Slide2:
WASHINGTON OREGON MONTANA IDAHO NEVADA CALIFORNIA UTAH WYOMING COLORADO ARIZONA NEW MEXICO NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA NEBRASKA KANSAS OKLAHOMA TEXAS ALASKA HAWAII LA ARKANSAS MS ALABAMA GEORGIA FL SO.
CAROLINA NO.
CAROLINA TENNESSEE KENTUCKY MISSOURI VIRGINIA WV ILLINOIS IN OHIO IOWA MINNESOTA WISCONSIN MICHIGAN PENNSYLVANIA NEW YORK MAINE CT VT MA NJ NH MD DE RI Percent Served Less than 5.0% 5.0% to < 6.0% 6.0% to < 7.0% 7.0% to < 8.0% Map 2
Percentage of children ages 3 through 5
served under IDEA, Part B
December 1, 2003 8.0% or higher Sources: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS), “Report of children, with disabilities receiving special education under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,” 2003. Data updated as of July 30, 2004.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Population data for 2003, retrieved October 2004 from http://www.census.gov/popest/data/states/files/STCH-6R.CSV.
Note: Percent = Part B child count for ages 3 through 5 divided by population ages 3 through 5 multiplied by 100. No data
Slide3:
WASHINGTON OREGON MONTANA IDAHO NEVADA CALIFORNIA UTAH WYOMING COLORADO ARIZONA NEW MEXICO NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA NEBRASKA KANSAS OKLAHOMA TEXAS ALASKA HAWAII LA ARKANSAS MS ALABAMA GEORGIA FL SO.
CAROLINA NO.
CAROLINA TENNESSEE KENTUCKY MISSOURI VIRGINIA WV ILLINOIS IN OHIO IOWA MINNESOTA WISCONSIN MICHIGAN PENNSYLVANIA NEW YORK MAINE CT VT MA NJ NH MD DE RI Percent Served Less than 8% 8.0% to < 9.0% 9.0% to < 10.0% 10.0% to < 11.0% Map 3
Percentage of students ages 6 through 21
served under IDEA, Part B
December 1, 2003 11.0% or higher Sources: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS), “Report of children, with
disabilities receiving special education under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,” 2003. Data updated as of July 30, 2004.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Population data for 2003, retrieved October 2004 from http://www.census.gov/popest/data/states/files/STCH-6R.CSV.
Note: Percent = Part B child count for ages 6 through 21 years divided by population ages 6 through 21 years multiplied by 100.
No data
Slide4:
WASHINGTON OREGON MONTANA IDAHO NEVADA CALIFORNIA UTAH WYOMING COLORADO ARIZONA NEW MEXICO NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA NEBRASKA KANSAS OKLAHOMA TEXAS ALASKA HAWAII LA ARKANSAS MS ALABAMA GEORGIA FL SO.
CAROLINA NO.
CAROLINA TENNESSEE KENTUCKY MISSOURI VIRGINIA WV ILLINOIS IN OHIO IOWA MINNESOTA WISCONSIN MICHIGAN PENNSYLVANIA NEW YORK MAINE CT VT MA NJ NH MD DE RI Percent of Part C Less than 50.0% 50.0% to < 60.0% 60.0% to < 70.0% 70.0% to < 80.0% Map 4
Percentage of infants and toddlers transitioning from Part C
who are eligible for Part B,
2002-03 Source: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS), “Report on Infants and Toddlers Exiting
Part C” 2003. Data updated as of July 30, 2004.
Note: Because the criteria for Part C eligibility varies widely across states, differences in the percentage exiting C and eligible for Part B should be interpreted with caution.
Percent = Number exiting Part C and eligible for Part B divided by number transitioning from Part C.
Transitioning from Part C includes Part B eligible, not eligible for Part B, and eligibility not determined.
. 80% or higher PUERTO RICO
Slide5:
WASHINGTON OREGON MONTANA IDAHO NEVADA CALIFORNIA UTAH WYOMING COLORADO ARIZONA NEW MEXICO NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA NEBRASKA KANSAS OKLAHOMA TEXAS ALASKA HAWAII PUERTO RICO LA ARKANSAS MS ALABAMA GEORGIA FL SO.
CAROLINA` NO.
CAROLINA TENNESSEE KENTUCKY MISSOURI VIRGINIA WV ILLINOIS IN OHIO IOWA MINNESOTA WISCONSIN MICHIGAN PENNSYLVANIA NEW YORK MAINE CT VT MA NJ NH MD DE RI Students per Thousand Less than 5 5 to 10 10 to 15 15 to20
Map 5
Special education students suspended/expelled
per thousand special education students
2002-03 Sources: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS), “Report of Children with Disabilities
Unilaterally Removed or Suspended/Expelled for More than 10 Days,” 2002-03 and “Report of children, with disabilities receiving special
education under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,” 2002. Data updated as of July 30, 2004.
Note: Students per thousand = Number of students with disabilities suspended/expelled during the school year divided by the child count for that year multiplied
by 1,000. 20 or more