logging in or signing up FGI P3 9 1 Grebenkov UpBeat Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 47 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: November 23, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: French-German Initiative – Project 3 – Health Sub-Project n° 3.9.1 Data Base on Radiological Situations, Countermeasures and Medical Care in Contaminated Settlements AUTHORS : Grebenkov A., Yakushau A., Mansoux H., Tirmarche M., Antsipov G., Averin V., Germenchuk M., Minenko V., & Zhouchenko Yu. RADIOLOGICAL PASSPORTS of Contaminated Settlements in Belarus: Database and Data AnalysisObjectives of the sub-project: Objectives of the sub-project Collection, securing and validation of existing data that cover radiological and sanitary information, and data on economical, demographic and societal infrastructure in selected settlements of Belarus Development of a database tool for risk-based decision-making protocol applied to inhabited areas Such the database would: Address critical locations (annual dose > 1 mSv) Assist for ranking of contaminated settlements and file data on these settlements to support a risk-based analysis Recommend and evaluate protection measuresMethodology: data collection: Methodology: data collection Radiological-Hygienic Passport (RHP) consisted of 13 separate forms grouped under three headings: Statistics (societal and demographic structure of population, housing, land used and predominant soil type) Economical infrastructure and public utilities (farms, industries, schools, hospitals, shops, service, etc.) Radiological data and doses (total area subdivided vs. level of contamination, 137Cs content in human body, contamination of agricultural products, contamination of households, annual effective dose) Every RHP is filled out by responsible organizations RHP is concluded with proposed countermeasuresMethodology: data verification: Methodology: data verification Statistics department of a higher-level Cross-references of different files Standard measurements followed by statistical analysis Additional revision along with the data of previous surveys Periodical spot checks or additional arbitral survey in case of significant deviationMethodology: RHP Compilation: Methodology: RHP CompilationMain results: Main results 96 settlements and data for the period from 1993 through 2001 Almost 15 thousand inhabitants in the areas with level of contamination ranging from 2.5 through 27.5 Ci/km2 Over 65 thousand samples of food products partitioning (seasonal, farming mode, etc.) effect of countermeasures About 1.5 thousand WBC measurements age occupationMain results (Milk quality vs. soil contamination): Main results (Milk quality vs. soil contamination) Public farms Private farmsMain results (Milk contamination at different seasons): Main results (Milk contamination at different seasons) Private farms Public farmsMain results (WBC measurements): Main results (WBC measurements)Main results (Average annual effective doses): Main results (Average annual effective doses)Main results (Two components of effective dose): Main results (Two components of effective dose)Main results (Effect of countermeasures): Main results (Effect of countermeasures)Main results (Evolution of milk quality): Main results (Evolution of milk quality)RHP Database: RHP Database Realizes an informational block: data defining general parameters of a settlement; data on radioactive contamination (lands, buildings, food,…) ; demographic and societal parameters; industrial and municipal infrastructure, etc.; characteristics of available countermeasures. Realizes a simulation block comprised by the following models: contaminant transfer to basic forage resources and food; exposure and risk assessment and prediction; cost and efficiency analysis based on data of available countermeasures.RHP Database structure: RHP Database structureRHP Database table interactions: RHP Database table interactionsFragment of RHP thematic data: Fragment of RHP thematic dataFragment of countermeasures data: Fragment of countermeasures dataRHP Database table with sub-tables: RHP Database table with sub-tablesRHP Database table with sub-tables: RHP Database table with sub-tablesForm responding to “Dose Forecast”: Form responding to “Dose Forecast”Form responding to “Cost-Benefit Analysis”: Form responding to “Cost-Benefit Analysis”Form responding to “Link to Least Cost Analysis”: Form responding to “Link to Least Cost Analysis”Conclusions: Conclusions RHP Database provides for target settlements: reliable data on radiological, sanitary and social parameters list and characteristics of appropriate countermeasures RHP Database provides for decision-makers a risk-based remedial planning tool a feasibility assessment of recommended measures based on a cost-benefit and least-cost analysisOutlook: Outlook Further progress and use of RHP Database will facilitate wider recommendations concerning radiation, health, sanitary and social protection of contaminated settlements in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine The RHP Database user interface envisages populating the database with new information on continuing basis. Due to harmonized codes, it can be easy extended to Russian and/or Ukrainian regions You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
FGI P3 9 1 Grebenkov UpBeat Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 47 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: November 23, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: French-German Initiative – Project 3 – Health Sub-Project n° 3.9.1 Data Base on Radiological Situations, Countermeasures and Medical Care in Contaminated Settlements AUTHORS : Grebenkov A., Yakushau A., Mansoux H., Tirmarche M., Antsipov G., Averin V., Germenchuk M., Minenko V., & Zhouchenko Yu. RADIOLOGICAL PASSPORTS of Contaminated Settlements in Belarus: Database and Data AnalysisObjectives of the sub-project: Objectives of the sub-project Collection, securing and validation of existing data that cover radiological and sanitary information, and data on economical, demographic and societal infrastructure in selected settlements of Belarus Development of a database tool for risk-based decision-making protocol applied to inhabited areas Such the database would: Address critical locations (annual dose > 1 mSv) Assist for ranking of contaminated settlements and file data on these settlements to support a risk-based analysis Recommend and evaluate protection measuresMethodology: data collection: Methodology: data collection Radiological-Hygienic Passport (RHP) consisted of 13 separate forms grouped under three headings: Statistics (societal and demographic structure of population, housing, land used and predominant soil type) Economical infrastructure and public utilities (farms, industries, schools, hospitals, shops, service, etc.) Radiological data and doses (total area subdivided vs. level of contamination, 137Cs content in human body, contamination of agricultural products, contamination of households, annual effective dose) Every RHP is filled out by responsible organizations RHP is concluded with proposed countermeasuresMethodology: data verification: Methodology: data verification Statistics department of a higher-level Cross-references of different files Standard measurements followed by statistical analysis Additional revision along with the data of previous surveys Periodical spot checks or additional arbitral survey in case of significant deviationMethodology: RHP Compilation: Methodology: RHP CompilationMain results: Main results 96 settlements and data for the period from 1993 through 2001 Almost 15 thousand inhabitants in the areas with level of contamination ranging from 2.5 through 27.5 Ci/km2 Over 65 thousand samples of food products partitioning (seasonal, farming mode, etc.) effect of countermeasures About 1.5 thousand WBC measurements age occupationMain results (Milk quality vs. soil contamination): Main results (Milk quality vs. soil contamination) Public farms Private farmsMain results (Milk contamination at different seasons): Main results (Milk contamination at different seasons) Private farms Public farmsMain results (WBC measurements): Main results (WBC measurements)Main results (Average annual effective doses): Main results (Average annual effective doses)Main results (Two components of effective dose): Main results (Two components of effective dose)Main results (Effect of countermeasures): Main results (Effect of countermeasures)Main results (Evolution of milk quality): Main results (Evolution of milk quality)RHP Database: RHP Database Realizes an informational block: data defining general parameters of a settlement; data on radioactive contamination (lands, buildings, food,…) ; demographic and societal parameters; industrial and municipal infrastructure, etc.; characteristics of available countermeasures. Realizes a simulation block comprised by the following models: contaminant transfer to basic forage resources and food; exposure and risk assessment and prediction; cost and efficiency analysis based on data of available countermeasures.RHP Database structure: RHP Database structureRHP Database table interactions: RHP Database table interactionsFragment of RHP thematic data: Fragment of RHP thematic dataFragment of countermeasures data: Fragment of countermeasures dataRHP Database table with sub-tables: RHP Database table with sub-tablesRHP Database table with sub-tables: RHP Database table with sub-tablesForm responding to “Dose Forecast”: Form responding to “Dose Forecast”Form responding to “Cost-Benefit Analysis”: Form responding to “Cost-Benefit Analysis”Form responding to “Link to Least Cost Analysis”: Form responding to “Link to Least Cost Analysis”Conclusions: Conclusions RHP Database provides for target settlements: reliable data on radiological, sanitary and social parameters list and characteristics of appropriate countermeasures RHP Database provides for decision-makers a risk-based remedial planning tool a feasibility assessment of recommended measures based on a cost-benefit and least-cost analysisOutlook: Outlook Further progress and use of RHP Database will facilitate wider recommendations concerning radiation, health, sanitary and social protection of contaminated settlements in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine The RHP Database user interface envisages populating the database with new information on continuing basis. Due to harmonized codes, it can be easy extended to Russian and/or Ukrainian regions