logging in or signing up biotech Urania Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 2432 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: January 24, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: akilinc (4 month(s) ago) Thanks for preparation this ppt. Can I take a copy Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: rolly007 (9 month(s) ago) cvhbgfhtyjh Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: ratz24 (10 month(s) ago) very good one Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: omkartol (28 month(s) ago) it is very goood Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript “Agricultural Biotechnology and GMO’s : National and International Structures”: “Agricultural Biotechnology and GMO’s : National and International Structures” Johan Brink, Institute of International Agriculture Michigan State University National Extension Conference Michigan State University 24 -27 March 2003 Agricultural Biotechnology : Agricultural Biotechnology 1st Generation Biotechnology producing wine, beer, cheese, vaccines 2nd Generation Biotechnology conventional breeding, tissue culture techniques 3rd Generation Biotechnology or “Modern Biotechnology recombinant DNA technology, GMO’s, genomicsAgricultural Biotechnology : Agricultural Biotechnology Modern Biotechnology – GM products is not a silver bullet or a quick fix to solve the world’s poverty and food security problems when combined with conventional approaches, it can go a long way in the improvement of crop productivity does require a new way of thinking, organization and communication Slide4: Comprehensive Approach to Agricultural Biotechnology Market/Trade Economic Growth Food Security Improved Nutrition R & D Technology Biosafety Varietal Release Farmers Technology Transfer IPR PVP/IPR Extension & Stewardship Public Outreach Agri Industry Outreach Food & Environmental Safety Regulatory Framework Biotech Indus. Seed Indus. Outreach & Communication Conventional BreedingMajor Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology : Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology Biosafety Food Safety Environmental Safety Regulatory Frameworks Food Aid Intellectual Property Rights/Plant Variety Protection Patenting of technology, processes and products Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology : Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology International Trade Labeling Export markets to Europe Treaties : Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety; Codex allimentarius; WTO rules Globalization and control of the world’s food supply by multi-national companiesMajor Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology : Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology Communication & Outreach Public awareness & acceptance Policy maker awareness Agricultural Industry awareness Consumer benefits Trust in science and regulatory system Newsworthiness of GM foods Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology : Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology Public/Private Sector partnerships and Linkages Private sector concentrate on major crops such as corn, soybean, cotton Public sector concentrate on papaya, potato, cassava, sweetpotato, banana, etc. Private sector has deep pockets to comply with regulatory requirementsBiotechnology Policy : Challenges and Constraints in Developing Countries: Biotechnology Policy : Challenges and Constraints in Developing Countries No strategies for Communication and Outreach – Policy maker awareness and Public awareness Lack of Human Resources with expertise in Biotechnology related policies Lack of Financial resources to develop and implement policies Lack of political will to adopt biotechnology and address crop productivity Limited number of countries developed and implemented national biotechnology strategies Lack of viable seed industries Biotechnology Policy : Challenges and Constraints in Africa: Biotechnology Policy : Challenges and Constraints in Africa Lack of co-operation among Government Ministries regulating biotechnology derived products Lack of Public-Private sector partnerships that are critical to both R&D and “commercialization” International Trade barriers Food Aid Issues Compliance with/to International Protocols/Treaties Lack of Infrastructure and Institutional Support Structure eg. Biocontainment facilities, PVP/Patent offices, Food safety labs Lack of Risk Assessment Capacity and expertise Elements of a Biosafety Framework to regulate GM products : Elements of a Biosafety Framework to regulate GM products Legislative component – GM act or law passed by Parliament Specific GM regulations – linked to the GM act and to be implemented and administered by a Government Department Biosafety Framework implemented to : - Assess Scientific Risk of GM product - Assess Socio-Economic impacts - Ensure Public Communication, Biosafety Framework in South Africa: Biosafety Framework in South Africa GMO Executive Council Representatives from Depts. Of Agriculture, Science & Technology, Environmental Affairs, Health, Labor, Trade & Industry, Water Affairs & Forestry Duties: To advise the Minister of Agriculture on all aspects concerning the development, production, use, application and release of GM Product To assess the potential Socio-Economic impact of the GM Product To communicate and interact with the public Scientific Advisory Committee Duties: - Risk Assessment and Management - Appoint Scientific Review Panel GMO Registrar : Department of Agriculture Duties: Biosafety Administration Monitor all GMO facilities and activities Routine inspections Appeal Board Application for GMO Permit for Field test Communication with Public Current Status of Biosafety in Africa: Current Status of Biosafety in AfricaCurrent Status of Biosafety in Africa:2002: Current Status of Biosafety in Africa:2002Regulatory Framework in the USA: Regulatory Framework in the USA GM products are regulated by 3 different agencies Department of Agriculture (USDA) – oversees safety for cultivation Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – oversees the safe use of pesticides, including pesticides produced in GM plants Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – ensures products are safe to eat and addresses food labeling issues Roadmap for Commercialization of a GM Product: Roadmap for Commercialization of a GM Product R&D – Technology Development, Field Tests and establish Proof of Concept Product Development – Multi-location field trials, cultivar development and bulking-up of material Regulatory File Development – Perform Food safety analysis (allergenicity, toxicity and nutritional composition) and environmental studies (outcrossing potential, effects on non-target organisms, etc) Obtain “Freedom to Operate” – “Who owns the Intellectual Property of all the components of the product (gene, promoter, variety etc.)?” Dissemination strategy – “How will product reach the farmer?” ; “Will private sector seed companies be involved?” Extension – “ How do farmers grow and cultivate the product?” Stewardship and Liability – Management of the product by farmers, processors and exporters Public Communication of benefits, impacts Slide17: Source : Clive James, ISAAASlide18: Global adoption of GM Crops : 2002 Source : Clive James, ISAAASlide19: GM Crops planted in the USA : 2002 Source : Clive James, ISAAADominant Transgenic Crops :2002: Dominant Transgenic Crops :2002 Source : Clive James, ISAAAGlobal Adoption Rates of GMO’s: Global Adoption Rates of GMO’s Source : Clive James, ISAAAGM Crops planted in the USA : 2002: GM Crops planted in the USA : 2002 Planted 39 million ha (66% of total ha) Soybean (HT), Corn (IR;HT), Canola (HT), Cotton (IR;HT), Stacked traits Net gain of 3.3 million ha in 2002 79% of national soybean area planted to herbicide tolerant RR soybean Increase in planting of Bt Corn in 2002 10% Decrease in planting of GM cotton Source : Clive James, ISAAAMore information on GM Crops : More information on GM Crops International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) http://www.isaaa.org Crop Biotech Net - ISAAA Global Knowledge Centers http://www.isaaa.org/kc Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project (ABSP) at Michigan State University http://www.iia.msu.edu/absp What is “ABSP” : What is “ABSP” The Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project (ABSP) is a USAID-funded project based in the Institute of International Agriculture at the Michigan State University Since 1991 ABSP, in collaboration with other US universities and the private sector, has integrated research, product development and policy/regulatory development to assist developing countries in accessing and generating biotechnology and in establishing a regulatory framework for the adoption of biotech cropsWhat is “ABSP” : What is “ABSP” ABSP focused on GM applications in potatoes, cucurbits, corn and tomatoes Capacity building in: R&D, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Technology Transfer and Biosafety Partner Countries: Costa Rica, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Morocco, South Africa Regional Partners: East and Central Africa, Southern Africa Development of tuber moth resistance in potatoes : ABSP, MSU & AGERI: Development of tuber moth resistance in potatoes : ABSP, MSU & AGERI ABSP : 1991 - 2003: ABSP : 1991 - 2003 research management policy networking ABSP is a successful model for Agricultural Biotechnology developmentSlide28: Fire Damage to ABSP Offices January 1, 2000 Arson attack on ABSP offices in Agriculture Hall, MSU Earth Liberation Front (ELF) claim responsibility for fire damage Slide29: Thank you for your attention ! http://www.iia.msu.edu/abspEurope and GMO’s : Europe and GMO’s Cultural differences ; traditional agriculture system Small continent and countries ; ecologically vulnerable Science is criticized and scientists are not trusted No pressure to improve crop productivity Food scandals in Europe ; BSE etc. The role of the media in communicating the biotech message ; “Bad news is not good news” ; GM foods less newsworthy in recent months Public perception and acceptance You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
biotech Urania Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 2432 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: January 24, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: akilinc (4 month(s) ago) Thanks for preparation this ppt. Can I take a copy Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: rolly007 (9 month(s) ago) cvhbgfhtyjh Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: ratz24 (10 month(s) ago) very good one Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: omkartol (28 month(s) ago) it is very goood Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript “Agricultural Biotechnology and GMO’s : National and International Structures”: “Agricultural Biotechnology and GMO’s : National and International Structures” Johan Brink, Institute of International Agriculture Michigan State University National Extension Conference Michigan State University 24 -27 March 2003 Agricultural Biotechnology : Agricultural Biotechnology 1st Generation Biotechnology producing wine, beer, cheese, vaccines 2nd Generation Biotechnology conventional breeding, tissue culture techniques 3rd Generation Biotechnology or “Modern Biotechnology recombinant DNA technology, GMO’s, genomicsAgricultural Biotechnology : Agricultural Biotechnology Modern Biotechnology – GM products is not a silver bullet or a quick fix to solve the world’s poverty and food security problems when combined with conventional approaches, it can go a long way in the improvement of crop productivity does require a new way of thinking, organization and communication Slide4: Comprehensive Approach to Agricultural Biotechnology Market/Trade Economic Growth Food Security Improved Nutrition R & D Technology Biosafety Varietal Release Farmers Technology Transfer IPR PVP/IPR Extension & Stewardship Public Outreach Agri Industry Outreach Food & Environmental Safety Regulatory Framework Biotech Indus. Seed Indus. Outreach & Communication Conventional BreedingMajor Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology : Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology Biosafety Food Safety Environmental Safety Regulatory Frameworks Food Aid Intellectual Property Rights/Plant Variety Protection Patenting of technology, processes and products Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology : Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology International Trade Labeling Export markets to Europe Treaties : Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety; Codex allimentarius; WTO rules Globalization and control of the world’s food supply by multi-national companiesMajor Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology : Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology Communication & Outreach Public awareness & acceptance Policy maker awareness Agricultural Industry awareness Consumer benefits Trust in science and regulatory system Newsworthiness of GM foods Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology : Major Policy Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology Public/Private Sector partnerships and Linkages Private sector concentrate on major crops such as corn, soybean, cotton Public sector concentrate on papaya, potato, cassava, sweetpotato, banana, etc. Private sector has deep pockets to comply with regulatory requirementsBiotechnology Policy : Challenges and Constraints in Developing Countries: Biotechnology Policy : Challenges and Constraints in Developing Countries No strategies for Communication and Outreach – Policy maker awareness and Public awareness Lack of Human Resources with expertise in Biotechnology related policies Lack of Financial resources to develop and implement policies Lack of political will to adopt biotechnology and address crop productivity Limited number of countries developed and implemented national biotechnology strategies Lack of viable seed industries Biotechnology Policy : Challenges and Constraints in Africa: Biotechnology Policy : Challenges and Constraints in Africa Lack of co-operation among Government Ministries regulating biotechnology derived products Lack of Public-Private sector partnerships that are critical to both R&D and “commercialization” International Trade barriers Food Aid Issues Compliance with/to International Protocols/Treaties Lack of Infrastructure and Institutional Support Structure eg. Biocontainment facilities, PVP/Patent offices, Food safety labs Lack of Risk Assessment Capacity and expertise Elements of a Biosafety Framework to regulate GM products : Elements of a Biosafety Framework to regulate GM products Legislative component – GM act or law passed by Parliament Specific GM regulations – linked to the GM act and to be implemented and administered by a Government Department Biosafety Framework implemented to : - Assess Scientific Risk of GM product - Assess Socio-Economic impacts - Ensure Public Communication, Biosafety Framework in South Africa: Biosafety Framework in South Africa GMO Executive Council Representatives from Depts. Of Agriculture, Science & Technology, Environmental Affairs, Health, Labor, Trade & Industry, Water Affairs & Forestry Duties: To advise the Minister of Agriculture on all aspects concerning the development, production, use, application and release of GM Product To assess the potential Socio-Economic impact of the GM Product To communicate and interact with the public Scientific Advisory Committee Duties: - Risk Assessment and Management - Appoint Scientific Review Panel GMO Registrar : Department of Agriculture Duties: Biosafety Administration Monitor all GMO facilities and activities Routine inspections Appeal Board Application for GMO Permit for Field test Communication with Public Current Status of Biosafety in Africa: Current Status of Biosafety in AfricaCurrent Status of Biosafety in Africa:2002: Current Status of Biosafety in Africa:2002Regulatory Framework in the USA: Regulatory Framework in the USA GM products are regulated by 3 different agencies Department of Agriculture (USDA) – oversees safety for cultivation Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – oversees the safe use of pesticides, including pesticides produced in GM plants Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – ensures products are safe to eat and addresses food labeling issues Roadmap for Commercialization of a GM Product: Roadmap for Commercialization of a GM Product R&D – Technology Development, Field Tests and establish Proof of Concept Product Development – Multi-location field trials, cultivar development and bulking-up of material Regulatory File Development – Perform Food safety analysis (allergenicity, toxicity and nutritional composition) and environmental studies (outcrossing potential, effects on non-target organisms, etc) Obtain “Freedom to Operate” – “Who owns the Intellectual Property of all the components of the product (gene, promoter, variety etc.)?” Dissemination strategy – “How will product reach the farmer?” ; “Will private sector seed companies be involved?” Extension – “ How do farmers grow and cultivate the product?” Stewardship and Liability – Management of the product by farmers, processors and exporters Public Communication of benefits, impacts Slide17: Source : Clive James, ISAAASlide18: Global adoption of GM Crops : 2002 Source : Clive James, ISAAASlide19: GM Crops planted in the USA : 2002 Source : Clive James, ISAAADominant Transgenic Crops :2002: Dominant Transgenic Crops :2002 Source : Clive James, ISAAAGlobal Adoption Rates of GMO’s: Global Adoption Rates of GMO’s Source : Clive James, ISAAAGM Crops planted in the USA : 2002: GM Crops planted in the USA : 2002 Planted 39 million ha (66% of total ha) Soybean (HT), Corn (IR;HT), Canola (HT), Cotton (IR;HT), Stacked traits Net gain of 3.3 million ha in 2002 79% of national soybean area planted to herbicide tolerant RR soybean Increase in planting of Bt Corn in 2002 10% Decrease in planting of GM cotton Source : Clive James, ISAAAMore information on GM Crops : More information on GM Crops International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) http://www.isaaa.org Crop Biotech Net - ISAAA Global Knowledge Centers http://www.isaaa.org/kc Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project (ABSP) at Michigan State University http://www.iia.msu.edu/absp What is “ABSP” : What is “ABSP” The Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project (ABSP) is a USAID-funded project based in the Institute of International Agriculture at the Michigan State University Since 1991 ABSP, in collaboration with other US universities and the private sector, has integrated research, product development and policy/regulatory development to assist developing countries in accessing and generating biotechnology and in establishing a regulatory framework for the adoption of biotech cropsWhat is “ABSP” : What is “ABSP” ABSP focused on GM applications in potatoes, cucurbits, corn and tomatoes Capacity building in: R&D, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Technology Transfer and Biosafety Partner Countries: Costa Rica, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Morocco, South Africa Regional Partners: East and Central Africa, Southern Africa Development of tuber moth resistance in potatoes : ABSP, MSU & AGERI: Development of tuber moth resistance in potatoes : ABSP, MSU & AGERI ABSP : 1991 - 2003: ABSP : 1991 - 2003 research management policy networking ABSP is a successful model for Agricultural Biotechnology developmentSlide28: Fire Damage to ABSP Offices January 1, 2000 Arson attack on ABSP offices in Agriculture Hall, MSU Earth Liberation Front (ELF) claim responsibility for fire damage Slide29: Thank you for your attention ! http://www.iia.msu.edu/abspEurope and GMO’s : Europe and GMO’s Cultural differences ; traditional agriculture system Small continent and countries ; ecologically vulnerable Science is criticized and scientists are not trusted No pressure to improve crop productivity Food scandals in Europe ; BSE etc. The role of the media in communicating the biotech message ; “Bad news is not good news” ; GM foods less newsworthy in recent months Public perception and acceptance