiple sources and dynamic search help Techniques applicable to eCommerce (eCatalogs) and ePortalPersonal Agents (1K):Web spidering, meta searching, noun phrasing, dynamic categorization: Personal Agents (1K): Web spidering, meta searching, noun phrasing, dynamic categorizationSlide40: 2. Search results from spiders are displayed dynamically 1. Enter Starting URLs and Key Phrases to be searched OOHAY: CI Spider For project information and free download: http://ai.bpa.arizona.eduSlide41: 2. Search results from spiders are displayed dynamically 1. Enter Starting URLs and Key Phrases to be searched OOHAY: CI Spider, Meta Spider, Med Spider For project information and free download: http://ai.bpa.arizona.eduSlide42: OOHAY: Meta Spider, News Spider, Cancer Spider For project information and free download: http://ai.bpa.arizona.eduSlide43: 4. SOM is generated based on the phrases selected. Steps 3 and 4 can be done in iterations to refine the results. 3. Noun Phrases are extracted from the web ages and user can selected preferred phrases for further summarization. OOHAY: CI Spider, Meta Spider, Med Spider For project information and free download: http://ai.bpa.arizona.eduSlide44: Lessons Learned: Meta spidering is useful for information consolidation Noun phrasing is useful for topic classification (dynamic folders) SOM usefulness is suspect for small collections Knowledge workers like personalization, client searching, and collaborative information sharing Corporate users need multiple sources and dynamic search help Techniques applicable to marketing and competitive analysesCRM Data Analysis (5K):Call center Q/A, noun phrasing, dynamic categorization, problem analysis, agent assistance: CRM Data Analysis (5K): Call center Q/A, noun phrasing, dynamic categorization, problem analysis, agent assistanceSlide48: Lessons Learned: Call center data are noisy: typos and errors Noun phrasing useful for Q/A classification Q/A classification could identify problem areas Q/A classification could improve agent productivity: email, online chat, and VoIP Q/A classification could improve new agent training Techniques applicable to virtual call center and CRM applicationsNano Patent Mapping (100K):Nano patents, content/network analysis and visualization, impact analysis: Nano Patent Mapping (100K): Nano patents, content/network analysis and visualization, impact analysisData: U.S. NSE Patents: Data: U.S. NSE Patents Top assignee countries and institutionsData: U.S. NSE Patents (cont.): Data: U.S. NSE Patents (cont.) Top technology fields (US Patent Classification first-level categories)Content Map Analysis: Content Map Analysis NSE Grant Content Map (1991 – 1995) NSE Patent Content Map (1991 – 1995) Content Map Analysis: Content Map Analysis NSE Patent Content Map (1996 – 2000) NSE Grant Content Map (1996 – 2000) * Region color indicates the growth rate of the associated technology topic. The number associated with the colors were the actual growth rate: # of grants/patents during 1991-1995 / # of grants/patents during 1996-2000 for a particular topic (region). Regions with comparable growth rate as the entire field were assigned the green color. Sample Patent Citation Networks: Sample Patent Citation Networks Backbone citation network for the field “Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology (all patents shown were cited by more than five times) PI-inventors and their patents form a closely linked cluster within the largest connected component of the backbone citation networkH1.1 Patent – Number of Cites: H1.1 Patent – Number of Cites H1.1 supported: PI-inventors’ patents had significantly higher number of cites measure than most other comparison groups (except IBM) Order of the groups: NSF, IBM > Top10, UC, US > EntireSet, Japan > European, OthersH2.1 Inventor – Number of Cites: H2.1 Inventor – Number of Cites H2.1 supported: PI-inventors had significantly higher number of cites measure than most other comparison groups Order of the groups: NSF > Top10, Japan, EntireSet, US, IBM > UC, European, Others Japanese inventors had high number of cites measure despite the small number of cites for each patent they fileSlide57: Lessons Learned: Units of analysis: inventors, institutions, and countries USPTO patents are clean and comprehensive Content and network analyses help reveal trends and key innovations/inventors Patent analyses help with impact studyNewsgroup Categorization (1K):Workgroup communication, noun phrasing, dynamic categorization, glyphs visualization: Newsgroup Categorization (1K): Workgroup communication, noun phrasing, dynamic categorization, glyphs visualizationSlide59: Thread Disadvantages: No sub-topic identification Difficult to identify experts Difficult to learn participants’ attitude toward the communitySlide60: Thread Representation Time Message Person Length of TimeSlide61: People Representation Time Message Thread Length of TimeSlide62: Visual Effects: Thickness = how active a subtopic is Length in x-dimension = the time duration of a sub-topic Slide63: Proposed Interface (Interaction Summary) Visual Effects: Healthy sub-garden with many blooming high flowers = popular active sub-topic A long, blooming flower is a healthy threadSlide64: Proposed Interface (Expert Indicator) Visual Effects: Healthy sub-garden with many blooming high flowers = popular sub-topic A long, blooming people flower is a recognized expert.Slide65: Lessons Learned: P1000: A picture is indeed worth 1000 words Expert identification is critical for KM support Glyphs are powerful for capturing multi-dimensional data Techniques applicable to collaborative applications, e.g., email, online chats, newsgroup, and suchGIS Multimedia Data Mining (10GBs):Geoscience data, texture image indexing, multimedia content: GIS Multimedia Data Mining (10GBs): Geoscience data, texture image indexing, multimedia contentSlide67: Airphoto analysis: Texture (Gabor filter)Slide68: AVHRR satellite data: Temperature/vegetationSlide69: Lessons Learned: Image analysis techniques are application dependent (unlike text analysis) Image killer apps not found yet Multimedia applications require integration of data, text, and image mining techniques Multimedia KMS not ready for prime-time consumption yetSlide70: Knowledge Management Systems: Future Other Emerging Categorization Challenges/Opportunities:: Other Emerging Categorization Challenges/Opportunities: Multilingual terminology and semantic issues Web analysis and categorization issues E-Commerce information (transactions) classification issues Multimedia content and wireless delivery issues Future: semantic web, multilingual web, multimedia web, wireless web! Slide72: The Road Ahead The Semantic Web: XML, RDF, Ontologies The Wireless Web: WML, WIFI, display The Multimedia Web: content indexing and analysis The Multilingual Web: cross-lingual MT and IRSlide73: For Project Information at AI Lab: http://ai.arizona.edu hchen@eller.arizona.edu